Hokies Win The ACC!


Recommended Posts

ND and OSU, two of the most storied programs in college football (the acc doesn't have any) on the ROAD.  you lost twice at home.  no argument.  try harder

They may be "storied programs" but thats all they are...they suck a$$ this year. And Tech lost ONCE at home. Washington D.C. is 4 hours away from Tech...that is closer to UVA's home territory. Besides, it really doesn't matter WHERE you lose...if you lose you lose, there is no column for "away game loses". If you can't play good at an opponents home stadium then your program has no chance to begin with.

Oh an if you wanna talk about "storied programs" take a look at all the NFL players from Miami and Florida State (both ACC). And all the bowl rings between Miami, Va Tech, and Florida State. Also Va Tech has been in the Top 25 every year for the past 18 years...

Big 10 started off as my #1 conference, but Purdue and Wisconsin just went down the gutter as the season ended. The best conference is the SEC followed by the Big 10 and Big 12. The ACC falls right behind those three.

BroChaos, Michigan isn't that great of a team either, they will lose to Texas. You guys lost to Notre Dame, barely beat San Diego St. (:laugh:), barely beat Minnesota, barely beat Purdue (who had already lost its greatness), and got humiliated against Ohio St. You won by a combined 8 points in those three games I stated above :blink:

behind a frosh qb and tb. give us a break ;)

they have matured. had hart played against ND, we would have won that one.

also, the blackshirts of SDSU are a good D, and again, were able to rattle a young qb.

minnesota is a decent team, purdue is still a decent team, and we came off with the wins.

now ohio st., no excuses. but again, remember that these are freshman in the 2 biggest positions.

now, texas is only there because of a made up pass intereference call against the might kansas jayhawks. oh, and texas gave up how many pts in one half to OkSt.? their passing game doesn't even exist, practically the worst in div 1a. we'll see what happens ;)

dreaming, you don't understand the concept of rivalry game. ND and OSU's main goals are to beat michigan. for the past year, every ND training activity had been done in reps of 31, just to remind them of the 31-0 loss to michigan a year ago. i'd love to see vatech go into notre dame stadium, or the shoe in columbus, and pull off a win. doens't matter who's supposed to be the better team. michigans last home loss? oct 26 2002. no excuses for losing at home to a team that has no business beating you.

you wanna talk bowl rings? one name, tom brady. we got just as many as you do, so please, keep trying :)

and vatech has made 12 straight bowls, whopdee do. try 30.

there's nothing you can argue...the acc just isn't the conference you wish it was.

BroChaos, Michigan isn't that great of a team either, they will lose to Texas. You guys lost to Notre Dame, barely beat San Diego St. (), barely beat Minnesota, barely beat Purdue (who had already lost its greatness), and got humiliated against Ohio St. You won by a combined 8 points in those three games I stated above?

lol...there are no excuses for that crap...don't try to make any either:))

dreaming, you don't understand the concept of rivalry game. ND and OSU's main goals are to beat michigan. for the past year, every ND training activity had been done in reps of 31, just to remind them of the 31-0 loss to michigan a year ago. i'd love to see vatech go into notre dame stadium, or the shoe in columbus, and pull off a win. doens't matter who's supposed to be the better team. michigans last home loss? oct 26 2002. no excuses for losing at home to a team that has no business beating you.

Not only would Va Tech go into Notre Dame Stadium and crush them but they would drag 30,000+ fans along with them when they do it. Same thing with Ohio State....what a joke, you've got to be kidding. Your right about Va Tech losing at home to NC State though, they had no business losing that game and I can't make up any stupid excuses for them. They lost.

you wanna talk bowl rings? one name, tom brady. we got just as many as you do, so please, keep trying

Dude, Tom Brady is a decent QB so I'm not gonna argue that. But he also inherited a team full of guys that are pro bowl material. They would have been super bowl champs alot of other quarterbacks. If you wanna talk about QB's take a look at the Falcons and the guy who has revolutionized the position. That team sucks without him. He has no recievers, running backs, and an OK defense. They lose every game he doesn't play. He's the most valuable player to his team than any other player in the league and their respective teams.

