578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

hay~

I found something rad about Opera, a feature that i didn't even know existed. (Well i kind of did but i didn't know it applied to things like this.)

CLICK ME

Notice how the image (which MSN's site has resized) is all ugly in IE and Firetruck, but it's all pretty in Opera. That's what it looks like with 'smooth zooming of images' enabled in Opera. If i untick that it looks hideous like the others.

Even when i enable 'smart dithering' in IE it still looks ugly. I looked around in about:config in Firetruck but i didn't see anything that was real obvious. Do IE and Firetruck have features like that at all? If not, sucks for them. :/

hay~

I found something rad about Opera, a feature that i didn't even know existed. (Well i kind of did but i didn't know it applied to things like this.)

CLICK ME

Notice how the image (which MSN's site has resized) is all ugly in IE and Firetruck, but it's all pretty in Opera. That's what it looks like with 'smooth zooming of images' enabled in Opera. If i untick that it looks hideous like the others.

Even when i enable 'smart dithering' in IE it still looks ugly. I looked around in about:config in Firetruck but i didn't see anything that was real obvious. Do IE and Firetruck have features like that at all? If not, sucks for them. :/

585115786[/snapback]

Wow, i thought that feature just made images smoother when you zoomed into them, obviously not :p. Always wondered if there was actually any difference. I'll be keeping this on now youve pointed that out, thanks :)

My computer had been clean of Firetruck since i got it, until like 3 days ago. <_<

The items on the bottom are just links. I didn't want to have a full personal bar (because i want more vertical space), so i added buttons to the 'main' tool bar for links and just put like nick names for them. (4c is 4chan, di is dictionary.com, go is Google, wi is Wikipedia, and stuff.) That's what you're talking about, right?

^^ yeah.

I thought I'd bite the bullet and try a more up to date version of Firefox, so went to the official site and grabbed the latest official build.

I went in with a clean mind, my plan was to use it as my browser for a week.

The speed it worked at was disgusting....I couldn't stand it. There I was trying to view the latest strip of CtrlAltDel-Online, and about 3 minutes later I let out a guttural scream of frustration. 2 minutes later I had Firefox uninstalled, was using Opera again, and viewing the new CtrlAltDel-Online strip.

There are a) optimized builds b) tweaks to make Firetruck faster.

But even w/ those Opera > Firesnail w.r.t page rendering speed from my observation. The speed at which Opera shows pages when we go back and forward simply makes you scream "wow!"

w.r.t others like customization, extensibility I find Firetiger > Opera.

^^ yeah.

I thought I'd bite the bullet and try a more up to date version of Firefox, so went to the official site and grabbed the latest official build.

I went in with a clean mind, my plan was to use it as my browser for a week.

The speed it worked at was disgusting....I couldn't stand it. There I was trying to view the latest strip of CtrlAltDel-Online, and about 3 minutes later I let out a guttural scream of frustration. 2 minutes later I had Firefox uninstalled, was using Opera again, and viewing the new CtrlAltDel-Online strip.

585115928[/snapback]

Can this nightly be installed on top of 1.0 final?

585117426[/snapback]

Yes, WFM here. However, there is a bug in the trunk nightly which means you can't install themes. I know its minor but there are a few regressions since the code for firefox 1.0 has been merged with the development trunk. Check http://forums.mozillazine.org/ for the bug status on nightly builds.

It's a personal preference thing. I use Firefox. Opera's big hurdle is it costs money to get rid of the ads. IE has a multitude of problems because of its age. Yes, I realize that it has had updates, but the guts of IE are almost the same as the IE that I had on my old Win95 machine. Plus, I was just reading about the latest IE problem that has to do with ActiveX (again). IE will continue to lose its market share unless Microsoft completely rebuilds it. Firefox is free, fixes problems when they occur and doesn't have ActiveX. Speed wise, they are all comparable. Remember when Netscape was the number 1 browser (at one time it was, I swear to God :yes: ) but they didn't keep it up to date on a regular basis and that's when IE took over. Sound familiar? Opera, although a nice browser, will always be number 3 because of the cost. So, that leaves IE and Firefox. Until Microsoft rebuilds IE, it will continue to lose its market share to Firefox. Like I said, I use Firefox, and no, it's not a fanboy thing. I like my browser to be fast, secure and free. Opera, IE and Firefox are fast, no arguement there. But, Opera isn't free and IE is ancient and allows BHO's, viruses and spyware on your computer on a daily basis. If you want a free, up to date, secure and fast browser, Firefox is the only one of the three that is all that. I prefer IE, but until it is as safe to use as Firefox, I'm not using it.

