[FX] bangbang023: 07-01-30 [Trunk/Win32](O2/GAL)


Recommended Posts

All fine here.  Works just as well as yesterday's build.  What happens w/ a clean profile?

-Bryce

PS: Thanks bangbang for your builds :)

585569299[/snapback]

glad to be of service

yeah i just tried a clean profile and it worked sorry about that, what could that have been

585569330[/snapback]

probably a borked extension

Great work bangbang! (Y)

BTW, is anyone having this bug where you can't open external URLs without the http:// in front of it? Like clicking a URL that's only www.neowin.net in mIRC or whatever program. It gives me an error. But with https://www.neowin.net it works fine...

I've searched some but bugzilla seem to have ignored the bug or I'm just not finding it.. Maybe someone has some more information about it? I'm using 05-03-03 if anyone wonders, might be fixed now, dunno.. :)

Great work bangbang! (Y)

BTW, is anyone having this bug where you can't open external URLs without the http:// in front of it? Like clicking a URL that's only www.neowin.net in mIRC or whatever program. It gives me an error. But with https://www.neowin.net it works fine...

I've searched some but bugzilla seem to have ignored the bug or I'm just not finding it.. Maybe someone has some more information about it? I'm using 05-03-03 if anyone wonders, might be fixed now, dunno.. :)

585598423[/snapback]

happening here too :blink:

I thought i had messed up my mircscript.

any fixes for this? registry?

its a change they've made for any builds not using the --enable-official-branding call. I'm stil ltrying to investgate whether or not I can legally use that call.

585607404[/snapback]

I guess this all falls in with the Community Edition branding and such. I can understand it from one standpoint, but, how far they're going to take this is anyone's guess. It would be nice if you could use the --enable-official-branding, I just wonder what has to be done to make everything kosher. Either way, your builds have been great. I just hope this whole thing doesn't put you off from building.

I guess this all falls in with the Community Edition branding and such.  I can understand it from one standpoint, but, how far they're going to take this is anyone's guess.  It would be nice if you could use the --enable-official-branding, I just wonder what has to be done to make everything kosher.  Either way, your builds have been great.  I just hope this whole thing doesn't put you off from building.

585607898[/snapback]

It does **** me off to a degree. It's not like I've ever claimed it as my own work and from the get go I have stated that my builds are intended to help the organization in finding bugs more quickyly since I use a pretty vanilla codebase.

If IE7 has the few features I want, it may be the final straw, but we'll see. I like hhelping out, but not when more and more I'm made to feel like some sort of threat to their copyright.

It does **** me off to a degree. It's not like I've ever claimed it as my own work and from the get go I have stated that my builds are intended to help the organization in finding bugs more quickyly since I use a pretty vanilla codebase.

If IE7 has the few features I want, it may be the final straw, but we'll see. I like hhelping out, but not when more and more I'm made to feel like some sort of threat to their copyright.

585607910[/snapback]

Yeah, that's the thing that gets me, you're doing more of a service than anything and anyone who frequents MozillaZine knows that. So, why should you be denied the right to use the official flag? It's not like you're putting out a hacked version or any super mods. Yet they still make you jump through hoops to get their approval. It gets me a bit p*ssed off too.

I wouldn't get my hopes up on IE7 though. From everything I've read, it still won't come close to Firefox.

Yeah, that's the thing that gets me, you're doing more of a service than anything and anyone who frequents MozillaZine knows that.  So, why should you be denied the right to use the official flag?  It's not like you're putting out a hacked version or any super mods.  Yet they still make you jump through hoops to get their approval.  It gets me a bit p*ssed off too.

I wouldn't get my hopes up on IE7 though.  From everything I've read, it still won't come close to Firefox.

585607955[/snapback]

if it has tabbed browsing and a few cicking options like double clicking on the tab closes it, it's something I will seriously consider. I have to use what's best for me. Right now, Fx is best for me.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, mucking around with settings, maybe shoot some calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!