iPod vs Zen Micro, iPod mini vs Muvo2


Recommended Posts

One apology is more than enough ;) It's fine, I was just wondering why i was put into the list because as far as I was concerned, I tried my best to not bash anyone or be too biast.

Anywhoo, about that WAV vs ACC post: I'd say that it all depends on the bitrate. When it gets to the high bitrates I do believe that ACC proves to be better (who can tell that much anyways) though I havent personally tested it myself.

WAV vs AAC? Sorry?

:huh: :blink:

You can't compare lossless with true sound!

If you meant MP3... well, the jury's still out. But IMO OGG is better than AAC, because of the whole open-source huge fanbase thing.

I did a little battery test myself with my Zen Micro here at work. I came in around 8:00 and left it playing all day. I had it randomly playing MP3s using the pop EQ(for what it's worth) and only paused it a few times. The Micro stopped playing around 3:30 giving it a total time of 7.5 hours. It was fully charged and is upgraded to the latest firmware. I don't know where Creative comes up with the 12hrs of battery life, but I did not come close to it as you can see. I forgot my extra battery at home, so I get to sit in silence for the last hour or so at work. Atleast I can change the battery if it runs out and don't have a charger handy.

So far after having it about a month and a half, I love it. If I bought an IPod instead, I would mostly likely would have loved it also.

Ahem... excuse me... this is a thread about ipod vs zen. This is not a thread about THIS GUY vs THAT GUY.

Who's the one here who's calling other people 'stupid' or 'ignorant' anyway? You don't see me saying such words to other people.

You're the one who's saying all those things to other people. Not me. If you want to defend iPod so much, you don't need to attack other people. Just attack the real threat to iPod... which is the Zen.

Or, just leave MS all together and join Apple instead... if you love iPod so much.

*****************

Timmah, the Rock meant WMA vs AAC.

Ok, since so many people are arguing I'll just put in my two cents worth.

I build my computer with my dad. For my age, I don't think that's pretty ignorant.

I am a 14 year old girl. I have an iPod mini. I think it rocks. I bet if I had a Creative or iRiver or whatever else, i would think it rocks too.

I don't see what the fuss is about which is better. There is never going to be an answer; it's a matter of personal choice. What's better, Windows or Mac? Well, both have different features.

For me, the purpose of my mini is to listen to the music. MOST of the time, I don't care what the sound qualitly is. Hell, I don't even pay attention. I just relax and enjoy the music.

I would choose a mp3 player depending on price and capacity to suit my needs. But since (i think) all of them are around the same capacity it's just a matter of price.

The only complaint i have is the headphones. They hurt my ears. lol.

This is just my (disjointed) opinion from an average buyer. You could say I followed the crowd and bought apple.

Dust, you make good points, however I'd like to point out that you bought a ipod mini. Right there, I can say that you automatically paid way too much for it... for like 80 bucks more you can get 15 more gigs on there...

I'd never get a mini of any brand name, but thats just me.

Dust, you make good points, however I'd like to point out that you bought a ipod mini. Right there, I can say that you automatically paid way too much for it... for like 80 bucks more you can get 15 more gigs on there...

I'd never get a mini of any brand name, but thats just me.

585198808[/snapback]

I did pay too much for it but I don't have that many songs. I don't think I would really use a 15 gig one.

The only real flaws are the battery life and price.  But you sacrifice both for form and function.

585179612[/snapback]

That is simply not true...for the same price as the ipod mini creatives provide a FM stations and the ability to record from them...there is also the mentioned removable batter (with the replacement only being $40, rather than the $150 for the ipod mini...) there is also the ability to sync to outlook and I know the masses might not care but there is SUCH a difference in the sound quality. I love the way the ipod looks, but my friends who own them are disappointed when the compare the ipod mini to my Zen micro.

lol off topic but where did u guys purchase the zens? this thread has helped me in my desision (not zen or mini but zen or no zen =P) and now i want to buy one. the places that ive found so far are Amazon and Newegg. Newegg is out of the color i want (black), and Amazon is just too expensive. thanks!

lol off topic but where did u guys purchase the zens? this thread has helped me in my desision (not zen or mini but zen or no zen =P) and now i want to buy one. the places that ive found so far are Amazon and Newegg. Newegg is out of the color i want (black), and Amazon is just too expensive. thanks!

585247537[/snapback]

I ordered directly from Creative, came with the extra free battery so it was worth paying a little extra. The batteries cost $50 by them self.

I love my Zen micro :wub:

585249469[/snapback]

Lol me too.

I ordered directly from Creative, came with the extra free battery so it was worth paying a little extra. The batteries cost $50 by them self.

585249469[/snapback]

Right now, all Zen Micros are Limited Edition Version. Until the number has been reached, it will include an extra battery.

Ok, since so many people are arguing I'll just put in my two cents worth.

I build my computer with my dad. For my age, I don't think that's pretty ignorant.

I am a 14 year old girl. I have an iPod mini. I think it rocks. I bet if I had a Creative or iRiver or whatever else, i would think it rocks too.

585198662[/snapback]

Damn. I wish the girls I knew could build their own computers and make such eloquent contributions to such a technical argument.

do they sell extended warrenties too? i tend to have electronics break o me...

and is it true that the darker colors show fingerprints and such more? if so ima get a silver...

585249462[/snapback]

I have the black and I haven't noticed it getting to grubby myself, but I do keep my hands pretty clean.

Not sure about the extended warranty from them, I didn't see anything when I ordered although that would be nice if they had one.

Just read through this entire thread (yeah I'm bored at work again).

Here's my take:

First off, I owned a first-gen iPod 5GB. Before that, I owned a Creative Nomad Jukebox (6GB original version) and a Diamond Rio (the original MP3 player, with SmartMedia!).

I loved the Rio for its size and battery life compared to a normal CD player. Even though I had something like 96MB to work with (32MB plus 64MB card).

The Jukebox was awesome for its capacity and recording capabilities. Its battery life was its achilles' heel. The size was about equilivant to a CD player at the time.

The iPod changed everything. Because of Toshiba's new super small PC card size hard drive (the Nomad Jukebox used a regular laptop hard drive), they could put 5GB in something the size of the original Rio! It was phenomenal, and the 8-10 hour battery life was very impressive. It couldn't play WMAs, but I figured that would come in time, and as it was the only choice I had I didn't really complain.

For a while the iPod reigned supreme in my mind for useability and style. Creative had their Nomad NX series and there were others... but they were bulky and inefficient. I actually bought one of the Nomad Zen NX players (when they made them slightly smaller), and loved the battery life and super fast USB 2.0 transfers (compared to the slow firewire iPod). But it had to "boot up" like the old Nomad and that really bugged me. The interface was mediocre, and it was still too bulky. So I returned it to the store.

My iPods battery was slowly dying, and while the new slimmer touch-sensitive iPods looked appealing, I found myself feeling abandoned by Apple for 1) not fixing the battery problems in the original iPod and 2) not giving us the firmware update necessary for iTunes and AAC playback.

So I waited. The next player that I purchased was the iRiver iHP-120. It was the same size as my original iPod but with a huge battery capacity and 20GB of space. And it could play several different formats including my personal preference, WMA. The menu system was good and it packed countless features. I really liked the player, except it also had to "boot up" which is really a pet peeve of mine when it comes to these things.

At that point I still thought the iPod had advantages. The iRiver interface wasn't as easy to learn and the controls were not as intuitive as the iPod's scroll wheel. And it definitely didn't look as cool.

But when I first saw the Rio Carbon I said "wow." It looks so sleek and packs so much player into such a small package. And it's so small that it can live in my jacket pocket wherever I go. I also carried a Treo 600 until recently, and now carry a Sprint PPC-6601 Pocket PC phone. So pocket real estate was at a premium for me. The Carbon was the first player that I truly felt was better than the iPod.

The Zen Micro was the second. I used one at CompUSA recently. Even thought about buying one and keeping whichever of the two I liked more. You see, the Carbon still has one flaw... That damned 5 second load time when you turn it on. The Zen Micro, however, works like the iPod... it's usually in "standby" mode and responds instantly when you want to use it. Even a reset of the device yields only a 1-2 second animation screen before it's ready to go (even faster than the iPod's reboot).

I decided to stick with the Carbon, though. I found through my own testing that I could get to the track I wanted more quickly with its interface than with the Creative. The Carbon also has better autoplaylist-like features and other "DJ" functionality, from what I've seen.

I await Rio's successor to the Karma, and the new batch of iRiver devices, to see what the future holds. Right now my iRiver iHP-120 is still in use in my car (it never leaves). But I think it's going to be replaced very soon.

