Revert NEW Homepage Design To Something Useable


Recommended Posts

On 01/10/2025 at 07:04, adrynalyne said:

Click cancel; it should reload after and be fine until next time.  At least that’s how it works for me. 

When I click cancel, the site loads but then implodes itself after 10 seconds or so. What a mess...

On 01/10/2025 at 08:53, Steven P. said:

One of our devs knocked the wrong button and uploaded a test environment to the live site..

Because we are in Europe, we didn't see it till now. 

So basically, it was unintentional and will be corrected shortly!

It was amusing and eye-opening to read some of the assumptions and comments in this thread though, so thanks for that!

Well, at least now you know not to roll out anything that looks like that did! :p 

  • Like 3

i don't use adblock. And even with all add-ons disabled ( browser in safe mode ) the problem still exist.

I was able to solve it temporarly  - I've wrote how a bit earlier.  But deleting browser cache and cookies every five minutes is not a solution.

You should check what's happened. Because before changing the site there was no problem. I guess reverting didn't worked perfectly.

At least, now, after I did the cleaning, the first page works, only opening an article generate the issue.

On 30/09/2025 at 19:11, adrynalyne said:

It loads page, isn’t mobile friendly at all; then blows up. 

IMG_0119.png

This is what I'm seeing on Windows 11 with Edge also.  When I click fix issue, I then get second issue. I have Neowin whitelisted in Ublock Origin.

screenshot-1759325583899.png

Screenshot_1-10-2025_93327_report.error-report.com.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
On 01/10/2025 at 09:49, cork1958 said:

This is what I'm seeing on Windows 11 with Edge also.  When I click fix issue, I then get second issue. I have Neowin whitelisted in Ublock Origin.

screenshot-1759325583899.png

Screenshot_1-10-2025_93327_report.error-report.com.jpeg

Same issue. This definitely is an interesting way to see how people about a redesign - claim it was 'unintentional' - sure Steve sure...

  • Haha 1
On 01/10/2025 at 10:03, tsupersonic said:

Same issue. This definitely is an interesting way to see how people about a redesign - claim it was 'unintentional' - sure Steve sure...

Seems to be working correctly in Edge now without me doing anything to settings or cookies/cache.

Edit: I lied. Just had that pop up again but clicked cancel and it's letting me continue, so far. Wouldn't let me continue before.

On 01/10/2025 at 03:53, Steven P. said:

One of our devs knocked the wrong button and uploaded a test environment to the live site..

Because we are in Europe, we didn't see it till now. 

So basically, it was unintentional and will be corrected shortly!

It was amusing and eye-opening to read some of the assumptions and comments in this thread though, so thanks for that!

At least it wasn't on a friday 😛 

  • Haha 2
On 01/10/2025 at 07:03, tsupersonic said:

Same issue. This definitely is an interesting way to see how people about a redesign - claim it was 'unintentional' - sure Steve sure...

I wonder if the ad blocker detection is what was new and the rest was the wrong roll out. Way to alienate users though. Noting says don’t visit my site anymore than web page crashes. 
 

They would be better off just not letting the warning dismiss than crash the page.

We do have an anti-adblock now, courtesy of our advertiser, but nothing else has changed with the site. The mistaken style update was reverted.

According to my account manager:

Quote

Based on our AdShield's experience, most of the users who claim to have “no adblocker” in place tend to have something going on, whether it be a VPN or DNS-level blocking

I do not block ads on Neowin, so since the site style was reverted to the correct one, it has been working perfectly for me.

As a reminder, the inline ads that members see help us keep the lights on, but we also have a $28 per year tier where we remove all of the ads for that member account.

I still find it shameful that certain members gloat about ad blocking while it's clear they also rely heavily on our services, insofar that they demand absolutely no interruptions/site breakage/hosting issues/etc to it!

On 01/10/2025 at 08:48, Steven P. said:

We do have an anti-adblock now, courtesy of our advertiser, but nothing else has changed with the site. The mistaken style update was reverted.

According to my account manager:

I do not block ads on Neowin, so since the site style was reverted to the correct one, it has been working perfectly for me.

As a reminder, the inline ads that members see help us keep the lights on, but we also have a $28 per year tier where we remove all of the ads for that member account.

I still find it shameful that certain members gloat about ad blocking while it's clear they also rely heavily on our services, insofar that they demand absolutely no interruptions/site breakage/hosting issues/etc to it!

I’ll trade you my ad blocking for the removal of AI generated articles. 

On 01/10/2025 at 18:01, adrynalyne said:

I’ll trade you my ad blocking for the removal of AI generated articles. 

Don't click on them, we need views and eyeballs on the site and some of them go hot.

I find it laughable you'd hold a small percentage of our news coverage to ransom like that. So it's do as I want fully, or no?

