"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

The remaining episodes...

20) "Two for the Road" May 3 2006

21) "?" May 10 2006

22) "Three Minutes" May 17 2006

23) "Finale" May 24, 2006

To add to that:

Two for the Road is an Ana Lucia centric episode. It is rumored that we find a connection between her and another person on the island that will be shocking. I believe that it will be Sayid, but that would be obvious, so maybe the writers have something good up their sleeves for her.

? is a Mr. Eko centric episode. This one will be very interesting and where we find the purpose for the hatch and a startling secret about the island.

Three Minutes will be a very interesting episode because with Locke gone, Jack will have to decide whether or not to push the button based on information from the fake Henry Gale.

Of course the Finale will be great, but unfortunately I cannot find any information about it. From what I've read, the script is being kept very hush-hush. Not very many people know anything about it yet.

So looks like the last set of episodes is going to be awesome. Cannot wait to see how they end the season!

Three Minutes will be a very interesting episode because with Locke gone, Jack will have to decide whether or not to push the button based on information from the fake Henry Gale.

Where is Locke going? :huh:

The last episodes sound really interesting, I cant wait. I think that there will be a Season 3 after Season 2 as well...but Season 3 will be the last Season.

Where is Locke going? :huh:

The last episodes sound really interesting, I cant wait. I think that there will be a Season 3 after Season 2 as well...but Season 3 will be the last Season.

Actually, if I remember correctly the Executives Produces have said that there will be at least 5 seasons.

And Locke and Mr. Eko are going to "?".

I have a feeling that it's going to go on for more than 3 seasons, there's just way too much to cover, they just need to hang on to the cast and not lose any body which seems to be working since the creators just increased their pay a while ago, if one of the main character's leaves then it's like we're missing a part of the show.

Flashbacks are good but I didn't like the recent episode about rose and bernard, it wasn't all that appealing to me and just cleared up their story, the only good thing about the flashback was rose knowing locke was on a wheelchair and michael coming back, that was a great ending.

... which leads to the cliffhanger for season 2 and a four month wait to see what happens in september

I really hope not. But it wouldn't surprise me at all. They have a really sucessful show on their hands, but come on, season 2 has been boring. The hatch thing started in the first 3 episodes, and we really didn't get any useful info on it, besides pushing a damn button every 108 minutes. Now they're gonna use it as the cliffhanger? A whole season to find out what the swan station is for? Besides that, everything stays the same: the monster, the sickness, the others... now we just don't know who the other are, and what they have to do with DHARMA.

It's getting boring IMO.

I thought they said they were going to reveal why the plane crashed on the island.

The hatch thing started in the first 3 episodes, and we really didn't get any useful info on it, besides pushing a damn button every 108 minutes. Now they're gonna use it as the cliffhanger?

Hey, come on!, we already 'know' a lot more than Danielle (Rousseau) in 16 years!! :D. She didnt know about the hatch, about what happend with her daughter! , the 'Henry' crash and a lot of (the) other(s?) stuff or maybe yes :p

And yes, I agree with Gabnoj, that might be an special. They will never lose this train. I bet they will make this series last 5 seasons (more)

Lost started good. Unfortunatley, like all good things in America, money-making forces them to push it on - milk the cow for all she's worth.

It becomes really obvious when they put cliffhangers in, like... every other episode, and take so long to get to the point of the story.

To add to that:

Three Minutes will be a very interesting episode because with Locke gone, Jack will have to decide whether or not to push the button based on information from the fake Henry Gale.

the writers also stated that Three minutes is the duration of an event.... :yes: :shifty:

^^

I beleive that it is a 2 hour special.

the episode is not entitled 'lost'

tv.com lists episodes by the name of the show until the name is known... unless everyones getting on the bandwagon and the simpsons have an episode called the simpsons and the same with Desperate Housewives...

:yes:

Lost started good. Unfortunately, like all good things in America, money-making forces them to push it on - milk the cow for all she's worth.

It becomes really obvious when they put cliffhangers in, like... every other episode, and take so long to get to the point of the story.

Being a good patriot, I can't let yet another Bash America post go without response.

I can see why everyone loves American tv. TV shows produced abroad must be very boring if there are no cliffhangers, dramatic scenes, or plots lasting longer than the attention span of the audience. Yes, it's about the money... I guess no other nation on the earth does things for money. It's just those damn capitalist Americans.

With the formula most whiners on this thread demand, Lost would start on season 1 and end on season 1 with all revealed and the story finished. Wait.... isn't that the way a MOVIE is made?????

This is a TV SERIES. It's designed to entertain people over the course of several years. To do that each week, only little bits of info are shown in order to whet the appetite of the viewer. The magic of Lost is giving us something to talk about during the week waiting for the next episode. I really like Lost and hope it continues in the format that's been so successful.

It must pain the writers and producers to see so much work going into the script, filming, and directing only to see viewers complain about the pace, the script, the actors, etc. Rarely have you seen a network tv series with this much attention to detail with a plot to follow each week.

Hats off to the people of Lost. Continue the way you are and keep us entertained. The ratings are proving your formula works and I along with million of other 'non-whiners' appreciate your efforts.

And keep raking in the bucks.... :0

Being a good patriot, I can't let yet another Bash America post go without response.

I can see why everyone loves American tv. TV shows produced abroad must be very boring if there are no cliffhangers, dramatic scenes, or plots lasting longer than the attention span of the audience. Yes, it's about the money... I guess no other nation on the earth does things for money. It's just those damn capitalist Americans. [...]

The reason people are really ****ed off the most is that in the UK for instance, there is NEVER a break in a series. They never - EVER just stop showing a series mid-season for a week or 2 (or in the case of lost 6 weeks) It just never happens.

Even Lost itself is being shown on Channel 4 in the UK (First Season, 2nd nearly here I think) and It's not had a 1 week break since the start. The UK networks plan ahead and make sure they can run the series without any breaks..

US however.. it seems like they film it as soon as possible and show it as soon as they have anything that could be viewed out. Why not film enough episodes and start the season later into the year so there are no gaps? - Milking the cow for all its worth indeed, even the Producers of the show have said that ABC are dragging it out over several more weeks so they can make the most money on the show. Why not just give the producers more episodes? 24 to small? Want 1 season to span several months? make more episodes per season!

i really hope nobody ruins the series finale for me.. im glad it's being kept very very hush hush, i'd rather it be a suprise, then someone leak anything about it.. even the flashbacks :angry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!