578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I have used both Opera and FF, (plus IE), for a quite a while and apart from the obvious speed, features, and usability differences favouring Opera, there is one thing FF does better than Opera, it has the weather plug-in.

Also there is one thing IE and FF do better than Opera, and that is handle saved web pages in a more manageable form, that is the .html file linked to the _files folder. Opera saves web-pages more reliably than either other browser, but in just a loose collection of files. I don't know why that is, but it's messier than IE and FF.

In every other way Opera creams FF.

Worbd, saying that extensions aren't worth your time is just ignorant as the FF people saying Opera's interface is bloated. Extensions have huge potential and if used right, they're awesome. I guess you wanted to say it's a big huss to download them, configure & keep them updated with new releases.

As for the english thing, I meant the stupid leet/sms-speek, there's a difference between that and simply 'bad' english from non-native speakers. The one's disturbing while the other's annoying. Is it that hard to press the shift key here and there without letting out letters?

Did anyone understand this post? A translation would be helpful.

U cant understand what i post.... and why the **** u all talk about proper english?

Translation:bang ur head at a barbed fence and then u could understand. F**k u. :devil: Stop spamming now.Next time onwards, i will ignore ur crap ****ing post.

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant **** properly!!!!"

-----------

To worbd:

u opera fans don thave any answers to:

* open source of firefox.

* more extention available

And democracy rulezzzz! I like and use whatever i like.

U just fell zomming is usefull because opera IMO, has less browsing area and we need to scroll more.

585237991[/snapback]

Urm, less browsing area? I dont no how to get rid of the 'File Edit..lalal' Toolbar in firefox, but in opera its just CTRL + F11. Also, quality sucks on the FF SS because i had to lower the file size. Opera renders the pages MUCH faster then Firefox for me, and opera loads pretty quick too, firefox just takes forever.

Edit:\\ To the guy above, open source means nothing to the average user, heck, i wouldnt want to have to compile opera to get it the way i want it. First of all i'd have no clue what i had to do, and it would take forevvvvvvvvvverr.

Yeah, more extensions available, proberbly because firefox has a system that allows extensions? I really dont feel i need extensions in opera, i have quite a few in firefox as there the only things i can do to it to make me actually enjoy using it, for 5 minutes..

post-48339-1105028689_thumb.jpg

post-48339-1105028745_thumb.jpg

Well golly, you all have good points.  Now does anyone actually think that they'll "win" this argument?  Is it honestly going to improve your life (hey, I won an argument about the best browser on neowin.net, come be my friend)?

585241793[/snapback]

Of course not. I keep posting in response to those who post misinformation. I don't think people shold be able to post FUD and get away with it. So I try to make sure the record is set straight. Not trying to win anyone over to Opera at all.. just trying to make the differences clear and truthful.

I'm happy when people are using anything but IE. But I think they should understand the differences between Firefox and Opera and not fall trap to the crap some firefox fans spread about Opera, and sometimes the other way around as well.

Here's my opinion of Firefox and Opera:

They are two completely different browsers, trying to do different things. Opera is trying to be an all-encompassing internet suite. You have your browser, email, and chat, and options galore. It is the browser for a power user, you can customize it exactly the way you want.

Firefox is, and was designed to be, the antisuite. You have basic browsing that's very simple to configure, with a few helpful tools as well. If you want anything else, you download an extension and add on gradually if you find a need to.

There is no "better browser", it just depends on your preference.

I really hate it when people say something like this.

It is obvious he hasn't even bothered to give opera a fair try b4 saying all those.

He probably even didnt read my post.

1.If u give operav8 400mb(or decent size) of caching..it wud load pages much faster than  any browser on da wrld.

2.Those r more features?

Opera's d'load manager is much more advanced than opera's.

585238160[/snapback]

1. Any browser with cachine enabled will be faster than loading the page again.

2. Yep. You proved that Opera sucks if it 0wns itself.

I would also say Firefox is ten times better than Opera. Opera is not good at being compatible, while Firefox is. Also, Firefox definitely has a lighter, better-looking interface. Not to mention you can customize it quite a bit using CSS.

584793506[/snapback]

Opera is only payware if you dislike the adds, but they are quite light.

I find Opera better costomisable. It is very easy to skin (just put skin in folder, even on-the-fly). Add cosumisable menu's, interface (true drag-n-drop a la OS X).

