Recommended Posts

Ford Shelby Musteng 1969 GT 500 (or something like that :D) Im thinking of.. Eleanor.. from "60 seconds"... I just love that car :wub:

Well I like alot of other version of the mustang too..

I'd have to agree. Either that or an Aston-Martin V12 Vanquish....sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet....

Lexus is not just about horse power if that's all you care.

Lexus has all the luxury both inside and outside the car. It is the accessories and design that make you impressed.

Also, with a V8 engine and 290 HP, it is very impressive if you compare it to similar class of car. LS430 or LS400 models are very heavy, and it always amazes people that a car with such heavy weight can go that fast. Beat that and then tell me your V6 is so great and so on.

I know all that because I have a 1994 LS400. 10 years old.. V8, but has 250 HP.

I drove BMW once, but once I made a switch to Lexus, I never looked back. I never regret either.

http://www.bmwusa.com/vehicles/7/745LiSedan

meet the 745Li.

i drove a bmw once, and i never look back. i never regret it either.

Wow, that's the first non-ugly car Chrysler has made! (okay, they have some okay looking cars, but most of them make me want to puke!)

Chrysler ME Four-Twelve is rated to be the most powerful car you can drive legally in the street with only the premium gas(not the racing gas most supercar need).

Here is some spec of this supercar

* horsepower -- 850 hp/850 lb-ft

* Top speed: 248 mph

* 0-60 mph in 2.9 seconds

* 0-100 mph in 6.2 seconds

::::: Power-to-Weight :::::

The power-to-weight ratio of a car is simply the total power output divided by the weight (usually the curb weight -- the weight with no passengers or cargo). The result will be a fraction of a horsepower per pound of car. Here are some famous high-performance cars and their power-to-weight ratios.* How does the ME stack up?

* Chrysler ME Four-Twelve - .295 hp/lb

* McLaren F1 - .251 hp/lb

* Bugatti 16/4 Veyron - .230 hp/lb

* Ferrari Enzo - .219 hp/lb

* 1965 Ford GT40 Mk1 - .213 hp/lb

* Ferrari Koenig 360 Modena - .174 hp/lb

* Lamborghini Countach - .139 hp/lb

* Dodge Viper RT/10 - .131 hp/lb

* Chevrolet Corvette Z06 - .123 hp/lb

* Porsche 911 Turbo - .119 hp/lb

* Ford Mustang Cobra R - .107 hp/lb

* Ferrari Testarossa - .104 hp/lb

More information about this car : Chrysler ME Four-Twelve

Everyone choose slow accelerating cars :no:, me wants power!!!!

So my pick is The Koenigsegg CC

  • 655 HP
  • Top speed of 243.5 Mph (392 Kmph)
  • 0 to 60 MPH in 3.5 Seconds, or 0- 100 Kmph 3.5 secs

Movie of Top Speed Reached

http://www.wallpaper.net.au/wallpaper/auto...-%20800x600.jpg

Then you are calling the F1 a slow acceleration car?

That is just ignorant..... they are completely different cars for different purposes. GT2 is aimed for pure speed whilst the GT3 is a lightweight NA track car. And if you're looking for a daily driver the Turbo is a much better proposition.

It's hard to decide when you're asked to make a choice between the GT2 and GT3. They're both amazing cars. But the reason I chose a GT2 is simply because it gives you torque when you want it while the GT3 makes you wait for it; plus I like the exterior styling of the GT2 :drool: more than the 3 (interior is pretty much the same). Looking at the GT2, you can't tell wether it's evil or elegant. :p Overall the two cars come very close to eachother. Although the GT2 is fastest factory 911 ever and can hit 198MPH, the GT3 isn't that far behind with a top track speed of 190MPH. The acceleration times are not that far off from eachother as well. Where the biggest difference lies is the $$$. I mean value was never the GT2's strong point being nearly doubled the price of a GT3. :wacko:

The GT3 is better for drivers that want a track capable car that is understated, graceful and powerful. The GT2 on the other hand is better suited for drivers who want a car that can be driven on the track, but more often on freeways and such where there can be long stretches of road with the ocassional bend. If I were given the choice one day to drive either the GT2 or the GT3 to work... I'd have to take the bus. :cry:

Chrysler ME Four-Twelve is rated to be the most powerful car you can drive legally in the street with only the premium gas(not the racing gas most supercar need).
[GLOW=orange]Thats good and all, but whats its mileage like?!?! :woot:
Lexus is not just about horse power if that's all you care.

[GLOW=orange] I agree, the Lexus is more of an 'exclusive' car. I've been thinking again, and the possibilities are endless for me, but a few more cares to add to my list would have to be the BAR Honda F1 XD or last years LM Panoz XD or Marcos Ambrose or Glenn Seton's BA Falcon (Marcos Ambrose)

So add them to the previous list of:

  • My dream cars
  • Ford GT40
  • Ford Mustang
  • A rebuilt Austin A50
  • One of the new Mercedes S-Class
  • Audi A8
  • BA or AU Ford Falcon XR8

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The laptop in the bedroom is an Acer with i7-10510U CPU. Acer's website states they will not be upgrading it so I had little choice other than disable secure boot. I know next to nothing on these matters so hopefully it will be fine.
    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!