Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...

The first season hasn't even aired, and Paramount has already renewed for a second season, https://redshirtsalwaysdie.com/paramount-makes-a-suprising-announcement-about-star-trek-starfleet-academy-01jakkjsd1d0

Also, Tatiana Maslany (Orphan Black and She Hulk) will be a guest star.

 

On 11/06/2024 at 12:57, Steven P. said:

I'll watch it if that useless redhead (I think she's called Tlly? Most incompetent ensign in Trek) from ST Discovery is not in it.

 

If I remember correctly, it was one of her ideas that resolved the spore drive's primary problems when they ended up in the spore's "universe" if you will (can't remember it was back in S1). She also resolves a ton of highly technical issues... perhaps you may not take to her walking on eggshells mentality when it comes to her behavior? She always does seem to be afraid of her own shadow.

On 21/10/2024 at 17:51, xMorpheousx416 said:

 

If I remember correctly, it was one of her ideas that resolved the spore drive's primary problems when they ended up in the spore's "universe" if you will (can't remember it was back in S1). She also resolves a ton of highly technical issues... perhaps you may not take to her walking on eggshells mentality when it comes to her behavior? She always does seem to be afraid of her own shadow.

She grew on me over time.  Annoyed me in the beginning alot.  

  • 9 months later...
On 22/10/2024 at 03:19, DramaInc said:

She grew on me over time.  Annoyed me in the beginning alot.  

I just remember wondering how she was ever a bridge officer at all with all of her insufferable insecurities. I am sure she's a wonderful person in real life, but the character was poorly written. They even had to dedicate a whole episode to her being forced into taking the responsibility of leading cadets out of a problem of some sort as if to show how she is "growing" into her function.

Never bridge officer material and I just rolled my eyes at her scenes and eventually stopped watching the show altogether, but also because of all the lead character's cry/whisper/talking that frustrated me.

On 26/07/2025 at 09:47, Steven P. said:

I just remember wondering how she was ever a bridge officer at all with all of her insufferable insecurities. I am sure she's a wonderful person in real life, but the character was poorly written. They even had to dedicate a whole episode to her being forced into taking the responsibility of leading cadets out of a problem of some sort as if to show how she is "growing" into her function.

Never bridge officer material and I just rolled my eyes at her scenes and eventually stopped watching the show altogether, but also because of all the lead character's cry/whisper/talking that frustrated me.

It was a bit much. I try not to skip any trek though. Stuff like that doesn’t bother anywhere as much as section 31 movie did. 

On 26/07/2025 at 18:00, DramaInc said:

It was a bit much. I try not to skip any trek though. Stuff like that doesn’t bother anywhere as much as section 31 movie did. 

 

On 26/07/2025 at 18:52, primortal said:

That was a cluster f*ck.

Yep!

On 27/07/2025 at 00:30, primortal said:

Nice throwback to Sisko and is that a female Jem'Hadar?

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

On 27/07/2025 at 09:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

Riverdale... in space?

Hope not.

On 26/07/2025 at 19:30, primortal said:

Nice throwback to Sisko and is that a female Jem'Hadar?

Also on the dedication wall Lt Nog's name was there :) 

 

:o Mr. Kim actually got a promotion!

image.thumb.png.721f4e2c40d6b9b88cc789cca55a86f3.png

On 27/07/2025 at 08:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

I was gonna say something similar but decided there's no point anymore. Some people like nutrek for whatever reason,.let them have it and I'll just rewatch the originals and hopefully in a decade someone new will take over and do a retcon

  • Like 1
On 27/07/2025 at 03:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

While I'm not trying to make an excuse for it... How many years in the future does this take place?  Is there a possibility that the Jem'Hadar were re-engineered to have a split male/female species? 

 

I think to part of the issue is they may be taking STO (star trek online) as cannon....https://memory-gamma.fandom.com/wiki/Jek'Kralija

  • Like 2
On 27/07/2025 at 03:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

Genetic roll of the dice and one point a female was born?  There was an episode of DS9 when Bashir and O’Brien crashed landed and ran into a bunch of Jem’Hadar and one wasn’t naturally dependent on ketracel-white (genetic anomaly). So, it’s possible a female could have been born at one point.  Plus after how many centuries have passed between DS9 and when this takes place.

On 27/07/2025 at 06:29, Matthew S. said:

Also on the dedication wall Lt Nog's name was there :) 

 

:o Mr. Kim actually got a promotion!

image.thumb.png.721f4e2c40d6b9b88cc789cca55a86f3.png

A lot of throwback names listed there 😀

On 27/07/2025 at 08:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever..

They seem reptilian, which can adapt to such things. And the genetic manipulation may have either stopped or (as can happen) trigger a push back reaction. If anything it tells a story within itself, about them no longer following the founders or such

On 27/07/2025 at 03:38, FloatingFatMan said:

A female Jem'Hadar makes no bloody sense whatsoever... They're a male only, genetically engineered, clone species...  Did the idiots making this not watch ANY of DS9, or bother to check a wiki, at ALL?

This is going to be crap, isn't it? :( 

 

 

On 27/07/2025 at 12:51, Matthew S. said:

While I'm not trying to make an excuse for it... How many years in the future does this take place?  Is there a possibility that the Jem'Hadar were re-engineered to have a split male/female species? 

 

I think to part of the issue is they may be taking STO (star trek online) as cannon....https://memory-gamma.fandom.com/wiki/Jek'Kralija

Quote

 

Starfleet Academy not only brings back traditional Klingons like Cadet Jay-Den Kraag, but it also debuts Klingon hybrids.

Commander Lura Thok (Gina Yashere) is a Klingon/Jem’Hadar hybrid who is the Chancellor Nahla Ake's First Officer and Cadet Master. Meanwhile, the villainous Nus Braka is a hybrid of Klingon and Tellarite, creating fascinating new spins on the warrior race.

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/entertainment/news/star-trek-starfleet-academy-trailer-breakdown-13-reveals-easter-eggs/ar-AA1JoTe0+

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Love 1

As much as I was a StarTrek fan, I noped out on ST:Discovery and anything related. This doesn't look much better to me tbh.

I kinda like ST:SNW, as long as they don't do musical eposides.... 😛

 

  • Like 2
On 29/07/2025 at 09:16, Dutchie64 said:

As much as I was a StarTrek fan, I noped out on ST:Discovery and anything related. This doesn't look much better to me tbh.

I tried to rewatch ST:D (from where I left off in season 4 ep7) but my god, it's like they all have to stop and talk about their feelings every 5 minutes. It's infuriating!

Michael's whisper talking really gets to me, and she just does not have the vibe of a Captain.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
    • Another devilish issue surrounding these certificates is what can happen with old, unsuspecting PCs that nevertheless have Secure Boot enabled. In my case, it was a Dell with a 3rd-gen Core chip (so about 13 years old). As of the last few weeks, it was suddenly BSOD'g within about 5 minutes of booting. Turns out it was because of MS's "Secure-Boot-Update" scheduled task, which is scheduled to run 5 minutes after login. It's explained in gory detail here (this is not my post, but it was where I found the answer), but the short version is that this legacy system would need fairly elaborate, manual certificate intervention since MS's automatic cert update method cannot work. How to do that is linked late in the thread. https://www.bleepingcomputer.c...od-caused-by-scheduled-task Secure Boot wasn't at all important for this particular PC, so I disabled it to be done with the problem.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      95
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!