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
On 01/10/2025 at 17:45, adrynalyne said:

Way to alienate users though. Noting says don’t visit my site anymore than web page crashes. 

A mistake was made, because sometimes, even after 25 years of running a website human errors occur.

On 01/10/2025 at 16:45, adrynalyne said:

I wonder if the ad blocker detection is what was new and the rest was the wrong roll out. Way to alienate users though. Noting says don’t visit my site anymore than web page crashes. 
 

They would be better off just not letting the warning dismiss than crash the page.

I've actually had the page crash, off and on, for a few weeks now.  FWIW, the front page is working OK for me at the moment after the rollback.

  • Like 1
On 01/10/2025 at 18:27, FloatingFatMan said:

I've actually had the page crash, off and on, for a few weeks now.  FWIW, the front page is working OK for me at the moment after the rollback.

We use Cloudflare, which has its own set of checks. It might not play nice with VPN. In my experience I have a VPN but I use Split Tunneling and prevent Chrome from using the VPN, I feel like SecureDNS and a VPN extension (if I need it) in Chrome is enough.

  • Like 1
On 01/10/2025 at 21:33, Steven P. said:

I find it laughable you'd hold a small percentage of our news coverage to ransom like that. So it's do as I want fully, or no?

I agree with Steve, this month we published just 14 AI-generated science stories, which is just ~0.02% of all the articles we published (not counting the software stories in this number). 

It really seems like you @adrynalyne is quite biased against them if you feel such a small percentage of articles is making your Neowin experience bad. :( 

On 01/10/2025 at 17:30, hellowalkman said:

I agree with Steve, this month we published just 14 AI-generated science stories, which is just ~0.02% of all the articles we published (not counting the software stories in this number). 

It really seems like you @adrynalyne is quite biased against them if you feel such a small percentage of articles is making your Neowin experience bad. :( 

I *do* use a VPN (NordVPN), but it's adblocker has never flagged up Neowin's ads so I can't even add it to a whitelist and I'm NOT disabling it in my entire browser just for one site... Not a chance!  My in-browser ad-blocking has Neowin whitelisted.

  • Thanks 2

I wonder how he (and others) feel about all the sites that do not disclose they were written with AI assistance? (and there are tons of them out there with garbage articles that make little to no sense because they aren't even edited)

Ours are AI assisted, and checked by an Editor. We do not have a machine that spits out articles and self publishes them.

  • Like 2
On 01/10/2025 at 09:30, hellowalkman said:

I agree with Steve, this month we published just 14 AI-generated science stories, which is just ~0.02% of all the articles we published (not counting the software stories in this number). 

It really seems like you @adrynalyne is quite biased against them if you feel such a small percentage of articles is making your Neowin experience bad. :( 

Only 14?

🤮

  • Haha 2
On 01/10/2025 at 17:34, Steven P. said:

I wonder how he (and others) feel about all the sites that do not disclose they were written with AI assistance? (and there are tons of them out there with garbage articles that make little to no sense because they aren't even edited)

Ours are AI assisted, and checked by an Editor. We do not have a machine that spits out articles and self publishes them.

Honestly, I'd not actually noticed any AI articles... Can't say I like that sort of thing, but I'm not gonna judge you for using them... Reporters aren't cheap.

  • Thanks 2
On 01/10/2025 at 09:34, Steven P. said:

I wonder how he (and others) feel about all the sites that do not disclose they were written with AI assistance? (and there are tons of them out there with garbage articles that make little to no sense because they aren't even edited)

Ours are AI assisted, and checked by an Editor. We do not have a machine that spits out articles and self publishes them.

No, you are using AI to summarize what you don’t understand, leading to more confusion from readers because half the time it makes even less sense and when the writer is questioned, they cannot answer the questions because they don’t know either.

Take the disclosure off, it makes no difference. AI generated articles are easy to spot. 

  • Facepalm 1
  • Thanks 1
On 01/10/2025 at 18:37, adrynalyne said:

No, you are using AI to summarize what you don’t understand, leading to more confusion from readers because half the time it makes even less sense and when the writer is questioned, they cannot answer the questions because they don’t know either.

Take the disclosure off, it makes no difference. AI generated articles are easy to spot. 

One does not to have a PHD or be a scientist to summarize "Largest black hole ever discovered and it's bigger than you may have imagined" the article went hot and got us a lot of views.

I think it's weird that you can't just decide to skip them if they bother you so much. 

I'm a co-owner of the site, and believe it or not I do not read every news article and every forum post, especially the ones that do not interest me.

  • Like 2
On 01/10/2025 at 12:32, FloatingFatMan said:

I *do* use a VPN (NordVPN), but it's adblocker has never flagged up Neowin's ads so I can't even add it to a whitelist and I'm NOT disabling it in my entire browser just for one site... Not a chance!  My in-browser ad-blocking has Neowin whitelisted.

Exact same setup and situation here.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!