578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

They could.. they could.. they could...

... but they don't. Opera manages to keep it's footprint down to a minimum so it can use the same rendering engine on different platforms, including phones.

The ability for it to be flexible like this is very important for this. It is NOT easy to implement.

You seem to think that just because you don't use it, it's not all that important, or impressive.

And the maturity of this thread is now at.......13% :sleep:

$20 USD if you're a student. Now that also means it's an unlimited cross-platform license too.

Ahh, but ease of use has everything to do with not only an Operating System but also a web browser. The aesthetics and ergonomic desings of a web browser are important as it will almost surely be used daily. But layout of the browsers is something that was discussed a lot of pages ago :sleep:

I don't think anyone's an idiot (bar one or two earlier posts in this thread). People should use the browser that makes them happy, but not rubbish every other browser on planet earth to try justify their own choice. I swear, some people are not trying to convince other people but only convince themselves.

585232736[/snapback]

1. As if you always act mature.

2. $40 for people who aren't students which is most people in this world. My point stands. "I swear, some people are not trying to convince other people but only convince themselves."

I'll leave it at that.

Battle of the flaming browser lovers in here...

I don't know the internals of Firefox or Opera, but I do know I like Firefox a lot better than IE. I also like the simplistic beauty of Firefox whereas Opera looks like too much is going on. One thing I am sure of is that everyone should stop using IE.

To each his own

Firefox is always the one that displays things the way I want them to.

Probably because you primarily code in Firefox, and only then check in other browsers... :no:

Oh, and also, Opera does not have extensive Javascript support (at least I haven't seen it) that is needed for some pages.

Opera has 100% support for JavaScript. The problem isn't that Opera can't do it. The problem is that sites send Opera outdated code from before Opera had proper DOM support, and that breaks Opera now that it does have it. If they sent Opera whatever they are sending to everyone else, it would work fine.

i did try opera, the interface is just too messy for me.
I also like the simplistic beauty of Firefox whereas Opera looks like too much is going on.

Did you people try Opera 8.0?

Opera is a nagware ass far as i am concerned.

It's adware, not nagware.

I don't see where I would ever use that, but any other browser could easily implement it. Adium does it for chat windows.

Uh, comparing a program's ability to transform pages it generates itself, and a program which does that to any web page is rather silly.

Apple could implement it in Safari. It's all a matter of what they want to do.

They could, but that is not to say that it's easy. Remember, this is about reformatting any page to any screen size!

MSR seems interesting, but it's not that new of an idea. SSR (which they mentioned) has done this for a while (or at least the better SSR browsers). They just took the idea and modified it a bit.

LOL. Opera invented SSR! :D

The SSR arconym came from Opera's name for its new small screen feature.

Opera's ERA (Extensible Rendering Architecture) is a step beyond SSR (Small Screen Rendering) and MSR (Medium Screen Rendering), and basically merges everything into one thing where you can use any size instead of being limited to only certain predefined sizes.

indeed. <yoda> begun the browser wars have. </yoda>

Opera and Mozilla are cooperating on several projects, actually, like an extension to HTML, and a new plug-in architecture... Seems to me that the "wars" are more about bickering between fanboys like myself and lots of others in this thread :laugh:

:yes: Firefox has won me over after using Opera for the better part of a year. Opera has an overly-busy GUI and does not offer the same security features that Firefox does in its present format. While Opera 8.0 has some useful add-ins, what a mess to look at.

Firefox is the clear winner. Simplicy on the face that is driven by finesse

Opera has an overly-busy GUI and does not offer the same security features that Firefox does in its present format.  While Opera 8.0 has some useful add-ins, what a mess to look at.

What "security features"?

How is Opera "a mess to look at"?

You are one of the people giving Firefox a bad name, with your badly formulated and vague attacks against Opera. It is like you haven't really tried Opera, but it's COOL to love Firefox and hate Opera now.

i sad everytime read fighting posts on neowin.

nature is watching us, tsunami is the prove, my country is mourning...

Offtopic...