I'm far from being an anti-iPod fanboy. But I won't buy another one until Apple gives me the features I want. If they updated the 20GB player with WMA support (including PlaysForSure) I would have a hard time resisting. Especially with the longer battery life and color screen that the iPod Photo has.

Just read through this entire thread (yeah I'm bored at work again).

Here's my take:

First off, I owned a first-gen iPod 5GB.  Before that, I owned a Creative Nomad Jukebox (6GB original version) and a Diamond Rio (the original MP3 player, with SmartMedia!).

I loved the Rio for its size and battery life compared to a normal CD player.  Even though I had something like 96MB to work with (32MB plus 64MB card).

The Jukebox was awesome for its capacity and recording capabilities.  Its battery life was its achilles' heel.  The size was about equilivant to a CD player at the time. 

The iPod changed everything.  Because of Toshiba's new super small PC card size hard drive (the Nomad Jukebox used a regular laptop hard drive), they could put 5GB in something the size of the original Rio!  It was phenomenal, and the 8-10 hour battery life was very impressive.  It couldn't play WMAs, but I figured that would come in time, and as it was the only choice I had I didn't really complain.

For a while the iPod reigned supreme in my mind for useability and style.  Creative had their Nomad NX series and there were others... but they were bulky and inefficient.  I actually bought one of the Nomad Zen NX players (when they made them slightly smaller), and loved the battery life and super fast USB 2.0 transfers (compared to the slow firewire iPod).  But it had to "boot up" like the old Nomad and that really bugged me.  The interface was mediocre, and it was still too bulky.  So I returned it to the store.

My iPods battery was slowly dying, and while the new slimmer touch-sensitive iPods looked appealing, I found myself feeling abandoned by Apple for 1) not fixing the battery problems in the original iPod and 2) not giving us the firmware update necessary for iTunes and AAC playback.

So I waited.  The next player that I purchased was the iRiver iHP-120.  It was the same size as my original iPod but with a huge battery capacity and 20GB of space.  And it could play several different formats including my personal preference, WMA.  The menu system was good and it packed countless features.  I really liked the player, except it also had to "boot up" which is really a pet peeve of mine when it comes to these things.

At that point I still thought the iPod had advantages.  The iRiver interface wasn't as easy to learn and the controls were not as intuitive as the iPod's scroll wheel.  And it definitely didn't look as cool.

But when I first saw the Rio Carbon I said "wow."  It looks so sleek and packs so much player into such a small package.  And it's so small that it can live in my jacket pocket wherever I go.  I also carried a Treo 600 until recently, and now carry a Sprint PPC-6601 Pocket PC phone.  So pocket real estate was at a premium for me.  The Carbon was the first player that I truly felt was better than the iPod.

The Zen Micro was the second.  I used one at CompUSA recently.  Even thought about buying one and keeping whichever of the two I liked more.  You see, the Carbon still has one flaw... That damned 5 second load time when you turn it on.  The Zen Micro, however, works like the iPod... it's usually in "standby" mode and responds instantly when you want to use it.  Even a reset of the device yields only a 1-2 second animation screen before it's ready to go (even faster than the iPod's reboot).

I decided to stick with the Carbon, though.  I found through my own testing that I could get to the track I wanted more quickly with its interface than with the Creative.  The Carbon also has better autoplaylist-like features and other "DJ" functionality, from what I've seen.

I await Rio's successor to the Karma, and the new batch of iRiver devices, to see what the future holds.  Right now my iRiver iHP-120 is still in use in my car (it never leaves).  But I think it's going to be replaced very soon.

I'm far from being an anti-iPod fanboy.  But I won't buy another one until Apple gives me the features I want.  If they updated the 20GB player with WMA support (including PlaysForSure) I would have a hard time resisting.  Especially with the longer battery life and color screen that the iPod Photo has.

585251240[/snapback]

I chose ZM for its microphone and the FM Tuner which is great for me.

