Which is the best browser engine ever made?  

2407 members have voted

  1. 1. Which is the best browser engine ever made?

    • IE
      399
    • Opera
      504
    • Gecko (mozilla)
      1446
    • KHTML
      58


Recommended Posts

Windows is the best operating system for home users, hands down, because of application compatibility.

I think you need to start understanding that it depends on what someone expects from an OS and what he/she is going to do with it.

  • 3 weeks later...
It's so compatible is a valid argument.

yes, it is perfectly valid. sites are compatible with msie, not the other way around. it says nothing about how good msie is at all.

Windows is the best operating system for home users, hands down, because of application compatibility.

uh, no, there's more to quality than compatibility. but applications are compatible with windows, not the other way around.

Along the same lines, we can argue that MSIE is good because the overwhelming majority of sites are compatible with it.

no. that's got nothing to do with msie's quality.

  • 2 weeks later...

IE, Firefox, Opera and Sadari are all good to me but if I wanted to pick a favourite, I would choose IE as for me it is the simplest to use, especially with the IE7 Beta 2 Preview though Opera 9 TP 2 comes a close second. I haven't tried the new Firefox 2 Codename "Bon Echo" but will do soon enough.

PSG22

yes, it is perfectly valid. sites are compatible with msie, not the other way around. it says nothing about how good msie is at all.

uh, no, there's more to quality than compatibility. but applications are compatible with windows, not the other way around.

no. that's got nothing to do with msie's quality.

Usefulness is a measure of quality.

Usefulness is a measure of quality.

A Mac is extremely useful with only 1/10th of the application library that Windows has. Compatibility has nothing to do with quality. In this case, it's only a measure of the quality of the individual applications.

Honestly, the same goes for websites. Quality of the browser isn't reliant on compatibility with crap. I'd much rather have a browser that works perfectly well on quality sites and web applications (Writely, Basecamp, Flickr, etc.) I'm sure those devs would be a lot happier if they could just use one iteration of XMLHttpRequest and a standard stylesheet/XHTML combo.

This post asks for the best browser *engine*, so looking at the standards support, I'd have to say Gecko is the best overall, although Opera 9 will pull ahead a bit. I don't have much information for KHTML and WebKit, but from personal experience and some initial testing, I put Gecko and Presto (Opera) quite a bit ahead of them. Trident (Internet Explorer) is dead last among popular browsers, and Internet Explorer 7 isn't much better.

  • 2 weeks later...

Talking browser engine purely, I would go with Opera due to it having the best standards compliance than all of the others. Though I haven't tried the KHTML one (only linux right and my Linux box isn't live yet); Gecko is getting overrated IMO. My girlfriend's PC hates it, but dunno if that's Firefox or the engine's fault.

KHTML, best standards support, fast and until recently, the only browser engine that passed ACID2 (opera's newer nightlies join it).

First there was Safari (WebKit), then Opera (Presto), although iCab and KHTML are close, they don't pass it (they ignore a certain CSS rule that should be applied, makes the window show scroll-bars)

Gecko is getting there, and Trident are slowly moving towards it.

First there was Safari (WebKit), then Opera (Presto), although iCab and KHTML are close, they don't pass it (they ignore a certain CSS rule that should be applied, makes the window show scroll-bars)

Gecko is getting there, and Trident are slowly moving towards it.

Indeed Gecko is getting there..

http://flickr.com/photos/dbaron/126886608/

i really get sick of people bitching about web standards like article posted on frontpage then disspeard strandards are rules that are there to follow if you want they really in theory dont mean a damn hell of alot most popular websites arn't valid but who cares they work ffs!

...

most popular websites arn't valid but who cares they work ffs!

Yes, because they have to work around bugs in browsers interpretations of the standards.

End users don't care about them (hence the number of posts saying standards are stupid), but they all seem to like the fact the pages they go to work in their browser of choice, the only reason that happens is because the people who write the site have to make changes to their code until they work properly (if all browsers were standards based, any page would look the same in any browser).

And if you really hate the standards that much, stay with IE6 or less, as with IE7 MS has gotten serious at supporting the W3C specs (hence why IE7 is alot better than IE6, still lags behind the other browsers though)

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This article does not make sense and it’s very evident, the bug wasn’t confirmed to exist, because the application itself runs on editions of Windows which make it impossible to run Hyper-V VMs on, “Basically, Claude Desktop on Windows spins up a 1.8GB Hyper-V virtual machine if you use Claude Cowork or agent mode even once.”, suggests the bug is caused by something else otherwise it would only happen to users with the capability of running Hyper-V VMs and that’s only if Hyper-V was enabled which is by default not enabled. The true issue is that the author who reported the bug used the incorrect terminology.
    • “To prevent hallucination issues and keep the database clean, the platform uses a multi-agent verification loop to check code quality.” - This absolutely isn’t happening. ”Before the massive rise of LLMs, which tanked its traffic by about 50% over the last couple of years, Stack Overflow was the go-to website for millions of programmers seeking coding solutions.” - It still is trusted, because the community of users, blocked other users from submitting false and misleading answers generated by AI agents that can be convinced something it generated is actually incorrect even if it’s actually correct. The company itself doesn’t know what it wants to be so it keeps trying and failing to introduce AI features to the platform. This effort will also fail, already submitted one successful poison pill, look forward to generating more.
    • Faster? MBP M5 Max, I have 4k video renders running faster than Teams.
    • Completely irrelevant as long as pricing is garbage. With OneDrive I get storage for about $18 / TB for a year. With Proton it's $96. For the record, Google One is around $48, Dropbox $69, iCloud $60. In other words, Proton is the worst value BY FAR. Not to mention with OneDrive I get full desktop and web office suites for 6 people.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sopa flores earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      StaticMatrix earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      lamborghiniv10 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Month Later
      pinnclepd earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      211
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      159
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!