• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I posted this on Neowin's thread about PearPC, but with 160+ pgs of information, it tends to get lost, so I thought I would post it here also. Sorry for those who have to read it both places! :lol:

It didn't seem like anyone has done a comprehensive comparison between the nightly builds and the SDL version, so I did some testing/benchmarking and here are the results:

My system specs:

Custom built P4 2.53 GHz

Asus P4B533 mobo

512 RAM

32MB nVidia GeForce2 MX 200

Windows XP Professional SP1

WD 80 GB HD SE with 8mb buffer

Networking: T1 with FreeProxy bound to the TAP win32 driver (I find this faster than tunneling)

PearPC Specs:

SDL.0003 with RAM set to 256MB and networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window

Nightly Build 6-3-04 with RAM set to 256MB and Networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window with 60ms redraw.

I was surprised that there really isn't much speed difference between the two. The SDL version seems faster because the video is smoother. But practically it isn't. I may or may not run some more test with the nightly build adjusting the redraw rate.

I think this is enough to give you the factors. So here is the chart!

post-12-1086362067.jpg

Edited by jedavis1
  • 0
Okay, Beta 1 Release 2 is hot off the compiler. :cool:

View: Homepage

Download: Here

Screenshot below:

Does PearPCFront do anything related to your network? Just curious because after installing it I had to go to Network in OS X and refresh my PCI card thing. It wasn't a problem or anything. The internet worked right away. I just thought it was weird. Did this on both pc's I had it running on.

  • 0
I posted this on Neowin's thread about PearPC, but with 160+ pgs of information, it tends to get lost, so I thought I would post it here also. Sorry for those who have to read it both places! :lol:

It didn't seem like anyone has done a comprehensive comparison between the nightly builds and the SDL version, so I did some testing/benchmarking and here are the results:

My system specs:

Custom built P4 2.53 GHz

Asus P4B533 mobo

512 RAM

32MB nVidia GeForce2 MX 200

Windows XP Professional SP1

WD 80 GB HD SE with 8mb buffer

Networking: T1 with FreeProxy bound to the TAP win32 driver (I find this faster than tunneling)

PearPC Specs:

SDL.0003 with RAM set to 256MB and networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window

Nightly Build 6-3-04 with RAM set to 256MB and Networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window with 60ms redraw.

I was surprised that there really isn't much speed difference between the two. The SDL version seems faster because the video is smoother. But practically it isn't. I may or may not run some more test with the nightly build adjusting the redraw rate.

I think this is enough to give you the factors. So here is the chart!

Thanks.

That's a helpful chart. Benchmarking the different builds was a good idea :yes:

  • 0
Does PearPCFront do anything related to your network? Just curious because after installing it I had to go to Network in OS X and refresh my PCI card thing. It wasn't a problem or anything. The internet worked right away. I just thought it was weird. Did this on both pc's I had it running on.

You probably used the default MAC address, which was different from the MAC Address that *was* in your config file.

  • 0
I dont mean the ones packaged in .sit files.I know how to convert those.I mean the ones like Icontainer files and the ones in .dmg format.I love how people allways assume they know what your talking about.

how do you know I didn't know what you were talking about? I can get an icon from whatever Mac file I want and use it on a Win machine. :rolleyes:

  • 0
how do you know I didn't know what you were talking about? I can get an icon from whatever Mac file I want and use it on a Win machine.  :rolleyes:

Meaning all you get are sit files or tell me how to convert dmg to a usable format.Also i do know you didnt know what i was talking about because of your stupid comments.

  • 0
Meaning all you get are sit files or tell me how to convert dmg to a usable format.Also i do know you didnt know what i was talking about because of your stupid comments.

Why didn't you say formats instead of icons? Last time I checked icons have nothing to do with the format of a file. So really the problem is your lack of computer terminology knowledge.

  • 0
Why didn't you say formats instead of icons? Last time I checked icons have nothing to do with the format of a file. So really the problem is your lack of computer terminology knowledge.

The icons come in the dmg file.Its a mac format.And i said i was talking about file formats in my second and third post,maybe you should learn to read.

  • 0
The icons come in the dmg file.Its a mac format.And i said i was talking about file formats in my second and third post,maybe you should learn to read.

Why don't you learn to write?

Here is your post.

Any else think yes,we will finally get some of those non convertable icons on windows now?

It would have been a lot clearer if you wrote it more like this.

Is anyone else thinking that we will finally get to use some of those icons from (where ever you get them) that come in .dmg formated images?

But lets not turn this into an English lesson and get this topic locked by the Mods.

  • 0

Why doesn't PearGUI work for me? When I click "Run PearPC" the dos box appears, flashes "usage: ppc configfie" and then quits.

PearGUI.exe is in the same folder as my PearPC installation, and it is pointing to the correct IMG and ISO files. Is PearGUI expecting my config file to be a certain name? Either that, or it's not passing its own files correctly to the command interpreter.

And another thing...how does it enable right-click functionality in pearPC?

  • 0
Why don't you learn to write?

Here is your post.

It would have been a lot clearer if you wrote it more like this.

Is anyone else thinking that we will finally get to use some of those icons from (where ever you get them) that come in .dmg formated images?

But lets not turn this into an English lesson and get this topic locked by the Mods.

You should have picked up what i said on my second and third post.Nonetheless you should have asked what i meant before you tryed to show off on this board.Your the only one turning this into a english lesson.

  • 0
You should have picked up what i said on my second and third post.Nonetheless you should have asked what i meant before you tryed to show off on this board.Your the only one turning this into a english lesson.

If you want me to, I can pick at your other posts. But instead how about I say I should have asked you to clarify what you meant. And you admit that your post was clear as mud.

  • 0

So you go off,when you should have ask me about my post and then because you didnt understand the post in the first place im the jerk.That tells me thiers no need to talk any longer.You just want to fight about this.Im sorry if my post wasent clear enuff for you.Next time ask,dont flame.

Edited by I need Zoloft
  • 0
Why doesn't PearGUI work for me? When I click "Run PearPC" the dos box appears, flashes "usage: ppc configfie" and then quits.

PearGUI.exe is in the same folder as my PearPC installation, and it is pointing to the correct IMG and ISO files. Is PearGUI expecting my config file to be a certain name? Either that, or it's not passing its own files correctly to the command interpreter.

And another thing...how does it enable right-click functionality in pearPC?

Make sure that you save the config file. Also, make sure that you don't have a setting checked that isn't supported by your version of PPC (Right click option isn't enabled on the current standard versions, so don't check that) and things like that. PearGUI is my favorite front end right now. Simple and effective!

  • 0

Guys, lets please try to stay on topic here. This is a PearPC thread; not a lets talk about converting icons thread or lets talk about other virtual machine applications thread!

Keep the questions on topic, and this 100+ page thread will contain useful information; wander off, and it will be ignored and disreguarded.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That reminds me. Now that i have Quest 3 I should go back and try the first one in VR. ... last time i did that I tried it in some janky VR setup which was still really good.
    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!