I must say, those wireless headphones using magnetic induction from Creative look pretty awesome. I hope they build support for those into the next player (right now it's going to be an add-on for the Zen Micro).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know The ONLY thing I need to know is the price, which I know will be way higher than I (and most people) are willing to pay for a phone... so basically nothing here I need to know. PS: Nice job getting that Apple reference to a non-existent and unrevealed product as "competition" in there. Cheque is in the mail.
    • Well I really think the repasting helped if your higher clocks have returned, maybe the next thing to look at is if there is a problem with your case airflow? I guess this because your 3080 has returned to optimal state, but is still staying too warm, which might suggest it was thermal throttling before you repasted, of which the only logical conclusion could be outside factors.
    • Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8, Flip 8, Z Fold Wide: Everything you need to know by Hamid Ganji Galaxy Z Fold 7 - Image via Samsung The next generation of Samsung foldables is set to be unveiled next month at the second Unpacked event of the year. Samsung’s 2026 foldables are not expected to offer significant upgrades over their predecessors, with the Korean firm instead focusing on design refinements and conventional upgrades such as faster processors and better cameras. However, Samsung is reportedly planning to unveil an all-new passport-style foldable this year to rival Apple’s first foldable iPhone, which is expected to debut this September. Here’s a roundup of everything we know about Samsung’s upcoming foldable devices ahead of their official debut. When can we expect Samsung’s new foldables? The Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Z Flip 7 series were unveiled in July, and Samsung is expected to maintain this timeframe in 2026. Based on previous reports from Korean sources, Samsung will hold its Unpacked event on July 22 in London, UK, to pull back the curtain on the Galaxy Z Fold 8 series. The devices are also expected to hit the shelves a few weeks after launch. However, Samsung has yet to announce an official date. A new naming scheme? One of the most interesting changes we might see this year is a new naming scheme for Samsung’s latest foldables. SamMobile reported that since Samsung is expected to unveil three foldables this year, it has adopted a new naming strategy to simplify product identification for customers. Accordingly, the standard Galaxy Z Fold 8 will reportedly be called the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and will serve as the direct successor to last year’s Galaxy Z Fold 7. The “Ultra” suffix suggests the phone could feature higher-end specifications, such as additional rear camera modules. Samsung’s new passport-style foldable is expected to carry the Galaxy Z Fold 8 name without any suffix. This model is reportedly equipped with two rear cameras. No major changes are expected for the Flip model. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 anticipated specs Rumors over the past few months suggest Samsung is preparing several upgrades for its upcoming foldables, although the devices may continue to rely on larger batteries and faster charging speeds rather than dramatic design changes. The primary focus this year is expected to be the Galaxy Z Fold 8 and its wide-screen design. Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here are the anticipated specifications for the Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra based on previous leaks: 6.5-inch outer display and 8-inch inner display, 120Hz refresh rate, and 2,600 nits peak brightness Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, paired with 12GB or 16GB of RAM and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB of storage 4.1mm thickness when unfolded and a weight of 210g 200MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, 10MP or 12MP telephoto camera, 10MP cover camera, and 10MP selfie camera 5,000mAh battery with 45W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 As for the Galaxy Z Flip 8, the device is not expected to be a major departure from its predecessor, although it could become slightly slimmer. Expected specifications include: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 or Exynos 2600 processor 12GB of RAM with 256GB and 512GB storage options 6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X inner dispaly and 4.1-inch Super AMOLED outer dispaly 50MP main camera, 12MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera 4,300mAh battery with 25W wired charging Android 17 and One UI 9 Samsung’s foldables are also expected to launch with Gemini Intelligence, Google’s AI suite for automating tasks in Android ecosystem. Moreover, given current memory and component costs, some Galaxy Z Fold 8 Ultra and Z Flip 8 variants could see a price hike. Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopts a wide-screen design The centerpiece of the upcoming Unpacked event could be the Galaxy Z Fold 8, previously rumored as the Galaxy Z Fold Wide. This model adopts a passport-style form factor and is expected to compete directly with Apple’s iPhone Fold. Galaxy Z Fold 8 official CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines Here’s what to expect: 7.6-inch primary OLED display and 5.4-inch cover display, 120Hz refresh rate, 2,600 nits peak brightness, and 4:3 aspect ratio Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor, 12GB or 16GB of RAM, and 256GB, 512GB, or 1TB storage options 4,800mAh battery with 45W wired charging 50MP main camera, 50MP ultrawide camera, and 10MP selfie camera Android 17 and One UI 9 The three new foldable phones are unlikely to be the only devices unveiled at Samsung’s Unpacked event. The company is also expected to introduce the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 and the Galaxy Watch 9 series.
    • Thanks
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      141
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      89
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!