Recommended Posts

Might I kindly remind you that Apple recently had a series of banners implying that Microsoft will be ripping off Tiger when Longhorn comes out.

<snip!>

Spin it however you want, Apples attitude in these areas is juvenile and cheap at best.  OS X is a nice OS, yes.  Apple hardware is pretty good as well.  But if Microsoft was doing half the crap Apple is pulling right now, there would be a riot over it.

I love your rootie-toot snobbery.. "might I kindly remind you.." Yeah, whatever.

Might I kindly remind you, after you so stupidly used the LaunchBar example, and now imply that MS would never do the same thing; that they are about to do it by killing AppRocket off with WinFS.

You'd better believe they're going to claim WinFS as a breakthrough in the same way Apple claims Spotlight is a breakthrough. So if Spotlight kills LaunchBar and Apple are hypocrites for claiming innovation, how is Microsoft NOT just as bad for their inevitable claims of innovation when they 'kill' AppRocket? AppRocket does exactly the same thing as LaunchBar.

"Spin it however you want".. okay, I think I will! Using your own flawed logic, Microsoft is about to do the same thing you used to defend them, and the same thing for which you termed Apple juvenile and cheap 'at best'.

Thanks for clearing that up! Might I kindly remind you how silly this all is?

Might I kindly remind you that WinFS is what, 2-3 years away? Tiger is 6 -months- away. If/When Microsoft do that, then I'll criticize them the same way, which I've stated about a bazillion goddamn times, if you weren't so blinded by your own idiotic fanboyism to actually attempt to grasp a contrary thought that may perhaps contradict your Apple worship.

"stupidly", eh? So we've gotten down to childish namecalling.

What's stupid is when a braindead zealot can't take two screenshots, put them side by side, and simply say "hey, they look strikingly similar. That's pretty screwed up". Especially when the two programs in question perform the exact same function. Some people can see that that's messed up. Even a few reality-minded Apple fans can see it for what it is. You'd think you could see that, but then again, I'm sure it's probably hard to see much of anything with your head lodged deeply enough in Steve Jobs' ass that your tasting what he ate for lunch.

Might I kindly remind you that WinFS is what, 2-3 years away?  Tiger is 6 -months- away.  If/When Microsoft do that, then I'll criticize them the same way, which I've stated about a bazillion goddamn times, if you weren't so blinded by your own idiotic fanboyism to actually attempt to grasp a contrary thought that may perhaps contradict your Apple worship.

Never mind. Microsoft's not gonna make it anyways! They said that (about WinFS) earlier too.

Spotlight technology at Apple first appeared in iTunes and then Preview.app for Panther. This technology did not get copied from Quicksilver or Launchbar but rather Live query from BeOS. Lest we forget that one of the guys behind the metadata support in Panther's Journaled Filesystem worked at Be Inc.

Enough of this Quicksilver stuff. The developer of Quicksilver is excited about the new search framework.

If I hear someone say Apple ripped off Smoothstripes, I'm going to scream. How could Apple steal Aqua? Come on people.

Spotlight technology at Apple first appeared in iTunes and then Preview.app for Panther. This technology did not get copied from Quicksilver or Launchbar but rather Live query from BeOS. Lest we forget that one of the guys behind the metadata support in Panther's Journaled Filesystem worked at Be Inc.

Enough of this Quicksilver stuff. The developer of Quicksilver is excited about the new search framework.

If I hear someone say Apple ripped off Smoothstripes, I'm going to scream. How could Apple steal Aqua? Come on people.

Very True.

I am not even upset that they took the basic idea from konfab, I always hated that app and it looks like apple has made the idea work a lot better.

Seriously, you all can analyze all you want...oh my gosh, that Ford car has four wheels, they must have copied GM. Ya'll need to calm down, every company borrows an idea now and then. Fanboyism aside, we all need to step away from our computers now and then. There is more to life than Tiger, Longhorn, Apple, Microsoft...so let's all act like civilized, adult human beings.

All that aside, I'll say it again, if I had money, I'd buy a mac...but I'm stuck with my Dell...ahhh well.

After watching the entire presentation I have concluded one thing; OSX is far more advanced then Longhorn, in fact it's years ahead of it. Microsoft has a long way before they can get anything close to Tiger's performance and features.

how?

spotlight ( i dunno about the tech) but seems to apples answer to winfs. and core image is agian apples answer to avalon. yes, tiger is going to ship before longhorn, but its not years ahead.

