Recommended Posts

The topic speaks for himself, so lets start...

I have two things to say:

-What the hell happened in the Goldberg-Lesnar match??????????????????!!!! It doesnt lasted more than 15 minutes :s :s that's just wrong :s:s :ninja: :huh:

-And the Undertaker Win!!!!!!!! Yay ! :D :D Go Deadman

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/148638-wrestlemania-xx-results-discussion/
Share on other sites

W00t! New champ! Good job Benoit. Lesnar/Goldberg match sucked ass. Glad that they both got booed. Untertaker's gimick just plain stunk. It was a mix of the american bad ass and dead man inc. I was very disappointed. :( Glad Cena won. There were a few highlights but on a whole I was disappointed with the show.

Thanks for the pics, doesn't really look like what I would have imagined.. but still nice to see paul bearer back hehe

he isnt back for good from what i hear. paul bearer that is.

as for lesner the sorry butt.

sorry he wasted all his time in the WWE for nothing

have fun in the NFL lesner.. if you make it jackssa.

the undertaker thing was awesome, that is all. It was like undertaker from like the beginning when he was the real undertaker. Like when he looked to paul bearer to see what to do....sooo goood

Really boffa? I thought the Undertaker part ruined it.

@ StaticX: I totally agree. Those three matches were great. I was also glad that my boy Cena went over. Also I was glad that Orton got put over on Foley.

I was also shocked that so many people knew Brock was leaving. Usually a few smart fans chant but that was like the whole friggin building.

Stephanie has been gone for months..paul heyman runs smackdown now writing all those good storylines...undertaker return was kind of good..I loved him being back as before but I wish he would of kept his old look instead of the leather coat/hat/short hair..brock vs goldberg sucked big time..all that hype for nothing..best match of the night I think was eddie vs angle..great match..2nd fav was triple threat match...still was worth the 50.99 I spent to order it..

Stephanie has been gone for months..paul heyman runs smackdown now writing all those good storylines...undertaker return was kind of good..I loved him being back as before but I wish he would of kept his old look instead of the leather coat/hat/short hair..brock vs goldberg sucked big time..all that hype for nothing..best match of the night I think was eddie vs angle..great match..2nd fav was triple threat match...still was worth the 50.99 I spent to order it..

Uh, Paul Heyman is an on-air talent ONLY he has no creative input at all. Stephanie McMahon is the head creative writer for the WWE. She makes up all these wonderful storylines we all know and love. Vince does the final approval for them, but Steph writes em. Three cheers for Steph.

And no, Bischoff doesn't write for RAW, he is just an on-air talent too.

As for WMXX. I am sure as hell glad I didn't fork over money I can't afford for that steaming pile of feces that the WWE had the NERVE to show on PPV last night. It was a complete and utter rip off. The Lesnar/Goldberg match? Seriously, when the best part of your match is when the crowd is chanting "You sold out" and "Na na na na na goodbye" you know it's bad. For Goldberg's part, hey the man can't wrestle worth anything but at least people know that, Lesnar...ugh. Lesnar was given the WWE on a silver platter, and he just puked it all over the place. Great job Brock. (Unless this is an elaborate work, which I doubt)

The only other matches worth a damn, were the Rock/Sock Evolution match, the Eddie Angle match, and the HBK/HHH/Benoit match. I didn't care for the Cena Show match, but kudos to Cena for his first title. Everything else just blew chunks. Where were the huge stars like in previous WM's? Where was the glamour and the surprises? Oh wow, Jesse Ventura was probing for a presidential run in 2008, yippe skippy. Oh, man wow, we saw Torrie Wilson's boob, big deal. OMG UNDERTAKER CAME BACK. Yawn.

On a scale of 1 to 10 for this WM, I give it a 3, and this is only because of the 3 decent matches, and because I mark out for Foley, Rock, HBK, Benoit and Victoria (sorry she's just HOT)

Vince should be ashamed of himself, Bret Hart should be GLAD he didn't show. Hogan should be glad he didn't lower himself to this level of DUNG. Shall I continue? :(

Uh, Paul Heyman is an on-air talent ONLY he has no creative input at all. Stephanie McMahon is the head creative writer for the WWE. She makes up all these wonderful storylines we all know and love. Vince does the final approval for them, but Steph writes em. Three cheers for Steph.

And no, Bischoff doesn't write for RAW, he is just an on-air talent too.

As for WMXX. I am sure as hell glad I didn't fork over money I can't afford for that steaming pile of feces that the WWE had the NERVE to show on PPV last night. It was a complete and utter rip off. The Lesnar/Goldberg match? Seriously, when the best part of your match is when the crowd is chanting "You sold out" and "Na na na na na goodbye" you know it's bad. For Goldberg's part, hey the man can't wrestle worth anything but at least people know that, Lesnar...ugh. Lesnar was given the WWE on a silver platter, and he just puked it all over the place. Great job Brock. (Unless this is an elaborate work, which I doubt)

The only other matches worth a damn, were the Rock/Sock Evolution match, the Eddie Angle match, and the HBK/HHH/Benoit match. I didn't care for the Cena Show match, but kudos to Cena for his first title. Everything else just blew chunks. Where were the huge stars like in previous WM's? Where was the glamour and the surprises? Oh wow, Jesse Ventura was probing for a presidential run in 2008, yippe skippy. Oh, man wow, we saw Torrie Wilson's boob, big deal. OMG UNDERTAKER CAME BACK. Yawn.

