578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I think everyone would agree that horizontal scrolling is the most irritating thing while surfing.

Opera helps you to get rid of that.It has an option to autometically fit pages to window width.

Another feature I would never use. I hardly ever come across pages where I have to do horizontal scrolling.

Another feature I would never use. I hardly ever come across pages where I have to do horizontal scrolling.

585254162[/snapback]

Yes, only in some porn sites we find use for horizontal scrolling. I dont visit porn sites .

@pallab,

You talk abt the small download size, remember the help files are not included and it has online help one, unlike firefox.

Also the for the voice commands we will have to download a additional 2.5mb.

I agree opera now has support for gmail, but i tried opening gmail.com in both Firefox and opera( V. 8) , FF opened much faster. opera took time to open.

^ Hmm, someone's never heard of monitors that aren't set to 1600x1200 :sleep:

Are you actually criticising Opera for not having an offline help system? A web browser, intentionally designed to be used for THE INTERNET, not having an OFFLINE help file? Oh noes, call the fire brigade!!!!1111oneoneoneelevenusefirefox

You have the choice of the 2.5mb, whether you download it or not. Once you ahve downloaded it, it should remain between versions of Opera.

Time to open gmail.com. Hmm, so many variables here (not limited to user stupidity) that I am forced to question the validity of your comparison.

I use Firefox myself, but I'm seriously thinking of switching to Opera. Firefox was using 113mb of memory the other day! Needless to say, it stopped responding. I tried to kill it via Task Manager and that ended up locking up too. :wacko:

Does anyone have any ideas on how to do decrease memory usage? I only run one extension (Adblock).

I use Firefox myself, but I'm seriously thinking of switching to Opera. Firefox was using 113mb of memory the other day! Needless to say, it stopped responding. I tried to kill it via Task Manager and that ended up locking up too. :wacko:

Does anyone have any ideas on how to do decrease memory usage? I only run one extension (Adblock).

585254545[/snapback]

Although Firefox uses unnecessarily large amount of memory, that is ridiculous.

If I were you, I'd reinstall Firefox and see if the problem still exists.

Refering back to the thread topic, I believe theres room for both browsers, they have similar goals, but different philosophies. I have great respect for Opera users, Yes I'm a Firefox user. Opera has some nice features, as does Firefox with its powerful extensions.

But I have little or no respect for users of IE and the IE rendering engine, its buggy, slow, security problems seem to happen on a daily basis. Lets face it, Microsoft can't follow W3C standards if it tried, hell its been atleast 2-3 major revisions and I'm still waiting for proper support for transparient png or even proper CSS2 support.

I don't care how cool the interface is, or how fast it is, or how many features Maxthon, Avant etc has, its severely limited by the aging IE engine, and this will only be worse when we see more advanced CSS2 and CSS3 based websites slowly develop over this year and without IE support, or with IE Support but with cutdown interface. Both Opera and Firefox are already implementing CSS3 into there browsers, wheres Microsoft in the picture? "Just Wait till IE 7", thats like waiting for Duke Nukem Forever. Are you IE fanboys really going to wait that long before you see any decent features? And even so, I bet with any CSS3 support in Microsoft's new browser will be either partially supported or unsupported, we've seen it before, it will happen again. *sigh*

Just to sum up, if you choose Opera, great, good stuff. If you choose Firefox or Mozilla Suite, great, good stuff. These browsers are going somewhere.

just my 2c.

But I have little or no respect for users of IE and the IE rendering engine, its buggy, slow, security problems seem to happen on a daily basis. Lets face it, Microsoft can't follow W3C standards if it tried, hell its been atleast 2-3 major revisions and I'm still waiting for proper support for transparient png or even proper CSS2 support.

585254783[/snapback]

But what is worse is ASP.NET a .NET extension which has controls which write HTML, more and more people use it and yet it does not support the w3c standard either. Microsoft need to wake up and do things the correct way no matter how damaging of demeaning they find it. Standards are not there so you can do it your way.

But more on topic the best way to decide on whether Opera or Firefox is best for you is to try it yourself, or if u cannot decide then use both, open one page with firefox and another with opera loading alternate pages in each so to use each one fairly :p

Well consider this FF doesn't even have voice commands!

585255120[/snapback]

I still think voice command systems are more trouble than their worth. They don't work like they should, and ambient noise totally kills the idea.

Well consider this FF doesn't even have voice commands!

585255120[/snapback]

First we will have to download 2.5mb, then it will be more heavy download than FF (u always talk abt small file size).

Then we will have to train opera with our voice.

So voice command feature isnt that hot and i have no use for it.

Do u really use all these voice commands?

You dont need to train it.

585255793[/snapback]

Come on now, you don't expect him to actually read this, now do you? It's been said what.. 3 times now.. and he still thinks you need to train it? Obviously, he's content with remaining misinformed about Opera.

Others seem content with being convinced that Opera is someone majorly affected by these features "I'll never use". As if having a few extra features will some how magically make their browsing experience worse.

