578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

dont listen to these idiots

opera loads faster, opens sites faster, uses less ram, uses less cpu, has mouse gestures, etc etc etc

its way better than firefox

these trolls love firefox cause its free and open source

584793279[/snapback]

God don't you hate trolls. :rolleyes:

Anyways, I prefer firefox. They are probably equal in most things, yup they sure do open up webpages. But Firefox is free. That's the biggest difference to me.

Perhaps he's talking about the features? I know that's what puts me off it. Too much stuff I don't want and not enough of what I do.

584974783[/snapback]

I do have to agree with this. The first thing I always do when I install Opera is customise the hell outta the interface to better match my personal preferences...which normally means removing about 20 buttons/toolbars/etc

Opera

Just because it works the way I want it.

Firefox loads pages quick, but somehow it doesn't feel comfortable to me, some things aren't that responsive for me, and some extensions cause some problems for me. And I like the resizeable tabs in opera, and F12 popup blocker on the fly, javascript/image disabling.

I'll give Firefox a try sometimes again on my pc, I messed it up playing with extensions and themes last time on mac. But Opera for me until then. But I've been using Opera for a while on pc.

On osx I'm still on Safari, I'd like to use firefox when I get my extensions to work right on it, safari feels slow for me in some areas.

Opera, 100%. I just wish Opera had a plugin as well designed as AdBlock. I've looked into a few ways of doing something similar, but they all involve setting up something to block anything from the ad's servers. I just want to right click and go "Destroy Ad", and have the little tab for Flash ads.

I agree with BBTak though - I've tried it so many times (firefox) but it just doesn't seem as respsonsive. I don't particularily like the way it handels tabs, and even with themes, I can't find a way to make it the way I want. I guess I'm picky. But Opera does what I want it to do, and I'll use it.

If Opera didn't exist? I'd be all over Firefox though. It's a great piece of kit.

Edit - Ouch. As I hit the "post" button, it crashed. Man, what a kick in the nuts. Thanks for nothing Opera! :angry:

Firefox.

Reasons :

- Its free (no ads)

- It starts up faster than Opera

- It uses less memory

A clean install of Firefox lacks alot of features Opera has though, but these can be added by downloading and installing the Firefox extensions.

Here are my list of extensions which would make Firefox work as well as if not better than Opera :

All-In-One Gestures - Adds mouse gestures

Tabbrowser Extension - Tabs

FlashGot - Manage downloads using Flashget

Compact Menu - Duplicates menubar on the toolbar as a menu

CuteMenus - neat icons

Gmail notifier - :yes:

I still can't find a way to have all the tabs automatically reopen if say Firefox crashes though... Opera handles this very well. Anyone knows how?

I prefer Firefox. I keep trying Opera every few versions and I still dislike it a lot. The default GUI is horrible so you have to get rid of all the crap you don't want. At least the newest skin is a lot better than the older one. People also have to remember Opera is at version 7.54 and has been developed a lot longer than Firefox, which is only at version 1. I like the idea of having a minimal browser and adding extensions to fit my needs. Opera has lots of things I don't want or need by default. The bit about Opera being the fastest browser in the world is kind of a mute point with a modern computer and a broadband internet connection. The rendering time difference between IE, Firefox, and Opera is only a fraction of a second. As far as the RAM issue, again it's not a big deal if you have a modern computer. Who maxes out their RAM with a browser? I know I don't. I'm sure Firefox's install file size and RAM usage will decrease as development continues.

Tried both on a number of occasions, always reverted back to ie until opera 7.5 came out, been with opera ever since then and imo its better than firefox, i tried firefox 1.0 but still is behind opera, and when opera 7.6 is released it will just enfore that even more, im using the 7.6 beta and 7.6 is a major improvement over 7.5, so yea opera all the way, and although firefox is still good it just doesnt feel finished and trustworthy yet

I am using Firefox. All the browsers are good, and all the browsers have their disadvantages. IE loads faster than firefox, and I'm still using it, but I'm using firefox because i think it's more secure than IE, (not excluding themes and more). I've used opera, but since it's not free, I don't like that banner. I have talked with some of my friends and told me better to choose 2 from the 3 browsers (since my PC is a bit slow), so now I'm left with Firefox (default browser) and IE. Why I'm still using IE not just firefox? Not every website is compatible with firefox, since IE is still the main free microsoft windows browser (the most popular). That's all from me :)

Any comments, feel free ;)

I started out using FireFox, then switched to Opera and I can't switch back.

I don't find the UI cluttered, the program still loads fast and I turn those extras off which took a good minute.

Has everything I want in it. I thought they did a great job with it. Which is why I paid for it as well.

Depends on your machine. I've heard everything. For some people they load faster, for some they don't.

More than likely (to my experience):

-IE will load itself faster and take up less resources, given that it's pretty frill-less and is loaded upon Windows startup. On the other hand, older versions are ugly and don't block popups (not even sure if the new ones do).

-Firefox has by far the most customizability, you just have to search a bit. On the other hand, it does tend to use a good deal of RAM and processor. Oddly, it still runs faster than my IE.

-Opera is feature-laden (although much of the stuff could be dled via FF extensions) and seems a bit cluttered. It is *slightly* faster than Firefox.

Really, you have to try them all out to see which works best. I choose Firefox.

-Opera is feature-laden (although much of the stuff could be dled via FF extensions) and seems a bit cluttered. It is *slightly* faster than Firefox.

