578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

I dont understand why people say Firefox = free but opera isn't.

OPERA IS FREE!

585287118[/snapback]

Actually, that's what I have been saying. But it since the 'Opera costs money' idea is the only thing that justifies saying that Firefox fans don't try Opera but Opera fans test Firefox, you are supposed to be quiet about it.

see, it's better that it doesn't come with ff by default. if they decided to include loads of extensions they thought people may use as part of the browser, then the download and install will become big and long. also, not everyone wants all the features, so by having them as an extension you can allow people to have a clean, simple browser, or one customised to your own needs.

opera, on the other hand, forces you to download loads of crap against your will.

And yet, Opera is smaller than Firefox. Go figure.

What do you mean has never said it? The fastest browser slogans are all over opera.com. It was just an example of Opera's false advertising.

I was talking about spreading lies about Mozilla. Even though Opera has had lots of chances to do so, they haven't actually done it.

If you had read futher the same paragraph I said that exact same thing you say, it's just a catchy marketing phrase. I don't see how you can realise that as marketing talk but then fail to see that the link you pasted (about Minimo) is nothing but similar marketing talk. If you adamantly want to bash something over it, bash the reporter as RufioPan suggested.

You still don't seem to understand. The Mozilla spokesman made a claim about Opera being less portable than Mozilla. That very different from using a marketing slogan.

Yes, he is a Opera fan. That's what I said, he decides to try to start a flame war on mozillazine even after being repeatedly told to not to do it. I don't see how I was dishonest? I was just pointing out the fact that people are same, no matter if they are Opera or Firefox fans. The bad Firefox fans just are sadly more dominant since Firefox's market share is larger.

There is a reason why Firefox zealots are becoming more and more hated. You simply cannot compare a single Opera user trolling the MZ forums with the masses of Firefox users who bash Opera based on, not their own testing, but on what other people are saying, just because it's "cool" to bash Opera these days.

You can find things like popup blocker, password saving and integrated search function from the list. Maybe they are better in Opera but that's a matter of taste and shouldn't be said as a fact.

IE has a popup blocker in XP SP2, that is right, but this does not show a pattern of deception and lies. And IE does not have the Wand, and it does not have Opera's extensive search capabilities.

Actually, that's what I have been saying. But it since the 'Opera costs money' idea is the only thing that justifies saying that Firefox fans don't try Opera but Opera fans test Firefox, you are supposed to be quiet about it.

585287246[/snapback]

You are missing the point yet again :)

Opera is free, that is correct. But Firefox fans often say that it isn't, and that's why they don't want to use it.

That Opera is free does not contradict the claim that Firefox users won't give Opera a try because they perceive it as not being free.

an extension called session saver would be perfect for what you want.

see, it's better that it doesn't come with ff by default. if they decided to include loads of extensions they thought people may use as part of the browser, then the download and install will become big and long. also, not everyone wants all the features, so by having them as an extension you can allow people to have a clean, simple browser, or one customised to your own needs.

opera, on the other hand, forces you to download loads of crap against your will.

585287211[/snapback]

what if you don't have time to go round searching for extensions and finding the right version?

i don't see opera forcing anyone to download anything against their will because you don't have to download the browser itself. what you might consider crap may be useful to someone else. also you don't have to use the features, you can turn them off.

ok so maybe you still have to download the extra stuff that you might not use but the download is still smaller than firefox. what if you were to include extensions with firefox to match the features that opera already has, what would the size of firefox be then?

i find firefox flimsy looking and almost not like a full browser. this isn't all down to having to download extensions to get what you want. don't ask me to explain, i get the same feeling when buying non-official control pads for the PS2.

The point is that these things indicate a willingness to be dishonest in order to get the upper hand.

585285342[/snapback]

I'd be very careful when making accusations about dishonesty. Unless you know what the Mozilla devs themselves, or an official Moz Foundation rep has been saying, it's best not to make assumptions. Media is media... unfortunately not everyone gets a fair or balanced portrayal in the media.

Relating to the chart... how long was it up? Why was it taken down? Again, shouldn't we give credit for that?

