Which 5 movies do you wish they'd never made sequels for?


Recommended Posts

On 14/09/2022 at 19:25, Nick H. said:

Heresy! 😅

 

That's got to be one of the better sequels for a film. surely?

I did sequels to sequels. So, Terminator 3 would be the odd one out.

 

Terminator 2 might be one of the best films ever made, imo.

  • Like 2
On 14/09/2022 at 14:04, Brandon H said:

I agree with you on most of these except for Predator. The new Pray really redeemed the series for me.

 

forgot Independence Day and Robocop even had sequels lol

 

On 14/09/2022 at 20:06, adrynalyne said:

Prey was amazing.

 

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

Edited by Good Bot, Bad Bot
On 15/09/2022 at 15:07, timster said:

I did sequels to sequels. So, Terminator 3 would be the odd one out.

 

Terminator 2 might be one of the best films ever made, imo.

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

On 15/09/2022 at 15:16, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

On 15/09/2022 at 10:41, Nick H. said:

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

True but he was at least built like a tank and was able to take some damage.

On 15/09/2022 at 17:02, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

True but he was at least built like a tank and was able to take some damage.

Hmm, good point. I need to watch Prey again and take another look. I can't say that it was particularly memorable for me - it was like a coming-of-age story, but rather than growing up it was about proving that women can do what men can. Unlike Predators, which I thought was a decent action sequel because of the mashup of killers thrown into the Predators' game.

On 15/09/2022 at 14:16, Good Bot, Bad Bot said:

I haven't watched it because I was skeptical of the plot as I understand it. How in the world did a native American woman from 300 years ago last longer than 30 seconds against a Predator?

She doesn't.  In the first movie we had a squad of special forces soldiers, heavily armed, and only ONE survived through sheer luck more than anything.  My suspension of disbelief doesn't go far enough to let me think a primitive human woman with stone weapons could even scratch a race as advanced and physically imposing as the Predators.  Not even the tribes fiercest of warriors would have lasted more than a minute or two against it.

 

I've tried to watch it twice now, and so far haven't gotten more than 30 minutes in before I just can't take the dumb any more and shut it off...

 

 

On 15/09/2022 at 09:29, FloatingFatMan said:

She doesn't.  In the first movie we had a squad of special forces soldiers, heavily armed, and only ONE survived through sheer luck more than anything.  My suspension of disbelief doesn't go far enough to let me think a primitive human woman with stone weapons could even scratch a race as advanced and physically imposing as the Predators.  Not even the tribes fiercest of warriors would have lasted more than a minute or two against it.

 

I've tried to watch it twice now, and so far haven't gotten more than 30 minutes in before I just can't take the dumb any more and shut it off...

 

 

Keep in mind the predator is also less sophisticated. 

On 15/09/2022 at 21:21, adrynalyne said:

Keep in mind the predator is also less sophisticated. 

Approx 100 years for a race that has interstellar travel REALLY isn't going to make a great deal of difference to primitive humans that still use stone tools or at best, muskets...

 

Ant meet boot.

 

Anyway, I'm perfectly happy some folks enjoy it.  There's just some things I find too... silly to enjoy.

On 15/09/2022 at 23:19, FloatingFatMan said:

Approx 100 years for a race that has interstellar travel REALLY isn't going to make a great deal of difference to primitive humans that still use stone tools or at best, muskets...

 

Ant meet boot.

 

Anyway, I'm perfectly happy some folks enjoy it.  There's just some things I find too... silly to enjoy.

Dunno, that bear drew quite a bit of blood on that boot. 

On 14/09/2022 at 12:12, Nick H. said:

I think Jurassic Park is the one for me that hasn't been mentioned. The Lost World was unnecessary, or maybe it was just poorly done.

 

Other than that, I agree that Independence Day didn't need the sequel, nor did Jaws or Men in Black - although I will concede that MiB3 was good fun.

 

Part of me wants to say that Blade Runner didn't need a sequel, but I think that what they did ended up being pretty decent. The only issue is that it removed the ambiguity from the original.

I'D argue ID itself did not need to exist period.

On 15/09/2022 at 10:41, Nick H. said:

Oh, right! Yeah, that was pretty bad. I mean, the whole series is in decline after 2. I think Kristanna Loken was the only thing that kept me watching - I was probably only 14/15 when it came out though, so cut me some slack. :laugh:

 

In fairness, Arnie ended up going old school in order to take the Predator down in the first film...

Arnold took the predator down because he "outsmarted" him ... or more realistically he was smarter than the Predator thought he was and the Predator being a superior race was overconfident in his ability to win. Overconfidence leads to mistakes. Arnold would have got his ass kicked and died had the Predator really wanted to.

 

People often talk lately about how realistic the first movie was because there was a bunch of muscular men in it. But in reality it doesn't make a difference. The Predator is of a superior race, far more advanced and intelligent and also physically superior. Your only chance is a bit of luck and being smart and hope the Predator will do some mistakes. The new movie doesn't "suck" because it's a small primitive woman it sucks because it's stupid like 90% of movies those days. The worst is it's still far better than the previous movie in the series lol

  • Like 1

Yesterday I heard that Disney are doing a re-make of The Neverending Story. Why they do these things is beyond me. Some stuff just needs leaving the hell alone!

On 21/09/2022 at 02:07, spikey_richie said:

Yesterday I heard that Disney are doing a re-make of The Neverending Story. Why they do these things is beyond me. Some stuff just needs leaving the hell alone!

