578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

guys we should stop bickering especially as there are people out there who think msn explorer is a great browser (yes i know someone like this).

585249356[/snapback]

Hey, dont diss it, i used to use that back in the days, it was great :) told me the weather, welcomed me when i started it and everything :p

Ah, so you haven't even bothered to try it properly! I get it.

So Opera is bloated, why?

How does your opinion matter, when the facts speak for themselves?

Have you even tried Opera 8?

- Standards compliance: Tie.

- JS/DOM: Tie.

- Toolbars: Tie, if you ignore the ads in Opera.

- Open in background: Yeah, Firefox "stole" that from Opera :)

- Web dev toolbar: There's one for Opera too (and they claim that it kicks Firefox's butt).

Improves, how? It's already smaller, faster, and a smoother experience than Firefox...

585248920[/snapback]

Yes, I installed Opera 8 and have tried it.

Yes, I have actually used the voice thing for a while, thought not in Opera 8. Did not like it.

My opinion matters for me, since I am someone who browses the Internet.

Standards compliance and JS/DOM are definitely not a tie. DOM code just does not work in Opera. Also, Opera has some quirks with standards compliance. Honestly.

I admit that I did not know the web developer toolbar existed for Opera. I think that it is very important and it might actually make me go back to Opera once they sort out the standards compliance and JS/DOM thing.

Some of you argue that Opera takes up less space in the toolbar area without ads. That may be true, but the fact remains that with the ads it takes up more space. Now I'm not really worried about tiny bits, but it really does bother me sometimes.

Opera 8 has a lot of improvements, that's true. However, I don't expect the Firefox devs to do nothing either. For now, I'm staying with Firefox. When Opera 8 is ready, I will compare it to the latest version of Firefox (which I think at that point might be something newer than 1.0) and see which one is the best.

It all comes down to preference anyway. I just have a better feeling when browsing with Firefox. Some of you have that with Opera. Let's just stop about the "bloat" thing (I know I started it) and tell what we like or dislike about a particular browser, and why.

I hope the author of this topic will try out both browsers and find out for him/herself what he/she likes best.

:)

wht i hav noticed about FF users is dat most(not the wrd..most...there r exceptions) r ignorant.

Like grudge himself!!

From his posts it is evident that he hasnt even tried opera properly b4 saying FF is the best of all or opera sucks

Most people supporting ff says things like FF rocks and Opera suxx without reasons.If any reasons r put forward..they r mostly it is free and has extensions or r rubbish reasons!

However there r exceptions.

Being an opera fan..i cannot deny though that opera messes up with pages containing java script a lot of times.

But opera can not be blamed always.

Go to Myopera forums and look at the section called open the web,and u wud c that many web masters r vindictive 2wards opera and purposely send wrong code to it when it is detected!!!

I have always maintained FF is good but Opera is better.

U can freely use FF but dun say opera suxx..that ****es me off!

I don't know why my post isn't displaying the BB code! I have went through and made sure all tags are closed, to no avail. Sorry :(

I know these points have already been addressed.. but I'm going to put my touch on it.

An example: the voice features that read out a piece of text. It's funny to try out once, but isn't really useful since it doesn't sound natural and takes too much time IMO.

You have to download the voice libs the first time you want to use them. Thus, the code is NOT INCLUDED, and has no effect on speed or memory usage.

Another example: the built-in email client, M2. I don't need an email client in my web browser. I use Gmail or Hotmail and they work fine for me.

M2 is a few hundred KB at most. Not only that, it is a DLL, and thus the code is not loaded until you use it. Furthermore, you can disable M2 altogether or just not use it.

Third example: IRC support. I use mIRC for chatting through IRC, so why would I want extra functionality for that in my web browser?

Same as above. A DLL, can be disabled or just not used.

Then why do I see a "voice" icon in my toolbar in Opera 8?

So you can enable it easily if you want to use it. Why don't you TRY something out before trying to argue against it?

Sorry, I am not confused by the terms. I know that Firefox is a larger download. I'm just argueing Opera could be an even smaller download if it didn't incorporate all the extra features I don't need. Firefox does this by using the extension system. I know Firefox is a larger download and I can't really understand why. I'm not bothered by the size of download packages, actually, since it only matters several seconds to me anyway.

Again, since they are DLLs, they are not even loaded unless you use them. Why does it matter if Opera "could be smaller" when it is already more than 1mb smaller than Firefox? You're just looking for things to hold against Opera.

I personally feel Opera is not lighter than Firefox. There is nothing you can do about it, I have tried to explain why I think so, but you seem to think my opinion is irrelevant.

