578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I have used both Opera and FF, (plus IE), for a quite a while and apart from the obvious speed, features, and usability differences favouring Opera, there is one thing FF does better than Opera, it has the weather plug-in.

Also there is one thing IE and FF do better than Opera, and that is handle saved web pages in a more manageable form, that is the .html file linked to the _files folder. Opera saves web-pages more reliably than either other browser, but in just a loose collection of files. I don't know why that is, but it's messier than IE and FF.

In every other way Opera creams FF.

Worbd, saying that extensions aren't worth your time is just ignorant as the FF people saying Opera's interface is bloated. Extensions have huge potential and if used right, they're awesome. I guess you wanted to say it's a big huss to download them, configure & keep them updated with new releases.

As for the english thing, I meant the stupid leet/sms-speek, there's a difference between that and simply 'bad' english from non-native speakers. The one's disturbing while the other's annoying. Is it that hard to press the shift key here and there without letting out letters?

Did anyone understand this post? A translation would be helpful.

U cant understand what i post.... and why the **** u all talk about proper english?

Translation:bang ur head at a barbed fence and then u could understand. F**k u. :devil: Stop spamming now.Next time onwards, i will ignore ur crap ****ing post.

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant **** properly!!!!"

-----------

To worbd:

u opera fans don thave any answers to:

* open source of firefox.

* more extention available

And democracy rulezzzz! I like and use whatever i like.

U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more.

585237991[/snapback]

Urm, less browsing area? I dont no how to get rid of the 'File Edit..lalal' Toolbar in firefox, but in opera its just CTRL + F11. Also, quality sucks on the FF SS because i had to lower the file size. Opera renders the pages MUCH faster then Firefox for me, and opera loads pretty quick too, firefox just takes forever.

Edit:\\ To the guy above, open source means nothing to the average user, heck, i wouldnt want to have to compile opera to get it the way i want it. First of all i'd have no clue what i had to do, and it would take forevvvvvvvvvverr.

Yeah, more extensions available, proberbly because firefox has a system that allows extensions? I really dont feel i need extensions in opera, i have quite a few in firefox as there the only things i can do to it to make me actually enjoy using it, for 5 minutes..

post-48339-1105028689_thumb.jpg

post-48339-1105028745_thumb.jpg

Well golly, you all have good points.  Now does anyone actually think that they'll "win" this argument?  Is it honestly going to improve your life (hey, I won an argument about the best browser on neowin.net, come be my friend)?

585241793[/snapback]

Of course not. I keep posting in response to those who post misinformation. I don't think people shold be able to post FUD and get away with it. So I try to make sure the record is set straight. Not trying to win anyone over to Opera at all.. just trying to make the differences clear and truthful.

I'm happy when people are using anything but IE. But I think they should understand the differences between Firefox and Opera and not fall trap to the crap some firefox fans spread about Opera, and sometimes the other way around as well.

Here's my opinion of Firefox and Opera:

They are two completely different browsers, trying to do different things. Opera is trying to be an all-encompassing internet suite. You have your browser, email, and chat, and options galore. It is the browser for a power user, you can customize it exactly the way you want.

Firefox is, and was designed to be, the antisuite. You have basic browsing that's very simple to configure, with a few helpful tools as well. If you want anything else, you download an extension and add on gradually if you find a need to.

There is no "better browser", it just depends on your preference.

I really hate it when people say something like this.

It is obvious he hasn't even bothered to give opera a fair try b4 saying all those.

He probably even didnt read my post.

1.If u give operav8 400mb(or decent size) of caching..it wud load pages much faster than  any browser on da wrld.

2.Those r more features?

Opera's d'load manager is much more advanced than opera's.

585238160[/snapback]

1. Any browser with cachine enabled will be faster than loading the page again.

2. Yep. You proved that Opera sucks if it 0wns itself.

I would also say Firefox is ten times better than Opera. Opera is not good at being compatible, while Firefox is. Also, Firefox definitely has a lighter, better-looking interface. Not to mention you can customize it quite a bit using CSS.

584793506[/snapback]

Opera is only payware if you dislike the adds, but they are quite light.

I find Opera better costomisable. It is very easy to skin (just put skin in folder, even on-the-fly). Add cosumisable menu's, interface (true drag-n-drop a la OS X).

Love the mouse-gestures (heck I got so used to it that i had to have myself those for windows itself, fortuneately I found the: even free of charge

stroke-it).

Integrated e-mail, which = cool

Pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, but most of all stable & great sessions saving.

One day my g/f accedentally disabled the main power and when I turned it back on my Opera sessions were recovered including the mail I was typing: invaluable!

Ok.. but when you have an opinion.. you should at least have SOMETHING to back it up.  Anything.  Not just how you feel.  If you only FEEL that it is bloated and nothing else.. then please understand that your feeling is illogical.  We do have illogical feelings, so no one should hold it against you.  But at least admit it.  If it's more than just a feeling, then why not explain why you think it's bloated?  I gave a comparison that shows the real story, fact for fact.  You told me you get a 'feeling'.

585237297[/snapback]

Well.. bloat is an adjective that describes a program. You can't just throw out that "that is a bloated program" without backing it up.

source: dictionary.reference.com

585237567[/snapback]

An example: the voice features that read out a piece of text. It's funny to try out once, but isn't really useful since it doesn't sound natural and takes too much time IMO.

Another example: the built-in email client, M2. I don't need an email client in my web browser. I use Gmail or Hotmail and they work fine for me.

Third example: IRC support. I use mIRC for chatting through IRC, so why would I want extra functionality for that in my web browser?

