Community activity list not updating much
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Posts
-
By Accuphase · Posted
To be fair, those are relatively old versions now that would require updates. -
By EdwardFranciscoVilla · Posted
Simply the BEST email client I use it every single day . Phenomenal . It works with Gmail Aol for all out there to try it out ! -
By Ccl Ncc · Posted
All I want is fast charging... -
By binaryzero · Posted
It's been best practice for years to disable it anyway... TS disables 2.0, installs Pwsh 7.whatever -
By excalpius · Posted
That's helpful, thanks. The key issue as I see it is that the issuer of the verification is still getting that request from WhateverNaughty.com, which immediately becomes a problem if this is a government issuer, etc. but it's a huge problem for any user with any issuer. I guess the solution, and maybe this goes without saying and I've missed it in your fine posts, is that the requester is also anonymized. That way, the issuer doesn't have a record of X person requested verification for Y website. And anyone who hacks that data is going to get precisely nothing. This only works is, as you say, this is a one-time challenge each time, and we all agree that no one is keeping/storing that data for any use anyway. After all, "is this person 18+ age" would only respond Yes/No, which is hardly actionable by anyone...as long as the asker only gets Yes/No and the Answerer doesn't know or care who's asking. :) Are both ends anonymized?
-
-
Recent Achievements
-
Celilo earned a badge
First Post
-
K.I.S.S. earned a badge
One Year In
-
solidox earned a badge
Week One Done
-
solidox earned a badge
Dedicated
-
Devesh Beri earned a badge
Week One Done
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Tell a friend
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now