Video_9 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 (edited) http://www.stolenhonor.com/ http://www.videopa.com/kerry/gaither.asx http://www.videopa.com/kerry/risner.asx http://www.videopa.com/kerry/warner.asx Edited August 28, 2004 by Video_9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neowin_hipster Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Didn't know what this what so i read it. Bush didn't even go. That's all i can say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebigj Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Didn't know what this what so i read it. Bush didn't even go. That's all i can say. BUT WAIT. That doesnt matter, Bush is a hero for sitting around snorting coke, and all Kerry did was go to Vietnam and get 3 purple hearts! You see to conservatives, being some cokehead in the guard is better than actually going to vietnam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timan Veteran Posted August 28, 2004 Veteran Share Posted August 28, 2004 Let me ask this, who did not Fck up in those times? I think its safe to say it was the "normal" thing to do lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Video_9 Posted August 28, 2004 Author Share Posted August 28, 2004 Actually not going to Vietnam is better than going and then coming back and telling lies, saying fellow soldiers committed war crimes, and even saying that he committed war crimes himself. And then after all that using his military service in Vietnam as a big part of his campaign for president, portraying himself as a war hero, when he himself said he committed war crimes, and is a criminal. Helping North Vietnamese keep their spirits up and bringing down our soldier?s spirits. Giving the North Vietnamese more ammunition to use against our soldiers, our vets. Why is a self-proclaimed war criminal running for president, he should be in jail for all those crimes he has said he committed. He did not fight for America in Vietnam he fought for the North Vietnamese; he started fighting for us, and then turned his back and fought against us.. No action is better than a bad action. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thebigj Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Actually not going to Vietnam is better than going and then coming back and telling lies, saying fellow soldiers committed war crimes, and even saying that he committed war crimes himself. And then after all that using his military service in Vietnam as a big part of his campaign for president, portraying himself as a war hero, when he himself said he committed war crimes, and is a criminal. Helping North Vietnamese keep their spirits up and bringing down our soldier’s spirits. Giving the North Vietnamese more ammunition to use against our soldiers, our vets. Why is a self-proclaimed war criminal running for president, he should be in jail for all those crimes he has said he committed. He did not fight for America in Vietnam he fought for the North Vietnamese; he started fighting for us, and then turned his back and fought against us.. No action is better than a bad action. Really? How about you just go and arrest around 10,000 other troops who committed the same acts, quite possibly the ones featured in the swift boat ads? No action is better than a bad action? Look whos talking. *cough*Iraq*cough*. The only reason Kerry uses his war record as a major part of his campaign is because Bush has none. Why should Kerry pay for the same acts so many other soldiers committed, and often times on orders? Jesus i can't believe you go as far as saying Kerry is a communist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fotix Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 If you speak out against the Iraq invasion you are fighting for Saddam or Sadr or boogeyman of the month. Same logic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcom826 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 You can't support the troops and not support the war. They are mutually inclusive, unlike what Moore would lead you to believe. The troops in Iraq have been saying how they feel like they are alone because many oppose what they are doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digipoi Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Kerry is ugly. So Im not going to vote for him. He also cant surf for sH!t. Those are the most logical reasons ever. Bush looks like a monkey, and so do you.~anonymous evolutionist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK1150 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Bush didn't even go. That's all i can say. it's kinda better not to go and keep ur mouth shut about war crimes then to go an get all ur fellow soldiers in trouble and make their toture worse b/c the US admits to performing war crimes. that's what this site is about. good site, watch the videos to know what i'm talking about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Black Hawk Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 You can't support the troops and not support the war. They are mutually inclusive, unlike what Moore would lead you to believe. The troops in Iraq have been saying how they feel like they are alone because many oppose what they are doing. Wrong. The troops are in Iraq because they didn't have a choice. They did not ask to be there, they did not choose to be there. They were ordered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dashel Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 No, unlike Vietnam, todays troops had EVERY choice not to go. We have a voluntary military. If we want to demonize anyone, it SHOULD be the troops of today, not those of 30 years ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Starcom826 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Wrong. The troops are in Iraq because they didn't have a choice. They did not ask to be there, they did not choose to be there. They were ordered. Yes, and they feel like they are alone because theres isnt much support for what they are doing. Basically people are telling them they shouldn't be doing their job, but they are being forced to stay there anyways, while terrorists take pot shots at them. Vietnam was like that too. This "support the troops but oppose the war" thing is just idealist talk which doesn't work in the real world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dashel Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Who feels like that Starcom? None of the people I know who are over there...they are having a blast blowing the **** of stuff and then rebuilding it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PseudoRandomDragon Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Sure it does. It is just that you can't comprehend the idea of being thankful someone is doing what they must, even though their government has the wrong idea. They are putting their life on the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
threetonesun Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Yes, and they feel like they are alone because theres isnt much support for what they are doing. Basically people are telling them they shouldn't be doing their job, but they are being forced to stay there anyways, while terrorists take pot shots at them. Vietnam was like that too. This "support the troops but oppose the war" thing is just idealist talk which doesn't work in the real world. No, it's just the government's fault we can't. I'd support them if they were somewhere else, just not in Iraq. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuturePowerUser Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 What is so ironic is that if The Iraq War had happened during the clinton administration all the same Bush Bashers would make it out to be a great Humanitarian milestone and it would be heralded as the crowning glory of his legacy. But now the mindless mantra of "We Hate George Bush" even negates the common decency that knows that we have truly liberated millions of fellow human beings from a tyrannical madman. The people that we ousted hung children from the lightposts as their regime began to crumble. Are you people so desensitized and selfish that this means nothing. Trying to compare collateral damages of war is not the moral equivalency of premeditated calculated sadistic atrocities that were established as the rule of law. To sit back and let this continue would have been selfish weak and cowardly. To continue to insist the war is wrong just as a dying grasping political ploy to discredit the President is insanity at its worst. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PseudoRandomDragon Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 You assume too much. If Clinton did things like keeping the Patriot act and upgrading it while we are distracted or sending us to a war for little or no reason (like the Iraq war), then I most certainly wouldn't vote for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neowin_hipster Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Let's face it, clinton would have gone about the whole war business smarter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK1150 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Let's face it, clinton would have gone about the whole war business smarter. like bombing Afghanistan, and then leaving with no results? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PseudoRandomDragon Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 You say Bush bombed Afganistan and left with no results? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JK1150 Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 no... clinton did read up: http://www.washtimes.com/national/20040702-122632-4277r.htm Those attacks killed 74 Americans and left hundreds more wounded. In one retaliation, Mr. Clinton bombed sites in Sudan and Afghanistan that later turned out to have little or no value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuturePowerUser Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 http://www.stolenhonor.com/http://www.videopa.com/kerry/gaither.asx http://www.videopa.com/kerry/risner.asx http://www.videopa.com/kerry/warner.asx Anyone that could watch these clips and still vote for J. Kerry is confessing to mental instability. The man himself (Kerry) needs to be Court Martialed and at the very least commited to a mental institution if not incarcerated for the crimes he confessed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PseudoRandomDragon Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 Yes! Linch John Kerry for his service! Slay all democrats and non-belivers. Our truth must be known by all! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuturePowerUser Posted August 28, 2004 Share Posted August 28, 2004 You act as if this is some silly Sitcom that is only here for your amusement. Watch the clips and hear what somebody who has done something substantive and not mock something that is of a far too serious nature. Immaturity is not something to be admired. Please if you cant be real go start a video game blog somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts