[FX] bangbang023: 07-01-30 [Trunk/Win32](O2/GAL)

[Veedems Veteran]

All fine here.  Works just as well as yesterday's build.  What happens w/ a clean profile?

-Bryce

PS: Thanks bangbang for your builds :)

585569299[/snapback]

glad to be of service

yeah i just tried a clean profile and it worked sorry about that, what could that have been

585569330[/snapback]

probably a borked extension

[Veedems Veteran]

3/5

[Veedems Veteran]

3/6

[Veedems Veteran]

3/7

[Veedems Veteran]

3/8

[Veedems Veteran]

3/9

[Veedems Veteran]

3/10

[steamfish81]

:no: ... Had to clean my profile else the 3/10 trunk complains...

Now it randomly crashes every few minutes...

BTW, why does it shows 'Gecko Browser' instead of 'Mozilla Firefox' in the newest release ?

[Spyker]

yeah i get simmilar error, i get this even with a clean load

[Veedems Veteran]

3/10 seems to be problematic on every release

[Spyker]

i love this builds bangbang thanks for keeping them up

[By-Tor]

3/10 seems to be problematic on every release

585597941[/snapback]

Yep, it's been pretty unstable on this end. I've had more than a couple of crashes on this end. How long has the print patch been back in? I just noticed today that it was there.

[epple]

Great work bangbang! (Y)

BTW, is anyone having this bug where you can't open external URLs without the http:// in front of it? Like clicking a URL that's only www.neowin.net in mIRC or whatever program. It gives me an error. But with https://www.neowin.net it works fine...

I've searched some but bugzilla seem to have ignored the bug or I'm just not finding it.. Maybe someone has some more information about it? I'm using 05-03-03 if anyone wonders, might be fixed now, dunno.. :)

[XhaKeR]

Great work bangbang! (Y)

BTW, is anyone having this bug where you can't open external URLs without the http:// in front of it? Like clicking a URL that's only www.neowin.net in mIRC or whatever program. It gives me an error. But with https://www.neowin.net it works fine...

I've searched some but bugzilla seem to have ignored the bug or I'm just not finding it.. Maybe someone has some more information about it? I'm using 05-03-03 if anyone wonders, might be fixed now, dunno.. :)

585598423[/snapback]

happening here too :blink:

I thought i had messed up my mircscript.

any fixes for this? registry?

[iwishing]

It seems that I am not the only one have problems with build 20050310.

Hope it could be fixed in today's build.

[Veedems Veteran]

3/11

[Veedems Veteran]

3/12

due to changes in liscencing and such, all unofficial builds will now have the title "Gecko Browser"

[Pink Floyd Veteran]

is that something mozilla programmers are asking? to change your name for unofficial built..

[Veedems Veteran]

its a change they've made for any builds not using the --enable-official-branding call. I'm stil ltrying to investgate whether or not I can legally use that call.

[Pink Floyd Veteran]

ahh okiedokie

[By-Tor]

its a change they've made for any builds not using the --enable-official-branding call. I'm stil ltrying to investgate whether or not I can legally use that call.

585607404[/snapback]

I guess this all falls in with the Community Edition branding and such. I can understand it from one standpoint, but, how far they're going to take this is anyone's guess. It would be nice if you could use the --enable-official-branding, I just wonder what has to be done to make everything kosher. Either way, your builds have been great. I just hope this whole thing doesn't put you off from building.

[Veedems Veteran]

I guess this all falls in with the Community Edition branding and such.  I can understand it from one standpoint, but, how far they're going to take this is anyone's guess.  It would be nice if you could use the --enable-official-branding, I just wonder what has to be done to make everything kosher.  Either way, your builds have been great.  I just hope this whole thing doesn't put you off from building.

585607898[/snapback]

It does **** me off to a degree. It's not like I've ever claimed it as my own work and from the get go I have stated that my builds are intended to help the organization in finding bugs more quickyly since I use a pretty vanilla codebase.

If IE7 has the few features I want, it may be the final straw, but we'll see. I like hhelping out, but not when more and more I'm made to feel like some sort of threat to their copyright.

[By-Tor]

It does **** me off to a degree. It's not like I've ever claimed it as my own work and from the get go I have stated that my builds are intended to help the organization in finding bugs more quickyly since I use a pretty vanilla codebase.

If IE7 has the few features I want, it may be the final straw, but we'll see. I like hhelping out, but not when more and more I'm made to feel like some sort of threat to their copyright.

585607910[/snapback]

Yeah, that's the thing that gets me, you're doing more of a service than anything and anyone who frequents MozillaZine knows that. So, why should you be denied the right to use the official flag? It's not like you're putting out a hacked version or any super mods. Yet they still make you jump through hoops to get their approval. It gets me a bit p*ssed off too.

I wouldn't get my hopes up on IE7 though. From everything I've read, it still won't come close to Firefox.

[Veedems Veteran]

Yeah, that's the thing that gets me, you're doing more of a service than anything and anyone who frequents MozillaZine knows that.  So, why should you be denied the right to use the official flag?  It's not like you're putting out a hacked version or any super mods.  Yet they still make you jump through hoops to get their approval.  It gets me a bit p*ssed off too.

I wouldn't get my hopes up on IE7 though.  From everything I've read, it still won't come close to Firefox.

585607955[/snapback]

if it has tabbed browsing and a few cicking options like double clicking on the tab closes it, it's something I will seriously consider. I have to use what's best for me. Right now, Fx is best for me.

[Veedems Veteran]

3/13 is up