Recommended Posts

I have been using spymac for a while now and its great. Just after google anounced their 1gb email www.spymac.com also made it available. Go check it out I sent emails with some much larger attachments (10mb) and it worked fine. You also get free 350mb of ftp space as well. The site is great and its all free!!!

www.spymac.com

SPYMAC.COM

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/155115-spymac-1gb-e-mail-available-now/
Share on other sites

Please fill in required information

Membership is completely free (no strings attached) and includes an unsurpassed suite of services tailored for Mac users:

100 megabytes of free web space (complete with FTP and WebDAV access)

Free e-mail account with 25 megabytes of storage (includes both POP3 and Web access)

250 megabytes of free storage in Spymac's patent-pending Gallery

What's more, each member gets an individual blog, unlimited iCal publishing and access to exclusive deals on leading Mac OS X software. To use these services, we ask that you fill in the below information. Spymac respects your privacy and we invite you to read our privacy policy. If you wish, you may fill out this information at a later time.

still going to wait for Gmail..Google is the bomb :D

How in the hell is this free? Thats ALOT of space.

BTW, I won't be using Google mail. All that stuff about them going through the content of the emails anddelivering ads based onthe content seems a little intrusive to me. I have nothing to hide, but maybe I just don't want to show everything.

azan: please resize your image next time. Just for the sake of readability.

How in the hell is this free? Thats ALOT of space.

BTW, I won't be using Google mail. All that stuff about them going through the content of the emails anddelivering ads based onthe content seems a little intrusive to me. I have nothing to hide, but maybe I just don't want to show everything.

azan: please resize your image next time. Just for the sake of readability.

think about it, no one will ever have 1gb of mail. Especially if they use pop3 and download to their pc. They will in a way "oversell" it, if you get what i mean

i really dont understand how offering 1gb free space will ever be profitable... now granted, most people will never reach 1 gigabyte, but look at it this way, if just 1,000 people use up the entire gig, thats 1 terrabyte... now, there are several solutions for multiple terrabyte storage that have been around for quite some time, but as far as I know, it takes a small fortune to even have 10 terrabytes of storage space.... It just does not seem cost effective to me...

i really dont understand how offering 1gb free space will ever be profitable... now granted, most people will never reach 1 gigabyte, but look at it this way, if just 1,000 people use up the entire gig, thats 1 terrabyte... now, there are several solutions for multiple terrabyte storage that have been around for quite some time, but as far as I know, it takes a small fortune to even have 10 terrabytes of storage space.... It just does not seem cost effective to me...

they know that no-one will ever use that much. Thats why. No doubt they only have an 80gb drive or something, and will stop after a while. You never know, i think google would be more feasable (sp?) because they are a more well known company/site

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!