All things considered, it's generally a better use of our time to talk about why our products are good, and how they can be improved, rather than argue about who said what about whom.

Peace.

You still don't seem to understand. The Mozilla spokesman made a claim about Opera being less portable than Mozilla. That very different from using a marketing slogan.

That's just ridiculous. First of all, he isn't a Mozilla spokesman. He's a developer of Minimo. Only way to know that he's lying would be to say that he's all knowing.. which I doubt. It's very cool to judge the whole Mozilla Foundation by a single comment of a single developer, who probably even isn't a Moz Foundation staff member.

You are missing the point yet again :)

Opera is free, that is correct. But Firefox fans often say that it isn't, and that's why they don't want to use it.

That Opera is free does not contradict the claim that Firefox users won't give Opera a try because they perceive it as not being free.

585287313[/snapback]

I'm starting to think that you're the one missing the points here. Just read the 6 last pages or so. One of the main arguments has been that Firefox fans are more ignorant about other browsers (Opera) because Opera costs money.

Edit: Blah, missed the second half of the post.

Yet huge majority of users on Mozillazine has used or is using Opera. I don't see how you can keep claiming that the theory about 'Firefox user not trying Opera because it costs money' is true when the only thing backing it up is your words.

Edited by Elendil
That's just ridiculous. First of all, he isn't a Mozilla spokesman. He's a developer of Minimo. Only way to know that he's lying would be to say that he's all knowing.. which I doubt.

So. Does that justify his comment?

Yet huge majority of users on Mozillazine has used or is using Opera.

Not in my experience. Most comments from those who have even tried Opera are usually "I tried it ages ago, and hated it".

I don't see how you can keep claiming that the theory about 'Firefox user not trying Opera because it costs money' is true when the only thing backing it up is your words.

I'm not sure how many different ways I can put this. "Opera has ads" and "Opera costs money" are two of the most common complaints from Firefox users, especially in the MZ forums. Many also go even further, slagging Opera based on, not their own experience, but what they've heard from someone else, who heard it from someone else, who heard it from someone who tried Opera 4 once upon a time. You get the idea.

I'm not sure how many different ways I can put this. "Opera has ads" and "Opera costs money" are two of the most common complaints from Firefox users, especially in the MZ forums. Many also go even further, slagging Opera based on, not their own experience, but what they've heard from someone else, who heard it from someone else, who heard it from someone who tried Opera 4 once upon a time. You get the idea.

We're talking about testing the browser, not using it. If someone can't live with a browser that has ads, it's their choice.. but at least they have tried it. Ads don't stop anyone from testing the browser.

So. Does that justify his comment?

It makes your holy wrath against Mozilla Foundation and Firefox unjust.

I'm starting to think that you're the one missing the points here. Just read the 6 last pages or so. One of the main arguments has been that Firefox fans are more ignorant about other browsers (Opera) because Opera costs money.

Edit: Blah, missed the second half of the post.

Yet huge majority of users on Mozillazine has used or is using Opera. I don't see how you can keep claiming that the theory about 'Firefox user not trying Opera because it costs money' is true when the only thing backing it up is your words.

Do u have anything to back up ur statement that they aren't ignorant about other browsers ?

Most who have used it have used it in the early Version, Its GUI has almost completely changed since then and so has its rendering Engine..

The attitude of most FF users is either

1- FF Rox Opera Sux 11one11oneone1111

2- I Never Used Opera and never will

3- Why pay For a Browser ??

4- I've used it b4...its Bloated..

I dont say that FireFox is bad.. One thing that Opera can never beat FF at is Customization.. Its Open-Source so u cant beat that unless Opera Decides to go Open Source aswell (Dont see it happening in the near Future). I use Opera beacuse i find it easier to Disable Options then to hunt for Extension.

Almost every1 that gives the latest version of Opera have said they like it.. mayb u should try too ?

One thing that Opera can never beat FF at is Customization.. Its Open-Source so u cant beat that unless Opera Decides to go Open Source aswell (Dont see it happening in the near Future). I use Opera beacuse i find it easier to Disable Options then to hunt for Extension.

