"Lost" TV Show - Currently Season 2 (US aired)


Recommended Posts

After rewatching the special with scenes from the first 10~ episodes from season 2, some things don't seem right to me:

- In episode 3, desmond says that when he arrived in the island, kelvin came to him, saying "hurry! hurry!"... From what we saw in the finale, he was barely conscious and was carried by several people.

- The orientation video says "Do not attempt to use the computer for anything else than entering the code". We don't get to see what happens when you use the computer to communicate with the outside world (as Michael did), and the computer is now destroy. Maybe Kate/Jack/Sawyer will be taken to the same place Walt was and we may see the computer walk used... but that mystery remains unsolved.

- Why did the plane split in 2?

Great article: top 10 moments on LOST this season

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12959716/

#1 is a great point that no one here has brought up. You can throw out half of the theories right there because of it.

I think the French Lady made a deal with Henry to setup the "capture" in exchange for reuniting with her daughter (which I think we all agree is the young gal with the Others).

Why would she shoot him with the arrow then? Pretty risky thing to do....

where would these girls come from?

At the Other's true home (whereever it is)?

Michael is a bit of a bitch with the whole "they took my sooooooooooonnnnnnnnn!", it's getting kind of annoying and he killed two people and betrayed his friends just to get Walt back. He could of just waited or thought it through a bit more.

You probably would done the SAME thing if YOUR kids are kidnapped!

some spoilers..

probably not true..but hey..

SEASON FINALE AFTERMATH ? SEASON THREE OPENER

1. HATCH

All are alive.

Desmond is 99% O.K. (shell-shocked, for lack of a better word), Locke is injured, but ultimately fine, Eko on the other hand is substantially injured (incapacitated), but his injuries are NOT life threatening (badly broken limb etc. likely too be trapped under something). The hatch is completely crippled, structurally squashed. The opening episode of the new series will be focused around trying to get the three out of the Hatch. They realise that they are trapped, by which time Charlie and others have come to investigate, thus ensuing a rescue operation. It is during this rescue operation that we will begin too meet other castaways, i.e. NEW characters.

These characters are in the process of being cast at the moment, but rough story arcs have been created to accommodate TWO NEW MALE and TWO NEW FEMALE characters.

The rescue party will be lead by Charlie, Rose and Bernard. Rose and Bernard will be asserting themselves a lot more in the absence of Jake, Kate, and Sawyer.

2. JIN, SUN AND SAYID

They search for Hurley, Jake, Kate, and Sawyer, with no luck, until Jin and Sun convince a desperate Sayid to return to the beach.

3. JACK, KATE, SAWYER AND HURLEY

This is an issue that is very far from being finalised, but we are incredibly unlikely to see them in the season opener (ex. Hurley). There is also a strong possibility that we will barley, if at all see them till later on in the season, as there is a strong desire to keep as much of the mystery that surrounds the ?others?, as possible.

Hurley will return to the beach at the end of the opener.

FLASHBACKS

The flashback for the season opener has yet to be decided. The hope is for it to be one of the newly introduced castaways but this is dependant on casting. Another possibility is flashbacks for Jack, Kate, and Sawyer, without showing them in real time.

Kelvin and Libby WILL appear in more flashbacks, supposedly in the early part of the season.

Walt WILL get his own flashback this season, but likely to be in the second half of the season.

We have not seen the last of Walt and Michael.

those spoilers are obviously BS as it talks about not seeing Jack, Kate, Sawyer because of keeping the others all secret yet the people who make the show have already stated the next season will be very "others" heavy...

and they've also discussed that they would lay off on the flashbacks a little bit yet these "spoilers" discuss flashbacks like they're still going to be in every episode...

sorry...that's not a spoiler up there...its a "foiler"

ok i am really suprised no one has even thought that the hatch door might not of been their hatch door. its a door with no distinguishing marks, so whos to say its not from another hatch near by or a hatch for where the EMP was being built up.

I thought this, too, and checked: the "quarantine" marking and orientation is identical to the one we saw earlier at the Swan.

Yey, it seems my prediction was right...kinda: https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...#entry587203429

Also Desmond can't be dead, afterall he did say "say you in another life brother", just as he went into the floor.

Nice prediction (Y)

i want to know what that flash was damn it!

Indeed. :yes:

Just realized something: Sonya Walger, the actress who plays Desmond's girlfriend, looks a bit like a mix between Carmen Electra and Linda Hamilton (Sarah Connor from Terminator 2) :shiftyninja:

He definitely said it, I watched it again, and it was clear as day.

I think the birds and polar bears and stuff are victims of the dharma initiative, and may end up helping the LOSTies one way or another.

BTW, looooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong way back:

The thing that killed the pilot: it wasn't the black smoke, right? I mean, that black smoke that Eko saw sure wasn't the stomping jungle thing... or was it?

Whats everyone thoughts on the bird saying Hurleys name?

I think it's another one of those polar bear things the writers included just for the hell of it. It seems like half of this stuff will be unexplained...or explained much later. Gotta love it, though.

The thing that killed the pilot: it wasn't the black smoke, right? I mean, that black smoke that Eko saw sure wasn't the stomping jungle thing... or was it?

The appearances of the "black smoke" or the tree-crushing/chomping, pilot-eating creature, to my knowledge:

1. On the first night as everyone hears it from the beach

2. When the pilot is lifted and they are running in the jungle

3. A few times throughout season 1 like during Boone's "delusion"

4. Season 1 finale (first "appearance" of the cloud)

5. Eko and Charley during the Eko backstory

There seems to be no pattern or interval. :pinch:

I think it's because hurley's name is the least obvious one...

i mean, a bird screaming "SAWYER" is hard to ignore, right?

But, if you have a bird that sounds like it might be screeching.....

BTW, just realized it, if 99% of the people on the Island don't know Sawyer's real name, how the f**** did that black woman know it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!