584997559[/snapback]

The cluttered look is been worked out in the 7.6 beta's. I'm the sure that the 7.6 final will have a much more streamlined look straight from installation ;)

I am sorry if I am repeating something as this thread is into 15th pg and I can't go through all those pages.I have only seen the first page.

My choice is OPERA

1.It loads pages faster.

2.It has a lot lot lot more features than any other browsers.

a)Allows you to resume sessions and start from where u left last time.I luv this feature.

b)Excellent e-mail client(called Revolutionary M2)

c)Allows you to zoom in and out of the pages.Zooming in is something dat I just love in those porn sites.And da zoom out feature may come handy to tackle annoying horizontal scrolling in some pages.

d)Has a form filler.Though basic.

e)Magic Wand-The wonderfull password manager.Very very handy tool.

f)The search engine tab.It is better than that of FF's.Using a small freeware tool u can even add your own search engines.

g)Has IRC client.Chat feature.Allows you to recieve RSS feeds.

h)VOICE BROWSING

i)Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

j)Can hide the browsers original identity and pretend as a Mozilla or an IE.

k)Mouse gestures.Yes there r extensions available to enable dat feature in ff but it is there by default and da opera one is beter.

l)Small download size.

+All the common features FF has like pop-up blocker,download manager etc.

I hope I have been able to clear your doubt about which browser is better. :)

Edited by Pallab
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • They aren't going to want to. Most would just go with the 17 Pro and save money. Why would they want to spend $300 for basically the same thing? It's not worth it if there are hardly any changes from year to year.
    • 24H2 rolled out to the Release Preview Channel in early June 2024, so this coming a bit later in the Experimental Channel (formerly Dev) doesn't really say much more than earlier H2 releases that came out in October. I am not sure what the thinking is here by putting it in Experimental, one would think that the 26H2 stamp means features are locked down and it's now bug tested until October? I don't even pretend to understand Microsoft's strategy for Windows Insider Program though
    • Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 with active noise cancellation drop to lowest price ever by Fiza Ali With Prime Day 2026 scheduled to run from Tuesday 23 to Friday 26 June, Amazon has already begun rolling out early access offers ahead of the main event. Particularly, Nothing Ear (a) and CMF Buds Pro 2 wireless earbuds have dropped to their lowest price ever with limited Prime deal offering 33% and 24% discounts, respectively. Nothing Ear (a) are equipped with 11mm dynamic drivers featuring a PM1 + TPU diaphragm. For noise control, the earbuds offer active noise cancellation (ANC) of up to 45dB across frequencies reaching 5,000Hz. The smart ANC algorithm adapts to surrounding noise levels, while a Transparency Mode allows users to remain aware of their environment when needed. Connectivity is handled via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for AAC, SBC, and LDAC audio codecs. Additional features include IP54-rated earbuds for dust and splash resistance, paired with an IPX2-rated charging case. Furthermore, users also benefit from pinch controls, in-ear detection, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, dual-device connectivity, and a low-latency mode designed for gaming and video playback. The Nothing X app unlocks a range of customisation options, including a personalised equaliser, bass enhancement, control remapping, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, dual-device management, a Find My Earbuds feature, and low-latency mode settings. When it comes to the battery, the earbuds house a 46mAh lithium-ion battery, while the charging case contains a 500mAh cell. With ANC disabled, users can expect up to 9.5 hours of playback from the earbuds and up to 42.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, battery life is rated at up to 5.5 hours per charge and up to 24.5 hours combined with the case. Finally, fast charging is also supported that should provide up to 10 hours of playback from a 10-minute charge with ANC turned off. Nothing Ear (a) Wireless Earbuds (Black): $53.20 (Amazon US) - 33% The CMF Buds Pro 2 feature a dual-driver audio system consisting of an 11mm bass driver and a 6mm micro-planar tweeter. The earbuds use PU (polyurethane) and PET (polyethylene terephthalate) titanium-coated diaphragms and are tuned by Nothing to deliver balanced audio performance. They further support active noise cancellation of up to 50dB across a frequency range of up to 5,000Hz, and noise control features include a Smart ANC algorithm, Adaptive ANC, Transparency Mode, and Clear Voice Technology 2.0. For calls, the CMF Buds Pro 2 use a total of six microphones and feature an environmental noise-cancelling algorithm, Clear Voice Technology 3.0, and Wind Noise Reduction 3.0 that should improve voice clarity during conversations. Furthermore, when it comes to the connectivity, it is provided through Bluetooth 5.4. Additional features include an IP55 rating for dust and water resistance, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, in-ear detection, a low-latency mode, and a Find My Earbuds function. Moreover, through the Nothing X app for Android and iOS, users can access custom EQ settings, a bass enhancement algorithm, customisable controls, Find My Earbuds, low-latency mode, dual-device connectivity, an ear tip fit test, and firmware updates. The earbuds contain a 60mAh rechargeable lithium-ion battery, while the charging case houses a 460mAh battery. A full charge of the earbuds and case via USB-C should take approximately 85 minutes, while the earbuds alone should be fully recharged in the case in around 60 minutes. Battery life is rated at up to 11 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 43 hours with the charging case when ANC is turned off. With ANC enabled, playback time is reduced to up to 6.5 hours on the earbuds and up to 26 hours with the charging case. Talk time is rated at up to 6 hours on the earbuds and 25 hours with the case with ANC disabled, or up to 4.8 hours and 18.6 hours, respectively, with ANC enabled. CMF Buds Pro 2 Wireless Earbuds (Dark Grey): $37.05 (Amazon US) - 24% Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The entire world moved to the vastly superior and now universally supported Dolby Atmos technology a very long time ago, mate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      544
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!