[Olympics] Paul Hamm wins Men's all around


Recommended Posts

Once South Korea gives back Roy Jone's gold medal that was "stolen" from 88 Hamm should give his back :rolleyes:

Seriously, when DOESN'T South Korea complain about medals they should have won? Yet when they have a controversial decision go their way they're as concrete on "we won fair and square" as anyone in a situation like that should be.

Please... just get over it. Every sport has errors. Doesn't mean Hamm should have to give back his medal. And, as others said, if they would have done EVERYTHING correctly, Hamm would have still won.

Ha, yep, that post was made before I did some research on it. And before NBC replayed it with better commentary. Anyways, it was human error, but still jeoperdized the final standings. Paul Hamm should keep his gold, but I think the Korean should have gotten a gold too. It's horrendous to me that the IOC would ask Hamm to give back the gold. That's just wrong, but there's nothing wrong with sharing the gold: they did this in Sydney. I don't understand why the IOC want Hamm to give back the gold... Just create another one and have them share it.

Just a couple of corrections.

It's horrendous to me that the IOC would ask Hamm to give back the gold.

Actually, it was the president of the FIG (International Federation of Gymnastics, in English) that wrote a letter to Paul Hamm asking him (but not demanding) to give up his medal. The IOC has actually stated that they are not going to interfere with the results and believe the whole argument is dead in the water.

That's just wrong, but there's nothing wrong with sharing the gold: they did this in Sydney.

Sydney did not have duplicate golds in any events. At the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, the judging scandal in pairs figure skating where one judge deliberately and intentionally scored the Canadian skaters Jaime Sal? and David Pelletier lower than Russians Elena Berezhnaya and Anton Sikharulidze (obvious wrongdoing was involved), despite the Canadians having a cleaner performance, caused the IOC to award duplicate gold medals to the Canadians.

Just a couple of corrections.

Actually, it was the president of the FIG (International Federation of Gymnastics, in English) that wrote a letter to Paul Hamm asking him (but not demanding) to give up his medal. The IOC has actually stated that they are not going to interfere with the results and believe the whole argument is dead in the water.

Sydney did not have duplicate golds in any events. At the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, the judging scandal in pairs figure skating where one judge deliberately and intentionally scored the Canadian skaters Jaime Sal? and David Pelletier lower than Russians Elena Berezhnaya and Anton Sikharulidze (obvious wrongdoing was involved), despite the Canadians having a cleaner performance, caused the IOC to award duplicate gold medals to the Canadians.

Oops. My bad. Well, you get the general gist of my statements.

Well, after reading a few posts, i have some comments. First, Hamm fell flat on his face which is abit funny, yet angry that he gotten the gold medal for that. Second, this is why im not going to watch the next olympics because its always something going on with the dopings and scandals and third, the IOC should just make a second copy of the gold medal and give it to Yang because it was human error.

Many koreans ( not speaking on all koreans in general ) think Hamm should give the gold back because Yang started out with a low score to begin with and would've won if the game was set properly.

Still, they should still make another gold medal and give Yang that one. I wonder how they fix the problem at the 2002 Winter games when the russians took the gold and was it canada?, who gotten bronze or silver was it?

Well, after reading a few posts, i have some comments. First, Hamm fell flat on his face which is abit funny, yet angry that he gotten the gold medal for that. Second, this is why im not going to watch the next olympics because its always something going on with the dopings and scandals and third, the IOC should just make a second copy of the gold medal and give it to Yang because it was human error.

Many koreans ( not speaking on all koreans in general ) think Hamm should give the gold back because Yang started out with a low score to begin with and would've won if the game was set properly.

Still, they should still make another gold medal and give Yang that one. I wonder how they fix the problem at the 2002 Winter games when the russians took the gold and was it canada?, who gotten bronze or silver was it?

The Korean would have lost anyway becuse he did 4 holds when only alowed 3

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,130397,00.html

The U.S. Olympic Committee suggested giving Yang an additional gold. But Olympic rules wouldn't allow it. Funny, because Olympic rules allowed a Canadian figure skating team to share an additional gold when they were un-fairly docked points in the last winter Olympics

Well, after reading a few posts, i have some comments. First, Hamm fell flat on his face which is abit funny, yet angry that he gotten the gold medal for that. Second, this is why im not going to watch the next olympics because its always something going on with the dopings and scandals and third, the IOC should just make a second copy of the gold medal and give it to  Yang because it was human error.

Many koreans ( not speaking on all koreans in general ) think Hamm should give the gold back because Yang started out with a low score to begin with and would've won if the game was set properly.

Still, they should still make another gold medal and give Yang that one. I wonder how they fix the problem at the 2002 Winter games when the russians took the gold and was it canada?, who gotten bronze or silver was it?

Oh please.

Do you honestly know how many times South Korea has complained about being unfairly rewarded for their efforts? This isn't the first time. Look it up -- search Google and you will find plenty of times. Also, you guys give Roy Jones Jr. a duplicate of the gold medal that he should have recieved for beating a South Korean (rather obviously) in the 1988 Olympics in Seoul, then we'll talk.

Secondly, you obviously don't pay attention, because someone already brought up the fact that if we were going by "correct" scores and rules that Yang would have been disqualified for his routine for violating the rules. Funny how that works out, no?

Third, the situation in the Winter Olympics is a completely different situation entirely. For one, a judge was bribed. That didn't happen, from what we know, in this all-around. Next, the Russians wouldn't have been disqualified if they were going to the "correct" scores and rules, unlike Yang, who would be disqualified.

This is getting a bit old. We know you're patriotic of your heritage... but sometimes enough is enough. :sleep:

Oh please.

