Recommended Posts

71 Chevy :cool:

http://home.ptd.net/~mtracy/71chev.jpg

Now on the serious side. I want a Supra. Maybe the 2005 is it ever comes out

http://toyotacelicaonline.com/new/2005supra.jpg

That supra is gorgeous. I know what I'm saving my money for now. :)

I would also like to restore my 1970 Chevelle SS that's sitting with a seized engine at my mother's place.

Everyone choose slow accelerating cars :no:, me wants power!!!!

So my pick is The Koenigsegg CC

  • 655 HP
  • Top speed of 243.5 Mph (392 Kmph)
  • 0 to 60 MPH in 3.5 Seconds, or 0- 100 Kmph 3.5 secs

Movie of Top Speed Reached

http://www.wallpaper.net.au/wallpaper/auto...-%20800x600.jpg

my m5 doesn't accelerate slowly for it's class. :whistle:

Not to nitpick or anything, but there isn't a '99 Toyota Supra. Toyota stopped producing these cars in '98.

wouldnt that make the 'production line in '98 producing '99 cars? just asking.

mine would have to be the Bugatti Veyron (which I would mod the hell out of, exterior and especially interior).

ill photoshop now to see how it would look in black with black 5 star 2 spoked rims.

post-7-1087097576.jpg

i just had to get in on the topic

lets see in order of cars i will own after college

TEXAS BOYS AND THERE TRUCKS DODGE SRT 10

BMW M3

BMW M5

AUDI RS6 TWIN TURBO w/CHIP

PORCHE GT2 (because GT3 is not better then a GT2)

SL600 V12 Twin Turbo Mercedes Benz AMG style

Those would be my realistic choices of everyday driving

but for hella fun

FORDS GT40

AND an ENZO

chickemoney: As far as i know, one of the rarest cars in the market, if no the rarest, is any of the McLaren F1 models, the F1, F1 LM, F1 GTR, etc...

Only 100 of them were built. And that's my dream car, I really need one of those

Yep, and I think the McLaren F1 LM is the rarest though, I believe only 5 were ever built :cry: so the chances of every actually owning a F1 LM is pretty slim indeed...but I still want one :woot: :laugh:

PORCHE GT2 (because GT3 is not better then a GT2)

That is just ignorant..... they are completely different cars for different purposes. GT2 is aimed for pure speed whilst the GT3 is a lightweight NA track car. And if you're looking for a daily driver the Turbo is a much better proposition.

it has a v8 and only produces 290hp!?? that's pitiful!? the m3 has a straight 6 and still produces 333hp...

Lexus is not just about horse power if that's all you care.

Lexus has all the luxury both inside and outside the car. It is the accessories and design that make you impressed.

Also, with a V8 engine and 290 HP, it is very impressive if you compare it to similar class of car. LS430 or LS400 models are very heavy, and it always amazes people that a car with such heavy weight can go that fast. Beat that and then tell me your V6 is so great and so on.

I know all that because I have a 1994 LS400. 10 years old.. V8, but has 250 HP.

I drove BMW once, but once I made a switch to Lexus, I never looked back. I never regret either.

Edited by ThunderRiver
Yep, and I think the McLaren F1 LM is the rarest though, I believe only 5 were ever built :cry: so the chances of every actually owning a F1 LM is pretty slim indeed...but I still want one :woot: :laugh:

Indeed, only 5 were built and they are about $2 million a piece. 0-60 mph in 2.5 seconds, top speed ~210 mph.

mclarenf1lm95_01.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Turbo Pascal was my first real programming experience more than 30 years ago at university. I mostly taught myself from the included examples and help documentation, because the university only taught the basic syntax and philosophy of Pascal, without going deeply into Turbo Pascal’s advanced features. I still remember when I discovered that I could embed assembly language directly into Pascal code, call BIOS functions, manipulate screen memory, use mouse interrupts, and control peripherals from my programs. That opened huge doors for me. Programming back then felt really fun, direct, and close to the machine. What I loved about Pascal was its readability and the almost instant compile time. Turbo Pascal was an amazing environment, but unfortunately Turbo Pascal for Windows 3 did not feel like it fully carried that legacy forward. Later, Delphi got things back on the right track after the messy transition to TP for Windows. Sadly, Delphi suffered from years of uncertainty as it moved from Borland to CodeGear and then to Embarcadero. That instability made many developers lose confidence in it, even though Delphi itself remained a powerful and productive tool. I still work with Delphi from time to time, but I definitely miss the old days of Turbo Pascal.
    • I hope this encodes in to AV1 or AV2 as currently tiktok uses h265 and h264.
    • Qualcomm reportedly in talks to build custom video chips for TikTok parent ByteDance by Karthik Mudaliar Qualcomm is reportedly in advanced discussions to provide custom chip-design services to Chinese tech giant ByteDance, the same company behind TikTok. According to a report from Reuters, Qualcomm could be involved in designing custom silicon tailored for ByteDance's massive data-center workloads. If it goes through, the deal would make ByteDance one of Qualcomm's early anchor customers for its fastly growing custom chip-design division, For years, Qualcomm was the king of making smartphone processors and modems. The company has also been moving into the PC ecosystem and other formats such as on-device AI for Android XR headsets. However, this particular deal is about Qualcomm's custom Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs). For a platform like TikTok, ByteDance needs hardware that can help it ingest, process, and serve billions of short-form videos daily. Generalised hardware is no longer the most cost-effective and efficient route, which is why ByteDance is trying to develop custom Video Processing Units (VPUs). VPUs designed specifically for ByteDance’s algorithmic needs could drastically reduce data-center power consumption and improve encoding speeds at an unprecedented scale. The underlying tech behind these processors is actually from Qualcomm's recent acquisition of AlphaWave Semi, a high-speed connectivity specialist company. By combining AlphaWave’s high-bandwidth IP with Qualcomm’s architectural expertise, the company could begin mass production by the end of 2026, if the talks go through. All this also comes at a time when U.S.-China tech relations have dwindled. Escalating trade frictions between Washington and Beijing have severely impacted the export of high-end AI chips from U.S. firms like Nvidia, AMD, and Lam Research. Yet, the Qualcomm-ByteDance discussions show that U.S. tech companies are still actively seeking growth avenues and are open to doing business with China, where regulators still permit. Reuters notes that the outcome of this deal could be uncertain, and ByteDance might also seek partners other than Qualcomm. via Reuters | Image via DepositPhotos.com
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      117
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Xenon
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!