RAM Issues with XMP on with ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I've been experiencing some issues with my RAM. Enabling XMP seems to cause problems, and I keep failing Test 8 with Memtest86. However, when I run Memtest86 without XMP enabled, it passes successfully. I conducted individual tests with a single stick in slots A2 and B2 with XMP enabled. Stick 1 passed in both A2 and B2, while Stick 2 passed in A2 but failed in B2. I reran the tests several times and obtained the same results. Initially, I suspected an issue with the B2 slot on my motherboard, but since Stick 1 passed in B2, that seems unlikely.

System Details:

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-E GAMING WIFI 2 (BIOS Version 1202)

Case: Corsair 7000D Airflow

PSU: Corsair RM1000x

CPU: Intel i9-13900K

GPU: GIGABYTE 4070 Ti Super

RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB

Storage: Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB

I'm at a loss about what to do next. I'm considering an RMA for the RAM, but I'm not sure if anyone else has encountered similar issues. The RAM kit I have is Corsair Vengeance 32GB (SN CMH32GX5M2E6000C36), and I have checked my motherboard QVL, and it shows it as listed.

If you're correct with BIOS revision 1202 the current version is 2202 which is around 8 revisions newer, probably worth flashing that before returning anything and doing some further testing. Early BIOS revisions are often unstable and QVLs typically relate to the latest BIOS revision for the motherboard. If it was just a typo and you're already on 2202 feel free to ignore this :)

  • Like 2

What Ixion said, and assuming you are only using 2 DDR5 ram modules, in A1 & B2 as outlined in the manual... once you have updated to latest bios, you "should" be more stable. I had similar issues as well... mine mainly were down to me not reading things right, and had 4 modules, and tried to enable XMPII which caused me all sorts of issues!

Double check the specs of the exact model of ram, and compare the timings to what your bios XMPII timings, voltages etc are!

1202 is the Lastest BIOS Version for my Motherboard which I'm on right now
chrome_WQfuGJR8kZ.thumb.png.3d4e529542334c7671fdf7a0bfa41ae6.png

Here are the Specs for my RAM.
chrome_KufcKPry4T.thumb.png.e104fe43a35f2f68fdba87ded5a80969.png

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

On 31/05/2024 at 07:47, Richard Hammers said:

I also tried to set my  Memory Controller Voltage to1.35 which seemed to work at first but then I was unstable again. 

Your RAM is rated for 6000 at CL40 at 1.35v. Since it's unstable at these specs, you'll need to go for ~ 1.375 volts. Just make sure to stay under 1.4v.

Ok are you saying to try to set my Memory Controller Voltage to 1.375 volts and see if that works? If that is the case I will try running Memtest86 again since that is the best way for me to make sure my RAM is stable.

A lot of Intel 13th and 14th Gen CPUs are currently having stability issues which is why Intel had to add that Baseline settings. It could well be that your CPU is causing the trouble and the memory kit and the board may be fine. Hard to say.

Still, you can try increasing these voltages slightly:

  • Dram VDD voltage

  • Dram VDDQ voltage

  • CPU System Agent voltage

  • IVR Transmitter VDDQ voltage

  • Memory Controller voltage

You don't want to go too overboard though.

Looks like Asus just released a new BIOS to throttle back the automatic overclock of 13th/14th gen processors which was causing reported stability problems (1301) I can only think I got linked to the wrong motherboard before!

https://rog.asus.com/motherboards/rog-strix/rog-strix-z790-e-gaming-wifi-ii/helpdesk_bios/

Interesting that your spd speed rating on the DIMMS is Cas 40, I guess that's a different XMP profile or lower voltage. If you're still struggling with stability you could try using the SPD ratings rather than the XMP and back things off a little, you probably won't notice the difference as the clock speed makes a lot more difference than the latency.

Hey, So Memtest86 passed runs 1 and 2 but failed runs 3 and 4, indicating it's still unstable with BIOS version 1301. I also reverted to version 1201 because 1301 caused my CPU multipliers to fluctuate erratically, jumping from 55 to 8 on cores 1-9 and from 43 to 8 on cores 10-24. This erratic behavior seemed unusual and might be related to the Intel default settings. After reverting to version 1201, this issue stopped.


I might just keep my RAM at the baseline 4800 MHz for now and wait for any new BIOS updates that might fix the issue, or I might consider buying new RAM. When I had XMP enabled, I didn't notice a significant difference between 4800 MHz and 6000 MHz, especially since I usually game at 60 FPS in 1440p, so I'm not sure how much 6000 MHz would benefit me.

  • Like 1

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

On 02/06/2024 at 09:55, Kelxin said:

Try XMP with a single DIMM, then swap and try with the other DIMM, if both those pass tests, try the other two DIMM sockets on the motherboard for dual channel. If that still fails, try putting them into slots next to each other so they run in single channel and test.  That's a fast way to check if it's a DIMM, socket or motherboard.

