RAM Issues with XMP on with ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've been experiencing some issues with my RAM. Enabling XMP seems to cause problems, and I keep failing Test 8 with Memtest86. However, when I run Memtest86 without XMP enabled, it passes successfully. I conducted individual tests with a single stick in slots A2 and B2 with XMP enabled. Stick 1 passed in both A2 and B2, while Stick 2 passed in A2 but failed in B2. I reran the tests several times and obtained the same results. Initially, I suspected an issue with the B2 slot on my motherboard, but since Stick 1 passed in B2, that seems unlikely.

System Details:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2 (BIOS Version 1202)

Case: Corsair 7000D Airflow

PSU: Corsair RM1000x

CPU: Intel i9-13900K

GPU: GIGABYTE 4070 Ti Super

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB

Storage: Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB

I'm at a loss about what to do next. I'm considering an RMA for the RAM, but I'm not sure if anyone else has encountered similar issues. The RAM kit I have is Corsair Vengeance 32GB (SN CMH32GX5M2E6000C36), and I have checked my motherboard QVL, and it shows it as listed.

If you're correct with BIOS revision 1202 the current version is 2202 which is around 8 revisions newer, probably worth flashing that before returning anything and doing some further testing. Early BIOS revisions are often unstable and QVLs typically relate to the latest BIOS revision for the motherboard. If it was just a typo and you're already on 2202 feel free to ignore this :)

  • Like 2

What Ixion said, and assuming you are only using 2 DDR5 ram modules, in A1 & B2 as outlined in the manual... once you have updated to latest bios, you "should" be more stable. I had similar issues as well... mine mainly were down to me not reading things right, and had 4 modules, and tried to enable XMPII which caused me all sorts of issues!

Double check the specs of the exact model of ram, and compare the timings to what your bios XMPII timings, voltages etc are!

1202 is the Lastest BIOS Version for my Motherboard which I'm on right now
chrome_WQfuGJR8kZ.thumb.png.3d4e529542334c7671fdf7a0bfa41ae6.png

Here are the Specs for my RAM.
chrome_KufcKPry4T.thumb.png.e104fe43a35f2f68fdba87ded5a80969.png

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

On 31/05/2024 at 07:47, Richard Hammers said:

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

Your RAM is rated for 6000 at CL40 at 1.35v. Since it's unstable at these specs, you'll need to go for ~ 1.375 volts. Just make sure to stay under 1.4v.

Ok are you saying to try to set my Memory Controller Voltage to 1.375 volts and see if that works? If that is the case I will try running Memtest86 again since that is the best way for me to make sure my RAM is stable.

A lot of Intel 13th and 14th Gen CPUs are currently having stability issues which is why Intel had to add that Baseline settings. It could well be that your CPU is causing the trouble and the memory kit and the board may be fine. Hard to say.

Still, you can try increasing these voltages slightly:

  • Dram VDD voltage

  • Dram VDDQ voltage

  • CPU System Agent voltage

  • IVR Transmitter VDDQ voltage

  • Memory Controller voltage

You don't want to go too overboard though.

Looks like Asus just released a new BIOS to throttle back the automatic overclock of 13th/14th gen processors which was causing reported stability problems (1301) I can only think I got linked to the wrong motherboard before!

https://rog.asus.com/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z790-e-gaming-wifi-ii/helpdesk_bios/

Interesting that your spd speed rating on the DIMMS is Cas 40, I guess that's a different XMP profile or lower voltage. If you're still struggling with stability you could try using the SPD ratings rather than the XMP and back things off a little, you probably won't notice the difference as the clock speed makes a lot more difference than the latency.

Hey, So Memtest86 passed runs 1 and 2 but failed runs 3 and 4, indicating it's still unstable with BIOS version 1301. I also reverted to version 1201 because 1301 caused my CPU multipliers to fluctuate erratically, jumping from 55 to 8 on cores 1-9 and from 43 to 8 on cores 10-24. This erratic behavior seemed unusual and might be related to the Intel default settings. After reverting to version 1201, this issue stopped.


I might just keep my RAM at the baseline 4800 MHz for now and wait for any new BIOS updates that might fix the issue, or I might consider buying new RAM. When I had XMP enabled, I didn't notice a significant difference between 4800 MHz and 6000 MHz, especially since I usually game at 60 FPS in 1440p, so I'm not sure how much 6000 MHz would benefit me.

  • Like 1

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

On 02/06/2024 at 09:55, Kelxin said:

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

On 02/06/2024 at 15:30, heslo said:

There's no reason you shouldn't be able to run that board at 6000MT/s unless you've got a particularly terrible IMC on the CPU. Increase the VDD and VDDQ on the mem to 1.4 manually and see what happens

I tried that and it didn't work

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

On 02/06/2024 at 17:04, heslo said:

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

Ya I have ran Memtest86 with XMP off with base 4800 it passes all 4 runs. When I set the Memory Controller to 1.35v and DRAM VDD/VDDQ 1.4V  Memtest86 will pass runs 1-2 but fail runs 3-4. Also to note it fails mainly on Test 8 ( random number sequence)

Also I did Test running single ram with XMP on

On 02/06/2024 at 13:49, Richard Dewey Hammers said:

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

 

On 02/06/2024 at 17:44, heslo said:

If one was passing and the other failing then yeah, sounds like possibly a dodgy stick. Just RMA it and get another kit, hopefully no issues with that one!