Love the mouse-gestures (heck I got so used to it that i had to have myself those for windows itself, fortuneately I found the: even free of charge

stroke-it).

Integrated e-mail, which = cool

Pop-up blocking, tabbed browsing, but most of all stable & great sessions saving.

One day my g/f accedentally disabled the main power and when I turned it back on my Opera sessions were recovered including the mail I was typing: invaluable!

Ok.. but when you have an opinion.. you should at least have SOMETHING to back it up.  Anything.  Not just how you feel.  If you only FEEL that it is bloated and nothing else.. then please understand that your feeling is illogical.  We do have illogical feelings, so no one should hold it against you.  But at least admit it.  If it's more than just a feeling, then why not explain why you think it's bloated?  I gave a comparison that shows the real story, fact for fact.  You told me you get a 'feeling'.

585237297[/snapback]

Well.. bloat is an adjective that describes a program. You can't just throw out that "that is a bloated program" without backing it up.

source: dictionary.reference.com

585237567[/snapback]

An example: the voice features that read out a piece of text. It's funny to try out once, but isn't really useful since it doesn't sound natural and takes too much time IMO.

Another example: the built-in email client, M2. I don't need an email client in my web browser. I use Gmail or Hotmail and they work fine for me.

Third example: IRC support. I use mIRC for chatting through IRC, so why would I want extra functionality for that in my web browser?

Do you understand what I am talking about now? :)

An example: the voice features that read out a piece of text. It's funny to try out once, but isn't really useful since it doesn't sound natural and takes too much time IMO.

The voice libs are not distributed with Opera by default (they are downloaded on demand). And voice has great potential for people with disabilities.

Another example: the built-in email client, M2. I don't need an email client in my web browser. I use Gmail or Hotmail and they work fine for me.

Third example: IRC support. I use mIRC for chatting through IRC, so why would I want extra functionality for that in my web browser?

Do you understand what I am talking about now? :)

...and yet Opera is a smaller download than Firefox. And mail/chat can easily be disabled in 7.54, while they are hidden/disabled by default in 8.0.

No, I don't understand what you are talking about. Opera has all these features, yet it's a far smaller download than Firefox. How can you claim that Opera, especially Opera 8, is "bloated"?

You can't.

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

U cant understand what i post.... and why the **** u all talk about proper english?

Translation:bang ur head at a barbed fence and then u could understand. F**k u. :devil: Stop spamming now.Next time onwards, i will ignore ur crap ****ing post.

Pointing a old man:"Look son, that poor man cant **** properly!!!!"

585243303[/snapback]

I know the language barrier is difficult, but perhaps if you calmed down and stopped typing to be rude you would be more easy to understand. In case you can't tell, I still can't understand you.

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

585248314[/snapback]

yeah i've noticed you've been saying that all along but these guys aren't going to listen. most of these firefox fans think having features is bloat even though you don't have to use it and that even with those features it's still lighter than firefox. maybe you guys have the time to download extensions to get features which are already included in opera but i don't have the time.

Q. if opera is 'bloat' for having too many features what is software that comes with a small amount of features and requires you to download extensions to make it feature rich?

A. firefox fans would put a spin on it and say 'customisable'.

The voice libs are not distributed with Opera by default (they are downloaded on demand). And voice has great potential for people with disabilities.

585248286[/snapback]

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

I think people are confusing the term 'bloated' with 'feature-rich'.

Opera is in every way LIGHTER, LIGHTER, and LIGHTER than Firefox.

You are not forced to use all the features included in Opera, you can choose certain features and hide everything else, and it will still be lighter than bare-bone Firefox.

I mean, why the hell is Firefox taking up resources so much more than Maxthon, Opera and any other browsers with more features??

585248314[/snapback]

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box. And then there are the ads in Opera that take up quite some space. I'm sorry, but I don't like those.

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

Opera

  • Mouse gestures out of the box - very intuitive
  • Fast previous and next page buttons, they load instantly
  • Wand feature - click a button and the form field submits

Actually, the web developer toolbar is one of the primary reasons I use Firefox. However, I find the browser itself to be better than Opera as well.

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot and if it becomes free. However, I doubt it will ever become free, so I doubt I will ever switch back to Opera.

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

Ah, so you haven't even bothered to try it properly! I get it.

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

So Opera is bloated, why?

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

How does your opinion matter, when the facts speak for themselves?