And you know why you feel that way? Because of the default interface Opera used prior to 8.0. It gave the ILLUSION that it was not lighter.. and that stuck with you. But with Opera 8.0, the interface is pretty much the same as Firefox. The download is still smaller. The memory footprint is now on par or better than Firefox. The # of features does not make Firefox lighter than Opera. Anyone who believes this is simply ignorant of how software/code works.

Also, the toolbars in Opera are too large for my preference. I know that I can make them smaller, but it will require me to mess around with settings to choose smaller icons. I don't want that, I want it out of the box.

Wow. Are you even reading my posts? TRY OPERA 8.0, THE TOOLBARS ARE NOT 'LARGE'.

Smaller toolbars

Wrong.

Right-click on a bookmark and choose "open as background tab"

Middle-click in Opera.

Web developer toolbar - this one is AWESOME!

There is one for Opera too

I might once switch back to Opera if it improves a lot and if it becomes free. However, I doubt it will ever become free, so I doubt I will ever switch back to Opera.

If the price is the ONLY thing you measure to decide whether or not to use a product, you are depriving yourself.

You didn't take the favorites bar off of Firefox, and you didn't switch the icon size to small icons. You also have no menu bar in Opera. You've really put that thing through a lot of customization, while you didn't bother to touch one customization feature of Firefox. Real nice comparison there. :rolleyes:

worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

Actually, the menubar IS there. Not only that, he didn't make any changes to Opera besides for getting rid of the ad. AND he did customize Firefox, he made the tab bar visible.

Yes, I installed Opera 8 and have tried it.

Then explain your ignorance?

Yes, I have actually used the voice thing for a while, thought not in Opera 8. Did not like it.

7.60 previews then?

DOM code just does not work in Opera.

Hahaha. Right. Just does not work.. then I guess all those sites that utilize it work for me in Opera magically.

Also, Opera has some quirks with standards compliance. Honestly.

As does Firefox, or any other browser. Why don't you point these quirks out?

It all comes down to preference anyway. I just have a better feeling when browsing with Firefox. Some of you have that with Opera. Let's just stop about the "bloat" thing (I know I started it) and tell what we like or dislike about a particular browser, and why.

That is fine. And we are discussing what we like and dislike. I just hated to see you misinformed about particular things in Opera, so my intent was to inform you of the truth.

Edited by vcv
worbd, you can't claim that Firefox and Opera have a tie in standards compliancy. You may be able to say that about JavaScript and DOM support (and I'm skeptical about that), but you definitely can't get away with the standards compliancy statement.

Sure I can. Several sites use advanced CSS which works fine in Opera, but breaks completely in Firefox. These sites are of course specifically created to show off what CSS can do.

Why should one pay and register for a software when we get other browsers for free?

Even if opera is good, why should we buy?

We have Firefox, maxton, internet explorer...

Because neither of them are the same as Opera. You don't get the same functionality, integrated in the same way, in a tiny package.

My opinion matters for me, since I am someone who browses the Internet.

You can say that "my opinion is that the sky is green", but when the fact is that the sky is blue... Well, I don't know what that would say about you :)

Standards compliance and JS/DOM are definitely not a tie. DOM code just does not work in Opera.

Uh, "DOM code just does not work in Opera" is a rather broad statement. Of course DOM works in Opera. It works fine.

Also, Opera has some quirks with standards compliance. Honestly.

Sure it does, as does Firefox.

Opera 8 has a lot of improvements, that's true. However, I don't expect the Firefox devs to do nothing either. For now, I'm staying with Firefox. When Opera 8 is ready, I will compare it to the latest version of Firefox (which I think at that point might be something newer than 1.0) and see which one is the best.

So you expect Opera to stop improving at Opera 8 then? Of course not.

wht i hav noticed about FF users is dat most(not the wrd..most...there r exceptions) r ignorant.

Like grudge himself!!

From his posts it is evident that he hasnt even tried opera properly b4 saying FF is the best of all or opera sucks

Most people supporting ff says things like FF rocks and Opera suxx without reasons.If any reasons r put forward..they r mostly it is free and has extensions or r rubbish reasons!

However there r exceptions.

Being an opera fan..i cannot deny though that opera messes up with pages containing java script a lot of times.

But opera can not be blamed always.

Go to Myopera forums and look at the section called open the web,and u wud c that many web masters r vindictive 2wards opera and purposely send wrong code to it when it is detected!!!

I have always maintained FF is good but Opera is better.

U can freely use FF but dun say opera suxx..that ****es me off!

585250171[/snapback]

We are not ignorant, but it is a fact that you can not use proper English.

