• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I posted this on Neowin's thread about PearPC, but with 160+ pgs of information, it tends to get lost, so I thought I would post it here also. Sorry for those who have to read it both places! :lol:

It didn't seem like anyone has done a comprehensive comparison between the nightly builds and the SDL version, so I did some testing/benchmarking and here are the results:

My system specs:

Custom built P4 2.53 GHz

Asus P4B533 mobo

512 RAM

32MB nVidia GeForce2 MX 200

Windows XP Professional SP1

WD 80 GB HD SE with 8mb buffer

Networking: T1 with FreeProxy bound to the TAP win32 driver (I find this faster than tunneling)

PearPC Specs:

SDL.0003 with RAM set to 256MB and networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window

Nightly Build 6-3-04 with RAM set to 256MB and Networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window with 60ms redraw.

I was surprised that there really isn't much speed difference between the two. The SDL version seems faster because the video is smoother. But practically it isn't. I may or may not run some more test with the nightly build adjusting the redraw rate.

I think this is enough to give you the factors. So here is the chart!

post-12-1086362067.jpg

Edited by jedavis1
  • 0
Okay, Beta 1 Release 2 is hot off the compiler. :cool:

View: Homepage

Download: Here

Screenshot below:

Does PearPCFront do anything related to your network? Just curious because after installing it I had to go to Network in OS X and refresh my PCI card thing. It wasn't a problem or anything. The internet worked right away. I just thought it was weird. Did this on both pc's I had it running on.

  • 0
I posted this on Neowin's thread about PearPC, but with 160+ pgs of information, it tends to get lost, so I thought I would post it here also. Sorry for those who have to read it both places! :lol:

It didn't seem like anyone has done a comprehensive comparison between the nightly builds and the SDL version, so I did some testing/benchmarking and here are the results:

My system specs:

Custom built P4 2.53 GHz

Asus P4B533 mobo

512 RAM

32MB nVidia GeForce2 MX 200

Windows XP Professional SP1

WD 80 GB HD SE with 8mb buffer

Networking: T1 with FreeProxy bound to the TAP win32 driver (I find this faster than tunneling)

PearPC Specs:

SDL.0003 with RAM set to 256MB and networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window

Nightly Build 6-3-04 with RAM set to 256MB and Networking enabled. Screen set at 800x600 window with 60ms redraw.

I was surprised that there really isn't much speed difference between the two. The SDL version seems faster because the video is smoother. But practically it isn't. I may or may not run some more test with the nightly build adjusting the redraw rate.

I think this is enough to give you the factors. So here is the chart!

Thanks.

That's a helpful chart. Benchmarking the different builds was a good idea :yes:

  • 0
Does PearPCFront do anything related to your network? Just curious because after installing it I had to go to Network in OS X and refresh my PCI card thing. It wasn't a problem or anything. The internet worked right away. I just thought it was weird. Did this on both pc's I had it running on.

You probably used the default MAC address, which was different from the MAC Address that *was* in your config file.

  • 0
I dont mean the ones packaged in .sit files.I know how to convert those.I mean the ones like Icontainer files and the ones in .dmg format.I love how people allways assume they know what your talking about.

how do you know I didn't know what you were talking about? I can get an icon from whatever Mac file I want and use it on a Win machine. :rolleyes:

  • 0
how do you know I didn't know what you were talking about? I can get an icon from whatever Mac file I want and use it on a Win machine.  :rolleyes:

Meaning all you get are sit files or tell me how to convert dmg to a usable format.Also i do know you didnt know what i was talking about because of your stupid comments.

  • 0
Meaning all you get are sit files or tell me how to convert dmg to a usable format.Also i do know you didnt know what i was talking about because of your stupid comments.

Why didn't you say formats instead of icons? Last time I checked icons have nothing to do with the format of a file. So really the problem is your lack of computer terminology knowledge.

  • 0
Why didn't you say formats instead of icons? Last time I checked icons have nothing to do with the format of a file. So really the problem is your lack of computer terminology knowledge.

The icons come in the dmg file.Its a mac format.And i said i was talking about file formats in my second and third post,maybe you should learn to read.

  • 0
The icons come in the dmg file.Its a mac format.And i said i was talking about file formats in my second and third post,maybe you should learn to read.

Why don't you learn to write?

Here is your post.

Any else think yes,we will finally get some of those non convertable icons on windows now?

It would have been a lot clearer if you wrote it more like this.

Is anyone else thinking that we will finally get to use some of those icons from (where ever you get them) that come in .dmg formated images?

But lets not turn this into an English lesson and get this topic locked by the Mods.

  • 0

Why doesn't PearGUI work for me? When I click "Run PearPC" the dos box appears, flashes "usage: ppc configfie" and then quits.

