578 members have voted

  1. 1. FireFox or Opera ?

    • Firefox
      354
    • Opera
      224


Recommended Posts

Well you guys using the "Kill Firefox" image aren't much better than the Opera flamers.

AFAIK, they didn't start using it until heated debates with Firefox users...

I'll keep on preferring Firefox for its speed and lean feel. That's not going to change any time soon unless Opera drops most of what it has inside of it.

The funny thing is still that Opera is smaller, faster and more memory efficient, despite having more features than Firefox. Also, I bet I can surf at least ten times faster with a default Opera installation than you can with a default Firefox installation.

Anyway, you are one of the people who keep this thread going with your silly insinuations that Opera is somehow bloated, despited being a smaller download than Firefox.

That's a horrible analogy.? Ads aren't the same as brand name.

585328475[/snapback]

No kidding. It wouldn't be an ANALOGY if they were the same, English professor. You're saying that something is not free just because you don't like some particular down side that it includes. Whether that's because it comes with advertisements or because it's cherry red when you wanted lime green or because it's Sony instead of Magnavox, the point is that you're saying it's not free because it comes with something you don't like. If i LIKE the advertisements (i don't, but supposing i did), is it still not free?

Also, I don't know if you're dumb, retarded, or both, but it's Firefox.? I know you think it's cool or funny, but it just makes you look stupid.? Even a kindergartener can master that word.

585328475[/snapback]

I don't know if you're dumb, retarded, or both, but i said 'Firefox' twice in that post. Clearly i've mastered the word.

I call it Firetruck because i think it's a cute nickname. If i used Firefox, i would use Firesomething to rename it Firetruck. It doesn't carry the slightest negative connotation. It certainly has no political motivation, in any case, so it's hardly as bad as M$ or Winblows or anything like that, which are used excessively here and elsewhere.

You pick the features you want and download them.? Firefox is pretty much stripped when you download it.? I fix computers for a living.? I have a 4 year degree to be able to fix computers.? How many degrees do you have?? ZERO, you are still in high school.? Get a clue kid.

585328490[/snapback]

And, uh, Internet Explorer isn't stripped? You're telling me that Opera has the most features, and Internet Explorer has the second-most, and Firefox has the least? I think you're selling your browser of choice pretty short there.

Furthermore, your PhD in 'FIXING COMPUTERS' (whatever that means) is hardly an indication of your intelligence or your mastery of programming jargon. President Bush has a degree from Harvard AND Yale, and half of America still thinks he's a complete moron, so i don't really see why you expect me to be impressed by your 4-year journey through college.

Also, i'm not in high school, thanks. They skipped me a grade. Wish i still was, though. High school beats real life any day.

(For the record, by the way, even though i like Opera a lot and the amount of Firetruck propaganda flooding the Internet is pretty depressing, i do agree that 'Kill Firefox' is kind of childish.)

^ owned.

Personal preference to me is Firefox, never really tried Opera but I was an Internet Explorer user for a long time, and eventually switched after hearing that Firefox was a safer browser, and I just stuck with it, never felt compelled to try Opera, and the fact I had to pay always turned me off as I am a cheapskate :), Firefox always did what I wanted to, and that was be a nice, simple, customisable browser, that I could add functionality to if I needed it. It's fast enough for me, I barely notice a delay between pressing my "WWW" multimedia key [which has the IE logo on it :p] and having it open, as for opening pages faster, I find that my connection does that work for me.

The best way to discover what browser you should use is to try both of them, and see which is most suited to your needs, rather than asking for biased opinions.

So that still doesnt fix the whole not being able to empty the junk mail folder in hotmail issue. The window pops up, but the OK button just does nothing.

585332067[/snapback]

Thats because microsoft need to learn how to code properly :p

You could just select all and choose delete, not really that hard unless u have 500 pages of spam.

So that still doesnt fix the whole not being able to empty the junk mail folder in hotmail issue. The window pops up, but the OK button just does nothing.

The reason this happens is that Hotmail uses server-side browser sniffing, and it fails to send an important JavaScript file to Opera. If you use a proxy and spoof 100% as Firefox, it works fine, because Opera gets the file. But without 100% spoofing, it seems that Hotmail breaks in Opera on purpose.

The funny thing is still that Opera is smaller, faster and more memory efficient, despite having more features than Firefox. Also, I bet I can surf at least ten times faster with a default Opera installation than you can with a default Firefox installation.

585331371[/snapback]

Never said Firefox was smaller, faster and more memory efficient (except on OS X, it definitely is). I just said it felt leaner and faster to me. All the features in Opera seem to give it a cluttered preferences UI. There are also lots of toolbars you can turn on and off. It's just all this stuff I have to do before it's looking exactly like I want it to and acting exactly like I want it to act. I don't want to start a flame battle with these statements. These are specific to my needs. My needs are probably very different from the needs of most Opera users.

vcv, extra features do make a product bloated when they sacrifice ease of use to put them in. That's how I feel with Opera. I know that may not be how you feel, but it's how I feel.