585287498[/snapback]

How is FF more customizable than Opera? You can make Opera look like what ever you want. I tried FF v.1.0 when it was launch. Only customization I saw was skinning and add/remove toolbars...

Again, I'm not saying that there aren't ignorant Firefox users. I'm being neutral here. There are stupid Firefox spammers who are just using the browser because it's 'in' and 'cool'. There are similar Opera users. Since Firefox's market share is much larger than Opera's the Firefox fans are louder.. which probably makes them more obnoxious. Herds always make idiots feel stronger.

I've used Opera for years, I love it. I'll definitely install it again once version 8 is final. I just love Firefox more, at the moment at least. It's just too much fun to mess around with it.

U have the source Code at ur hands..U can turn it into whatever to want...it goes more than just skins but then again the average joe doesnt know all this..but if u really want to argue on which is more customizable i'd say FF without any hesitation.

It has extension + u have the Code, But if u just want to Compare the GUI Customizability then Yea Opera is Probably Better & Thats why i use it :D

It makes your holy wrath against Mozilla Foundation and Firefox unjust.

you have got to be kidding me...

because he is not an official bloatzilla person, he can lie as much as he wants?

dude, he's the lead developer or minimo or something! of course he's part of the mozilla corporation. he's probably a paid programmer.

Good points. In regards to the comparison chart, well I never saw the original, nor have I heard a rebuttal from the author of that chart, so I won't comment. Should we ignore the credit that is due when the chart was eventually corrected?

I have given credit that is due, to the person who corrected it, an Opera user. Mozilla corrected about half of the page after their blatant lying was pointed out but they absolutely refused to have an accurate comparison on their site which is the reason it was removed from their website (you can consider this the original author's "rebuttal," since he couldn't possibly have a real one to justify his lies.)

Secondly, you seem to be thinking that "fud" is what led Firefox to where it is. Are you so certain? You are basically saying that chart, and other lies perpetrated, stole usership from Opera? So all those noob web users were actually headed over to the Opera site to purchase their license, or download their free versoin, and were instead amazed by a chart?

Are you saying that their lies couldn't have possibly made a difference? If you are, then I must ask: Why did the Mozilla Foundation find it necessary to lie? Surely they wouldn't blatantly lie about their competitors if it didn't benefit them...

A good portion of Firefox's userbase, if not the vast majority comes post 1.0. I call it good marketing. Yes, unfortunately, you have to market a product to make it successful to the masses.

Firefox's marketing was rather good but the coincidences surrounding the marketing played a bigger role in the adoption of Firefox than anything else, how successful would Firefox have been if Microsoft weren't being dissed by the U.S. Government at the same time? It would've only been about half as successful if it weren't for sheer luck.

What morals did they throw out the window? You're still referring to the chart that dates back to Firefird 0.7?

Translation: "Lying to millions of people doesn't prove that they threw their morals out the window."

Yeah, a browser that's just good enough isn't good for me, nor you, nor for the industry, but if Opera is really the killer app you and others are suggesting, get Opera to prove it... to put some muscle into their marketing.

I know you've been reading this thread but have you listened to a single thing that has been said? I believe everyone in this thread, except you, has agreed that marketshare says nothing about the quality of a product. If a logical fallacy like that was true then why isn't Discreet's 3D Studio Max the most popular 3D authoring tool?

Techno_Funky, use Ctrl+H to hide Opera to the system tray. It's Opera's "boss key".

A porn browser is never complete without the almighty boss key! ;)

You are missing his point, I think. This is not just about a comparison table. It is about a general trend. There are other things too, such as the story on Minimo reinventing mobile browsing, where you basically get the impression that Minimo is leading the race and innovating, when the fact is that all those things are already done by Opera.

Yeah, that minimo story was full of crap. That was about the 10th time Mozilla done something "innovative" which was copied from Opera. I don't mind Mozilla and Opera borrowing ideas from eachother, it's the fact that Mozilla is always claiming something to be intuitive when it's not.

How on earth can a Mozilla spokesman make any kind of statement about Opera's portability, especially considering the fact that Opera is available for a helluva lot more mobile operating systems than Minimo?