I am truly sad for your area of the world. Ravaged now by a natural disaster... after years of conflict after conflict, poor economic conditions and instability in government (generally speaking) The reality is almost all of the people on Neowin are not poor and come from coutries where REAL poverty no longer exists. 80% of the people in the food kitchen lines (free meal lines) in New York City have VCRs at home. That's right, not only do the have homes, but the have VCRs.

Your perspective is unique and honest, just foreign to most everyone here. Maybe over time people will begin to have an understanding that the things that seem so important to them are not what is important in life.

i like firefox more probably becuase its free and i peronally like some of the extensions i can get for it.

although i have used opera before 7.somit and it was a good browser its just i prefered to use firefox over anything ive tryed so far.

but just becuase i like firefox doesnt mean that other people have to use it.. they are free to choose what they wish to run on their pcs/macs or whatever they use to browse.

Probably because you primarily code in Firefox, and only then check in other browsers... :no:

585235088[/snapback]

Well, I check in all browsers, and I have to put in hacks for IE and Opera. I admit that I primarily use Firefox, though. However, if I was to put together a web page in terms of code structure and CSS without ever looking at it at a browser, I'm sure it would look more like the intended in Firefox. I am not attacking Opera now, Opera is a fine browser, but there are still problems, like with IE.

P.S. your site doesn't validate as XHTML 1.0.  Might want to check it out ;)

585229584[/snapback]

I know, working on the backend atm, thanks for telling me anyway :)

I didn't say it was better, I said it was more advanced. There is definately a difference.

585229584[/snapback]

Well, true. However I think I value "better" more than "advanced".

It's just like Sykil said, it is my opinion whether or not something is bloat. It is how I feel about it. This is personal for everyone. How you think about it may not be how I think about it. That does not mean either of us is wrong.

You are one of the people giving Firefox a bad name, with your badly formulated and vague attacks against Opera. It is like you haven't really tried Opera, but it's COOL to love Firefox and hate Opera now.

Absolutely not true. I have used Opera for several months, and it is a nice browser. However, I just like Firefox better. I've stated my reasons why I find Firefox better than Opera. I have used both, so I know what I am talking about. Yes, I also have Opera 8 beta on my computer. It still has problems displaying certain websites (like my own).

There are things I like better about Opera, like the Wand (it's nice to have to click just one button and then it loads the form immediately). Firefox has something like the Wand, which is auto-complete. I like the Wand better, though.

Overall, both are good, but I prefer Firefox. Perhaps if Opera improves in the future, I will use it again. Perhaps.

It's just like Sykil said, it is my opinion whether or not something is bloat. It is how I feel about it. This is personal for everyone. How you think about it may not be how I think about it. That does not mean either of us is wrong.

Ok.. but when you have an opinion.. you should at least have SOMETHING to back it up. Anything. Not just how you feel. If you only FEEL that it is bloated and nothing else.. then please understand that your feeling is illogical. We do have illogical feelings, so no one should hold it against you. But at least admit it. If it's more than just a feeling, then why not explain why you think it's bloated? I gave a comparison that shows the real story, fact for fact. You told me you get a 'feeling'.
What do you think guys, i need prefromance comments, i know that opera costs money and ff is free but i need some comments on the prefromance ( ex: mem usage, speed ) ... many thanks in advance :)

584793263[/snapback]

Opera is faster going back/forward in history.

Otherwise, regarding loading speed, I dunno... Firefox seems a bit slower, but I think that's because Opera starts displaying the page faster without all loaded. On the other hand, exactly that setting is tweakable in Firefox so you can set it to 0 millisecs if you want in about:config. I think it's something like .25 secs by default since many feel it's annoying to have page reflows while trying to read a page.

I regard the ad as naging thing which is also GIF supported.

If i get a better browser for free then why should i settle for a nagware or register for it?

585237287[/snapback]

You don't have to. No one is saying you do.

I sure hope you aren't implying people that are paying for opera are "settling" for it. I paid because I want to support the Opera team for the awesome work they have done, and because I think Opera gives me the superior browsing experience.. something I can and have backed up with facts.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!