578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I've got Opera and FF on my PC. I tried switching to FF for a few days but found myself going back to Opera. Both are very good browsers, it's just that I prefer Opera.

Both have good security.

FF is probably more compatible, but I find very few sites that don't work in Opera.

Opera *seems* faster at rendering and loading, even compared to FF "optimized" builds.

FF seems to rely too much on extensions to provide basic functionality. Stuff like "Paste and Go", mouse gestures and "Reload every" are included in basic Opera.

FF has too many loud-mouthed fanboys who use it because it's cool. Sure, it's an excellent product, but it's hardly a religious movement, is it?

Opera has a better sidebar with more features.

Opera looks better.

Opera's "Insert personal" right-click context menu is a godsend when entering user names/passwords/etc.

Opera is more configurable.

All IMHO, of course.

Install them both, try 'em out. Then decide. Or just use both. Or just stick to IE and ignore the FF-Opera squabbles.

DrZoidberg said it all, for the most part, pretty accurately, except for the part of "seems" faster. There is no doubt in my mind, it IS faster. Been using it for years now. Tried FF one more time a couple weeks ago. First thing I wanted to do was get rid of the default bookmarks FF has listed. Can't do it. Got rid of it. Not very customizable, IMO, right from the word go. Plus, I think it's rediculous to have to have all those extensions you need for browsing. There was a thread on here recently about "how many extensions do you have" and they were acting like it was a contest to have the most. Not what I want. The KEY thing for me is the cpu/system resource usage. Opera is definitely lighter on all my setups.

As an extra side comment, I sure do wish Opera was free, just to see how many FF users would jump ship then.

Personally I prefer to use Opera on whatever platform I'm working at (Windows/Linux/BSD), mainly because it's fast, and stable.

But most importantly, it has one thing that Mozilla Firefox does not have, full MDI browsing. Try using it for a while and compare tabbed browsing versus an MDI interface... I'd say go for Opera if you like that better or Firefox if tabbed is your thing.

How about making up your own mind for once, and not relying on others to tell oyu which is 'cool' or 'better', eh?

I have tried both, and there is very little that Op can do that FF can't with extensions. FF appears to be a little slow for me on XP, but then it does render pages properly, and conforms to html/css specs much more than Op.

99% of the 'FF cant do this' comments are by people who just havent figured how yet (ever heard of www.google.com people?)

Sure, if you'd like to see screwed up pages, and pay for something that, like breathing, should be free, then try Op. IF you want a more secure browser, customizable to the hilt, renders pages properly and quickly, but is a little slow, currently, as it IS a preview release, then give FF a go.

Its your life, your computer.

You make your decisions.

I just installed Opera and I LOVE it!!!

For the past year I've been using Microsoft Internet Explorer and Firefox. I just installed Opera for the first time and it's so much faster and easier to use.

The browser is totally customisable (I mean more customisable than any other browser) and you guy's have no idea what your missing out on. :yes:

Its great ! :D

Check it out for yourselves..

Welcome to the club. Be prepared to be amazed by the lightning speed and lightness of Opera!

A quick tip if you don't know it already: 'z' takes you to previous page and 'x' to next (before you can blink) :yes:

I just installed Opera and I LOVE it!!!

For the past year I've been using Microsoft Internet Explorer and Firefox. I just installed Opera for the first time and it's so much faster and easier to use.

The browser is totally customisable (I mean more customisable than any other browser) and you guy's have no idea what your missing out on.  :yes:

Its great !  :D

Check it out for yourselves..

584810155[/snapback]

I can explain why I use Opera.

The fact that everything is there when you install it. No need to browse through tons of crappy extensions to get things done. The fact that it's a tiny download and has all this power. It's so easy to install for your friends because it has everything you need when installed. With Firefox you have to spend ages setting it up to get the really useful features. My non-geeky friends go "uh, why are you doing all that crap?" when I install Firefox. But when I install Opera it's "wow, cool!" when I show them some neat tricks available right away.

So it's not so much that Opera has unique features, it's the way they are all integrated perfectly, and soooo easy to use.

And let's not forget the email client M2! Gmail modeled its email handling after the way Opera does it! Opera is like a Gmail for your PC, searches through thousands of mails in less than a second. I've tried it myself. Got 50K messages, and I get the search results INSTANTLY.

Funny how people throw around the word bloat when it comes to Opera, when by definition, if you would compare FF to Opera it's the opposite.