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box.

Have you even tried Opera 8?

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

- Standards compliance: Tie.

- JS/DOM: Tie.

- Toolbars: Tie, if you ignore the ads in Opera.

- Open in background: Yeah, Firefox "stole" that from Opera :)

- Web dev toolbar: There's one for Opera too (and they claim that it kicks Firefox's butt).

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot

Improves, how? It's already smaller, faster, and a smoother experience than Firefox...

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box. And then there are the ads in Opera that take up quite some space. I'm sorry, but I don't like those.

Here's a list about what I like about Firefox and Opera:

Firefox

  • Better standards compliance
  • Better Javascript DOM rendering
  • Smaller toolbars
  • Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"
  • Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

Opera

  • Mouse gestures out of the box - very intuitive
  • Fast previous and next page buttons, they load instantly
  • Wand feature - click a button and the form field submits

Actually, the web developer toolbar is one of the primary reasons I use Firefox. However, I find the browser itself to be better than Opera as well.

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot and if it becomes free. However, I doubt it will ever become free, so I doubt I will ever switch back to Opera.

585248530[/snapback]

Are you aware that the dll file which is used for mail, rss and irc is only 300ish kB in size?

You can right click on an opera bookmark and have it open in the background, you can even middle click and open it in the background to (asuming you have opera set up that way).

There is also a Web-developers toolbar toolbar for opera too.

So you are saying that this 1600x1200

firefox_small.png

gives you more area than this 1600x1200

opera_small.png

You see the voice icon but you have to go into the preferences to enable it and when you do it asks you to download the additional files.

You didn't take the favorites bar off of Firefox, and you didn't switch the icon size to small icons. You also have no menu bar in Opera. You've really put that thing through a lot of customization, while you didn't bother to touch one customization feature of Firefox. Real nice comparison there. :rolleyes:

worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

ok, guys tell me:

Why should one pay and register for a software when we get other browsers for free?

Even if opera is good, why should we buy?

We have Firefox, maxton, internet explorer...

585249144[/snapback]

Why should we pay for Windows when theres other operating systems that are free?

Its all personal Preference. And you dont HAVE to pay for opera, just live with the ad, thats all.

You didn't take the favorites bar off of Firefox, and you didn't switch the icon size to small icons. You also have no menu bar in Opera. You've really put that thing through a lot of customization, while you didn't bother to touch one customization feature of Firefox. Real nice comparison there. :rolleyes:

worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

585248995[/snapback]

Sorry so pressing CTRL+F11 is a lot of customisation, that is the default way opera opens when you start if for the first time (minus the ad's). just for you I have changed the screenshot

What I was trying to show was that both browsers offer roughly the same screen area by default when first started. Opera has slightly more space with the ad's off and slightly less with them on.

Jagged: does he have a menu bar for firefox in the ss? Besides, he was trying to prove opera didnt have smaller view area, which is true. Customizations? I dont think so, he left them as they came. Like you said, "out of the box"