I have a open ticket right now with Corsair and I think I might just RMA the ram and see if it was Stick two that was the issue. But Like I said Stick 2 Passed in A2 but failed in B2 which was super odd lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft admits one of the most crucial Outlook features is currently broken by Sayan Sen Microsoft is making some decent progress when it comes to Windows 11. Recently we have confirmed reports of some rather useful improvements landing in the next version of the OS, 26H2, wherein GPU driver TDR crashes may finally be fixed, plus the company is also allowing users to disable web content on the Search. On the Outlook front though things have not been so rosy. Last month in May we reported several problems affecting basic functionalities on the app. These included a problem where documents would open blank or corrupt themselves. Following that, Quick Steps, a very useful feature, would no longer work correctly, and finally, Microsoft acknowledged a problem wherein images would fail to load up properly inside the email. Microsoft had resolved those bugs later and almost exactly a month after we reported on them, the company has now admitted a new similarly basic issue, this time on Macs. Users recently started noticing that Outlook would no longer display email threads properly as the original message itself was not displayed. An affected user Tsoumpas, C (ngmb) nicely described the problem in a forum post they made on Microsoft's site. They wrote: "Description of the issue: After updating Outlook for Mac [Version 16.110 (26061317)] on 18/6/2026, replying to any email no longer includes the original message in the reply window. Prior to the update, replies correctly contained the original email text below my response. Expected behavior: The original message should be included in the reply, as in previous Outlook versions and according to the configured reply settings. Actual behavior: The reply window contains only a blank composition area (or only my response), with none of the original email text included." Obviously this must be a highly frustrating for users as noted by several in that thread. The post, at the time of writing, has also been upvoted by more than 40 users indicating that is a fairly widespread bug. Thankfully Microsoft seems to have acknowledged the problem right around that time as it opened a new issue on its official website. In the support article, the company recommends switching to Outlook for Mac from the legacy app, where the problem appears to be happening.
    • PotPlayer 260622 by Razvan Serea PotPlayer is an extremely light-weight multimedia player for Windows. It feels like the KMPlayer, but is in active development. Supports almost every available video formats out there. PotPlayer contains internal codecs and there is no need to install codecs manually. Other key features include WebCam/Analog/Digital TV devices support, gapless video playback, DXVA, live broadcasting. Distinctive features of the player is a high quality playback, support for all modern video and audio formats and a built DXVA video codecs. A wide range of subtitles are supported and you are also able to capture audio, video, and screenshots. A comprehensive video and audio player, that also supports TV channels, subtitles and skins. Its been described on the Internet as The KMPlayer redux, and it pretty much is. Daum PotPlayer 260622 (1.7.22963) changelog: Removed Kakao TV Added pause function when navigating via the navigation bar Significantly improved internal stability Fixed an issue where colors appeared strange during RGB24 processing Improved playback for some HTTP streams Improved sync processing for the built-in audio renderer Fixed an issue where certain MP4 files behaved abnormally during playback Download: Daum PotPlayer (64-bit) | 54.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Daum PotPlayer (32-bit) | 61.1 MB View: Daum PotPlayer Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.44 is out.
    • Speccy 1.34.084 by Razvan Serea Speccy will give you detailed statistics on every piece of hardware in your computer. Including CPU, Motherboard, RAM, Graphics Cards, Hard Disks, Optical Drives, Audio support. Additionally Speccy adds the temperatures of your different components, so you can easily see if there's a problem! Processor brand and model Hard drive size and speed Amount of memory (RAM) Graphics card Operating system At first glance, Speccy may seem like an application for system administrators and power users. It certainly is, but Speccy can also help normal users, in everyday computing life. If you need to add more memory to your system, for example, you can check how many memory slots your computer has and what memory's already installed. Then you can go out and buy the right type of memory to add on or replace what you've already got. Download: Speccy 1.34.084 | 20.5 MB (Freeware) View: Speccy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • ImgDrive 2.2.7 by Razvan Serea ImgDrive is a CD/DVD/BD emulator - a tool that allows you to mount optical disc images by simply clicking on them in Windows Explorer. If you have downloaded an ISO image and want to use it without burning it to a blank disc, ImgDrive is the easiest way to do it. ImgDrive features: One-click mounting of iso, cue, nrg, mds/mdf, ccd, isz images Runs on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows versions Mount ape, flac, m4a, wav, wavpack, tta file as AUDIO CD (16-bit/44.1kHz) Mount a folder as DVD/BD Mount images in command line Does not require rebooting after installation Support up to 7 virtual drives at the same time Support multi session disc image (ccd/mds/nrg) A special portable version is available Translated to more than 10 languages Support File Type: .ccd - CloneCD image files .cue - Cue sheets files of ape/flac/m4a/tta/wav/wv/bin .iso - Standard ISO image files .isz - Compressed ISO image files .nrg - Nero image files .mds - Media descriptor image files ImgDrive 2.2.7 changelog: Added command line parameter to set number of drives Added AACS-Auth support for HD DVD Bumped kernel driver version to 2.2.7 Download: ImgDrive 2.2.7 | 692 KB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) Download: ImgDrive Portable 535 KB View: ImgDrive Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!