578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

It's just like Sykil said, it is my opinion whether or not something is bloat. It is how I feel about it. This is personal for everyone. How you think about it may not be how I think about it. That does not mean either of us is wrong.

585237183[/snapback]

Well.. bloat is an adjective that describes a program. You can't just throw out that "that is a bloated program" without backing it up.

software bloat

The result of adding new features to a program

or system to the point where the benefit of the new features

is outweighed by the extra resources consumed (RAM, disk

space or performance) and complexity of use. Software bloat

is an instance of Parkinson's Law: resource requirements

expand to consume the resources available.

source: dictionary.reference.com

You don't have to.  No one is saying you do. 

I sure hope you aren't implying people that are paying for opera are "settling" for it.  I paid because I want to support the Opera team for the awesome work they have done, and because I think Opera gives me the superior browsing experience.. something I can and have backed up with facts.

585237316[/snapback]

Even firefox team does a good job!

And still firefox is free, u dont have any nagging ads... See even linux team do a good job, and still it is open source. I dont need to register, and if i want support, i can have the mozillazine forums

Pallab said:My choice is OPERA

MY choice is Firefox

Pallab said:It loads pages faster.

ACtuall firefox is more faster... Mozilla claims it is the fastest browser. ANd i support them.

Pallab said:It has a lot lot lot more features than any other browsers.

Ok here is the FF features:

* Download manager

* Fast browsing

* Easy web page saving

* Tab browsing

* Not a resource sucker

* Pop up blocker(which is in-built)

* Search tab for search engines

* More Plugins and add-ons are available

* more Extentions

Pallab said:Allows you to resume sessions and start from where u left last time.I luv this feature.

Even maxton has these feature... , this is not new. :p

Pallab said:Excellent e-mail client(called Revolutionary M2)

Mozilla too has Thunderbird. It is only next better to MS outlook.

Pallab said:Allows you to zoom in and out of the pages.Zooming in is something dat I just love in those porn sites.

U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more. Anyways i dont visit forum sites so i dont think it will be of any use.

Pallab said:The search engine tab.It is better than that of FF's.Using a small freeware tool u can even add your own search engines.

Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

Well, the same can be said for Firefox too.

Pallab said:Has IRC client.Chat feature.Allows you to recieve RSS feeds.

u can get sage rss reader from www.extensionsmirror.nl

Pallab said:VOICE BROWSING

Hey will have to fug my time with opera jus to load/reload/back/stop...etc?

besides we will have to train it. This feature will be usefull for disabled ppl, not for everyone.

Pallab said:Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

u talk abt interface?

Definetly firefox's interface is simple and much better than opera's one. And fug, it has a GIF advertisement thing too.

* The status bar is not clusttered.

* no ads.

* The top portion of the browser interface is also not clustred and we can choose between small icons and large icons (but i dont know if this can be done with opera as well).

* Just measure the distance from the menu bar till the browsing part..., this is defenitely less than opera. So u need not scroll more often.

Pallab said:Small download size.

Well firefox is also lite with only 4.69 MB.The download size should not be actually compared, these are not substantial...anyway if one program have small sixe and it competitor one has a large file size, then it does not indicate the former is better.

AND i dont need to pay and register for a browser when a better browser is available for free.

Pallab said:My choice is OPERA

MY choice is Firefox

Pallab said:It loads pages faster.

ACtuall firefox is more faster... Mozilla claims it is the fastest browser. ANd i support them.

Pallab said:It has a lot lot lot more features than any other browsers.

Ok here is the FF features:

* Download manager

* Fast browsing

* Easy web page saving

* Tab browsing

* Not a resource sucker

* Pop up blocker(which is in-built)

* Search tab for search engines

* More Plugins and add-ons are available

* more Extentions

Pallab said:Allows you to resume sessions and start from where u left last time.I luv this feature.

Even maxton has these feature... , this is not new. :p

Pallab said:Excellent e-mail client(called Revolutionary M2)

Mozilla too has Thunderbird. It is only next better to MS outlook.

Pallab said:Allows you to zoom in and out of the pages.Zooming in is something dat I just love in those porn sites.

U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more. Anyways i dont visit forum sites so i dont think it will be of any use.

Pallab said:The search engine tab.It is better than that of FF's.Using a small freeware tool u can even add your own search engines.

Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

Well, the same can be said for Firefox too.

Pallab said:Has IRC client.Chat feature.Allows you to recieve RSS feeds.

u can get  sage rss reader from www.extensionsmirror.nl

Pallab said:VOICE BROWSING

Hey will have to fug my time with opera jus to load/reload/back/stop...etc?

besides we will have to train it. This feature will be usefull for disabled ppl, not for everyone.

Pallab said:Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

u talk abt interface?

Definetly firefox's interface is simple and much better than opera's one. And fug, it has a GIF advertisement thing too.

* The status bar is not clusttered.

* no ads.