The result of adding new features to a program or system to the point where the benefit of the new features is outweighed by the extra resources consumed (RAM, disk space or performance) and complexity of use. Software bloat is an instance of Parkinson's Law: resource requirements expand to consume the resources available. Causes of software bloat include second-system effect and creeping featuritis.

Well let's see. Do the benefit of features outweigh the extra resources consumed? Absolutely not.

Opera is still beautifully fast. The interface is no longer cluttered. Resource usage is down a ton in 8.0 beta. I'm failing to see where you could even begin to think there is bloat.

Would you consider mIRC bloated? It has just as many options as Opera, if not more.

Would you consider Windows or Linux or BSD os OSX bloated? After all, look at all those features!!!!!!

Software doesn't always work that way. You can add code without sacrificing speed or resources, if done right.

1. They're both secure.

2. They're both lean.

Fx is a fast clean-cut browser, and can be customized with extensions. Period. Extensions != Fx. So it cannot brag about that. Opera have most functionalities of these extensions built-in, with smaller installer. Some people call it good programming. Some call it bloat. Do the run-around...

I don't like the OOB interface configuration of Opera8b1 but I think that's a small matter, and because there's a good chance it will change in the final release.

3. They're both fast. The difference is negligible and affected by many other external factors.

4. They're both free.

Free means not paying for something you use. Opera just happen to have an ad which most of us abhors. It does not SIGNIFICANTLY lessen it's functionality. Some people are fine with it, some aren't. Do the run-around again.

5. They both provide means for powerful customizations and tweaks.

They're both great browsers! It's just a matter of preference. Dance to whatever music suits you. I'm just glad they're available for my use.:woot: I use both btw, often at the same time. ( Opera8b1 , Fx1.0+ )

I did read a lot of posts by Fx+rabid+fanbois spreading half-truths and half-lies, or maybe just plain un/misinformed. Even Fx's site did so too at one point, which is a big turn-off for me. That doesn't affect the quality of the product though.

JM2C

Well let's see. Do the benefit of features outweigh the extra resources consumed? Absolutely not.

Opera is still beautifully fast.  The interface is no longer cluttered.  Resource usage is down a ton in 8.0 beta.  I'm failing to see where you could even begin to think there is bloat. 

Would you consider mIRC bloated?  It has just as many options as Opera, if not more.

Would you consider Windows or Linux or BSD os OSX bloated? After all, look at all those features!!!!!!

Software doesn't always work that way.  You can add code without sacrificing speed or resources, if done right.

585333301[/snapback]

You chose to ignore my statement about ease of use, didn't you? Opera's ease of use was, in my mind, sacrificed when they decided to incorporate all those little browser engine quirks and features in the program. I do think mIRC is bloated. The ease of use is sacrificed for some extra features. Same goes with Windows in my mind. Ease of use is sacrificed for, actually, not many features at all. OS X got it right. Ease of use is not sacrificed in the implementation of all those extra features.

You chose to ignore my statement about ease of use, didn't you? Opera's ease of use was, in my mind, sacrificed when they decided to incorporate all those little browser engine quirks and features in the program. I do think mIRC is bloated. The ease of use is sacrificed for some extra features. Same goes with Windows in my mind. Ease of use is sacrificed for, actually, not many features at all. OS X got it right. Ease of use is not sacrificed in the implementation of all those extra features.

585333543[/snapback]

Well I'm sorry you feel that way. I don't think the ease of use is affected at all in Opera. And mIRC is probably the easiest irc client to use. And windows.. again. OSX is a little better, but windows is still easy to use.

But your definition of bloat is wrong. Try using another word that actually applies to what you are trying to say, NOT bloat. That gives Opera a bad image based on bad information.

Well I'm sorry you feel that way.  I don't think the ease of use is affected at all in Opera.  And mIRC is probably the easiest irc client to use.  And windows.. again.  OSX is a little better, but windows is still easy to use.

But your definition of bloat is wrong.  Try using another word that actually applies to what you are trying to say, NOT bloat.  That gives Opera a bad image based on bad information.

585334658[/snapback]

My definition of bloat comes directly from the one you stated.

The result of adding new features to a program or system to the point where the benefit of the new features is outweighed by the extra resources consumed (RAM, disk space or performance) and complexity of use.

I agree with VCV, bloat is adding features where the complexity outweighs their usefulness and I really can't put my finger on any of Opera's features which fit into that category. All of the features there are to remove tedious activities (notes built-in for easy researching, sessions to avoid typing in multiple addresses at startup, rss to stay updated on news/updates without effort, advanced tabbed browsing for comparing multiple documents at once instead of flicking between tabs constantly, etc) and do not add complexity much, if at all. Anyone with an IQ higher than a fridgerator's temperature can use Opera without much effort.

