"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

what do you mean you can't decide? :blink:

its obviously Zeke & not Locke's father....if them looking different isn't obvious enough listen to the voices....

how can people be this confused about this?

Eh, nevermind, it was just a passing thought. Just didn't look like the M.C. Gainey I'm used to though for some odd reason.

My first reaction to Locke supposedly succumbing to Henry's mind games was that he was just acting. Henry had just got done telling Locke that the doors were thin, so obviously Henry would hear Locke's outburst. Henry's attempts at manipulation were pretty transparent; hopefully I'm right and Locke isn't that stupid.

Just thought the song selection was curious.

not really...

It is the same song that Claire asked the potential adoptive parents if they knew, in her flashback last season. She asked them if they knew "Catch A Falling Star" and the woman answered that she did, and Claire said that they should sing it to her baby, because her dad used to sing it to her.

who the hell is Mr. Friendly?

its Zeke...the guy we've seen 3 times at this point (taking Walt, in the Jungle, and now in this hatch)

i guess maybe that's your nickname for him? :blink:

mr friendly is zeke. got this from lostpedia: The executive producers on the show refer to the character as "Mr. Friendly".

i like to call him that because we don't know his name.

i cant believe how some people can be so obtuse. this episode had many answers, yet people are turning them into questions.

YES.. IT IS NOW REVEALED that the others are all part of the dharma initiative. ethan 'dressed' up amongst the survivors and we have proof zeke did also (his fake beard, beanie and clothes) - this REVEALS that the survivors are a dharma experiment, being carefully watched (as Zeke himself said).

also, i think the show made it pretty obvious that the teenage chick was ALEX.

AND IT IS NOW CLEAR what the dharma people (NOT 'others') want from the people they kill or kidnap... its either to join their team or get rid of threats that want to hurt others (see proof here).

so can everyone please ACCEPT what they SEE as fact, because what the show reveals subtly, is supposed to be revealed... why does everyone seem to expect it to be spelled out to them?... OTHERS = DHARMA!

well imo others = dharma is made clear, but we cant ACCEPT all that what we SEE as FACT because there can be many TWIST and TURNS and could possibly DECIEVE us audiences. ok enough bashing

too bad 4815162342 forums are now closed to public, there were really good stuff in there.

My first reaction to Locke supposedly succumbing to Henry's mind games was that he was just acting. Henry had just got done telling Locke that the doors were thin, so obviously Henry would hear Locke's outburst. Henry's attempts at manipulation were pretty transparent; hopefully I'm right and Locke isn't that stupid.

Im agree with that. I think too many people are taking it at face value, that locke has been influenced by henry. What's more likely is that Locke is aware of what henry is trying to do, and is playing along to make him think he has control. Also the book he gave him might have some significance, any ideas on that?

Well I thought Locke had hidden something in there but apparently not...

Locke did realise that Henry was trying to manipulate him, that's why he went outside the room and smashed all the plates. However he seems to also be annoyed that other people think Jack is in control (maybe he's angry at himself for letting it get like that). You'll notice in the preview to next weeks episode that he refers to it as 'my hatch'.

AND IT IS NOW CLEAR what the dharma people (NOT 'others') want from the people they kill or kidnap... its either to join their team or get rid of threats that want to hurt others (see proof here).

who exactly did Claire want to hurt?

considering they were about to kill her, going by your theory she must have wanted to hurt someone....

this episode cleared up a lot of stuff....but its still not quite as cut & dry as you make it out to be...

i cant believe how some people can be so obtuse. this episode had many answers, yet people are turning them into questions.

YES.. IT IS NOW REVEALED that the others are all part of the dharma initiative. ethan 'dressed' up amongst the survivors and we have proof zeke did also (his fake beard, beanie and clothes) - this REVEALS that the survivors are a dharma experiment, being carefully watched (as Zeke himself said).

also, i think the show made it pretty obvious that the teenage chick was ALEX.g

AND IT IS NOW CLEAR what the dharma people (NOT 'others') want from the people they kill or kidnap... its either to join their team or get rid of threats that want to hurt others (see proof here).

so can everyone please ACCEPT what they SEE as fact, because what the show reveals subtly, is supposed to be revealed... why does everyone seem to expect it to be spelled out to them?... OTHERS = DHARMA!