* The top portion of the browser interface is also not clustred and we can choose between small icons and large icons (but i dont know if this can be done with opera as well).

* Just measure the distance from the menu bar till the browsing part..., this is defenitely less than opera. So u need not scroll more often.

Pallab said:Small download size.

Well firefox is also lite with only 4.69 MB.The download size should not be actually compared, these are not substantial...anyway if one program have small sixe and it competitor one has a large file size, then it does not indicate the former is better.

AND i dont need to pay and register for a browser when a better browser is available for free.

585237991[/snapback]

Use the "quote" button will ya? :(

ACtuall firefox is more faster... Mozilla claims it is the fastest browser. ANd i support them.
No it's not. I'm not saying Opera is faster, but both claim their browser is the fastest. It is really system dependent.
Ok here is the FF features:

That's great. Opera still has more features. Each extension is not a feature.
U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more. Anyways i dont visit forum sites so i dont think it will be of any use.
'IMO' my ass. It is not opinion. Opera8 has MORE browsing area than Firefox 1.0 by default. Even so, you can customize both to have as much browsing area as you want.
Hey will have to fug my time with opera jus to load/reload/back/stop...etc?

besides we will have to train it. This feature will be usefull for disabled ppl, not for everyone.

Why don't you try doing research before spouting off lies. You do NOT have to train the Opera Voice Recognition.
u talk abt interface?

Definetly firefox's interface is simple and much better than opera's one. And fug, it has a GIF advertisement thing too.

Actually, Opera8's interface is technically "more simple" by default.. and better.. no. Both are skinnable, so that means nothing.

* The status bar is not clusttered.

Both status bars have the same amount of content in them by default: NOTHING.

* The top portion of the browser interface is also not clustred and we can choose between small icons and large icons (but i dont know if this can be done with opera as well).
Yes it can be done and again.. TRY OPERA 8
* Just measure the distance from the menu bar till the browsing part..., this is defenitely less than opera. So u need not scroll more often.
Nope.. it's less with Opera8. And that's without showing the tab/page bar in Firefox.
AND i dont need to pay and register for a browser when a better browser is available for free.

585237991[/snapback]

Free does not always mean better.

I really hate it when people say something like this.

It is obvious he hasn't even bothered to give opera a fair try b4 saying all those.

He probably even didnt read my post.

1.If u give operav8 400mb(or decent size) of caching..it wud load pages much faster than any browser on da wrld.

2.Those r more features?

Opera's d'load manager is much more advanced than opera's.

Already clarified the fast browsing part.

Easy web page saving...FF as a very slight advantage.When saving pages ff places all the relavent files in a new sub-folder..but opera doesnt do dat..it places it in da same folder...this makes things a bit cluttered.But this is a very very minor fact.

Opera isnt a resource sucker in which way u look at it.

For ur kind information..opera also has one inbuilt pop-up blocker..with again a little better interface..as it has a pop-up notification

Opera has much more search tabs.And a better one as usual.

3.maxthon has it..yes..but it isnt like opera..it only retains the urls..not da whole page..so when u come online..it reloads them and clogs ur connection if u had a no.of connections left open.

Listen...dun mention those two e-mai clients.They r nowhere close to "The Bat!" (the best one) or M2.

DO me one favour..take screenshots of both browsers and then measure the viewing area (btw,in case u didn't knw...area=lengthxbreadth)

Opera(registered and v8)has the max viewing area.It has even removed the status bar at the bottom and merged it with the address bar...and the left bar has been made slidable.

The page resizing comes in handy in a lot of places..

Now...u said a lot bout extensions.

But but but..FF is a bigger d'load than opera and still it needs u to go and look for extensions to add on functionality which opera has built in it.

Remember that most extensions r made to give FF some of opera's features.

Still no match for features like copy to note,page resizer,voice browsing,smooth interface,irc client,hide ur browser identity,resume ur sessions and so on.

I recomend u atleast give this browser a fair try,look at my previous post carefully and also the 2 links i provided

http://www.gungfu.de/facts/archives/2004/1...y-i-love-opera/

and surely

http://www.gungfu.de/facts/archives/2004/1...efox-get-opera/

(these were written for v7..now it is even more better)

And you say that opera isnt free...well r u such an honest guy?

That reason stands only if u have never touched any illegal soft,sog,games or used opern source and free alternatives always.

[edit:vcv..i hadnt seen ur post while writing this..cause when i started to write there were no replies..so the nature of the two posts r bit same]

You're comparing somebody's English to someone's credibility? He doesn't live in America, the UK, or Australia. He lives in India, and he doesn't necessarily have to learn English.

In response to whoever said Opera invented the notion of scaling down elements so they fit on a small screen. I could've sworn mobile devices had that years before Opera released Opera for Mobile or the notion of SSR.

I think he was.

Observe, the fan boy at it's core. I oughta set up a fence and charge people to see it.

Pointing Little Girl: "Look mummy, that funny man is making an ass of himself!!!!!"