yeah, vick had a great performance yesterday...:rolleyes:

vick isn't revolutionizing jack, unless you mean inconsistency and the amount of turnovers a qb commits per game...

a mobile qb will never work in the pros. drew brees will get a ring before vick does.

i seriously hope you are joking about vatech walking into ND stadium or the shoe and crushing them, and there's no way you'd get 30,000 tickets for your fans. you are seriously misinformed on what it's like to play in those 2 stadiums. 100k+ fans at the shoe, 80k+ fans at ND. your players wouldn't know what to do...until you've played there, please don't act like you know what would happen.

I've been to Notre Dame and Ohio State and neither stadium is nearly as loud as Lane Stadium...

Btw...Brady only threw for 157 yards yesterday...Vick threw for 115 and ran for 81. :shifty:

Edited by DreAming in DigITal

Actually none of this arguing really matters anyways...Virginia Tech is ranked 8th in the Nation and will be playing in the Sugar Bowl against the best team in the nation. And Michigan is ranked 13th and will play Texas. Both teams are gonna be playing against superior opponents...but Va Tech is ranked higher than Michigan...ahhhhh :whistle: (Y)

Actually none of this arguing really matters anyways...Virginia Tech is ranked 8th in the Nation and will be playing in the Sugar Bowl against the best team in the nation. And Michigan is ranked 13th and will play Texas. Both teams are gonna be playing against superior opponents...but Va Tech is ranked higher than Michigan...ahhhhh  :whistle:  (Y)

585052433[/snapback]

i could care less about your ranking. you have two losses. one at home, one on neutral (according to you, but really a home game in terms of crowd).

we have two losses, both on the road at 2 of the toughest stadiums in the country.

if you talk about your stadium being so tough and loud, then why did you lose at home this year? why did you lose at home twice last year? the shoe and ND are still tougher places to play than lane. and the rivalry games are still bigger than anythign your team will ever play in. you just can't compare losing those games on the road to VaTech losing to NC State at home.

but whatever, we'll talk more when the bowls are over ;)

although trash talking is fun :)

i know michigan stadium isn't always the loudest, but you can't top us in terms of sheer numbers, and the overwhelming size of the stadium. as long as we don't lose at home, i don't care :p and we've been pretty good at winning there.

Yea it's definatly huge...what does it seat now? Like 105,000?

Lane only seats about 70,000 right now, but they are doing construction on it again. They're tearing down the press boxes and adding an upper deck to each side of the stadium then putting the press boxes on top of them. Last year they added seating to one end zone and put a resturant and bar in. This is what it looks like now...so it'll be pretty nice when they finish...I think it'll seat around 85,000 next year? This is what it looks like now...

Edit: You can only see the "sunny side" of the stadium...the side you can't see is about twice as tall.

post-66484-1102473619.jpg

Edited by DreAming in DigITal
i know michigan stadium isn't always the loudest, but you can't top us in terms of sheer numbers, and the overwhelming size of the stadium.  as long as we don't lose at home, i don't care :p  and we've been pretty good at winning there.

585061606[/snapback]

nope, but our 90,000 are louder :D ;)

nope, but our 90,000 are louder  :D  ;)

585063164[/snapback]

now that urban is on board, and i have yet to hear any negative comments from fans about him (after the press conference), i think we will get the swamp a rockin. O i cant wait.

Why cant the fall be all year round????

I love the trash talking :p 

Too bad Nebraska had an off year :/

585055641[/snapback]

"Off year" just doesn't quite put it together. Going to a minor bowl game is an off year for your spoiled Husker faithful. :laugh:

Take a look, the two Big East elite switch conferences, and it comes down to them in the final weekend of the season for the ACC title. Too bad my BC Eagles are going to get trounced when they get to the ACC next year.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!