Intel Processor Rating Details


Recommended Posts

Intel Processor Rating Details

Don?t Confuse Pentium 4 with a BMW

by Anna Filatova

03/19/2004 | 05:22 AM

Not so long ago we talked about Intel?s plans concerning the introduction of the processor rating. Intel has finally realized the necessity to offer a new metrics for its CPUs marking, because the core clock frequency doesn?t give a clear idea of the processor performance any more. In fact, this tendency has existed for quite a while now. Today Intel offers a few different desktop and notebook processor families: Pentium 4 Extreme Edition, Pentium 4, Pentium M and Celeron. And if you can tell the CPU performance from its working core frequency within a single family, then comparing processors from different families makes absolutely no sense. Intel?s marketing team, however, faces the following problems more and more often: it is really hard to explain to an unsophisticated user why a notebook based on Pentium M 1.6GHz is more preferable than a notebook based on Mobile Pentium 4 2.4GHz. Moreover, there are ?tricky things? even within a single family sometimes. For example, there are a few Pentium 4 2.4GHz modifications in the today?s market, which differ from one another by the bus frequency and L2 cache size, which surely affects their performance. So, introducing a unified rating is quite a logical move in this case.

We have also mentioned in our news the major principles that the new Intel rating would be based on. Intel?s rating system is going to be very similar to Opteron marking system. Or even to BMW classification, because there will be three series:

* High End - 7XX;

* Middle End - 5XX;

* Low End - 3XX.

The rating system implies that you should be able to move easily from the youngest to the top model within a processor family with a certain discrete step. For instance, Dothan and Prescott processors will differ from the next models by an increment divisible by 10. Celeron processors will be rated with a smaller increment divisible by 5, because the difference in their performance and clock frequency is smaller.

The size of this increment will be determined by the cache size as well as the processor bus frequency. For instance, if Dothan 1.6GHz with 400MHz bus is rated as 725 then a similar model with 533MHz bus will be rated as 730 even if its working frequency is the same.

They haven?t yet thought of a rating system for Pentium 4 XE processors, but they will surely belong to the most expensive and powerful ?7xx? series.

By the way, the use of this rating system is a part of Intel?s preparations for the launch of the new Merom processors and its desktop analogue, which is now known as Conroe. Intel starts moving away from the tradition to increase the clock frequency starting with Tejas announcement. The cache of the new CPUs is known to be increased to 2MB, and the bus frequency will rise to 1066MHz. Of course, they will have to add a few extra rating options in order to distinguish these CPUs from other Prescott based ones. In this case you will definitely get a better impression of Tejas? performance even if it works at the same frequency as Prescott.

The rating system from Intel will be introduced in May, when Intel announced new mobile Dothan CPUs with 2MB L2 cache and 90nm manufacturing technology.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20040319050055.html

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/150063-intel-processor-rating-details/
Share on other sites

um yeah...that looks confussing...more confussing that say....AMD's rating system

and Intel was the one who Bitched that AMD's was the misleading one....but looking at the Intel one clearlly shows they have no clue....or that they want to confuse the populous...

Definately time to get a Pentium M Motherboard. If this is how Intel is going.. :/

Indeed. They are moving away from high clock speeds and concentrating on multi-core processors based on the Pentium M architecture. This is obvious when you look at the processor roadmap. The Merom/Conroe looks damn good.

The Merom/Conroe looks damn good.

i second that.... honestly those will be insteresting times.

as for their ratings, i dont find it to confusing but i wouldnt have just distinguished the "rating" by bus and cache size.... still a little misleading....

