"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

Not sure if anyone posted it, but the part where they reversed Sawyer and Bernard's discussion, they said:

Bernard: Well...How do you know?

Sawyer: I've got my sources.

Bernard: Aren't you going to tell him that?

Sawyer: Not my place.

Bernard: Well..You should tell him.

Sawyer: Hell no...Let Sunshine tell him

speaking of bad actors/actress :|

I dont like Berbard and his wife.

They "exchange" this ppl for Shannon?? What the hell?

I still personally think Rose and Bernard are the masterminds of this entire situation :)

You could be onto something here...

-no one would really hurt an aging/elderly couple if they found out they were the "Others"

-we haven't seen any flashbacks (? have we ?)

They can't be (at least Rose isn't) because she's been in Jack's flashback on the plane.

No reason they cant have flashbacks and/or be in other's flashbacks and not have a part in what's going on :) They didnt necessarily have to start ON the island to be part of it. They might have intended to get there just like they knew everyone else would. Also, they both just seem too laid back about it all for my taste. They're more concerned with being a typical married couple and arguing over little mundane things rather than worrying about what's going on around them. It's almost like they know they're all safe in some respect.

No reason they cant have flashbacks and/or be in other's flashbacks and not have a part in what's going on :) They didnt necessarily have to start ON the island to be part of it. They might have intended to get there just like they knew everyone else would. Also, they both just seem too laid back about it all for my taste. They're more concerned with being a typical married couple and arguing over little mundane things rather than worrying about what's going on around them. It's almost like they know they're all safe in some respect.

Well, in the upcoming episode Bernard wants to make a signal and Rose seems to be against it. And it's likely we'll get to see some flashbacks of them.

No reason they cant have flashbacks and/or be in other's flashbacks and not have a part in what's going on :) They didnt necessarily have to start ON the island to be part of it. They might have intended to get there just like they knew everyone else would. Also, they both just seem too laid back about it all for my taste. They're more concerned with being a typical married couple and arguing over little mundane things rather than worrying about what's going on around them. It's almost like they know they're all safe in some respect.

No way, Rose's grief at her "seperation" from her husband in Season 1 was real.

"They know they are safe"

Its called faith :)

Its called faith :)

Amen. Which is why I love those two characters and Locke as well. Although I believe Locke's faith is in the wrong thing, he means well. Hopefully he realizes he needs faith in himself and not the island to survive.

So the numbers must be the crazy guy's (with graham crackers) Connect Four strategy!

Welcome to one of the S01 episodes. It's the one where Hurley wins the lottery using the crazy guy's numbers, he even says so in the episode. Edited by gertin

islostarepeat.com

this was already posted...

why do people still ask every single week...

*patiently waits for next week when someone will ask if there's a new episode....

:o thats another thing that **** me off about this show, they do long breaks. Thats an insult to the audience (their clients, nothing less, nothing more)

Damon has said that if ABC will let them (remember its ABC who makes the schedule...not the people who actually make Lost) they want to start a little later than normal (in Oct.) and show like 7 weeks in a row...then a small break...then 7 episodes in a row..then a break...then 8....(obviously the numbers would change a little if it was another 24 epi. season but you get the point...this would work to stretch it out until May and it wouldn't seem like there were so many breaks...

i know, I was just kididng...it's just funny because people get really bent out of shape when others ask that...I guess I am an antagonizer.

Oh yeah, I understand... I started to get bent out of shape actually about it, but then realized that no one really wants to go through 250+ pages of this thread to see if someone else has posted whether tonight's episode is new or not... I wouldn't :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!