Recommended Posts

I've had excellent luck with Win 98 SE, especially with legacy games.

Windows XP is great for newer games. Just that Simple. Try the dual boot yourself and see how it works for you. That is best, usually. (Y)

Best of luck!

Exactly what I would've suggested only install XP using fat32 instead of NTFS. Lose alot in security, but gain quite a bit in speed.

All those claiming Windows 2000 is more stable \ faster really don't know what you're talking about...

First off, Out of the box installation, YES, W2k is a lot faster... simply because it is a classic window OS; however, if you were to tweak XP, within minutes, your OS will run just as fast.

Second, WXP is based off W2k...I wonder what that means?? It means WXP is essentially W2k, but better and more robust; therefore, XP is theoretically more stable or just as stable. W2k may have 4 service packs, but XP came out after Service pack 2 or 3 of W2k. Since WXP is based off W2k, it stands to reason that their internal architecure is very similar and benefit from the same fixes. Add on the fact that WXP has had a SP and W2k now has SP 4, I'd say they are more even than you think.

Third, W2k is not more secure. Since they are based off the same technology \ kernel, they share the same faults. Hence the reason why all the blaster viruses affect 2k and XP.

Fourth, Part of your slow-down is the fact you have multiple partitions. I have posted this before... multiple partitions actually promote slower seek times as the data is further and further into the platter, which means the HDD must spin-up more while the heads must find the data.

The point is that you think 2K is faster \ sleeker because the Out of Box experience is faster than XP's Out of Box. Yes, that is true, but given some tweakage... they are both the same. I have personally tweaked the hell out of both OS's and I constantly return to Windows XP. It just seems a tad bit more responsive, but it's not that big if a difference.

Edited by HeartsOfWar
Windows 98 is CRAP for gaming. Nvidia and ATi no longer produce drivers for it, what good is an OS for gaming without up-to-date drivers? Also, newer games require Windows 2000 or XP, look at Thief: Deadly Shadows as a good example. Use 2K Pro or XP, both work great.

I agree with you on only one point - that since the major driver developers are dropping support for Win 9x, that it puts 9x gamers in a bit of a bind.

But 9x is NOT bad for gaming - it is extremely good for most games. Perhaps some won't run on 9x any more, but for many, many games, 9x does a great job. UT2004 runs just as good on 98 SE as it does on 2K or XP, for example.

It is baffling that MS says it extended support for 9x to July 2006 but has gone ahead and dropped WHQL certification for 9x. Isn't that contradictory?

There is really nothing wrong with XP or 2K for gaming, but there is also nothing wrong with Dual Booting to ensure you get the best of both worlds, IMO.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yeah, right! /s They've been saying that for two centuries now. Look up "China's final warning" on Wikipedia.
    • I have not verified if any of the fixes mentioned on the below article actually work. Why Claude Code Eats All Your RAM (And How to Fix It) There are at least four separate things that can eat your RAM, and only one of them is your fault. The Four Culprits 1. Bloated Session Logs (The Silent Killer). For 2-4 and more inluding the suggested fixes, see link https://marceloretana.com/blog...aude-code-eats-all-your-ram
    • One of my PC's is Windows 11 Home Edition... and guess what? it supports Hyper-V Disks and Containers, as well as WSL2... which these desktop tools leverage on an as-needed basis. It does not need to be enabled system-wide; it merely needs to exist. Furthermore, I tried something yesterday with Hermes Desktop and their "installer" actually builds everything from source as part of its installer toolchain! The installer (and updater as it were) both go through a roughly 19-step process to prep the system for the tool to be used -- and connectivity to local/remote models, local/remote agent configs, and other steps are not included as part of this process (those are all user config steps post-install). ALSO, the "bug wasn't confirmed to exist" is the weakest argument against a bug. That's literally every flawed product's knee-jerk reaction! Even politicians, lawmakers, murderers, and other violent criminals start with that defense... "I deny everything I'm accused of." The bug is the (shared) experience. Whether it's truly Claude Code's fault, or user error, or some other software package being the ultimate culprit, is not the point. They are experiencing unpleasant side effects and don't like that.
    • Each generaton has its exciting times and I was fortunate enough to be right there at the beginning of the PC industry.   I don't think any of us at that time realized how large it would become I still remember working on a TRS-80 with a green screen monitor that kept overheating and dying.     Also used some TRS-80 PCs with tape cartridge memory.   They worked but boy were they slow with everything being a very slow sequential read or write.  But heh, they worked though it wasn't long before they were repaced by the HDD. 
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      515
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      208
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      95
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!