• 0

Running Mac OS X on x86 PC!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I also got another weird problem, my mouse "go out" of the pearpc window and out to my desktop :s

So my mouse is "FUBAR" :rolleyes:

So i can't even get the system information box to see how many MHz it "gives" me :(

But i got 750 MHz on my laptop, but the mouse is also "FUBAR" but i some how manged to get the system information box :)

But is there a fix for that mouse bug?

  • 0
i really want to have a go at this but im petrified of screwing up my pc (just spent over a week setting up all the pcs in thehouse and wireless network stuff)

anyone fancy talking me through it on msn?

cheers :)

sure .. I got nothing to do today .. check ur PM ..

  • 0

I haven't followed this thread for a while and wondered if someone could answer a couple of questions on the progress:

Is it still incredibly slow? Does the reported speed related to the speed it is operating at - is it running at the equivalent of 500Mhz speed-wise for you guys that have this in your about box?

Cheers

  • 0
I haven't followed this thread for a while and wondered if someone could answer a couple of questions on the progress:

Is it still incredibly slow? Does the reported speed related to the speed it is operating at - is it running at the equivalent of 500Mhz speed-wise for you guys that have this in your about box?

Cheers

not incredibly slow .. I have an iMac 333 .. it runs kinda like 2x/3x slower than my iMac .. even though it says 559 MHz

  • 0

thanks!

mine runs at 850

mines not that fast, but its finally usable. Now if i could get to the internet........

I still can't get the networkd drivers. I try to boot without the #'s and it won't.

i get a can not locate any tap-win32 device error

Edited by jkabaseball
  • 0
photoshop? what the fu.......isn't photoshop slow on it? my pearpc runs fine but enough for PS?!

EDIT: what redraw rate are you running at?

Photoshop runs fine; it just takes about a minute to fully load. Most of us are using the SDL, so there is no 'redraw' rate. It's as fast as it can go.

  • 0
photoshop? what the fu.......isn't photoshop slow on it? my pearpc runs fine but enough for PS?!

EDIT: what redraw rate are you running at?

Yes, it is quite slow but still useable, much faster than I expected. Actually the whole system runs surprisingly well.

The worse thing about PearPC is that having experienced MacOSX I feel a sudden urge to buy myself a Mac. :happy: Now the question is: where to get money from?...

  • 0

Here's my entire config but I don't think it will be of any use, I guess it's pretty standard:

ppc_start_resolution = 8
redraw_interval_msec = 50
prom_bootmethod = "auto"
prom_env_machargs = ""
memory_size=0x20000000
pci_ide0_master_installed = 1
pci_ide0_master_image = "C:\SMacOS\HD-OS-X-Panther-PREP.img"
pci_ide0_slave_installed = 1
pci_ide0_slave_image = "C:\SMacOS\AppZorz\IsoZ\DMGTOOL.ISO"
pci_ide0_slave_type = "cdrom"
pci_rtl8139_installed = 1
pci_rtl8139_mac = "de:ad:ca:fe:12:34"
pci_usb_installed = 1
nvram_file = "nvram"

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The current Statcoungter desktop numbers has Google Chrome increasing it's market share this past year and currently commanding 75% share. Everybody else is just making up the numbers with even MS Edge losing 3% this past year and has dipped just below 10% share which is staggering considering it's default on every Windows deviced purchased. If these numbers are correct that terrible Edge number is both devastating and embarrassing for MS especially when you add in the terribly low Bing market share. This leads me to ask a couple of questions as the default browser holding just less than 10% market share seems really weird. It used to be that all Chromium browsers were being counted as Google Chrome in some cases.  Is this still happening? Do these high Google Chrome numbers contains some Edge user numbers?
    • Yeah, all web browsers seem to have some junk in them these days. The regular Brave browser has a lot of unnecessary stuff in it, similar to Microsoft Edge, so I don't see any benefits of using Brave over Microsoft Edge if you already have Microsoft Edge fully set up with adblockers and that. The cleanest or best free browser outside of 'Microsoft Edge' I’ve tried so far is 'Opera Air'. It still has some bloat, but nowhere near as much as Brave browser, for example. I also really like the web browser called 'Floorp' that is based on Firefox. I have a system wide Adblocking program for Windows 11 that doesn't just blocks ads in the the web browser, but over the whole thing. I don't really need a web browser with an inbuilt adblocker because of that.
    • I have been using Firefox for years.
    • I'd trust open source stuff on github more then closed source binaries from Microsoft.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      491
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!