Drgrudge you are a moron, for proof read your post couple pages before where you just say firefox is better at every aspect just because. Shut your mouse please, you dont have to pay and you dont have to register. It is perfectly functional without paying, only downside is you get an ad box, big deal when I can get so much more out the browser.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You still can, its just under the Transform flyout for WordArt now
    • Likely nothing will be done in corporate America, there have been countless Tesla self-driving incidents. Then again, there have also been countless human operated incidents. It's literally daily news here in Canada, to the extent that it's now odd if we get a day where a collision doesn't get announced on the radio throughout the day...
    • SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 hands on by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk, mousing around. Apologies for the knife cut across the top of the box; that was my doing, being a bit too heavy-handed with opening up the outer packaging. First up, what's in the box: SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 1x Type-C charging cable User Manual 1-Year Warranty (card) In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official Amazon listing, here are the key features: Full-Hand Air Compression: OS500 wraps your fingers, palm, and wrist with multi-chamber air compression for a complete hand relaxation experience. The extended massage chamber helps cover more of the hand and wrist area than standard palm-only hand massagers Palm Kneading with 6 Modes & 6 Intensities: Built-in palm kneading rollers add a hands-on massage feel, while 6 preset modes and 6 pressure levels let you choose the comfort level that fits your day—from gentle relaxation to a firmer full-hand massage 3 Heat Levels with Cooling Fan: Choose from 104°F, 113°F or 122°F warmth to suit different seasons and comfort preferences. The built-in cooling fan helps reduce stuffiness during heated sessions, keeping your hand feeling fresh and comfortable Easy Visual Display & Smart Timer: The digital image display clearly shows massage area, mode, intensity, heat level, and remaining time at a glance. Select 10, 15, or 20-minute sessions for quick office breaks, evening relaxation, or everyday hand care Rechargeable, Cordless & Comfortable: A 3000mAh battery supports over 90 minutes of full-function use on a full charge, with convenient USB-C charging. The soft inner lining, smooth ABS/PU finish, and premium black-gold design make OS500 ideal for home, office, or gifting With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. I gave it a try on both left and right hands, and as you can maybe see from the above YouTube Short, (sorry for the shaky video), my whole hand fits in, but my wrist barely enters the Hand Massager. I was able to push through a bit more with my fingertips extending out the other end to get a bit of massaging on the start of my wrist. Usage For some reason, there is a strap that is very difficult to fasten to my wrist with one hand. I am not sure what function it has, and it isn't mentioned in the user manual. The only thing I could find was in the product images that claimed "wrist precision". Unlike the Bob and Brad Hand Massager, this device does not massage the wrist anyway, even though a "wrist mode" is mentioned, which must be for smaller hands than I have, as it is mainly intended for the hand and fingers. In addition, for its steeper price, there are no disposable gloves provided in the box, which is a bit of an issue considering the internal cover (which appears to be elasticated nylon) cannot be removed for washing; so you are left with only one choice: always thoroughly wash your hands before using it. I can imagine this thing getting a bit grimy after a period of use, and that is a bit of a shame. With that said, the buttons on the device, from left to right, do the following: Heat button: 3-level heat control at 104°F, 113°F, or 122°F Mode button: Auto mode Circular mode Soothing mode Relax mode Palm and fingers mode Palm and wrist mode Intensity button: from (First-time users) 15Ka, 25Ka, 35Ka, 45Ka, 55Ka, 60Ka (Intensive relief) Knead button: on or off (6 pressure levels) Power button: Long-press to turn on or off Cooling button: turn on or off the cooling fan Also, in the product imagery, it states there are 36 "custom modes," but nowhere is it listed what these modes are. I can only imagine that they mean a combination of all of the above settings in different intensity levels. The device itself seems to rely on a single "kneading" mechanism located at the palm area of the hand, which spins when in use, and the other massage features are mainly utilized through the air sacs, increasing and decreasing at various levels on the hand and fingers. I am not sure it offered too much relief for someone who is typing and operating a mouse for hours at a time; further testing may be required. It does feel nice, though. Finally, you may be wondering how this fits into the scope of a tech website? Well, let me tell you something: sometimes I sit for up to 15 hours working on Neowin, and although I take breaks in between, it takes a toll on my body. I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief, a good massager like this Hand Massager can shed the strains of the day in just a couple of 15-minute bursts. On the official website, this has an MSRP of $99.99, but luckily for our readers, it is selling at $10 off for just $89.99 right now on Amazon. SKG Hand Massager with Heat OS500 for $89.99 (with $10 off coupon), $99.99 MSRP For me, this gets a thumbs hands(?) down. However, it could be improved by making it so that the protective covering could be removed and thrown into the washing machine, or get yourself some disposable gloves to use with it. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Thanks for the info, but I'm still not sure if I need this....
