iPod vs Zen Micro, iPod mini vs Muvo2


Recommended Posts

well i have a 20gb, 4th G iPod and i think it really rocks.

great interface, great playback options, great design [very slim and good looking], easy to operate, good sound quality....the list goes on. the only flaw is its short battery life

whereas my friend's zen micro 20gb IMO i think is not too good.

even though it has a really good battery life it has an OK interface, good playback options, really awful design [big, chunky, millions of buttons...need i say more?], not as easy to operate [instead of having 1 veru easy to use scroll wheel it has millions of buttons everywhere], great sound quality.

so even though the zen micro has a longer battery life and abit better sound quality i find myself thinking...

1) the iPod sound quality, although not as good as the zen micro one, is still really good and i dont think it is too big an issue

2) as a 14 yr old who listens to a lot of music i never run out of battery...why? because i only listen to the iPod when im out somewhere and walking around. at home im on the computer and listen on there.

on an average day say im awake 15 hours or so. not much chance im going to listen to music in my sleep is there? so who honestly needs 20 hours? the only reason i can really see is if you travel alot and are away from home for long periods of time.

but even then you can get car chargers for iPods so thats not really an issue either.

therefore i dont really see a need to have a zen micro when IMHO iPod is so much more better.

"Ideal conditions" = no eq, no backlight, 50% volume, no playlist, no shuffle, no menu activity and stock earbuds (yes earbuds make a difference, higher quality ones take more power to driver them)

On average you're more likely to get 8-10hours use out of it.

Every manufacturer does this, I was just pointing it out.

"Ideal conditions" = no eq, no backlight, 50% volume, no playlist, no shuffle, no menu activity and stock earbuds (yes earbuds make a difference, higher quality ones take more power to driver them)

On average you're more likely to get 8-10hours use out of it.

Every manufacturer does this, I was just pointing it out.

585255217[/snapback]

Huh, how do headphones make a difference? It's still outputting the same surely.

  • 2 weeks later...

:fro: Im Sorry but i've got the Creative Zen PMC (protable media Center) and this thing is insane. with amazing sound, high res color LCD for watching my anime in AVI format, very easy to use with windows media center edition sporting windows media player 10, audio and TV out to hook up to my tv is a pluse to record tv shows. you know what im going to say it... it's a portable TiVo. and crazy battery life (22hours music 8.5hours video i got out of it) the only down side i see is it's size. it's Freakin huge.

Now why did i post this simple we all seem to be going this way with are gear trasfer pics in video is already common with all MP3 players the only thing lacking is the proper screen and software. of course this is all my opinion feel free to take it apart. :D

Huh, how do headphones make a difference? It's still outputting the same surely.

585259440[/snapback]

Nope - think about it a pair of headphones that cost $60 are obviously going to sound better because they require more power to drive them. Often the volume is higher and the bass is more pronounced (two observations of quality headphones in my experience). It's something to do with ohms or something, I forget the science but it's TEH TRUTH!!111

Really.

now that we have all seen the creative zen micro-photo, you could put that in your list. and it comes in a 5gb or 6gb version. I just hope they make a battery that last longer than 12 hours. With my zen micro, I have noticed the batter lasts about only 9-10 hours with normal use. (I use the FM a bit, but I always keep my backlight turned off.)

I dont understand how people can spend over $50 usd on a pair of earbuds. I buy $10-15 ones and they are fine for me, especially if I lose them. They all sound the same to me anyways.

whereas my friend's zen micro 20gb IMO i think is not too good.

585254003[/snapback]

i got a zen touch, a ToUcH. :p

and you should get a player which suits what you want most. to each his own. im happy with my touch, and recommend creative products to anyone interested. i've read quite a few reviews about the zen micro and i gather is a damn good player.

i got a zen touch, a ToUcH. :p

and you should get a player which suits what you want most. to each his own. im happy with my touch, and recommend creative products to anyone interested. i've read quite a few reviews about the zen micro and i gather is a damn good player.