PearGUI.exe is in the same folder as my PearPC installation, and it is pointing to the correct IMG and ISO files. Is PearGUI expecting my config file to be a certain name? Either that, or it's not passing its own files correctly to the command interpreter.

And another thing...how does it enable right-click functionality in pearPC?

  • 0
Why don't you learn to write?

Here is your post.

It would have been a lot clearer if you wrote it more like this.

Is anyone else thinking that we will finally get to use some of those icons from (where ever you get them) that come in .dmg formated images?

But lets not turn this into an English lesson and get this topic locked by the Mods.

You should have picked up what i said on my second and third post.Nonetheless you should have asked what i meant before you tryed to show off on this board.Your the only one turning this into a english lesson.

  • 0
You should have picked up what i said on my second and third post.Nonetheless you should have asked what i meant before you tryed to show off on this board.Your the only one turning this into a english lesson.

If you want me to, I can pick at your other posts. But instead how about I say I should have asked you to clarify what you meant. And you admit that your post was clear as mud.

  • 0

So you go off,when you should have ask me about my post and then because you didnt understand the post in the first place im the jerk.That tells me thiers no need to talk any longer.You just want to fight about this.Im sorry if my post wasent clear enuff for you.Next time ask,dont flame.

Edited by I need Zoloft
  • 0
Why doesn't PearGUI work for me? When I click "Run PearPC" the dos box appears, flashes "usage: ppc configfie" and then quits.

PearGUI.exe is in the same folder as my PearPC installation, and it is pointing to the correct IMG and ISO files. Is PearGUI expecting my config file to be a certain name? Either that, or it's not passing its own files correctly to the command interpreter.

And another thing...how does it enable right-click functionality in pearPC?

Make sure that you save the config file. Also, make sure that you don't have a setting checked that isn't supported by your version of PPC (Right click option isn't enabled on the current standard versions, so don't check that) and things like that. PearGUI is my favorite front end right now. Simple and effective!

  • 0

Guys, lets please try to stay on topic here. This is a PearPC thread; not a lets talk about converting icons thread or lets talk about other virtual machine applications thread!

Keep the questions on topic, and this 100+ page thread will contain useful information; wander off, and it will be ignored and disreguarded.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qmmp 2.3.3 by Razvan Serea Qmmp (Qt-based MultiMedia Player) is a free, open-source audio player that delivers a classic music listening experience with a modern foundation. Inspired by the legendary Winamp, Qmmp features a familiar, customizable interface that supports both Winamp and XMMS skins, making it instantly recognizable to long-time users. It handles a wide variety of audio formats including MP3, OGG Vorbis, FLAC, WAV, AAC, and many others, ensuring smooth playback across diverse music libraries. In addition to basic playback, Qmmp offers advanced features such as a 10-band equalizer, crossfading, gapless playback, and audio visualization plugins. Users can manage playlists efficiently, create and save multiple lists, and even enable streaming from online sources. Plugin support extends the player’s capabilities, allowing integration of features like lyrics display, ReplayGain, and more. Built with the Qt framework, Qmmp runs smoothly and efficiently, making it ideal even for older systems. 10 great QMMP features you might not know: Global Hotkeys Support – Control playback using customizable system-wide keyboard shortcuts. CUE Sheet Support – Automatically detects and plays tracks from CUE files for full album playback. Last.fm Scrobbling – Integrated support for sending playback data to Last.fm. Audio CD Playback – Play music directly from audio CDs. Command Line Interface – Control Qmmp via command-line options for scripting or automation. System Tray Integration – Minimize to and control playback from the system tray. MPRIS Support – Integration with desktop media player controls via the MPRIS (Media Player Remote Interfacing Specification) interface. Spectrum Analyzer and Oscilloscope – Built-in visualizations for real-time audio feedback. Configurable Notifications – Custom pop-ups for track changes and playback status. Multiple Output Backends – Support for ALSA, PulseAudio, JACK, and more, offering flexible audio routing. Qmmp 2.3.3 changelog: fixed build with PipeWire versions less than 0.3.50; fixed settings dialog layout; fixed default CUE encoding; fixed possible null pointer dereference; fixed tracks order when added using drag and drop (2.3.3 only); fixed uninitialized structure usage; improved sid plugin: added libsidplayfp 3.0 support; added feature to build without residfp engine; fixed memory leak; fixed displaying audio information; updated Japanese translation (2.3.3 only). Download: Qmmp 64-bit | 24.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Qmmp 32-bit | 24.1 MB View: Qmmp Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • BATorrent 3.0.3 is out.
    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with ad blockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Samsung Browser'. It has very little bloat and is a nice-looking web browser with an inbuilt 'Ad blocker'. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. This browser can also install Chrome extensions. I have a system wide Ad blocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the web browser, but over the whole system. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt ad blocker because of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!