Do you understand what I am talking about now? :)

An example: the voice features that read out a piece of text. It's funny to try out once, but isn't really useful since it doesn't sound natural and takes too much time IMO.

The voice libs are not distributed with Opera by default (they are downloaded on demand). And voice has great potential for people with disabilities.

Another example: the built-in email client, M2. I don't need an email client in my web browser. I use Gmail or Hotmail and they work fine for me.

Third example: IRC support. I use mIRC for chatting through IRC, so why would I want extra functionality for that in my web browser?

Do you understand what I am talking about now? :)

...and yet Opera is a smaller download than Firefox. And mail/chat can easily be disabled in 7.54, while they are hidden/disabled by default in 8.0.

No, I don't understand what you are talking about. Opera has all these features, yet it's a far smaller download than Firefox. How can you claim that Opera, especially Opera 8, is "bloated"?

You can't.

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

U cant understand what i post.... and why the **** u all talk about proper english?

Translation:bang ur head at a barbed fence and then u could understand. F**k u. :devil: Stop spamming now.Next time onwards, i will ignore ur crap ****ing post.

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant **** properly!!!!"

585243303[/snapback]

I know the language barrier is difficult, but perhaps if you calmed down and stopped typing to be rude you would be more easy to understand. In case you can't tell, I still can't understand you.

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

585248314[/snapback]

yeah i've noticed you've been saying that all along but these guys aren't going to listen. most of these firefox fans think having features is bloat even though you don't have to use it and that even with those features it's still lighter than firefox. maybe you guys have the time to download extensions to get features which are already included in opera but i don't have the time.

Q. if opera is 'bloat' for having too many features what is software that comes with a small amount of features and requires you to download extensions to make it feature rich?

A. firefox fans would put a spin on it and say 'customisable'.

The voice libs are not distributed with Opera by default (they are downloaded on demand). And voice has great potential for people with disabilities.

585248286[/snapback]

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

585248314[/snapback]

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box. And then there are the ads in Opera that take up quite some space. I'm sorry, but I don't like those.

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

Opera

  • Mouse gestures out of the box - very intuitive
  • Fast previous and next page buttons, they load instantly
  • Wand feature - click a button and the form field submits

Actually, the web developer toolbar is one of the primary reasons I use Firefox. However, I find the browser itself to be better than Opera as well.

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot and if it becomes free. However, I doubt it will ever become free, so I doubt I will ever switch back to Opera.

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

Ah, so you haven't even bothered to try it properly! I get it.

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

So Opera is bloated, why?

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

How does your opinion matter, when the facts speak for themselves?

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box.

Have you even tried Opera 8?

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

- Standards compliance: Tie.

- JS/DOM: Tie.

- Toolbars: Tie, if you ignore the ads in Opera.

- Open in background: Yeah, Firefox "stole" that from Opera :)

- Web dev toolbar: There's one for Opera too (and they claim that it kicks Firefox's butt).

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot

Improves, how? It's already smaller, faster, and a smoother experience than Firefox...

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box. And then there are the ads in Opera that take up quite some space. I'm sorry, but I don't like those.

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

Opera

  • Mouse gestures out of the box - very intuitive
  • Fast previous and next page buttons, they load instantly
  • Wand feature - click a button and the form field submits

Actually, the web developer toolbar is one of the primary reasons I use Firefox. However, I find the browser itself to be better than Opera as well.

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot and if it becomes free. However, I doubt it will ever become free, so I doubt I will ever switch back to Opera.

585248530[/snapback]

Are you aware that the dll file which is used for mail, rss and irc is only 300ish kB in size?

You can right click on an opera bookmark and have it open in the background, you can even middle click and open it in the background to (asuming you have opera set up that way).

There is also a Web-developers toolbar toolbar for opera too.

So you are saying that this 1600x1200

firefox_small.png

gives you more area than this 1600x1200

opera_small.png

You see the voice icon but you have to go into the preferences to enable it and when you do it asks you to download the additional files.

You didn't take the favorites bar off of Firefox, and you didn't switch the icon size to small icons. You also have no menu bar in Opera. You've really put that thing through a lot of customization, while you didn't bother to touch one customization feature of Firefox. Real nice comparison there. :rolleyes:

worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

ok, guys tell me:

Why should one pay and register for a software when we get other browsers for free?

Even if opera is good, why should we buy?

We have Firefox, maxton, internet explorer...

585249144[/snapback]

Why should we pay for Windows when theres other operating systems that are free?

Its all personal Preference. And you dont HAVE to pay for opera, just live with the ad, thats all.

You didn't take the favorites bar off of Firefox, and you didn't switch the icon size to small icons. You also have no menu bar in Opera. You've really put that thing through a lot of customization, while you didn't bother to touch one customization feature of Firefox. Real nice comparison there. :rolleyes:

worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

585248995[/snapback]

Sorry so pressing CTRL+F11 is a lot of customisation, that is the default way opera opens when you start if for the first time (minus the ad's). just for you I have changed the screenshot

What I was trying to show was that both browsers offer roughly the same screen area by default when first started. Opera has slightly more space with the ad's off and slightly less with them on.

Jagged: does he have a menu bar for firefox in the ss? Besides, he was trying to prove opera didnt have smaller view area, which is true. Customizations? I dont think so, he left them as they came. Like you said, "out of the box"

Drgrudge you are a moron, for proof read your post couple pages before where you just say firefox is better at every aspect just because. Shut your mouse please, you dont have to pay and you dont have to register. It is perfectly functional without paying, only downside is you get an ad box, big deal when I can get so much more out the browser.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!