Is it worth upgrading S23 Ultra to S25 Ultra?


Recommended Posts

I was pretty underwhelmed at the S25 Ultra reveal, there are things I like though:

  • Overal a little smaller and thinner than S23 Ultra despite slightly larger screen (6.8" vs 6.9")
  • 850+ nits peak brightness vs S23 Ultra

However that's pretty much it. I don't care for the selfie camera bump from 12 to 50MP, and I do not have WiFi 7 here to benefit from that upgrade.

There are things to dislike too, the S-Pen no longer has the bluetooth support (but the S-Pen from the S23 series will work exactly the same way in the S25 with full bluetooth support) which seems like a cash grab from Samsung to force people to buy the bluetooth supported pens. So a bunch of these plastic ones will end up in a landfill, great! /s

Reasons to buy or not buy

I think the only reason I would buy is if the main camera array is any better than the awful S23 ones. You only have to look at any of my reviews (good example here) to see there's a terrible bokeh effect when taking pics, it's really exaggerated and I am not even using Portrait mode! My fellow review colleague, Robbie Khan, told me he switched to the Pixel 9 Pro because of the poor camera array and lacklustre spec bump to S24 last year, and he is really happy with the cameras on that.

On top of that, I accidentally discovered while reviewing the Magic7 Pro for Neowin, that my linked wearable Galaxy Watch 6 Classic switches to the Bedtime mode toggle when not linked with a Samsung phone. Right now when linked to my S23 Ultra you have to tap modes, and then Sleep to toggle at night, but when it is linked with a non Samsung phone, you only have to click on the icon for Bedtime mode on the Watch!

Wondering if there are any people that can break down the differences with the main camera array, or link me a review that does a deep dive into it?

Phones have stagnated these days in my opinion, I think its got to the point where you don't really gain much by upgrading every couple of years.

I suspect you'd probably not notice all that much in day to day use going from the S23 to the S25, looking long in to the future the S26 or even S27 in all honestly would probably be a more noticeable upgrade when the time comes.

Perhaps if Samsung let you keep a review copy it would be rude not to, otherwise I question do you really need to upgrade?

Camera wise DXOMARK rate the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL camera second in their global Smartphone camera rankings, so if the camera is the key decider then it might well be worth going with a Pixel, even the Cameras on older Pixel devices just constantly take great photos in my opinion. Samsung's and Google's take on Android is quite different, so that's something to keep in mind.

Might be worth having a read of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Camera test on DXOMARK, they are currently working on testing the S25 series, so you should soon be able to see how the two phones compare camera wise.

I feel exactly the same way.

I'm sat with S22 Ultra and I'm still not convinced that it is really an upgrade.

I use my phone for a lot of videos, photographs social media and my work. And right now it's still doing everything I need it to do.

On balance, I think I will upgrade but what a shame it's taken three generations and I'm still underwhelmed.

PS this was a me to post I know it did not help answer your original question.

Personally, I would hold on to them until Samsung is no longer updating the devices. Both the S22 and S23 receive updates for 5 years (4 major OS and 1 year of security) from their release date. Hopefully by then either Samsung or someone else will make it worth replacing it.

  • Like 2
On 27/01/2025 at 16:27, InsaneNutter said:

Camera wise DXOMARK rate the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL camera second in their global Smartphone camera rankings, so if the camera is the key decider then it might well be worth going with a Pixel, even the Cameras on older Pixel devices just constantly take great photos in my opinion. Samsung's and Google's take on Android is quite different, so that's something to keep in mind.

Might be worth having a read of the Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Camera test on DXOMARK, they are currently working on testing the S25 series, so you should soon be able to see how the two phones compare camera wise.

Thanks for this, really helpful! I was not surprised to see the S23 Ultra far down the list in 35th place, four places below the 2021 released iPhone 13 Pro!

As I do quite a few reviews, I might go with the Google Pixel 9 Pro if I can get it subsidized with my two year renewal (March 2025) but I wanted to stay in the Samsung eco system since I have a Samsung Watch and have just ordered a Galaxy Ring.

Bear in mind DXO is just one metric - The real world possibility of the camera is often far greater.

I watched the reveal live and some of the camera stuff is better now like LOG recording, but you can get immense results from past and present phones too if leveraging apps like MotionCam Pro or Blackmagic Camera - I used the latter on my Pixel 9 Pro XL recently to film an indoor gig in low light and the results are pretty substantial vs any stock camera app on any phone available:

 

For photos though the Pixel camera app just wipes the floor with everything else in any lighting condition thanks to the wide dynamic range that HDR+ seems to capture without blurring moving subjects and stuff:

PXL_20250124_215744388.thumb.jpg.b1ea05054d2f7b5585389686c4ea0b80.jpg

What I have learned having owned the S24 Ultra and now on Pixel is that the Pixel camera is just more versatile whilst the Galaxy camera app tries to do too much whilst forgetting what is important, just do great computational photography and have no shutter lag.

Personally I did not see anything remarkable enough with the S25 series to tempt me back to Samsung. They have not even updated to faster charging speeds, and whilst the wireless charging has increased to 25W, the number of 25W charging pad options out there to buy is super limited. You could buy one of the Chinese brand 50W wireless chargers but then you play the lottery on if it might work or not I guess.

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Hello,

When does your existing Samsung S23 Ultra stop receiving security updates from Samsung?  That might be something you wish to factor into your decision matrix.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

On 27/01/2025 at 21:56, goretsky said:

Hello,

When does your existing Samsung S23 Ultra stop receiving security updates from Samsung?  That might be something you wish to factor into your decision matrix.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

AFAIK 5 years total, so another 3 years of support!!!

