The Definitive "BEST BROWSER" thread


What is the Best Browser  

736 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the Best Browser

    • Mozilla/Firefox
      427
    • Opera
      86
    • Internet Explorer
      111
    • IE Alternative (MyIE2, etc)
      85
    • Netscape
      1
    • Safari
      13
    • Konqueror
      1
    • Lynx
      2
    • K-Meleon
      3
    • Other
      7


Recommended Posts

Favicons always save in bookmakr toolbar which Firefox doesnt.
Last time I checked, FFox asks you where you want to save the Bookmark... and it works just fine.
Chat which is just what I need and like and I like having it in the browser and it doesnt bloat the feel of the browser

You may like it in the browser, but figures probably 3/4 of the people would prefer a real IRC client like mIRC for exemple. It just isn't the place for a chat client.

RSS works for me unlike Firefox Extension
I don't use RSS so I wouldn't know.
Tabbed browsing is always in single window mode unlike firefox

uhhhh last time I checked the tabbed browsing was taking place in one single window... CTRL-T

and your car comparison is completly off. IRC is something useful that i always do at the same time as i am browsing.

First, my comparison is not off at all. We're talking about things that can be done but not nessecary welcomed and used by all (read most people). Second, IRC has its own place and its not integrated into a browser. You might like it like that and thats fine by me but thats NOT THE WAY A BROWSER SHOULD BE. With all that crap (imo) you can't even call it a browser anymore... cuz it isn't. The name is "Bloatware", an app thats trying to do things it shouldn't.

First its a browser and then it degenerates into something else. If Opera wants to sell a browser, then keep it as such.

Finally, like the other dude said : Isn't 40$ a major setback ? I'm sure you either bought it or endured the ads, RIGHT ?

Do you see mIRC having a built-in browser ? Or do you see someone using Winamp's mini-browser ? Of course not.

OPERA SHOULD STICK TO WHAT THEY DO BEST AND THATS A BROWSER

:yes:

maybe for you, but i never use IRC, and when i do ijust use trillian cause i have AIM and MSN on that too. also opera sets you back 40 bucks.

a) free version with small gogle ad

b) I get student discount so its only $20. :happy:

sorry for double post just too tired to edit. really late

Last time I checked, FFox asks you where you want to save the Bookmark... and it works just fine.

Read again i said favicons not the bookmakrs themselvs. Firefox doesnt save the favicons between sessions like opera does.
uhhhh last time I checked the tabbed browsing was taking place in one single window... CTRL-T

Yes i know that but thats true single window mode. You need an extension to get everything to open in same window by deafult which opera does and firefox dont.

First, my comparison is not off at all. We're talking about things that can be done but not nessecary welcomed and used by all (read most people). Second, IRC has its own place and its not integrated into a browser. You might like it like that and thats fine by me but thats NOT THE WAY A BROWSER SHOULD BE. With all that crap (imo) you can't even call it a browser anymore... cuz it isn't. The name is "Bloatware", an app thats trying to do things it shouldn't.

First its a browser and then it degenerates into something else. If Opera wants to sell a browser, then keep it as such.

Finally, like the other dude said : Isn't 40$ a major setback ? I'm sure you either bought it or endured the ads, RIGHT ?

Do you see mIRC having a built-in browser ? Or do you see someone using Winamp's mini-browser ? Of course not.

OPERA SHOULD STICK TO WHAT THEY DO BEST AND THATS A BROWSER

Yes i'm about to buy it soon. Its $20 since i get student discount and i remember mozilla having irc in it and mail and rss and a calender. Forgive me if i'm wrong tho. :whistle: No firefox dont but Mozilla did. It can be more convienent that way if done right and opera just uses 8 megs space and firefox 16+ and tb is nearly 30 here so thats almost 50 vs 10 wiht same things and more :yes:

first off, mozilla.org is pushing (or is going to anyway) firefox as its main browser. and just because opera has a small download does not mean its not bloated. i oculdnt care less how big a browser i dl once a month is. what i do care about is that the browser that i use every day does not get in my way.

This is a hard one . On WinXP I use Firefox and its the best I have found. However in Fedora I have found Firefox to be a bit flakey and renders fonts rather badly.

