"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

Learned something VERY important

11/16 - Executive producers Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse reveal: It's always possible [shannon] could pop up in someone's backstory. But she is definitely dead. When a character dies on the island, they stay dead. In the same moment that we decided Shannon would die, [we also decided that] Ana-Lucia would be responsible for that death. It would be the first time one castaway was responsible for killing another, and it would give so much inherent conflict and trauma [heading to] the merge. We're walking a very tenuous tightrope with her, but we feel that over the course of the next two episodes the audience will hopefully get a better understanding for that character and what she's been through. [shannon] was shot. Walt's disappearance and, ultimately, Michael's efforts to reunite with him were part of a grander plan. As we move into the middle run of episodes, we're definitely emphasizing the Jack-Kate-Sawyer romantic triangle. The level of sexual tension between those three characters is definitely being ramped up. As the respective leaders of their respective units, Ana-Lucia and Jack have a great deal in common with each other, and that's definitely something we're going to be exploring. But [the fact that] Ana-Lucia inadvertently murdered one of the members of the tribe doesn't exactly [lend itself] to candlelight dinners and walks on the beach. She is a woman; she will have romantic entanglements. But I think the one that will begin to emerge over the season will be the one that you least expect. We're definitely going to be paying attention to [the Charlie and Claire] relationship, but it's not going to turn in ways the audience expects. I think that [the] question [as to what the numbers mean] will never, ever be answered. I couldn't possibly imagine [how we would answer that question]. We will see more ramifications of the numbers and more usage of the numbers, but it boggles my mind when people ask me, "What do the numbers mean?" You'll learn more about [why Ethan abducted Claire] this season. [We still plan on revealing why the plane crashed this season.] In the next string of episodes, one of the really compelling backstory elements is what happened to Jack's marriage. We think Julie Bowen is amazing and she and Matthew Fox are so great in scenes together, and I think the audience is really curious as to what went wrong there. And you should pay attention to Mr. Eko's stick. That stick is an important ongoing clue. [We will learn more about the monster this season.

586818230[/snapback]

Every interesting stuff.

So we still need to spoiler tag

Shannon Killed

?

586818070[/snapback]

Just spoiler tag it, it's not THAT much effort  :)

586818112[/snapback]

Well, we had arrived to the conclusion that we are going to spoiler tag stuff from an episode for a week only. After a week, it's fair game.

I say let's follow these simple rules for spoiler tagging:

1) Tag it if what you are discussing happened on the show within the past week (i.e. Shannon's episode last week does not have to be tagged anymore since it has been a week).

2) Explain what you are tagging so that people can make a choice as to whether or not to look at it. In other words, if it is a FUTURE spoiler (i.e. info that is not known or stuff that will be airing in the future) please INDICATE it is in fact a future spoiler outside of the spoiler tag. If it is just discussion about the episode that just aired but less than a week old, please indicate you are just referring to the previous episode outside of the spoiler tag.

The reason I mention #2 above is because the previous post from JediX is a FUTURE spoiler from spoilerfix.com and most people would not want to read that. However, someone may read roll over it to read it since they have no idea what it is about (thinking it might be just discussion from Shannon's epside) and ruin it for themselves. Get it?

So I think if we just follow those simple rules, we should be perfectly fine! Do the mods and users agree?

WOW.. tonights lost was BRILLIANT!

everything about it, was just great. and finally, the first episode of season 2 that did not have a dumb flashback.. because there was none :)

as for the others :o! that was a crazy twist.. i always figured them to be more of a scarier human like, not just regular people... and they can be killed.

amazing episode!

This must be the only show in the world where than can have 2 episodes that end off at the same spot and still have an incredible show.

586819924[/snapback]

i thought of that too. it did stop in the exact same spot as this week.. that makes 2 this season. but it took a totally different route, to end up in the same spot. showing 2 sides of the story. the first time it happened it was involving the same characters.. and recapping 10 min in 1 hour. this time, it was 48 days, in 1 hour :p we'll let this one slip

WOW! That was just awesome (Y) (Y)

I like being able to see more of the "Others." I also liked being able to see the change in Ana-Lucia as the days passed... now after seeing what they went through, I completely understand why she is such as a bitch. I feel sorry for her and Sayid because of what happened.

This show is one of the best :yes:

Yeah I don't think there will be anymore new episodes till January 5th that?s when Alias is starting it's new season at it's new time on Wednesday so they will want to get some new viewers

585099722[/snapback]

Proof? and if so when's the other "new" episode.... i cannot live without Lost

so how come with this group of survivors they took 9 of them, but the other group, also with a spy, only had one attempt??

586819957[/snapback]

Just a guess, but it is a lot harder to attack a group of 40 survivors (with several pretty strong/able men) that are also armed.

The tail section group was a sitting duck. Outside of rocks and big sticks, none of them were armed and really just 2 of them had any sense of how to protect themselves.

Good episode (Y)

There was a lot of cutting-out during this episode on digital cable... I was rather upset I couldn't watch the ep in HD... I was forced to run downstairs and watch the analog-cable television.

Did anyone else experience blackouts during the show? In the heat of the moment I thought to myself 'they must be purposely tampering with the signal to boost purchase-rate at the itunes store... LOL.

so how come with this group of survivors they took 9 of them, but the other group, also with a spy, only had one attempt??

586819957[/snapback]

good point. i am also wondering if there are different classes of these "others" as the ones on the beach had old knives and heavily worn clothing whereas the guys on the boat that took Walt had fairly decent clothing and had guns as well.

Please use spoiler tags!!!!!!!!!!

:rolleyes:

really really good episode. Not to sound like an idiot, but who is mr. Eko again ( I have seen every episode up to now and don't recall him ) ? is it the big african - american guy? ( I find it hard to learn there names so quickly)

586819999[/snapback]

Yes that is him.

really really good episode. Not to sound like an idiot, but who is mr. Eko again ( I have seen every episode up to now and don't recall him ) ? is it the big african - american guy? ( I find it hard to learn there names so quickly)

really really good episode. Not to sound like an idiot, but who is mr. Eko again ( I have seen every episode up to now and don't recall him ) ? is it the big african - american guy? ( I find it hard to learn there names so quickly)

586819999[/snapback]

Yeah, he's the big guy that clubbed Sawyer and Micheal with that stick when they floated back ashore.

just to add did anyone notice he was engraving stuff on the stick, and the directors noted that the stick would show some importance? Maybe if someone has a screen of that...actually i recorded the episode on my computer I'll see if I can find it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!