My motivation for upgrading is for better main camera, since I use it a lot for reviews.

It may not seem like a lot but I have 209GB of 256GB used (mostly taken up from taking images for reviews) in the past two years!!!

Hello,

Does your existing model or the new one have a Micro SDXC card slot?  That has always been a hard requirement for me when upgrading a phone, since I also use mine as an MP3 player and carry my complete collection (~135 GB MB) with me.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Edited by goretsky
fixed a typo
On 28/01/2025 at 20:42, goretsky said:

Hello,

Does your existing model or the new one have a Micro SDXC card slot?  That has always been a hard requirement for me when upgrading a phone, since I also use mine as an MP3 player and carry my complete collection (~135 MB) with me.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

135 Megabytes? What is that mp3 for ants? 😛 To answer your question - the old and new ones don't have microSDXC slots. I think the last Samsung flagship that had a microSD slot was the S20 series 

On 28/01/2025 at 19:42, goretsky said:

Hello,

Does your existing model or the new one have a Micro SDXC card slot?  That has always been a hard requirement for me when upgrading a phone, since I also use mine as an MP3 player and carry my complete collection (~135 MB) with me.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

The last Galaxy S series to have a micro sd slot was the S20.

AFAIK Samsung hasn't upgraded the main camera since S21 (Ultra), and S25 isn't going to bring much new in that - or other sense.

I'm a happy with my S23U and I think the camera system is very versitale, but the main camera isn't basically any better than the previus Oneplus 8 Pro with gcam port.

Oppo, Vivo and Xiaomi flagships with 1" main sensors and good camera systems accross the board, would probably be a real upgrade, though that would yeild even bigger bokeh, which could be problem for product photos. I'm also really not fan of their software.  

On 28/01/2025 at 19:13, tsupersonic said:

135 Megabytes? What is that mp3 for ants? 😛 To answer your question - the old and new ones don't have microSDXC slots. I think the last Samsung flagship that had a microSD slot was the S20 series 

Hello,

Oops, that was a mistake on my part.  I meant about 135 gigabytes.  I have gone ahead and edited my post.  Thank you for catching that.

Regards,

Aryeh Goretsky
 

Personally, I went from a Fold5 to the S25 Ultra. I just can't do the fold anymore the inner screen is too fragile, I noticed I rarely open it anyway, and the outer screen aspect ratio is a nightmare. Spec wise it would be the equivalent of going from an S22 to a S25 I believe so it's a decent bump for me. Prior to the fold series (I had the Fold 1 -5 I was on the Note line of phones so that's why I went back to the Ultra (I like the stylus)

im swapping my S23 Ultra for an S25 Ultra and its due to be delivered this weekend

now performance and feature wise the S23 Ultra is fine for me i could continue to use this phone for another year or two no problem

but... the main reason im changing is i really dislike the curved edges on screen i like the fact that the S25 has a totally flat screen and its slightly bigger

 i spend alot of time on the london underground going to work and thats when i watch most of my TV shows and the glare and low brightness makes it hard to watch some shows with dark scenes im hoping the new improved anti-glare and higher brightness will help with that

also using Samsung's great trade in price and voucher codes im only paying £800 to upgrade to the 1TB model and i plan to keep it till the S27 or so

  • 10 months later...

I know this thread is almost a year old.. but I've not seen it til now. 😇 I've been in a similar situation, sorta.

I've got a S22 Ultra, had it since new. I used to upgrade my phone every couple of years, but everything I see and listen to about the S23, S24, S25 etc, There's literally nothing obvious to me that makes me think "wow.. I need that". In fact, some things even seem like a downgrade (S-Pen not having Bluetooth anymore for example).

I dunno. I've had this phone for a really long time, but the battery is still good, the specs are still good and it's still getting One UI 8 updates (albeit a little behind the newer models). The only thing I don't like about it is the curved edges of the screen, but that was cool in 2022. 😅

According to AccuBattery mine is at 85% health, which kind of makes sense because it is always on a wireless charger cradle here, so that 5000mAh has gone down to around 4250mAh capacity. Mind you I have not calibrated the battery for ages either.

In a way I'm not bothered because the battery started bulging in every other Samsung phone I've had after around two years, and I am up to almost three years with my S23 Ultra thanks to the new "battery protection" built into Android!

On 14/12/2025 at 04:21, jamesyfx said:

I know this thread is almost a year old.. but I've not seen it til now. 😇 I've been in a similar situation, sorta.

I've got a S22 Ultra, had it since new. I used to upgrade my phone every couple of years, but everything I see and listen to about the S23, S24, S25 etc, There's literally nothing obvious to me that makes me think "wow.. I need that". In fact, some things even seem like a downgrade (S-Pen not having Bluetooth anymore for example).

I dunno. I've had this phone for a really long time, but the battery is still good, the specs are still good and it's still getting One UI 8 updates (albeit a little behind the newer models). The only thing I don't like about it is the curved edges of the screen, but that was cool in 2022. 😅

I am going to pick up a galaxy z fold 7 today to replace my S24 ultra. i will miss my S pen but i admittedly do not use it as much as i thought i would.

i hear it has a pretty similar camera cluster which i should be happy with as Ive done some light professional photography as a backup for my fiance's much nicer camera set up with my ultra and i was pleasantly surprised at how nice everything came out.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!