Wow.  Are you even reading my posts? TRY OPERA 8.0, THE TOOLBARS ARE NOT 'LARGE'. 

[...]

As does Firefox, or any other browser.  Why don't you point these quirks out?

That is fine.  And we are discussing what we like and dislike.  I just hated to see you misinformed about particular things in Opera, so my intent was to inform you of the truth.

[...]

585250300[/snapback]

I for one haven't come across any quirks in Firefox.

I have tried out the voice features, AND I tried out Opera 8. You are the one who is not reading, as I have stated this several times already.

Please do not presume I am stupid, when I say something about Opera, that means I have actively used it and its features.

So you expect Opera to stop improving at Opera 8 then? Of course not.

Of course I did not expect that. I said I will try out Opera 8 when it is final. I expect both Firefox and Opera to improve.

I for one haven't come across any quirks in Firefox.

That does not mean they do not exist
I have tried out the voice features, AND I tried out Opera 8. You are the one who is not reading, as I have stated this several times already.
You tried out the voice features, yet you didn't know the library needed to be downloaded?

You tried out Opera 8, yet you still made claims about a cluttered interface/larger toolbars?

Can't you see why I am wondering if you actually TRIED Opera8? Not just used it, but tried it out for more than 10 minutes.

Please do not presume I am stupid, when I say something about Opera, that means I have actively used it and its features.
I do not think you are stupid at all. I just think you remain ignorant about some things with Opera.
That does not mean they do not exist

I know, but I have come across them in Opera.

You tried out the voice features, yet you didn't know the library needed to be downloaded?

I tried them out in Opera 7.6 (I believe, don't know the exact version).

You tried out Opera 8, yet you still made claims about a cluttered interface/larger toolbars?

Yes, but it's mostly the ads that annoy me.

Can't you see why I am wondering if you actually TRIED Opera8?  Not just used it, but tried it out for more than 10 minutes.

Yes I actually used it to browse with for a day (like 10 hours :p ). Did you try Firefox for a while? Not a personal attack, just wondering.

I do not think you are stupid at all.  I just think you remain ignorant about some things with Opera.

585250393[/snapback]

Good. I do not think I remain ignorant about some things with Opera, since I tried Opera out as well.

Yes I actually used it to browse with for a day (like 10 hours  ). Did you try Firefox for a while? Not a personal attack, just wondering.
I've used Firefox since it was phoenix. Not everyday, but a few times a week. And I always try out a new version.
Good. I do not think I remain ignorant about some things with Opera, since I tried Opera out as well.
Then do not type ignorant statements.
Sure I can. Several sites use advanced CSS which works fine in Opera, but breaks completely in Firefox. These sites are of course specifically created to show off what CSS can do.

585250328[/snapback]

Show me one. I'd love to analyze the code.

The first one doesn't seem to look right in Opera 7.54 (there's nothing in that "scrollable area"). The second one seems better, but since it uses a somewhat undocumented method, you can't really use that as standards compliancy. That's like saying IE filters are standards when nobody else can see them.

The first one doesn't seem to look right in Opera 7.54 (there's nothing in that "scrollable area"). The second one seems better, but since it uses a somewhat undocumented method, you can't really use that as standards compliancy. That's like saying IE filters are standards when nobody else can see them.

585252029[/snapback]

Try it with 8.0 instead?

Hey, dont diss it, i used to use that back in the days, it was great :) told me the weather, welcomed me when i started it and everything :p

585249537[/snapback]

:rofl: I agree, I loved how MSN Explorer welcomed me. "Good Afternoon!!!"

Opera rocks and so do I.

585252109[/snapback]

:devil:

Is there a beta for OS X?

585252453[/snapback]

Your using OS X? Maybe that's it because when I opened that page in Opera 7.54 (Windows), it showed "/ Bah, Humbug /" over and over, then it had the word Bah Humbug down the left side and a scrollbar down the right.

In Firefox I see the words, but not the word at the left or the scroll at the right.

Edited by NeoTech
Bill Gates claims that Internet Explorer is the safest browser there is. Your point?

Funny how most of these were invented or pioneered by Opera... :)

- Download manager like the one Opera has had for years.

- "Fast browsing"... Uh, yeah... I have a "car with wheels", and I love it! By the way, Opera is small and fast ehough to fit on mobile phones... (The same engine, the UI is different.)

- Saving pages. Opera's saved pages since v1.

- Tabbed browsing. Yes, like Opera introduced to the mainstream browsers...

- Not a resource sucker: Again, Opera is used on mobiles. Firefox isn't. Minimo is work in progress, but still too huge to be of any use.

