HL2 & CS:S - Nvidia FX Cards (30% FPS Increase)


Recommended Posts

the check from thousands of people that pays 60 bucks is bigger than what ATI might be willing to pay for this scam

585016415[/snapback]

I dunno, the ATI/Valve marketing deal was 6 million dollars, right?

I bet the whole HL2 thing sold many ATI cards. And I bet the number of people who didn't buy HL2 because of its performance on Geforce FX cards was minimal.

Haha. Horse manure. Try HL2 30% fps decrease. Having it set that way made me take a pretty major hit. I was getting 35-100 on airboat. With all this garbage on, I got 14 max. It might work better for a 5950, but not an a 5700u. :rolleyes:

Edit: No I didn't do official benchmark or anything. The frame rate drop was rather obvious. Looks like there's a reason I can only select dx 8.1 out of the box.

well... what did you expect for such lousy coding anyway? With Doom3 they didn't have to throttle a card vendors FPS, ATI just couldn't handle it... now with HL2 Valve has no choice but to throttle or else you would be seeing "nvidia wins fps race on HL2" in the headlines and ATI would pull out their investment

so is nvidia gonna fix this or what?

585016512[/snapback]

What..?!?!

As 'Flash' said, it's not Nvidia's problem. I'm guessing you didn't read the original post - this is deliberate by Valve (the makers of Half-Life 2), and this thread is how you can trick the game thinking it's an ATi card to benefit from the increase in performance. There's nothing Nvidia can do.

The bottom line is that ATi & Nvidia cards all work just superbly on this game, Valve wrote the game primarily for ATi users, and this is how we can access those facilities to work on all cards :)

No, they want their check from ATI.

585016348[/snapback]

Yeah, since ATi is their sole reason for making the game. They made the game to sell it to fans, not as a benchmark for ATi.

But I guess if nVidia fanboys need an excuse for the FX blowing balls, here it is.

Yeah, since ATi is their sole reason for making the game. They made the game to sell it to fans, not as a benchmark for ATi.

But I guess if nVidia fanboys need an excuse for the FX blowing balls, here it is.

585023780[/snapback]

way to read.. no one said they made the game for ati to benchmark.. and he never said ati was the sole reason for making the game, he only said when it comes to money from ati and money from customers, valve wants the money from ati.

I tried this on my 5600FX 256mb card and its slower when I do this, but I found no difference in image quality with DX9 compared to DX8. And yes I checked if HL2 said DX9 was enabled and it was :p I'll stick to DX8 seems faster. Besides I heard the FX series sucks using DX9, no surprise that the above happened ;)

btw, all you people complaining about 'valve just wants their ati check', look at valve.avi in the hl2 folder, what does it say in text at the bottom you may ask?

source code licensed from nvidia? whats that? huh?

and forcing higher detail onna card hardly gives a 30% fps increrase.

The reason the guys with the 5600/5700's are experiencing such a slowdown is cos they are much less powerful cards than the 5900/5950's that the "kid" tried this on. The fact of the matter is the 5900's and upwards are capable of doing everything (in a round about way) that the 9800 Pro's are, but because the DX9 coding and pathways was better implemented in the 9800's, lots of companies never bothered to include DX9 software coding for NV support, only Ati.

SLAYER,Dec 3 2004, 07:42]What happened to djmUK ?

585032754[/snapback]

I'm still here, just been concentrating more on HL2:DM. I do scan through the replies every now and again, and I'm catching up with all the news slowly.

It worked for me, however, the bottom line is:

- DX8.0/8.1 is great for performance

- DX9.0 is great for visuals

So depending on precisely what you want with your game you can choose the best version for your needs. Of course the more RAM and GPU-RAM you have the better your results will be yet again on DX9.0 (and the better your GPU is...higher FX cards have the most impact on framerate increases).

P4 3.0

XFX 6800 Ultra 256mb

1Gb Ram 400mhz

160 Hdd

This is what I have tried so far but without success :

Tried every possible configuration in mother board bios (all apertude sizes, agp 8x 4x 2x, agp fast write on/off etc etc etc)

Tried old drivers, new drivers, Nvidia drivers, Omega drivers etc etc etc... no significant changes

Tried my card in another Pc that had a gforce 4 and was getting 90 110 fps. With my card it went down to 60 70 fps.