I agree with VCV, bloat is adding features where the complexity outweighs their usefulness and I really can't put my finger on any of Opera's features which fit into that category. All of the features there are to remove tedious activities (notes built-in for easy researching, sessions to avoid typing in multiple addresses at startup, rss to stay updated on news/updates without effort, advanced tabbed browsing for comparing multiple documents at once instead of flicking between tabs constantly, etc) and do not add complexity much, if at all. Anyone with an IQ higher than a fridgerator's temperature can use Opera without much effort.

585335399[/snapback]

Unless they by any chance mosey on into the detailed preferences. Then you're bombarded with choices. It's like the first version of Adium. Lots of features, lots of preferences. Confused everybody.

Unless they by any chance mosey on into the detailed preferences. Then you're bombarded with choices. It's like the first version of Adium. Lots of features, lots of preferences. Confused everybody.

585335511[/snapback]

I'm not confused. Maybe your brain can only process so much information at once?

I just said it felt leaner and faster to me.

that's completely irrational, and cannot be justified.

All the features in Opera seem to give it a cluttered preferences UI.

you mean 'flexible'. i never open the preferences dialog anyway. just use f12 and quick preferences.

There are also lots of toolbars you can turn on and off.

uh yeah, and in opera 8 most of them are off by default. what's the problem?

It's just all this stuff I have to do before it's looking exactly like I want it to and acting exactly like I want it to act.

and firefox? do you use it without any extensions what so ever?

vcv, extra features do make a product bloated when they sacrifice ease of use to put them in. That's how I feel with Opera. I know that may not be how you feel, but it's how I feel.

how you 'feel' is irrelevant. you only say that because you think it means that you don't have to justify your anti-opera fud.

opera 8 is streamlined and has a much better ui than firefox. that's not just how i 'feel'. to me, browsing with opera is a lot faster with firefox because of all the built in features. and guess what, some of the best ones, like resuming the session after restart, built in keyboard shortcuts, mouse gestures, etc. don't even add anything to the visible ui!

see? i explained my opinion. it is not just a vague 'feeling'. but you have no arguments against opera, so you rely on those vague 'feelings' which you feel that you don't have to justify, so you spew out lies about opera like there's no tomorrow.

I'd rather tweak some configurations with Opera than downloading ten or twenty extensions on Firefox and configure them one by one.

Firefox with no extension is just not usable for me, no features at all at very slow speed.

585336270[/snapback]

I dont know how you can say that. I have Fx and Opera on a pII 450mhz and opera is slower than molasus on the north pole. I use Fx with no extentions and i can have 20+ tabs open without it slowing.

I dont know how you can say that. I have Fx and Opera on a pII 450mhz and opera is slower than molasus on the north pole. I use Fx with no extentions and i can have 20+ tabs open without it slowing.

585336606[/snapback]

It's REALTIVELY slow compared to other browsers such as Opera, IE, Maxthon, Avant, and K-Meleon.

And 20+ tabs with no slowing down? Please be honest.

that's completely irrational, and cannot be justified.

585336566[/snapback]

As you seen in this thread, there are reports on some people's systems that Firefox truly is leaner and faster. On my PowerBook, Firefox with two tabs takes up 38.82MB of RAM. Opera, 48.73MB of RAM.

you mean 'flexible'. i never open the preferences dialog anyway. just use f12 and quick preferences.

585336566[/snapback]

That's like Microsoft calling a bug a feature. The preferences are usually the first place any person goes to customize their software. If Opera scares them off immediately with its jumbled up mess of preferences, that's not a good thing. Opera should reorganize them and clean them up. If Adium can do it, so can Opera.

uh yeah, and in opera 8 most of them are off by default. what's the problem?

585336566[/snapback]

Because having them mostly turned off means I need to trek into customizing them to see what I want.

and firefox? do you use it without any extensions what so ever?

585336566[/snapback]

Only extension I sometimes use is Web Developer because it helps me to debug sites. Opera, internally, doesn't have the features the Web Developer toolbar gives to Firefox. I did hear Opera had an plug-in, but that would defeat the purpose of Opera, wouldn't it?

how you 'feel' is irrelevant. you only say that because you think it means that you don't have to justify your anti-opera fud.

opera 8 is streamlined and has a much better ui than firefox. that's not just how i 'feel'. to me, browsing with opera is a lot faster with firefox because of all the built in features. and guess what, some of the best ones, like resuming the session after restart, built in keyboard shortcuts, mouse gestures, etc. don't even add anything to the visible ui!

see? i explained my opinion. it is not just a vague 'feeling'. but you have no arguments against opera, so you rely on those vague 'feelings' which you feel that you don't have to justify, so you spew out lies about opera like there's no tomorrow.

585336566[/snapback]

All browsers are based on feeling. If a browser feels clunky to me, it feels clunky to me. I don't care how "streamlined" it is in your mind. I don't like it.

You might not acknowledge it, but the only reason you chose Opera over the other alternatives is because of your personal taste. Now you think it's the best. Just like I chose OS X for my personal taste. I also think OS X is best now. That happens all the time to people. They want the things the like most to automatically be the best, and everyone has to use the best, don't they?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!