585354342[/snapback]

o shutup. touch...micro...all the same :wacko:

I must say the first time I saw the Zen Micro I was quiet shocked that Creative basically redesign their player from the ground up to be something small and nice instead of like other companies just making a smaller version of the bigger brother. I like the colour range, however 10 colors too much to choose from (5 is the max IMO). However when I saw them in life I was, well not disappointed, but it wasn't compelling to me anymore. I feels much thicker than the iPod mini and the plastic doesn't have the sex appeal that the aluminum has.

Having said that, I would say the Micro is a better product right now cause Apple needs to get their act together and make a 5GB version of the Mini with better battery life. Then the mini would be king again.

On another thing I would like to say not all of the people who own iPods are arrogant, dumb, computer illiterate, and fanboys. Not all of us buy it cause its a fashion item. Not all of us buys it just cause everyone has one. No, some of us buy it because we actually think thats the best choice of us.

Edited by Phillip
I must say the first time I saw the Zen Micro I was quiet shocked that Creative basically redesign their player from the ground up to be something small and nice instead of like other companies just making a smaller version of the bigger brother. I like the colour range, however 10 colors too much to choose from (5 is the max IMO). However when I saw them in life I was, well not disappointed, but it wasn't compelling to me anymore. I feels much thicker than the iPod mini and the plastic doesn't have the sex appeal that the aluminum has.

Having said that, I would say the Micro is a better product right now cause Apple needs to get their act together and make a 5GB version of the Mini with better battery life. Then the mini would be king again.

On another thing I would like to say not all of the people who own iPods are arrogant, dumb, computer illiterate, and fanboys. Not all of us buy it cause its a fashion item. Not all of us buys it just cause everyone has one. No, some of us buy it because we actually think thats the best choice of us.

585377959[/snapback]

Yup. yup quite true.

Also Hitachi upgraded their microHDD. It used to be 4GB, which the iPod mini used, but now it is available in either 8 or 10GB in the same size. There could be a new mini coming out soon.

(Hoping that Creative does it too)

Rio karma sounds like the best bet for me.

Only $242 on Newegg

585124962[/snapback]

the karma is sooo tempting it was on sale at best buy for $199 i believe. however even cnet put a note on their review that:

Editor's note: More than a few Karma users, including some at CNET.com, have experienced hard drive problems or even failure after several months of use.

and if you look on cnet and amazon customer reviews, there are a shockingly large amount of users who have experienced MAJOR problems with no help from tech support :(.

iPods are simply better.  That's why they are purchased.

585176169[/snapback]

at least back your opinion up :(.

Dust, you make good points, however I'd like to point out that you bought a ipod mini. Right there, I can say that you automatically paid way too much for it... for like 80 bucks more you can get 15 more gigs on there...

I'd never get a mini of any brand name, but thats just me.

585198808[/snapback]

hmm. id like to start off saying i had a really tough choice when buying my mp3 player. i switched between a 20gig ipod, ipod mini, iriver h120, and rio karma. i ended up with the ipod mini. i chose ipod because of the x factor. they are amazing looking and have a wonderful UI. i never have to worry about tagging or file-trees. call me a corperate ######, but i just love apple design. i chose the mini because of the size, the fact that i had very little music at the time, and the build. its made out of 1 piece of metal hollowed out. its strong as hell. ive dropped it on several occasions and its absolutely fine. however, most players are probably really strong too.

lately, ive been looking into buying a new mp3 player. this time im not going apple. im looking for more features, a good price, a color screen, and driverless file transfer (not too important). im leaning toward the next generation 20 gig player from iriver. also, the iaudio m5/x5 looks very enticing. if anyone has some suggestions, please suggest away! thanks ;).

.will

Look at it this way. People that don't have any problems with their DAPs won't post on CNET, forums, w/e. Think of the amount of Karmas sold, and the number of people reporting problems online (I wouldn't trust CNET anyway).

The iAudio M5/X5 both look very promising, but I sent an inquiry about their release date and they replied that the M5/M5L has been pushed back to Q3 (Aug-Oct), no word about the X5.

Among the current crop of DAPs, the iRiver H320/40 (try to get the international version) is your best bet. Unless you want to import... you can always get the Toshiba F60 (IMO the best DAP availble) for a rather hefty price ;).

Also, check out the Archos Gmini400, it's a worthy competitor for the H320/40.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!