- Popup blocker built in: Yes, yes. Opera was the first browser to have a popup blocker, AFAIK.

- Search tab for search engines: Yet another Opera invention.

- More Plugins and add-ons are available + more Extentions: Yeah, like just about any other browser. They can all be extended in various ways. Me, I don't like Extension Hell and the security issues that may arise.

Guess where Maxthon got it from... OPERA!

Opera with browser and mail is smaller than Firefox alone. Also, Thunderbird is now trying to copy Opera's "virtual folders" concept (which Google copies as well) :)

Zooming is useful for a number of reasons, for example for accessibility reasons (not everyone has perfect eye sight). But I wouldn't expect someone like you to understand that.

Except, you have to restart Firefox to apply a theme... :D

Extensions? No thanks. My time is more valuable than that.

Firefox's interface is harder to customize for most people, and it is less flexible, unless you want to hack the code yourself. Opera's is more powerful.

Just because it does not favor Firefox doesn't mean that download size is irrelevant. Not everyone is on broadband, you know.

I can't see any free browsers that are better than Opera. Maybe you prefer Firefox, but price is not a measure of quality.

Opera works smoothly out of the box, without exposing you to Extension Hell. It is a tiny download, and has everything in this small package. Everything is tightly integrated, unlike extensions that go in all directions.

In short, Opera is a smoother, more polished Internet experience.

585241837[/snapback]

yeah, all he said :p

To the best of my knowledge, Opera's download manager is as fast as it's gonna get.

585241974[/snapback]

what he said as well :p

heh, seriosly, I've used FX and Opera, loving Opera 8.00, no need for extensions or downloading anything extra that fx needs, but opera has! don't get me started on the ads, they didn't bother me, I was so pleased with Opera I decided to pay for it ( total license $26 plus tax or so, can't remember lol payed for opera but not my OS ;) ). Operas memory footprint is a lot smaller than FX.

Opera is just the best, hands down. :yes:

  • Like 2

The page still doesn't seem to work correctly. Even with Opera 8.0. I will say that Opera 8 is nicer (and much more intuitive) than 7.54, but I still doesn't strike me as worth the payment. Care to clue me on the features you guys really find useful (and don't just start listing random features of Opera)? I wouldn't ever use Mail, IRC, or things like it (except RSS) inside my browser, so don't say those features over again. I'm more interested in browsing features. OmniWeb has a plethora of nice browser-oriented features, so I was wondering how Opera competes.

The page still doesn't seem to work correctly. Even with Opera 8.0. I will say that Opera 8 is nicer (and much more intuitive) than 7.54, but I still doesn't strike me as worth the payment. Care to clue me on the features you guys really find useful (and don't just start listing random features of Opera)? I wouldn't ever use Mail, IRC, or things like it (except RSS) inside my browser, so don't say those features over again. I'm more interested in browsing features. OmniWeb has a plethora of nice browser-oriented features, so I was wondering how Opera competes.

585252698[/snapback]

I use Opera because I feel I have more control over the pages I visit. IE and Firefox feels so... I don't know... not the same. When I first tried Opera 7.0 I fell in love with it instantly.

The page still doesn't seem to work correctly. Even with Opera 8.0. I will say that Opera 8 is nicer (and much more intuitive) than 7.54, but I still doesn't strike me as worth the payment. Care to clue me on the features you guys really find useful (and don't just start listing random features of Opera)? I wouldn't ever use Mail, IRC, or things like it (except RSS) inside my browser, so don't say those features over again. I'm more interested in browsing features. OmniWeb has a plethora of nice browser-oriented features, so I was wondering how Opera competes.

585252698[/snapback]

Well some of the browaing features which i am very fond of are:-

1.The ability to resume ur sessions even if there is a crash.

There is an extension in FF that allows you to do the same.But it doesn't load the page from the cache.So if u had like 10 windows open,then i can really clog up your connection(esp dial-up)

2.The ability to save notes while surfing with ease.Helpfull while researching for my school projects/

3.Magic Wand

4.It is the fastest around.For people with slow connection,it is a boon.

5.Ability to zoom in and out with ease.

[Tip.Try zooming into those high quality porn picts :p ]

I think everyone would agree that horizontal scrolling is the most irritating thing while surfing.

Opera helps you to get rid of that.It has an option to autometically fit pages to window width.

I think RSS feed is a great advantage.Like subscribe to the Neowin RSS feed and you don't have to visit neowin's oages to get the latest news

Btw,I am hearing about Omniweb for the first time.How is it?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!