585241352[/snapback]

hey chode guy it was funny...I could not quote properly and the bbcode(or whtever) dint work or i dint know the format... I am new. Heck spamming here, this not a opera or a Firefox related post.

Errect a fence and charge people wht what U post, err sorry spam here. :angry:

Bang your head at the barbed fence. :devil:

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant sh!# properly!!!!"

Stop resorting to personal attacks. It makes the "immaturity level" of this thread drop even more. :rolleyes:

Time and again, its been said that browser preference is the enduser's opinion. Time and again, people have pointed out that this thread is going around and around in circles. And yet people keep arguing, and resorting to petty bickering over someone's purported inability to use proper English (as if there is such a thing).

Well golly, you all have good points. Now does anyone actually think that they'll "win" this argument? Is it honestly going to improve your life (hey, I won an argument about the best browser on neowin.net, come be my friend)?

I'd say opera, and I'm even a fan of firefox.

But the download manager of firefox is basic crap. It always hangs my browser for a second or two everytime I want to save something, even an image.

I now noticed that opera 8 beta 1 uses less resources, for more pages. Not that this is a big deal, but still another pro for opera.

I used to rely on firefox for all my browsing but no longer, I'm now using opera, and this will probably stay as long as the download manager of FF won't get a make-over. (I don't care about any plugins, I want it to work well the way they let you download it)

hey chode guy it was funny...I could not quote properly and the bbcode(or whtever) dint work or i dint know the format... I am new. Heck spamming here, this not a opera or a Firefox related post.

Errect a fence and charge people wht what U post, err sorry spam here.  :angry:

Bang your head at the barbed fence.  :devil:

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant sh!#  properly!!!!"

585241731[/snapback]

Did anyone understand this post? A translation would be helpful.

ACtuall firefox is more faster... Mozilla claims it is the fastest browser. ANd i support them.

Bill Gates claims that Internet Explorer is the safest browser there is. Your point?

Ok here is the FF features:

Funny how most of these were invented or pioneered by Opera... :)

- Download manager like the one Opera has had for years.

- "Fast browsing"... Uh, yeah... I have a "car with wheels", and I love it! By the way, Opera is small and fast ehough to fit on mobile phones... (The same engine, the UI is different.)

- Saving pages. Opera's saved pages since v1.

- Tabbed browsing. Yes, like Opera introduced to the mainstream browsers...

- Not a resource sucker: Again, Opera is used on mobiles. Firefox isn't. Minimo is work in progress, but still too huge to be of any use.

- Popup blocker built in: Yes, yes. Opera was the first browser to have a popup blocker, AFAIK.

- Search tab for search engines: Yet another Opera invention.

- More Plugins and add-ons are available + more Extentions: Yeah, like just about any other browser. They can all be extended in various ways. Me, I don't like Extension Hell and the security issues that may arise.

Pallab said:Allows you to resume sessions and start from where u left last time.I luv this feature.

Even maxton has these feature... , this is not new. :p

Guess where Maxthon got it from... OPERA!

Pallab said:Excellent e-mail client(called Revolutionary M2)

Mozilla too has Thunderbird. It is only next better to MS outlook.

Opera with browser and mail is smaller than Firefox alone. Also, Thunderbird is now trying to copy Opera's "virtual folders" concept (which Google copies as well) :)

Pallab said:Allows you to zoom in and out of the pages.Zooming in is something dat I just love in those porn sites.

U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more.

Zooming is useful for a number of reasons, for example for accessibility reasons (not everyone has perfect eye sight). But I wouldn't expect someone like you to understand that.

Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.

Well, the same can be said for Firefox too.

Except, you have to restart Firefox to apply a theme... :D

Pallab said:Has IRC client.Chat feature.Allows you to recieve RSS feeds.

u can get? sage rss reader from www.extensionsmirror.nl

Extensions? No thanks. My time is more valuable than that.

Pallab said:[/b]Nice intereface and a lot of skins available.>

u talk abt interface?

Definetly firefox's interface is simple and much better than opera's one.

Firefox's interface is harder to customize for most people, and it is less flexible, unless you want to hack the code yourself. Opera's is more powerful.

Pallab said:[/b]Small download size.>

Well firefox is also lite with only 4.69 MB.The download size should not be actually compared, these are not substantial...anyway if one program have small sixe and it competitor one has a large file size, then it does not indicate the former is better.

Just because it does not favor Firefox doesn't mean that download size is irrelevant. Not everyone is on broadband, you know.

AND i dont need to pay and register for a browser when a better browser is available for free.[/b]>

I can't see any free browsers that are better than Opera. Maybe you prefer Firefox, but price is not a measure of quality.

Opera works smoothly out of the box, without exposing you to Extension Hell. It is a tiny download, and has everything in this small package. Everything is tightly integrated, unlike extensions that go in all directions.

In short, Opera is a smoother, more polished Internet experience.

Edited by worbd
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      512
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!