Software bloat is a derogatory term used to describe the tendency of newer computer programs to use larger amounts of disk space, more CPU power and/or more RAM memory than older programs. Software exhibiting this tendency is referred to as bloatware or, less commonly, fatware.

I suggest you to try both. I use FF, and have tried Opera, but Opera can't handle some Firewall settings we have in the office.

FF can handle Extensions and Skins that enhance the browser, it's fast and very reliable.

Opera has some built in extensions that makes it cool, can't say anything more, 'cause I can't make it even connect to the internet through the firewall. :(

With Opera 7.6 i got

Opera 7.6x, Windows XP, 2.40-2.59GHz

7.06 seconds, Oct 26, at 15:33:48

ranking: 23 out of 465 testers

http://www.24fun.com/downloadcenter/benchjs/benchjs.html

I don't think Firefox comes even close to those numbers, coz Firefox isn't very good with Javascript... right?

EDIT: Just realized i was watching a movie on the screen as well as running bittorrent, so i ran the test again and got these numbers.

Opera 7.6x, Windows XP, 2.40-2.59GHz

6.63 seconds, Oct 26, at 15:39:05

ranking: 18 out of 466 testers

What do you think guys, i need prefromance comments, i know that opera costs money and ff is free but i need some comments on the prefromance ( ex: mem usage, speed ) ... many thanks in advance :)

584793263[/snapback]

** The X marks which one is better in each category**

FF | Opera |

--------------------------------

..X..|..............| Memory usage

..X..|..............| Load speed

......|......X..... | Browsing speed

......|......X......| Integrated features

......|......X......| user friendly hot-keys

..X..|..............| Popularity

..X..|..............| Customizable

I used Opera for a while, then tested FF for a while and I stayed with FF 'cuse it uses less memory.

The good thing about Opera is that it has a LOT of integrated features. FF has the same... but you need to download and instal plugings to get them (hence why FF is more customizable).

Also, Opera saves lots of stuff to the cache, so they load faster. FF does the same, but Opera handeles them better.

My sugestion is... if you have lots of memory or don't run more than 3 apps at a time... then use Opera. For some reason... after using Opera for about 30 - 40min, it starts EATING UP your memory.... FF only does that if you open LOT of tabs.

** The X marks which one is better in each category**

FF  |  Opera  |

--------------------------------

..X..|..............|  Memory usage

..X..|..............|  Load speed

......|......X..... |  Browsing speed

......|......X......|  Integrated features

......|......X......|  user friendly hot-keys

..X..|..............|  Popularity

..X..|..............|  Customizable

I used Opera for a while, then tested FF for a while and I stayed with FF 'cuse it uses less memory.

The good thing about Opera is that it has a LOT of integrated features. FF has the same... but you need to download and instal plugings to get them (hence why FF is more customizable).

Also, Opera saves lots of stuff to the cache, so they load faster. FF does the same, but Opera handeles them better.

My sugestion is... if you have lots of memory or don't run more than 3 apps at a time... then use Opera. For some reason... after using Opera for about 30 - 40min, it starts EATING UP your memory.... FF only does that if you open  LOT of tabs.

584811569[/snapback]

Load speed is definitely owned by Opera, for me atleast, Opera loads in an instant here, while I hve to wait a littleless than IE for firefox to start. Customizability wise, opera is very very customizable, you can even go to sites that have custom buttons that perform custom made commands, etc. Populairty shouldn't be a category.

Seriously though, do people like..monitor their processes mem usage in the task manager every instant to see how much each browser specifically uses how much amount of memory? :s Whats the point of that when you don't notice a thing when you really just use it? I never feel anything being bogged down using opera, why do people even look how much memory it's taking when it doesn't have any obvious effect.

Seriously though, do people like..monitor their processes mem usage in the task manager every instant to see how much each browser specifically uses how much amount of memory? :s Whats the point of that when you don't notice a thing when you really just use it? I never feel anything being bogged down using opera, why do people even look how much memory it's taking when it doesn't have any obvious effect.

584812207[/snapback]

no obsious effect??

I'd like you to run MSN Messenger, Paint Shop Pro 8, RealOne and Opera (besides the background stuff like the firewall and antivirus) with 512mb... then tell me if you don't feel the lag...

I monitor my mem usage every time a instal a new app. I like to use my memory efficiently. :p

(call me a geek or what ever, but I will allways do it)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!