Tried it on a system with windows 2000 (im using Xp sp2 btw)

Tried a more powerfull power supply, (all that ended up doing was giving me a headache)

Tried 3 diferent monitors with diferent Hz (Vsync is off)

Funny thing is that it doesn?t matter what settings i use (AA and reflections and shadows all on or all off ) nor what resolution i play in the. Fps always basicly stay the same, even tough the game looks great.

Regarding other games, farcry runs great at max settings and so does Doom 3 (can?t play it on ultra mode tough but from what i?ve heard thats normal) Half life runs great untill i run into a gun fight with and its starts Lag like hell !

Been Spamming forums for help since the 16th november, nothing anyone suggested has helped and all I found was hundreds of High Spec Users with the same prob most of them using nvidia 6800 gt/ultra but a few X800 pro/xt users also share this problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This Dell 27 inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor is really cheap after a very long time by Sayan Sen Recently we covered a really good deal on an AMD RX 9070 three-fan model that's available at slightly above its MSRP. If you are looking for a GPU for 1440p gaming that's around the performance of the Nvidia RTX 5070 you should most definitely check it out. Let's say that you are looking for a monitor to pair that up with too. The Samsung 49" G9 curved QD-OLED superultrawide is a good option that can provide an immersive experience. However despite being a very good deal currently (at $855), it may seem unaffordable to you, or you may simply not want to spend as much on a monitor. In that case Dell's S2725QS can be a very good option as it's on sale at the moment for its lowest price in over six months (purchase link under the specs table down below). The big highlight of the Dell S2725QS is its 27-inch IPS panel with a 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) resolution, offering a high pixel density that can make text appear sharper while also providing plenty of screen space for productivity and media consumption. The display supports a refresh rate of up to 120Hz through both HDMI and DisplayPort, making it suitable not only for everyday desktop use but also for smoother gaming and scrolling. AMD FreeSync Premium support is included as well, helping reduce screen tearing during gaming sessions. The screen has fairly good brightness and color accuracy so you can use it for general work purpose, though photo/video editing is probably not going to be the best match for this. The technical specs of the Dell S2725QS are given in the table below: Specification Value Viewable Screen Size 27 in (68.58 cm) Screen Mode 4K UHD Maximum Resolution 3840 × 2160 Maximum Preset Resolution 3840 × 2160 @ 120 Hz Standard Refresh Rate 120 Hz Panel Technology In-plane Switching (IPS) Backlight Technology LED Edgelight System Pixel Density 163 PPI Response Time 8 ms GTG, 5 ms GTG, 4 ms GTG Horizontal Viewing Angle 178° Vertical Viewing Angle 178° Brightness 350 cd/m² (nits) Native Contrast Ratio 1500:1 Color Support 1.07 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% sRGB (CIE 1931) Adaptive Sync AMD FreeSync Premium HDCP Support Yes Mount Type Panel Mount VESA Mount 100 × 100 mm Maximum Height Adjustment 13 cm Tilt -5° to 21° Swivel -30° to 30° Pivot ±90° Stand Adjustments Tilt, Swivel, Height, Pivot Glass Hardness 3H Horizontal Frequency 27–270 kHz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Vertical Frequency 48–120 Hz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Video Inputs 2 × HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3), 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Storage Temperature -20°C to 60°C Operating Humidity 10%–80% (Non-condensing) Storage Humidity 5%–95% (Non-condensing) Get it at the link below: Dell S2725QS 27-inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor: $218.49 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $280) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Looks almost like what our office provides us, excluding the leg rest for obvious reasons 😴
    • Forget the iPhone. What about Android? Most Samsung Galaxy phones sold in the USA are manufactured in Vietnam. Asian countries have the infrastructure that the USA doesn't have. This is why most electronics are not made in the USA
    • The RAM would still probably be more expensive than what they were paying last year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      498
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      231
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      macoman
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!