Do you honestly know how many times South Korea has complained about being unfairly rewarded for their efforts? This isn't the first time. Look it up -- search Google and you will find plenty of times. Also, you guys give Roy Jones Jr. a duplicate of the gold medal that he should have recieved for beating a South Korean (rather obviously) in the 1988 Olympics in Seoul, then we'll talk.

Secondly, you obviously don't pay attention, because someone already brought up the fact that if we were going by "correct" scores and rules that Yang would have been disqualified for his routine for violating the rules. Funny how that works out, no?

Third, the situation in the Winter Olympics is a completely different situation entirely. For one, a judge was bribed. That didn't happen, from what we know, in this all-around. Next, the Russians wouldn't have been disqualified if they were going to the "correct" scores and rules, unlike Yang, who would be disqualified.

This is getting a bit old. We know you're patriotic of your heritage... but sometimes enough is enough. :sleep:

There is no such thing as having too much.

So why wasnt this korean guy given a copy of the gold medal like the winter olympics?

There is no such thing as having too much.

So why wasnt this korean guy given a copy of the gold medal like the winter olympics?

Mistakes by a judge are expected as part of sports. Intentional deceit is not. Pretty clear there. You wonder why the other Koreans don't have your back? You think maybe because they can see this for what it really is and disagree with you? Or do you think that all people of the same race should automatically support each other?

Digitaholic, please let it go. By your reasoning, Yang should have won because the judges messed up on his score, and yet you ignore the other side, where they did not give him an even larger deduction for his job on the parallel bars.

If you want Hamm to give him the gold, then I want Yang to give up his Bronze, because he wouldn't have even received it had the judges been correct...he would have been in 4th place.

Mistakes by a judge are expected as part of sports. Intentional deceit is not. Pretty clear there. You wonder why the other Koreans don't have your back? You think maybe because they can see this for what it really is and disagree with you? Or do you think that all people of the same race should automatically support each other?

well, i go to a predominant asian school, most of my friends or all are asian and i live in a predominant rich asian/white community , so yea, asians support each other.

well, i go to a predominant asian school, most of my friends or all are asian and i live in a predominant rich asian/white community , so yea, asians support each other.

That is a racist point of view don't you think? To beleive that a member of one race should support another member based solely on their race and not whether they are right or wrong? I don't support all German-Irish-Puerto Rican-Americans I know just becuase I am one of them...

Dude, it's fine that you support your friends. But stop tainting the facts with the race card -- it's quite possibly the most stupid and overused argument I've ever seen (not talking about your postings, per se, but when people bring out the race card over stupid things).

Your questions on why the Canadian team were rewarded gold medals have already been answered time and time again.

Well, thats how asians are. We support each other in any trouble or situations.

That is not true. You don't know the Koreans that I know and I have to say that they don't support a fellow Asian simply becuase they are Asian. I hope one day you will see just how narrow minded and racist you really are. Quit hanging out at the angryasian site and explore a bit of diversity.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, of course not. The real "victims" are the people who snipe kids in the head, have killed more journalist than all the worlds wars combined, do double tap strikes on medical personnel, claim history started on October 7th, have a $700 million dollar annual Hasbara budget and pay influencers $7k a post to spout exactly this kind of propaganda. How dare you question the most moral army in the world. Victimhood belongs to these genocidal freaks alone. Anyone who denies that is literally Hitler. If you're going to support a terrorist state, the least you could do is come up with better talking points.
    • Gears of War: E-Day brings 12-player co-op, smoother traversal mechanics, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Right as the Xbox Games Showcase came to an end today, The Gears of War developer The Coalition took over to show off its next project: E-Day. This prequel project was announced back in 2024, but now we have a lot more details about its campaign, new gameplay mechanics, and even a release date. The studio says this is the first time it has managed to get the time to build the entire game in a new engine, as it had worked non-stop on new titles for years while porting classic code and assets. With Unreal Engine 5 now powering Gears of War: E-Day, The Coalition says it started completely anew, with all assets, animations, environments, and others being built from scratch. The campaign will take place across three days in the city of Kalona. The story will follow the events through the eyes of Bravo Squad. This is made up of the returning classic duo Marcus and Dom, as well as the new characters Mags Carter and Lucas Reyes. Watch the trailer below to see Marcus in action without his iconic armor and gear, just as the Locust invasion kicks off. The story will draw on classic Gears novels like Aspho Fields as well, with the studio even collaborating with author Karen Traviss. "That continuity is what makes the destruction land," says the studio. "In E-Day, you watch a living city torn apart—homes still lit, meals half-finished—while people abandon their cars and run for cover. Small details—a child’s toy, an uneaten dinner—make the loss real as everyday places collapse under the Locust assault." The movement system is getting a big overhaul here. Players will be able to slide while running, jump across gaps, climb head-height covers, and even crawl on the ground to avoid fire from enemies. As for the returning horde mode, The Coalition teased a new 12-player PvE mode. This will involve three squads of Gears going up against the incoming Locusts in larger city maps than usual. The studio says that it is going to reimagine the classic formula just as co-op games are going through a resurgence. Multiplayer was touched on today too, where Versus is coming back touting four versus four Gears PVP action set across Kalona maps. More details about multiplayer will be revealed later. Open beta weekends are kicking off this August for fans wanting to jump in early too. Gears of War: E-Day is releasing on Xbox Series X|S and PC on October 6 with pre-orders available now. It will also be a part of Xbox Game Pass on day one. Microsoft has confirmed this as an Xbox platform exclusive, as there are no plans to bring it to PlayStation or Switch.
    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!