RAM Issues with XMP on with ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've been experiencing some issues with my RAM. Enabling XMP seems to cause problems, and I keep failing Test 8 with Memtest86. However, when I run Memtest86 without XMP enabled, it passes successfully. I conducted individual tests with a single stick in slots A2 and B2 with XMP enabled. Stick 1 passed in both A2 and B2, while Stick 2 passed in A2 but failed in B2. I reran the tests several times and obtained the same results. Initially, I suspected an issue with the B2 slot on my motherboard, but since Stick 1 passed in B2, that seems unlikely.

System Details:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2 (BIOS Version 1202)

Case: Corsair 7000D Airflow

PSU: Corsair RM1000x

CPU: Intel i9-13900K

GPU: GIGABYTE 4070 Ti Super

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB

Storage: Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB

I'm at a loss about what to do next. I'm considering an RMA for the RAM, but I'm not sure if anyone else has encountered similar issues. The RAM kit I have is Corsair Vengeance 32GB (SN CMH32GX5M2E6000C36), and I have checked my motherboard QVL, and it shows it as listed.

If you're correct with BIOS revision 1202 the current version is 2202 which is around 8 revisions newer, probably worth flashing that before returning anything and doing some further testing. Early BIOS revisions are often unstable and QVLs typically relate to the latest BIOS revision for the motherboard. If it was just a typo and you're already on 2202 feel free to ignore this :)

  • Like 2

What Ixion said, and assuming you are only using 2 DDR5 ram modules, in A1 & B2 as outlined in the manual... once you have updated to latest bios, you "should" be more stable. I had similar issues as well... mine mainly were down to me not reading things right, and had 4 modules, and tried to enable XMPII which caused me all sorts of issues!

Double check the specs of the exact model of ram, and compare the timings to what your bios XMPII timings, voltages etc are!

1202 is the Lastest BIOS Version for my Motherboard which I'm on right now
chrome_WQfuGJR8kZ.thumb.png.3d4e529542334c7671fdf7a0bfa41ae6.png

Here are the Specs for my RAM.
chrome_KufcKPry4T.thumb.png.e104fe43a35f2f68fdba87ded5a80969.png

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

On 31/05/2024 at 07:47, Richard Hammers said:

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

Your RAM is rated for 6000 at CL40 at 1.35v. Since it's unstable at these specs, you'll need to go for ~ 1.375 volts. Just make sure to stay under 1.4v.

Ok are you saying to try to set my Memory Controller Voltage to 1.375 volts and see if that works? If that is the case I will try running Memtest86 again since that is the best way for me to make sure my RAM is stable.

A lot of Intel 13th and 14th Gen CPUs are currently having stability issues which is why Intel had to add that Baseline settings. It could well be that your CPU is causing the trouble and the memory kit and the board may be fine. Hard to say.

Still, you can try increasing these voltages slightly:

  • Dram VDD voltage

  • Dram VDDQ voltage

  • CPU System Agent voltage

  • IVR Transmitter VDDQ voltage

  • Memory Controller voltage

You don't want to go too overboard though.

Looks like Asus just released a new BIOS to throttle back the automatic overclock of 13th/14th gen processors which was causing reported stability problems (1301) I can only think I got linked to the wrong motherboard before!

https://rog.asus.com/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z790-e-gaming-wifi-ii/helpdesk_bios/

Interesting that your spd speed rating on the DIMMS is Cas 40, I guess that's a different XMP profile or lower voltage. If you're still struggling with stability you could try using the SPD ratings rather than the XMP and back things off a little, you probably won't notice the difference as the clock speed makes a lot more difference than the latency.

Hey, So Memtest86 passed runs 1 and 2 but failed runs 3 and 4, indicating it's still unstable with BIOS version 1301. I also reverted to version 1201 because 1301 caused my CPU multipliers to fluctuate erratically, jumping from 55 to 8 on cores 1-9 and from 43 to 8 on cores 10-24. This erratic behavior seemed unusual and might be related to the Intel default settings. After reverting to version 1201, this issue stopped.


I might just keep my RAM at the baseline 4800 MHz for now and wait for any new BIOS updates that might fix the issue, or I might consider buying new RAM. When I had XMP enabled, I didn't notice a significant difference between 4800 MHz and 6000 MHz, especially since I usually game at 60 FPS in 1440p, so I'm not sure how much 6000 MHz would benefit me.