It's a personal preference thing.? I use Firefox.? Opera's big hurdle is it costs money to get rid of the ads.? IE has a multitude of problems because of its age.? Yes, I realize that it has had updates, but the guts of IE are almost the same as the IE that I had on my old Win95 machine.? Plus, I was just reading about the latest IE problem that has to do with ActiveX (again).? IE will continue to lose its market share unless Microsoft completely rebuilds it.? Firefox is free, fixes problems when they occur and doesn't have ActiveX.? Speed wise, they are all comparable.? Remember when Netscape was the number 1 browser (at one time it was, I swear:yes:od? :yes:? ) but they didn't keep it up to date on a regular basis and that's when IE took over.? Sound familiar?? Opera, although a nice browser, will always be number 3 because of the cost.? So, that leaves IE and Firefox. Until Microsoft rebuilds IE, it will continue to lose its market share to Firefox.? Like I said, and no, it's not a fanboy thing.nboy thing.? I like my browser to be fast, secure and free.? Opera, IE and Firefox are fast, no arguement there.? But, Opera isn't free and IE is ancient and allows BHO's, viruses and spyware on your computer on a daily basis.? If you want a free, up to date, secure and fast browser, Firefox is the only one of the three that is all that.? I prefer IE, but until it is as safe to use as Firefox, I'm not using it.

585117530[/snapback]

Really?

People, Firefox is no longer a PR.? If you are using the Opera could be version 25.54 and it would still suck. would still suck.? Pages don't render correctly, half the time none of the media pSecurity wise, it ranks up there with IE, ****ty!ithBut, let me thank you in advance because you'll be bringing your computer to my shop to fix it when it gets overloaded with viruses, spybots etc.ruses, spybots etc.? So, go ahead, When you run into compatability problems, don't call me, you won't like the answer that I will have for you.I will have for you.

585060305[/snapback]

Doesn't sound quite like it.:whistle:your mind... :whistle:

I have honestly never understood it, you guys. As annoying and crappy as Internet Explorer is, i have never thought to blame it for any spyware that i might get. I mean... if i'm driving a rusty Geo Metro down the highway and i get hit by an SUV and i die, maybe i could have lived if i had an SUV of my own... but that doesn't mean that i died because of my car. Somebody else hit me. That was the reason, that was the party at fault. Definitely my Metro could have been safer, but i'm an idiot if i didn't know that when i bought it and decided to take it onto the highway.

Further, although there are a couple Internet Explorer flaws that you absolutely can't do anything about, a LOT of the stuff people whine about regarding IE can be fixed by just disabling ActiveX and all that other garbage. It's a few clicks in the security preferences. I don't know why that's such a difficult concept for people to grasp, really.

But what's the most important is the fact that you're not just sitting there when you get spyware and stuff in Internet Explorer. It's not like you're signing into Gmail and then all of a sudden WHAM you get hit by a porn dialler out of no-where. You have to actually visit a malicious Web site in order to get stuff like that. I'm not that old, guys... i became an Internet junkie when i was a pre-teen. And i've always had this thing called 'common sense', which magically allows me to determine whether or not sites with 'FREE ACCESS 2 XXX SITES CLICK HERE!!!!!!!' plastered all over them were reputable. My special powers haven't let me down yet. I only wish i could pass them on to some of you.

I have to admit that I do love firefox so I may be a bit biased but I just tried Opera 7.54 and the latest test version and there are definitely some flaws that just don't exist in FF.

The major deal breaker was the problem every now and again with the browser losing it's history. I would be browsing and all of a sudden, I wouldn't be able go back at all. That is a big problem for me as I'm sure it would be for most. I looked into possible solutions and found an older one that did not work.

Opera does seem to load sites slightly faster but an optimized version of FF will out-do Opera. Overall, Firefox is much more stable for me and with the Moox M2 build, I cruise along lightning fast. To top it off, my startup on FF is just about 2 seconds. Opera is closer to 3 and IE6 is about 1.5. Not a huge difference between the three but FF does well.

My vote goes to Firefox

I've been using IE and Opera (among other browsers) for about 7 years and recently, over the last year, I have given FF a fairly good go.

Opera and IE are very good, I don't have much prob with either of them.

Opera works better generally IMHO. The only thing IE does better is that it saves web pages and handles them better IMO, (than Opera). Firefox is a very good browser, but it can't replace Opera and IE for me. It's good that people are really taking to it because we need as much competition as we can get. I'll stick with Opera, and use IE for saving web pages. (I also prefer the way it handles favorites compared to Opera.

i used to think that i have 'history problem' only to realize that i opened the link in a new window....

one of the things i love about Opera 7.6 Preview is the trash can. it saves tabs that i closed complete with it histories. very handy.

i discovered something recently. i edited some photos (jpegs) using photoshop without realizing that i'm working in CMYK mode. when i tested the html using IE and Firefox, all i get was a red x. but it worked just fine in opera. it took me 4 hours to figure out that i'm working in CMYK instead of RGB.

RGB vs CMYK

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!