Question, sorry if it has been answered: Who is supposed to be writing that diary?

after watching that episode i feel sorry for ethan. it looked as though he really did care for claire and there was a certain degree of chemistry between them in my opinion. and i dont think that dude is zeke at all.

It is, here's his picture out of costume. Clearly the same game :yes:

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0301370/

Even TV.com says that was "Mr. Friendly" - http://www.tv.com/lost/maternity-leave/epi...44/summary.html

Yeh its clearly mr friendly/MC gainey...I thought that the first time I heard the voice in the episode and now theres been picture proof of lockes dad its not him...hehe...but I think everyone on the island has a family connection there somewhere...and just came to me last night

now sun is pregneant will they take her as well or is that research dead?

Yeh its clearly mr friendly/MC gainey...I thought that the first time I heard the voice in the episode and now theres been picture proof of lockes dad its not him...hehe...but I think everyone on the island has a family connection there somewhere...and just came to me last night

now sun is pregneant will they take her as well or is that research dead?

I suspect that the

research is dead. I personally cannot imagine them coming back to a place that they abanded because a test subject escaped. However, there could be another hatch somewhere that they could do this, we just have seen it yet.

I suspect that the

research is dead. I personally cannot imagine them coming back to a place that they abanded because a test subject escaped. However, there could be another hatch somewhere that they could do this, we just have seen it yet.

My thought exactly, there are 6 other hatches we haven't seen, and this medical one wasn't even mentioned on the trainning video or on the web, maybe there are several of these since is a hospital...

I am still holding out for the whole "its nothing but a great big experiement" theory. No crash, no real flashbacks, all experiementally controlled.

Im with you. That or they were selected by their psychological profile, kidnaped and put them on that island.

Something that is really disturbing and annoying about this series its the all the time references, like the numbers are everywhere, the airline company everywhere (the damn oceanic airlines logo, Im tired of that and about the number 815).

I think this series will last, at least, 5 years more. :x

My thought exactly, there are 6 other hatches we haven't seen, and this medical one wasn't even mentioned on the trainning video or on the web, maybe there are several of these since is a hospital...

yeh you never know the other side of the mountain maybe this atropolis full of dharma facilitys... :wacko:

i don't understand why people think locke's reaction was so strange. before he came to the island, locke was a weak willed man. he took abuse from his boss, got suckered by his birth father and mother and could not get past it enough so that he lost the woman he loves.

when boone dies in season 1, he freaks out to the hatch, wondering what he's done wrong, and that he's "done everything you asked." his main strength comes from his faith in the island.

someone pointed out that he DOES know that jack is calling more shots than he is, mostly because locke is "locked" into pressing the button. jack doesn't care and would stop, but it's his only concession to locke; so, when henry gale gives him a hard time about it (and how ODD that he would go that route unless he knew it was a sore spot), i think it's completely part of locke's character to temporarily lose it.

now, is it enough to start locke spinning? i think it might. he is a volatile man.

ripped

after watching that episode i feel sorry for ethan. it looked as though he really did care for claire and there was a certain degree of chemistry between them in my opinion. and i dont think that dude is zeke at all.

Before I even saw his face, I turned to my wife and said "That's Zeke!" She told me to shut up. (but I was right!)

"Your part of the family now"

Taking that literally, the people they kidnap join the family... like Alexi... she didn't seem to be like someone who had snuck into the base to rescue Claire... and does this mean that the "Good Ones" that were kidnapped from the Tailies have also joined the family?

I guess this kinda clears up any confusion about "the others" and if theres 2 groups of them.

"Your part of the family now"

Taking that literally, the people they kidnap join the family... like Alexi... she didn't seem to be like someone who had snuck into the base to rescue Claire... and does this mean that the "Good Ones" that were kidnapped from the Tailies have also joined the family?

I guess this kinda clears up any confusion about "the others" and if theres 2 groups of them.

Yeah, that must be it. I mean, if Alex was taken when she was born, or she was very little, then she doesn't even know she was taken, so we could expect her to be fully on their side.

But for some reason alex, who was aware of what was going to happen with claire, saved her. Definitely there must be other good people there, otherwise I wouldn't understand alex's action.

Another thing.. wasn't there medicine in the hatch (the first one). Desmond took some when he went away, but I'm sure he left something, right? It was cleary the same thing, judging by the number.

I wonder why this 'sickness' requires periodical shots...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!