In Fedora I prefer Opera 7.23.

I tried Firefox but use web based email (three accounts) and love Avant and Roboform to quickly look at my mail. Firefox doesn't have a built-in email client. You have to use Thunderbird. One program too many for me. I don't use POP3 mail at all. Combined with Pop Peeper to alert me of new mail, life is a breeze with this combo.

most of u guys onyl use firefox cos u think it makes u 1337 and cos u liek the pretty lil fox icon, and hte new name soudns sexy .

actually we use firefox, because its fast rendering, makes you able to use themes - extensions etc, gets upgraded more often than IE, is available for multible platforms - i use it on my linux box too, it has tabs and so on.

So STFU with your "your just using it because bla bla".

most of u guys onyl use firefox cos u think it makes u 1337 and cos u liek the pretty lil fox icon, and hte new name soudns sexy .

No, it's because those who use it find it better than others. I prefer IE - and that's not beacuse I'm stupid :rolleyes:

first off, mozilla.org is pushing (or is going to anyway) firefox as its main browser. and just because opera has a small download does not mean its not bloated. i oculdnt care less how big a browser i dl once a month is. what i do care about is that the browser that i use every day does not get in my way.

yes but to me the less hards drive space a program uses the better. I just hate things taking up lots of space on my 80 gig hard drive. only using 5 gigs and plan to stay that way. :yes:

yes but to me the less hards drive space a program uses the better. I just hate things taking up lots of space on my 80 gig hard drive. only using 5 gigs and plan to stay that way. :yes:

:|

what the wtf

Why didn't you buy a 5gb hd then?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I literally tried to install it on my PC today and it crashed upon every start up. I tried all the tricks, terminate and remove cache, uninstall, reinstall, reboot, install via winget.. in the end I had my call with Brad Wardell on Google Meet. Oh I also tried Teams on the web, and got no video or audio (yes I allowed mic and camera).
    • Microsoft explains how it made Teams so much faster in 2026 by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is Redmond's flagship online communication and collaboration tool, primarily used in enterprise, government, and school environments. It regularly receives updates, with Microsoft frequently revealing features currently in development as well, such as Efficiency Mode and a dedicated app for meeting recaps. Now, the company has shed some light on the backend enhancements it has made to its popular software in 2026. During the first half of 2026, switching between chats has become 20% faster on desktop and web, which is especially great for less powerful devices or hardware on weak networks. Microsoft explains that it tracks two types of chat switches. The first is a warm switch, which relates to returning to a recent chat, in which case it is most likely already present in memory and should load extremely fast. The other is a cold switch where a chat that hasn't been opened recently is now opened. Naturally, the second type of chat switch was causing the most notable latency spikes. Microsoft realized that this was happening because of three reasons. First, the query to fetch conversation data was being fired too late. Next, queries were being sent sequentially, increasing the overall round-trip time. Finally, there was no handling of response priority, which meant that non-critical responses would sometimes block the main thread. Microsoft solved all of these problems by firing the data query immediately, bundling queries to be sent together so that they wouldn't create a "waterfall" effect, and enabling faster painting of the frame. As a result, warm and cold switches now have almost the same latency, and the only distinguishable difference between them is due to the data layer response time. Next, Microsoft focused on reducing app hangs and freezes on macOS and iOS by 35%. On macOS, the company has a health monitor thread running in the background that does exactly what it says on the tin. The tech firm built a dedicated StackDecoder tool to analyze health monitor's output at scale. Through this combination, it decided to move several error reporting and monitoring threads either to the background or treated them as an asynchronous call so that they wouldn't block the main thread, causing Teams to freeze. On iOS, the same result was accomplished through optimization of computations, caching, offloading operations from the main thread, refactoring database access behaviors, deferring non-critical tasks, and more. On a related note, it also made people search 25% on iOS by optimizing the query pipeline, and efficient database task queuing and scheduling. However, Microsoft has emphasized that improving Teams' performance is an ongoing endeavor, and that it hopes that these efforts will continue to make the software a reliable partner in online communication scenarios. On a related note, Microsoft recently unveiled some upcoming performance upgrades for OneDrive on macOS too, and you can check those out here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      X-No-file earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      209
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      83
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!