    • We check out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager by Steven Parker I was offered the chance to test out the SKG PS700 Neck Massager, and full disclosure, they let me keep it regardless of my findings. Anyway, I jumped at the chance due to my long hours sitting at my desk; I figured it could offer some neck pain relief. What's in the box: SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager Rechargeable Battery (inside massager) Type-C USB cable User Manual Quick Start guide 1-Year Warranty In short, everything you need to get started. According to the official listing, here are the key features: Biomimetic Kneading & High Torque Motor: Designed with innovative biomimetic kneading heads that perfectly simulate the touch of human hands. Powered by a high-torque motor, this massager delivers powerful and precise deep tissue relief to effectively target stiff neck muscles and release built-up tension Soothing Heat & Integrated Sound Relaxation: Experience the ultimate Relaxationation with our dual-action approach. The soothing heat function gently warms your neck, while the built-in sound Relaxation provides calming audio tracks, helping you achieve a state of mindfulness and mental tranquility during your physical massage Cordless Convenience & Travel-Ready & Father's Day Gifts: Crafted for maximum portability and ease of use. Its lightweight, cordless design allows you to enjoy a premium massage anywhere without the hassle of tangled wires-whether you're taking a quick break at your desk or winding down at home Versatile Relief for Home & Office: An essential wellness companion for office workers, gamers, frequent travelers, or anyone looking to integrate mindfulness into their daily routine. It seamlessly fits into your lifestyle, providing instant neck relief whenever and wherever you need it Safe & Premium Materials: Manufactured with high-quality, skin-friendly materials to ensure a safe and comfortable experience without irritation. SKG backs this device with dedicated customer service, making it a thoughtful tech-health gift for family and friends App & Bluetooth Music Control: Connect via Bluetooth to control your massage settings through the dedicated app and enjoy your favorite music during your massage session for a fully customizable and immersive relaxation experience Red Light Warmth Technology: Features advanced red light warmth technology that penetrates deep into neck muscles to enhance blood circulation and provide soothing comfort while relieving muscle tension and stiffness Design With all that out of the way, here are my own findings. SKG does not say what materials are used to make the neck massager. However, on the product website, it mentions "soft-touch silicone" with what looks like PU leather cushioning, with the rest being mostly made up of plastics. On the inside of the massager, there are two "biomimetic kneading heads" that are motorized for the different styles of massage, which are not actually listed at all in the paper user manual, but the standard included modes are: De-stress mode, Mediation mode, Relax mode, Shiatsu mode. The massager looks quite premium and is actually very comfortable to wear. This massager is small and light enough to go anywhere, as it doesn't get in the way of anything, so I was able to use it in the chair while writing this review. Unlike the back massager, SKG does not warn in the user guide not to use it for more than 30 minutes a day (or two 15-minute sessions). However, there is a long laundry list of important safeguards to consider before and during the use of the device, and it is warned that the neck massager is not waterproof. It also includes a 1,400mAh battery with a rated power of 14W and input of 5V, which is the standard for up to USB 3.0 power (although the Amperage is not mentioned at all). SKG does not say how long it takes to charge, but a quick calculation at 2A (if that is what it is) would mean it would take roughly 1.5 hrs to charge from empty. In any case, the light around the button changes from orange to green on a full charge. In addition, it is not possible to use the device while it is charging. On the right of the neck massager is the On/Off and modes button, which also acts as a joystick. You can operate all the modes directly from the power button, as well as the app, which I'll get into a bit later: Push up: Short press to adjust Heat levels On/Off button: long press Mode Switching: Short press (while in operation) ➕ Push left: increase Music volume ➖ push right: decrease Music volume Push down: Short-press to turn Music on or off The massager defaults to De-stress mode, and it is not stated anywhere if the neck massager has overheat protection. This time around, regarding heat, the only detail I could find is that it has "triple action soothing heat." The temperature stages are not listed anywhere in the paper manual, Amazon listing, or official website. The heat levels can be adjusted through the app or directly on the device using the joystick button. Usage There's also the SKG Health app, which makes using the massager far easier than feeling around for the button on the side of your neck. If the app is stopped, you are required to log in with a verification code over email, which I am not too pleased with, as this means it will only work that way for however long SKG decides to support it through said app. However, I was not able to get the app to connect to the OS500, which I have reported back to my contact. Bluetooth appeared to be working on the neck massager as it became available to pair with my phone, but the SKG app failed to discover it. Before I forget, there's also a switch next to the USB charging port to deactivate and activate the Voice Prompt, which, when enabled, audibly tells the user when switching intensities, modes, or connecting to the app and informs when the massages start and are completed. That said, on to my likes and dislikes, which are listed below. What I didn't like Unable to connect the Neck Massager to the app Use through the mobile app relies on continued support from SKG What I liked Can be used without the app Cordless use Light and comfortable to wear Heat is also quite comfortable Where to buy: According to the official website, this has an MSRP of $249.99, but is currently $50 (on Amazon). To sweeten the deal a bit more, there's also an in-page coupon that knocks a further $20 off the price. SKG PS700-2 Neck Massager for $179.99 on Amazon (was $199.99) Apply the in-page $20 off coupon for the final price of $179.99 Just like the back massager, this gets a confused thumbs up (due to the cost). However, I cannot rate it through app usage as it failed to connect. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!