It's impossible to state something like that while maintaining any credibility. The last time I checked, the Mozilla developers don't have Opera's source code so it's impossible to say which platforms it could be ported to (there's a couple of platforms which Opera could be ported to but there's not enough market interest in doing so.) Not to mention that Opera is coded with C++ which can compile to practically any platform as long as you include the right header files and we must also not forgot that Opera uses a commercial windowing library (Qt) so when that's updated they can port to even more platforms without any extra effort at all. This Mozilla claim has nothing to substantiate it, it's a fabricated benefit, it's a lie.

Well, Firefox's browse history usually works well in these cases.

Unless you are one of the unfortunate people which are effected by the "browser history gets lost" bug which has remained unpatched for nearly two years now. This indicates that the "it's open source so it'll get fixed faster" claim is also a lie. If you think that this bug doesn't exist then do a search through BugZilla, it's been duplicated about 60 times and is very easy to find.

I ask for lies and all I get is a REMOVED comparison chart, now.. I wonder why it was removed?

All you got? You must not be reading this thread. The comparison chart, the portability claim, the "open source benefits" claim, all of the "innovative" features that they claim to have created, how can you possibly not see more than one lie pointed out in this thread? It appears to me that you are ignoring what has been said.

*Post split into peices to avoid IPB's quote bug*

Edit: Couple minutes of browsing on Opera's site and I came up with more blatant lies, this time about IE:

http://www.opera.com/products/desktop/opera-ie/

Now how many of the features they claim are Opera only can be found in IE too? I counted at least 3

The only thing I see which contradicts today's Internet Explorer is about popup blocking and only about half of the Internet Explorer users have it (not everyone runs XP SP2) so in a comparison it is still fair game because the Internet Explorer user reading it might not have popup blocking. Besides that, I do not see any other possible contradictions.

I understand your gripes. Again, I'm not inclined to comment on accusations against ppl when they or their view are not being represented in some manner

They did represent themselves by removing the comparison page from their website after they were spotted, that's all the representation that is needed. The only other way to represent themselves was to keep the page online and simply correct it and leave a note at the bottom that it has been corrected, but that was too much to ask. This can be described like the guy who was screwing his neighbors wife and when caught he jumped out the window, just because he didn't stay and give an explanation for porking the guy's wife doesn't mean that he hasn't represented himself.

You don't see Opera claiming on their page 'OCCASIONALLY THE FASTEST BROWSER'. They claim they have the fastest browser period. Now, I've tested both Firefox and Opera and Firefox renders pages consistently faster (used stopwatch to time page rendering) for me. This of course means that Opera is lying on their page. They are promoting their product with lies and FUD, one might say. No, it's just a nice marketing phrase. Exactly what the alleged Mozilla Spokesperson was doing, exactly what any Opera exec would say if he/she had the chance.

I have already, quite clearly, explained why their slogan is absolutely true. It should also be pointed out that it's impossible to get any accurate statistics for loading time because there's a million factors involved: do you know how many users were on the site when you tried it with Firefox and how many were on it when you tried Opera, do you know how many users were online with your ISP at both moments, do you know how many people from your ISP were on that same site, do you know how much activity was being done by each individual user, do you know if your thumb hit the stopwatch at the very millisecond that each started and finished? You couldn't possibly answer any of these questions with any degree of accuracy, so how could you possibly claim that the outcome is an accurate representation of both browsers? Even if you used something more accurate like a packet sniffer then you'd still be woefully inaccurate due to all of the random factors that couldn't possibly be accounted for. You also conveniently ignored how that phrase could apply to using the application and not just downloading pages. Because you cannot possibly get an accurate test of either one, the rest of your arguments against Opera collapse by themselves, so there's no need for me to even counter them.

and what specific features are you referring to?

That's what I can't figure out. I only found one possible discrepency but that doesn't account for the 3 that he claims is there...

hmmm opera is a very good browser,but this interface is bloated somehow, don't feel comfortable with it,id rather use firefox for it's simplicity and speed.

cheers

You can customize the Opera interface, ask for help on the MyOpera forums and I'm confident that you'll get all the help you need. On my computer have the interface trimmed back enormously (I didn't remove functionality,) and on my parents' computer I have the interface almost identical to Internet Explorer (the only difference is a good search field to the right of the address bar.)