Okay, that is all well and fine. But you have to admit that Dashboard and Konfabulator look almost exactly alike, no? I am not suggesting that they sue Apple or anything, I just would have appreciated it if Apple maybe bought Konfabulator and made it better or hired Arlo.

Yes, they have. But the semi-transparent black box with the full size icons in the middle of the screen, all in one line with a 5px white border around them changing the transparency of the box within was something new. Lite switch were the original creators and Apple's implementation of this feature was 99 percent the exact same. The general rule when borrowing code or graphics is that for legality it has to be changed at least 30 percent right? cmd+tab was not even 2 percent changed. I am not suggesting Apple sat down and stole their code, but this is pretty clear where they got their idea, same with Konfabulator. I am not suggesting that it is a bad idea or that Apple's implementation is some how worse than the original, but it would have been nice if they would have at least given some credit where credit is due not even mentioning approaching the developers for a license agreement.

So let's follow your logic Superfula. "No, that graphic is not copyright because you just used pictures that someone else made and those pictures have colors in them that God made, so really, your work is just a rip of God. So there ya go, I can copy whatever I want and its fine."

Nice try.

Yes, neither are text-editors. That doesn't mean that I can find a copy of MS Word's source, rename it to Josh's Word and then redistribute it and call it my own.

Okay?

So what does this conclude? No one can ever create anything original anymore because no matter what it has already been done in some shape or form?

Sure they look similar. Konfab and DesktopX look similar too, but you don't see Stardock crying a river 8 miles long. I think Apple DID make it better. For one, I'm sure it will greatly improve upon the ram hog that Konfag is. Perhaps the biggest improvement is that the widgets aren't always showing. You use what you need and their gone.

I'm not talking about how the app switcher looks....I guess you were. I was speaking on the actual implementation of it. In the end, we don't know where Apple got the ideas from. They could have some guy in a hole out in Cali thinking all this stuff up. I do know that some sort of app switcher was one of the biggest requests of Mac users at that time.

You're missing where I was going. I don't understand how the Konfab or Liteswitch guys can be upset at all, since their programs is based ENTIRELY off someone elses ideas. Their ****ed because they stole the idea first. Aka, Bill Gates from Pirates of Silicon Valley.

Watson... Sherlock 2 was just inline with the natural progression of the application. I have no doubt some of the channels in Watson and Sherlock 2 were borrowed from each other, but as far as copying the whole program? No way.

Not sure if this has been posted (haven't read the full thread, sorry)

I wanted to blog briefly to clear up what the widgets actually are written in. They are Web pages, plain and simple (with extra features thrown in for added measure). Apple's own web site says "build your own widgets using the JavaScript language", but that's sort of misleading. The widgets are HTML+CSS+JS. They are not some JS-only thing.

In other words, each widget is just a web page, and so you have the full power of WebKit behind each one... CSS2, DOM2, JS, HTML, XMLHttpRequest, Flash, Quicktime, Java, etc. I'll have a lot more to say later on, but I thought it important to clear that up right up front, since a lot of people were asking me about it in email and such.

:)

steve jobs on konfabulator.

Excuse me, but Mac OS 9 had desktop Widgets long before Konfabulator did. Apple was the first to use the term Widgets as well. We never complained when the Konfabulator guys "ripped off Apple" and I think its a bit unfair for them to be claiming we ripped them off now.

Steve

apparently one of the guys at konfab wrote to steve and he replied. :o

more here: http://www2.konfabulator.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3966

I posted this in another thread but...

I'd hate to be a developer using a new 15" PowerBook... look how far I get into the install!

Yippee!!!

Little clearer

The Panic is at the top line...

Unable to find driver for this platform: "PowerBook5,4"

Whatever driver it is I am uncertain of but... looks like Tiger is just far too buggy from the start for this user!

Sure they look similar. Konfab and DesktopX look similar too, but you don't see Stardock crying a river 8 miles long.

No, it was a mere 2 pages. :laugh:

I'm with you on the rest though. I agree they don't have much room to cry about it, but you can feel for a smaller company who has tried to push a product only to have a bigger one come flush it out (which hasn't even happened yet but is much more of a possibility now).

Even so, I am sure someone at Apple has seen Konfabulator before. Why would they just not hire Arlo or buy out the program instead of spending all the money on developing their own? I wonder if there is some advantage for them by starting from scratch, from a business or creative perspective?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!