On a scale of 1 to 10 for this WM, I give it a 3, and this is only because of the 3 decent matches, and because I mark out for Foley, Rock, HBK, Benoit and Victoria (sorry she's just HOT)

Vince should be ashamed of himself, Bret Hart should be GLAD he didn't show. Hogan should be glad he didn't lower himself to this level of DUNG. Shall I continue? :(

Hey man you got your facts straight. ;) Nice.

Stephanie can write stories but her acting skills suck. She can do as much as her little heart desires back stage as long as she keeps that aweful shril voice behind closed doors. I was really glad to see the opening vignette with Vince handing the company over to Shane-O-Mac. He's the true talent in the family. I was also glad that Vince did that very short and nice promo thanking the fans. It was honest, out of character thanks from the man that I idolized as a child.

Now for the matches. Generally, the quality wasn't great. The top match was the three way dance and the bottom was either the Brock/Goldberg or the playboy match which thankfully was good. I agree with the three matches you selected but I would add Christian/Jericho as it was stellar and had a good heel turn at the end. I also like the Cruiserweight match but felt it didn't last long enough. I held my breath when Kidman didn't get that Shooting Star all the way around. Reminded me of Lesnar/Angle all over again.

In general I felt that the guys that won were the guys that should have won. The exceptions are the tag matches. WGTT should have won and I thought that La Resitance would be good heel champions and would allow for RVD and Booker to go singles.

All in all I give the show as 7/10 as for once the booking was right but there were a few moments that ruined it.

Hey man you got your facts straight. ;) Nice.

Stephanie can write stories but her acting skills suck. She can do as much as her little heart desires back stage as long as she keeps that aweful shril voice behind closed doors. I was really glad to see the opening vignette with Vince handing the company over to Shane-O-Mac. He's the true talent in the family. I was also glad that Vince did that very short and nice promo thanking the fans. It was honest, out of character thanks from the man that I idolized as a child.

Now for the matches. Generally, the quality wasn't great. The top match was the three way dance and the bottom was either the Brock/Goldberg or the playboy match which thankfully was good. I agree with the three matches you selected but I would add Christian/Jericho as it was stellar and had a good heel turn at the end. I also like the Cruiserweight match but felt it didn't last long enough. I held my breath when Kidman didn't get that Shooting Star all the way around. Reminded me of Lesnar/Angle all over again.

In general I felt that the guys that won were the guys that should have won. The exceptions are the tag matches. WGTT should have won and I thought that La Resitance would be good heel champions and would allow for RVD and Booker to go singles.

All in all I give the show as 7/10 as for once the booking was right but there were a few moments that ruined it.

Do you know why Vince came out and thanked the fans out of character? Because his ass was afraid of a riot in MSG. Plain and simple he was doing an apology for the crap that crowd had to sit through only minutes before.

And yes, the Christian/Jericho match was good too, I forgot to mention that. But the heel turn in that match was beyond me. Yes it accomplishes turning Jericho offically face, but to what end now? The cruiserweight match was decent too, I really enjoy watched rey rey in any match, but they weren't given enough time as I expected to make the match noteworthy.

As for Shane-o, well I love the guy as much as the next guy. He should be running things, and hopefully sooner or later he will be. But if you think Vince handed over the company last night to him, your wayyyy off man. Vince will never give it up, and if he does it'll be to Steph and her Preparation-H hubby.

And for all those who just love the "Taker" here's a small paragraph from Mr. Tito of Lordsofpain.net fame, I thought you might like it, it just sums up my feelings on the Undertaker perfectly:

Next, it was Undertaker vs. Kane. The Undertaker is the same old biker Undertaker, only with a big cowboy hat and longer (not even shoulder length) black hair. He looked TERRIBLE, and resembles nothing of his old "Dead Man" character except for the rolling eyes. This match was absolutely terrible and pure torture to watch. I admire Brock Lesnar for not wanting to feud with the Undertaker again. LOOK AT THIS MATCH AND SEE WHY! Once Undertaker started wrestling, the pops for him quickly died and "you suck" chants were heard towards the Undertaker by the end of the match. This man is going to dominate the Smackdown roster? What a crime! What a joke! What a complete letdown by the WWE on this guy's return.

I got a load of pics uploaded onto my server of Taker returning...

http://www.karlpurdon.com/kriz/Undertaker%20WMXX%20Return/

The Goldberg/Brock match just sucked, i got so bored. I wasnt expecting Trish to do that either lol.

WWE Could have given Undertaker better attire, and at least some hair extensions, he looks crap at the moment. Congrats to Benoit aswell, he deserved it.

"Where it all begins ... Again" Im expectin Vince to unveil a new WWE logo, to symbolise the end of the attitude era on Raw tonight.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!