You can find things like popup blocker, password saving and integrated search function from the list. Maybe they are better in Opera but that's a matter of taste and shouldn't be said as a fact.

If they are better then what you are arguing, exactly? How have they lied in the comparison when they rightfully point out that their's is better than Internet Explorer's?

Apparently you do, I visit there daily. I see way more Opera fans trying to flame Firefox users than the other way around.

Of course you do, it's a site of Mozilla fans where other browser users troll, they're not going to flame eachother for preferring the same software... and the same holds true for the Opera forums (other browser users troll there.)

opera, on the other hand, forces you to download loads of crap against your will.

Opera's load is smaller than Firefox's empty basket, so I don't see why it's such a big problem.

*Post split again for the same reason, sorry*

I'd be very careful when making accusations about dishonesty. Unless you know what the Mozilla devs themselves, or an official Moz Foundation rep has been saying, it's best not to make assumptions. Media is media... unfortunately not everyone gets a fair or balanced portrayal in the media.

Their lies go beyond the media, they publish lies on their own sites and in the media there are quotes, I repeat "quotes," from the developers which are flat-out lies. It's not an assumption, they've lied plenty of times.

Relating to the chart... how long was it up? Why was it taken down? Again, shouldn't we give credit for that?

The had it up on their site for 2 days and then the Opera community pointed out just how wrong it was (at this point it was debatable wether it was a stupid mistake or blatant lying.) Mozilla corrected half of the things pointed out (which automatically proves that they knew there was still lies in the comparison, at this point they were blatant liars and not just mistaken.) they left the revised (I'm hesitant to say "the corrected") version on their site for about a month or so until they couldn't bare listening to the Opera users, and employees, jump down their throat about it. Should we give them credit for being blatant liars? Sure, they deserve all the credit they can get for being liars.

All things considered, it's generally a better use of our time to talk about why our products are good, and how they can be improved, rather than argue about who said what about whom.

The people behind the product are just as important as the product itself. This is why I generally dislike Invision Power Board, not because it's a bad product but because IPS are liars. This is also the reason why I generally dislike Firefox, it's a good product but the Mozilla Foundation are liars. I think it's important for consumers, even moreso for those who would actually give donations, know the truth about the people behind the product.

Ads don't stop anyone from testing the browser.

It does if they hate ads and know that they'd have to pay to remove them.

Since you requested:

Feature 1: Pop-up blocking. Even though Opera.com claims it doesn't exist in IE, it does.

Feature 2: Built in search engines: Just open IE and hit ctrl-e, click customize. You'll see that IE comes with more built in search engines than Opera. 20 different ways to search things under different categories.

Feature 3: Wand. Wand is nothing more than a password manager. Especially it mentions one-click signing in, which happens to be very possible with IE.

Their lies go beyond the media, they publish lies on their own sites and in the media there are quotes, I repeat "quotes," from the developers which are flat-out lies. It's not an assumption, they've lied plenty of times.

You keep saying that but don't bring any proof, even though I particularly asked for it. All I got was a removed comparison chart, which by the way wasn't removed by Opera users, but by Mozilla staff.

Edit: It's amusing that my at least half trollish 'Opera' smug digging has provided more current proof than these 'Firefox!!@211 ar lyiers' steamers can come up with.

Since you requested:

Feature 1: Pop-up blocking. Even though Opera.com claims it doesn't exist in IE, it does.

Feature 2: Built in search engines: Just open IE and hit ctrl-e, click customize. You'll see that IE comes with more built in search engines than Opera. 20 different ways to search things under different categories.

Feature 3: Wand. Wand is nothing more than a password manager. Especially it mentions one-click signing in, which happens to be very possible with IE.

585288062[/snapback]

By built in I think they mean the part on the toolbar.

IE does have a thing to remember passwords, but you have to type in the user name first then click in the box. I'm sure there's a manager in it so you can delete them or edit them like Opera's, only I can't seem to find it. So as far as I know right now, they don't have the full feature Opera and Firefox have.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!