But hey.. that's fine. It could be worse. They could be still using Internet Explorer.

gawd will these debates EVER end.

i prefer opera because for me it loads pages faster AND has less bs in it, no need to download umteen extintions to get it working the way opera dose out of the box.

and so u know mozilla-firefox may be at an early number but look at where it came from b4 u say its better because its got a lower number i use BOUTH.

opera is by far more gui costomizable ppl here who use ff only would crap there pants if they saw what i do with my opera layout.

opera's voice works fine no training needed and no noise dosnt kill it. i rarely use it now because well im use to NOT using it and also i havent got my mic setup on my system anymore(loaned to my mother for her laptop)

opera is good as long as the page is made using proper code or hell even bad code works it may render some things wrong but when there are 440+ errors or ur avrage page u gotta think somebodys using frontpage or dreamweaver and not checking there code. FF renders some pages HORRIBALY most it renders fine But also reammber that some pages send opera a broken code version of the page because they can see that its opera and they want to mess with it ( try www.msnbc.com for an example )

oh and gmail works fine with opera8 havent had any problems yet.

the gmail notifyer is for ALL browsers though its still not 100% compatable with opera(googles and opera are working on the mail:to issues)

all in all i prefer opera for my day to day stuff and if i find a page it cant open properly i load up ff or ie*shudders*

Oh dont even get me started on "opensorce" i hate to tell yall but i have seen more BULLSH!T POS apps come out of opensorce then i can count ff and mozilla have been stealing ideas from opera since like version 3 (yes i had opera ver3) and they still do it and thats koo to a point since it dose make their browser more usefull.

oh and 25$ isnt bad for a browser that can do all that opera can do OUT OF THE BOX and that has a responcive staff OH and 25$=whole household all ur systems AND os's now :D

Sumdy asked earlier on for an example, well I just then stumbled on one so i thought I'd bring it here for you.

I got no idea why this is, but if you open this page in IE, FF, and Opera then see what happens. FF somehow screws it up, at least it does on my computer. I like its prettiness and it's got some great extensions, but it needs a fair bit more cooking to come up to standard IMHO.

Sumdy asked earlier on for an example, well I just then stumbled on one so i thought I'd bring it here for you.

I got no idea why this is, but if you open this page in IE, FF, and Opera then see what happens. FF somehow screws it up, at least it does on my computer. I like its prettiness and it's got some great extensions, but it needs a fair bit more cooking to come up to standard IMHO.

585257646[/snapback]

The site was done in Frontpage. That should explain any problems you're having. :p

The site was done in Frontpage. That should explain any problems you're having. :p

585258050[/snapback]

Yeah, M$ Frontpage messes things up a bit for firefox :pinch:

So when ever I was designing my site in Frontpage I had to do

some css shizz to make it look decent in Firefox

Here's my site :/

I tend to like Firefox better (Y)

Another feature I would never use. I hardly ever come across pages where I have to do horizontal scrolling.

585254162[/snapback]

oh i guess just because you don't use it, it must not be useful! if that's the case then the firefox fanboys shouldn't use the whole open source thing as a reason. after all a lot of people don't use the code so it's obviously useless.

and grudge you complain about voice but no one is telling you to download it, it's optional! you should be able to understand that seeing as you have to download the stuff you want in firefox! Also don't complain about how downloading the voice feature will increase the size of opera compared to firefox. i mean what if you were to download extensions for firefox for features that are already included with opera, what would firefox's size be then?

firefox ...

next question...

585260418[/snapback]

Question: Ya, Firefox or Opera?

Answer: Opera. Period.

From the Admins: We sincerely thank you for expressing your exalted opinion (as if things were going to change by your wishing) and wasting precious time, space and bandwidth. In future please substantiate your unintelligent answers with intelligent facts.

Now go play with yourself.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
    • Password Safe 3.72.0 by Razvan Serea Password Safe is a password database utility. Like many other such products, commercial and otherwise, it stores your passwords in an encrypted file, allowing you to remember only one password (the "safe combination"), instead of all the username/password combinations that you use. Once stored, your user names and passwords are just a few clicks away. Using Password Safe you can organize your passwords using your own customizable references—for example, by user ID, category, web site, or location. You can choose to store all your passwords in a single encrypted master password list (an encrypted password database), or use multiple databases to further organize your passwords (work and home, for example). And with its intuitive interface you will be up and running in minutes. PasswordSafe was originally designed by the renowned security technologist Bruce Schneier and released as a free utility application. Password Safe 3.72.0 changelog: Fixed bugs Improved font scale handling - should resolve font size issues on high resolution displays. GH1749 In the Master Password Setup window, "Show Master Password" is no longer truncated on some displays. GH1092, SF1595 Size and position of main window is now correctly restored on scaled displays. SF1630 Keep password expiry date when both password and password expiry are changed; don't clear a non-recurring expiry when the password's changed. SF1628 Custom values can now be copied to the clipboard in read-only mode via Ctrl-C and right-click->Copy Value. New features GH1196 Dark display mode support: Password Safe now supports the system display mode, as well as setting the mode directly via Manage->Options->Display->Display Mode. This change also updates the general "look & feel" of the app to the current Windows theme. Known limitations: The Date picker and keyboard shortcut controls do not switch to dark theme The Customize Toolbar dialog does not switch to dark theme Custom Field support has been added to the more advanced features: Filters XML and Text import and export Comparison, Sync and Merge databases SF938 Custom field values may now be selected by name and copied via a "Copy Custom Field Value..." submenu in the entry context popup menu. SF936 Notes and Custom fields layout now overlap, selectable by tabs, resulting in a more compact and less cluttered layout. SF935 Autotype: Specifying '\v{name}' in the autotype text will cause the corresponding value to be autotyped. Download: PasswordSafe 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: PasswordSafe 32-bit | Portable 32-bit View: PasswordSafe Website | Quickstart Guide | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!