  • Like 1

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

On 02/06/2024 at 09:55, Kelxin said:

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

On 02/06/2024 at 15:30, heslo said:

There's no reason you shouldn't be able to run that board at 6000MT/s unless you've got a particularly terrible IMC on the CPU. Increase the VDD and VDDQ on the mem to 1.4 manually and see what happens

I tried that and it didn't work

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

On 02/06/2024 at 17:04, heslo said:

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

Ya I have ran Memtest86 with XMP off with base 4800 it passes all 4 runs. When I set the Memory Controller to 1.35v and DRAM VDD/VDDQ 1.4V  Memtest86 will pass runs 1-2 but fail runs 3-4. Also to note it fails mainly on Test 8 ( random number sequence)

Also I did Test running single ram with XMP on

On 02/06/2024 at 13:49, Richard Dewey Hammers said:

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

 

On 02/06/2024 at 17:44, heslo said:

If one was passing and the other failing then yeah, sounds like possibly a dodgy stick. Just RMA it and get another kit, hopefully no issues with that one!

I have a open ticket right now with Corsair and I think I might just RMA the ram and see if it was Stick two that was the issue. But Like I said Stick 2 Passed in A2 but failed in B2 which was super odd lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • RustDesk 1.4.8 by Razvan Serea RustDesk is a fast, secure, and open-source remote desktop software designed for self-hosting, remote access, and IT support. It provides a privacy-focused alternative to TeamViewer and AnyDesk, offering full control over your data with minimal configuration. The client is fully open source, while users have the option to choose between two server solutions: the Professional Server, a premium offering with advanced features available for purchase, and the Basic Server, a free and open-source alternative for those who prefer a self-hosted setup. RustDesk features Open-source & free remote desktop solution Cross-platform compatibility – Works on Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and Web End-to-end encryption (E2EE) based on NaCl for secure connections Peer-to-peer (P2P) connectivity for fast and private remote access Self-hosting support – Own your data with easy deployment on your infrastructure Supports VP8, VP9, AV1 (software) and H264, H265 (hardware) codecs for efficient streaming Unattended access for remote management File transfer & clipboard sharing Multi-monitor support & remote printing Low-latency & high-performance remote access Session recording & chat functionality Professional & Basic server options for flexible deployment Lightweight & minimal resource usage No third-party server dependency for privacy No installation or admin privileges needed on Windows (elevate privileges locally or remotely on demand) Easy installation & minimal configuration required Custom branding & enterprise-level features available RustDesk 1.4.8 changelog: Added Add Windows arm64 support #15139 Feature: Add monitor-switch buttons to remote toolbars #15342 Refact/privacy mode 1 multi monitors #15321 autocomplete online #15313 feat: theme logo #15268 Changes refact: restart remote device, autoconnect #15290 refact(oidc): icon azure to microsoft #15278 Refact/printer driver default unchecked #15191 Revert "fix(iPad): keep touch gestures with external mouse" #15288 Fixes fix Wayland→Wayland clipboard paste fix(arm64-linux): fix CJK font rendering on flutter-elinux #15324 iOS: autocorrect/data detectors corrupt the server Key field (ID/Relay Server settings), making valid keys impossible (or very hard) to enter #15293 fix(ios): mouse mismatch #15339 fix(linux): reap leftover logind session procs on headless teardown #15337 Crash on startup (0xc0000409) / Fast Fail in librustdesk.dll on Windows 11 26H1 #15218 fix(clipboard): Windows DIB images, fill missing alpha #15296 Fix/generate py target injection #15248 Fix clipboard synchronization not fully disabled in View Only mode #15224 fix(keyboard): win, key, Pause #15351 Download: RustDesk 64-bit | MSI | 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: RustDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • This makes me think of Dune for some reason.
    • I'm too old to return to the "good old days" when I was installing custom ROMs and tinkering with my devices - now I just want to turn it on and use it. I've read that banking and payment apps work on Murena /e/OS (I'll have to check the ones I use) and I also really want to support Fairphone 😉
    • Time to start going to the local church and play Bingo for a while.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      80
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!