Because it's a neverending story

The Matrix - Should have left those alone after the 3rd.

Superman (original 1978) - They should have left that one alone after Superman II.

Halloween (original). After Halloween II, they should have left it alone.

Rambo - After 2009's Rambo, where he finally comes home. That should have been the end of it. Perfect ending, ruined by Rambo: Last Blood.

The Fast & The Furious. Sequels getting pretty stupid.

 

 

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

  • Like 1
On 22/09/2022 at 22:14, nerim said:

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

So, you want to wipe your brain of Star Trek: Nemesis so you can watch, that which you hate, for the first time again?

On 23/09/2022 at 06:44, nerim said:

Star Trek: Nemesis should never have been made, as it was just a crap film overall. Director Stuart Baird obviously had no clue what the ST franchise was about, nor who/what the TNG franchise main characters were, for that matter. Along with the "help" of writer John Logan, the franchise was killed for a time. Then, it was resurrected some years later in another new-ish format, only to be destroyed once again by another filmmaker who didn't "get it" after two films, namely JJ Abrams. 

This reminds me that I must have added another item to my list: Pirates of the Caribbeans 4 & 5. Like Stuart Baird, director Joachim Rønning had absolutely no idea what Jack Sparrow was all about, mistakenly thinking that in the first film, Jack Sparrow was not the lead. Apparently, nobody told him that in the first film, which Joachim Rønning says was his favorite, Jack shot and killed the primary antagonist.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I don't use Edge, I don't even use Windows these days as my main driver. Mac these days I use and Zen browser
    • Apple releases iOS 26.5.2 with dozens of security fixes for iPhone by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has released iOS 26.5.2 and iPadOS 26.5.2, which are security-only updates for the iPhone and the iPad. The update brings a bunch of security fixes for WebKit, WebRTC, WebKit Storage, WebKit Canvas, Web Extensions, libxslt, IOGPUFamily, and even the kernel. Some of the WebKit issues that were fixed could have allowed malicious web content to disclose sensitive user information, exfiltrate cross-origin data, crash Safari, or process restricted web content outside the browser sandbox. One notable WebKit Storage bug could let a malicious website to silently hijack clipboard data, according to Apple’s description. Other WebKit-related flaws involved memory corruption, use-after-free bugs, type confusion, out-of-bounds writes, permissions problems, and cross-origin data handling issues. The update also includes three kernel-related fixes. Apple says one of the flaws could let an app write kernel memory or cause unexpected system termination, while another may leak sensitive kernel state, and a third could corrupt kernel memory or terminate the system unexpectedly. Although Apple hasn't described them as remote web attacks, kernel bugs are still important to fix, as they can sometimes be chained with other flaws to escape app or browser restrictions. The updates are available for iPhone 11 and later, iPad Pro 12.9-inch 3rd generation and later, iPad Pro 11-inch 1st generation and later, iPad Air 3rd generation and later, iPad 8th generation and later, and iPad mini 5th generation and later. Similar security fixes also came with the latest update to macOS Tahoe 26.5.2, which Apple released on the same day. That overlap is not surprising, since Safari, WebKit, WebRTC, and other underlying components are shared across Apple’s platforms. Users are advised to update their devices sooner rather than later as these security fixes are crucial. iOS 26.5.2 can be installed from Settings > General > Software Update. Similarly, Mac users can find macOS Tahoe 26.5.2 through System Settings > General > Software Update.
    • Taken them long enough, that is one good thing. I still refuse to have a Whatsapp account, because it still need a phone number to have an account. don't want to give Meta my phone number
    • Good think I still have SDRAM and FP RAM sitting around.
    • Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker with Google apps is now at its lowest price with 47% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Fitbit Charge 6 fitness tracker at its all-time low price with a 47% discount. The device features an AMOLED touchscreen display protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 3 that should offer improved scratch resistance and durability. The Charge 6 is equipped with a range of sensors including an optical heart rate sensor, a 3-axis accelerometer, built-in GPS with GLONASS support, red and infrared sensors for SpO2 monitoring, a skin temperature sensor, an ambient light sensor, a vibration motor, NFC, and multipurpose electrical sensors compatible with the ECG and EDA Scan apps. Heart rate is recorded every second during exercise tracking and every five seconds during normal daily use. The device requires the Google Health app for setup and synchronisation. Furthermore, Bluetooth provides wireless connectivity for syncing and communication with devices running Apple iOS 16.4 or later and Android 11.0 or later. The tracker stores up to 7 days of minute-by-minute activity data and retains daily activity totals for the previous 30 days. In terms of water resistance, the Fitbit Charge 6 has a 5 ATM rating that should make it suitable for swimming and water activities. The tracker operates in temperatures ranging from 14°F to 113°F and at altitudes of up to 28,000 feet. Moreover, the included Infinity band is made from a flexible silicone material and features a loop-and-peg fastening. The small band fits wrists measuring 5.1 to 6.7 inches, while the large band fits wrists measuring 6.7 to 8.3 inches. Both small and large bands are included in the box. When it comes to battery performance, the Fitbit Charge 6 should deliver up to 7 days of battery life under typical usage conditions. Features such as the Always-On Display, built-in GPS, and SpO2 monitoring increase power consumption and may require more frequent charging. The rechargeable lithium-polymer battery should take approximately two hours to charge from empty to full. Fitbit Charge 6 Fitness Tracker with Google Apps: $85.45 (Amazon US) - 47% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!