but if they are factoring the overall performance.. then good for them

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have the Pixel 9 Pro XL...Unless this thing is "leaps and bounds" faster than the 9, I'll pass. And by leaps and bounds, I don't mean on benchmarks. "Real world" faster. Most people don't even come close to topping out the performance of their phones. Tensor G5 is Google's most powerful chip to date, boasting a staggering 36 percent performance leap over G4.
    • MIT's stunning 'bubble wrap' device squeezes water out from thin air even in deserts by Sayan Sen Image by Matteo Roman via Pexels Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) engineers have built a new kind of device that can pull clean drinking water straight out of the air—no electricity needed. It’s designed for areas where water is scarce and traditional sources like rivers or lakes aren’t reliable. Right now, more than 2.2 billion people globally don’t have access to safe drinking water. In the United States alone, 46 million face water insecurity, with either no running water or water that’s not safe to drink. This new device, called an Atmospheric Water Harvesting Window (AWHW), uses a unique hydrogel panel that looks like black bubble wrap. These dome-shaped bubbles soak up water vapor from the air, especially at night when humidity is higher. During the day, sunlight makes the vapor inside evaporate. That vapor then condenses on a glass surface and drips down through a tube, turning into drinkable water. The AWHW doesn’t rely on power sources like batteries or solar panels. It’s completely passive, meaning it works on its own. The team tested a meter-sized panel in Death Valley, California, one of the driest places in North America, and got between 57.0 and 161.5 milliliters of water per day even with humidity as low as 21 percent. That’s more than what other similar passive devices have managed. “We have built a meter-scale device that we hope to deploy in resource-limited regions, where even a solar cell is not very accessible,” said Xuanhe Zhao, a professor at MIT. “It’s a test of feasibility in scaling up this water harvesting technology. Now people can build it even larger, or make it into parallel panels, to supply drinking water to people and achieve real impact.” Another cool part of the design is how they kept the water safe to drink. Usually, these kinds of hydrogels use salts like lithium chloride to absorb more vapor but that can lead to salt leaking into the water, which isn’t ideal. To solve this, MIT’s team mixed in glycerol, a compound that helps keep salt locked inside the gel. In testing, the lithium ion concentration in the harvested water stayed below 0.06 ppm (parts per million), which is way below the safe limit. The hydrogel domes also give the material more surface area, letting it collect more vapor. The outer glass panel is coated with a special polymer film that helps cool the glass, making it easier for vapor to condense. “This is just a proof-of-concept design, and there are a lot of things we can optimize,” said lead author Chang Liu, now a professor at the National University of Singapore. “For instance, we could have a multipanel design. And we’re working on a next generation of the material to further improve its intrinsic properties.” Published in Nature Water, the study says the AWHW could last at least a year and shows promise for making safe, sustainable water in places with harsh climates. The researchers believe an array of vertical panels could one day supply water to individual households, especially in remote or off-grid locations. Source: MIT News, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Clear Linux is open source, indeed, so its source code is available for anyone. They're just shutting down its support from them, they're not forbidding anyone else from taking over.
    • Linux Mint is also my favorite distro, but I fear what will happen with it if Clem were to disappear tomorrow, to be honest.
    • Yeah, I totally get your point, which is possible it could happen. I just hope there is a few people around him who are similar to where if they took over things would run pretty much the same. if not, then yeah, it could start to decline rapidly etc. but I figure something that's been around for a longer period of time with a decent backing, and probably more users than most Linux distro's (which I would 'imagine' Mint is one of the more used Linux desktop distro's by volume of people who use it), is less likely to just disappear. but like you said, nothing is guaranteed. but I do think you are probably right in that Clem is probably the core of what keeps Mint, Mint. I like how it tends to stay pretty much the same with some slight tweaks here and there (but is largely the same) instead of that crap some people go for with change for the sake of change trying to create a overly fancy interface and other unnecessary stuff etc. I also feel Mint keeps a nice balance of things out-of-the-box where it's not too bloated, nor too striped down. p.s. but I see Mint as a better Ubuntu basically. but I get your point like if it was more of a really serious choice of needing a 'safe bet' to use long term, then yeah something like official Ubuntu would be one of the better choices for sure given what you said with it being backed by an actual company which makes it a safer bet than Mint which is smaller and 'could' potentially be more fragile.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      leoniDAM earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Ian_ earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Ian_ earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      MacDaddyAz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Explorer
      cekicen went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      209
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      202
    4. 4
      Xenon
      146
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      121
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!