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

On 02/06/2024 at 15:30, heslo said:

There's no reason you shouldn't be able to run that board at 6000MT/s unless you've got a particularly terrible IMC on the CPU. Increase the VDD and VDDQ on the mem to 1.4 manually and see what happens

I tried that and it didn't work

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

On 02/06/2024 at 17:04, heslo said:

Go 1.45 (it's safe, don't worry)

 

If not then I'd say your CPU's IMC is just ###### and can't support the faster than JEDEC speeds. If the RAM works at the stock 4800 then I doubt it's that. If you can get a hold of someone else's sticks to test that might be a good idea. Or go single stick and see what happens, that should be kinder on the IMC as well

Ya I have ran Memtest86 with XMP off with base 4800 it passes all 4 runs. When I set the Memory Controller to 1.35v and DRAM VDD/VDDQ 1.4V  Memtest86 will pass runs 1-2 but fail runs 3-4. Also to note it fails mainly on Test 8 ( random number sequence)

Also I did Test running single ram with XMP on

On 02/06/2024 at 13:49, Richard Dewey Hammers said:

So I have tried that before. When I had a single ram in A2 it passed with both but within B2 with a single ram, ram stick 1 was passing but ram stick 2 was failing. 

 

On 02/06/2024 at 17:44, heslo said:

If one was passing and the other failing then yeah, sounds like possibly a dodgy stick. Just RMA it and get another kit, hopefully no issues with that one!

I have a open ticket right now with Corsair and I think I might just RMA the ram and see if it was Stick two that was the issue. But Like I said Stick 2 Passed in A2 but failed in B2 which was super odd lol.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple releases iOS 27 Beta 2 for developers and power users by Aditya Tiwari It's been a couple of weeks since Apple previewed the iOS 27 update during the WWDC official keynote. The upcoming iOS version will bring even more refinements to the Liquid Glass design language, an upgraded Siri AI assistant, and several new Apple Intelligence features. Interestingly, the latest WWDC keynote was different than previous years. Apple has released the iOS 27 beta 2 (build 24A5370h) for developers who want to test the new features being baked for the iPhone and optimize their apps. If you're interested in downloading the latest beta, go to Settings > General > Software Update > beta Updates, then choose iOS 27 Developer Beta. You can download the latest iOS 27 beta on more than 30 supported iPhones. Make sure you know what you are doing since developer betas can be unstable and unexpected at times. If you want to be on the safer side, you can wait for the public beta, which will arrive next month. It's been a while since Apple discontinued its AirPort router lineup. Now, the company said in the iOS 27 beta 2 release notes that the AirPort Utility is deprecated and won't be available for new downloads from the App Store. Apple added that if you previously downloaded the app, you can re-download it. However, the functionality isn't guaranteed when using the AirPort Utility on iOS 27 or later. Speaking of known issues, Apple said that the Portrait mode blur effect might render incorrectly for photos; you may be unable to stop an alarm from the lock screen without unlocking your iPhone; the "Add a Control" button in Control Center edit mode might appear small or clipped. There are several new features in iOS 27 beta 2 as well. It comes with Neural Engine improvements for Apple Intelligence, including better performance when loading large models over 1GB. HomeKit Secure Video recordings are processed on-device and through Private Cloud Compute for video descriptions and search, when Apple Intelligence is enabled in the Home app. That said, you can also download the second betas of macOS 27 Golden Gate, iPadOS 27, watchOS 27, and other Apple operating systems.
    • FSR 4.1 is insanely superior to FSR 3. Like, FSR 4.1 Performance looks better than FSR 3.1 Quality. It's great they are finally enabling it for RX 7000 users. A bit late, but I guess better late than never.
    • Was it the way the cars handled in 4? or was it the choices you had to make?
    • I understand the position Valve is in with hardware pricing thanks to the AI bubble, but as others have said, this is DOA at this price point. There's no world in which a machine at that performance level is worth that price. My girlfriend's a console gamer and after meeting me, wanted to try PC but wanted something she could use on her TV with a controller. The Steam Machine is basically tailor made for her, but only at what it would have cost before the hardware crisis. I took my old Lenovo Legion laptop with a Ryzen 5800H and a 3060 Mobile 8GB, put Bazzite on it and it does the same thing with the games she's interested in very well. She still likes the Steam Machine, but won't be touching it until component prices are back in the sane range. I know Valve isn't a charity, but I don't know why they're not willing to at least partially subsidize this device or even take a loss on it during the component crisis, just to build some market share. Then again, the Steam Deck is also a complete ripoff at its current price and they can barely keep them in stock so...
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      98
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      80
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!