Dell readies slimmer blades


Recommended Posts

Dell's new strategy in blades is one equals one and a half.

The Round Rock, Texas-based computer maker will unveil a new blade server system in the fourth quarter that will allow customers to put one and a half blade servers into the same space that a 1U rack-mounted server takes up now, but include the vast majority of features such as redundant power supplies and fast processors that are found on 1U (1.75 inches thick) boxes, said Paul Gottsegen, vice president of worldwide enterprise marketing at Dell.

The new blades are designed largely to better balance the functionality, density and price premium on blades, he said. Blade servers are thin systems that slide into a chassis like books into a bookshelf; the chassis has shared components such as power supplies and external network connections.

Some of the early, extremely dense blades, which allowed PC makers to put hundreds of servers into a space that traditionally could accommodate about 80, did not come with redundant drives and depended on notebook processors.

"Customers have said 'Don't come and talk to me until they have the same functionality as your rack mounted blades,'" he said.

At the other end of the spectrum, beefier blades with dual Xeon processors end up not saving much space. Blade systems also cost around 30 percent to 40 percent more than standard rack-mounted servers, he said.

The new blade system will feature Intel Xeon processors, formerly code-named Nocona that can handle 32-bit and 64-bit software, speedy DDR 2 memory, and capability for redundant drives and power supplies. The redundant components will likely not be incorporated onto the individual blades but in the blade chassis or an independent storage unit.

The blade system will ideally cost about 25 percent less than an equal number of 1U systems when the blade chassis is completely populated. If only half the chassis is full, it will cost about the same as the equivalent number of rack mounted 1Us.

Dell's blade chassis--the large rack that houses the blade servers and the input/output connections--will also be able to accommodate networking blades and other non-server products. Customers likely won't be able to slide blades from Hewlett-Packard or IBM into the rack, he said, but there is substantial interest in the customer base to be able to put third-party blades into a rack. In other words, Dell's rack will be standardized, but only to a certain degree.

Gottsegen would not say whether Dell's blade chassis was based on the design being propounded by IBM and Intel.

CNET News

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/184518-dell-readies-slimmer-blades/
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
    • If you actually used it instead of responding like a petulant child you might be surprised. I switched from Google some time ago and have been very satisfied.
    • I am one of the first people to use the DXVK technology. In the channel below you can see some videos that I have made using this technology, including Assassin's Creed Odyssey. https://www.youtube.com/@nahum7995/videos Assassin's Creed Odyssey experienced several bugs and technical issues during its first months after release. It launched with its own fair share of funny but frustrating glitches. I ran it on DXVK 9 days after its release and I played it for many hours but didn't see a single significant bug on Linux. Assassin's Creed Odyssey is widely celebrated for pushing the franchise in bold new directions and specifically for nailing several elements better than any other title in the AC series: Player Choice & Branching Narrative, The Mercenary & Cultist System, Mythological Integration, Overpowered Combat Abilities, Open World Exploration But what I'm trying to point out is that this game wasn't quite playable on most windows systems, until a few months after its release when most of the bugs were fixed. However, on Linux it ran completely flawless from day one, although DXVK had seen little development and refinement at the time. What do you think the situation will be in 2026 now that most bugs and glitches of DXVK have been completely eliminated? This is information from Google about these situations that I am quoting. In many cases, using DXVK (a translation layer that converts DirectX 9, 10, or 11 into Vulkan) can result in more stable frame times and higher performance than native Windows rendering. This happens primarily by bypassing driver overhead and multithreading draw calls that were previously restricted to a single CPU core. Older APIs (like DirectX 9 and 11) are largely single-threaded on the CPU side. DXVK translates these calls to Vulkan, which is highly multi-threaded. This reduces CPU-bound stuttering on weaker processors. In certain cases, GPU manufacturers (especially AMD) have significantly better and more modern Vulkan drivers than they do for legacy DirectX. Vulkan gives developers—and in this case, the translation layer—closer control over how resources are held in VRAM. This can prevent micro-stutters and sudden frame drops during chaotic gameplay. Yes, certain games, particularly older DirectX 9 to 11 titles, can run with fewer crashes on DXVK than on native Windows. By intercepting DirectX draw calls and translating them into the modern, highly efficient Vulkan API, DXVK bypasses the limitations and poor driver support that cause instability in aging game engines. PlayStation 1, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 can be easily and perfectly emulated on Linux. In fact, modern Linux emulators offer high-performance upscaling, widescreen patches, and automatic controller mapping out of the box.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 PlayStation 1/2/3 games look drastically better on Linux thanks to resolution upscaling. Furthermore, it is also a fact that you cannot play many fun games on Windows either, isn't it? - The Nintendo Switch has an extensive library of exclusive games. - PlayStation has an extensive library of exclusive games - Android has "mobile-exclusive" games, meaning they are exclusive to mobile devices (iOS and Android) and aren't available on PC or consoles. And finally, it is also the case that in the next five years there will be games that millions of people will say you absolutely must play and that they want to play this specific game that released a few days ago. However, the other side of this story is that currently, absolutely no one cares that they cannot play these upcoming games right now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!