The MSStyle to WindowBlinds porter manifest.


Recommended Posts

Darrian: what type of computer are you running that you experence these glitches?  I run a athlon XP at 2 ghz with 64 mb geforce 4 and it works great.

Try the newest versions of WB 4.4 and give skins like dogmax a try, they will blow your mind away at how complex yet professional and minimal they are.

You want to now why the skins you use are all msstyles because they are all the same.  They are all basic mods of luna/panther/longhorn.  Nobody has any creativty left in them anymore and nobody can create anything radical anymore.  Take a look at any recently released msstyle on this board and you will see a mod of luna or longhorn.

KoL's newest theme is a perfect example.  While it is a great theme with graphics that are handcrafted, it has the fisher price look of luna.  A true lack of originality.  And yet look at the thread in the WB forum of the unorthodox skins.  Those show what true skinning can achieve.  Something radical, something original.  It may not be something you use day in and day out, but it is different and that is what counts.  It is also something that cannot be done with msstyles.

You talk about how you don't like how windowblinds handles itself when it comes to unloading the themes and uninstalling, etc....  Well, I hate to say it but no program is perfect but this one is definately improving.  Even Microsoft isn't perfect, that's why they stopped with only 3 variations on the themes.

I have done a lot of recoloring of skins using skinstudio and I haven't expeienced this slowdown you have talked about, can you explain it more??

585186578[/snapback]

Why is not original for you because it have similar Luna colors?? Sustenance is not another Luna mod, the theme is based on an idea that FOOOD posted on gfxOasis and I did everything to create a theme based on that idea. If you find one luna image in the theme let me know. I dont even work over Luna, I used my tiger port as a base for Sustenance.

That is something that I dont like, people saying that ALL msstyle are Luna mods or Longhorn themes. Search a little and you'll find a lot of original themes.

personally, if e can import 100% our VS to WB w/o any or almost any problems, I dont mind to pay IF there is more stuff to theme

within the windows gui

585187071[/snapback]

The last time that I tried to import a theme was on July and it work great. Just worked with some graphics and the theme was done. Im going to try with Sustenance :D

Why is not original for you because it have similar Luna colors?? Sustenance is not another Luna mod, the theme is based on an idea that FOOOD posted on gfxOasis and I did everything to create a theme based on that idea. If you find one luna image in the theme let me know. I dont even work over Luna, I used my tiger port as a base for Sustenance.

That is something that I dont like, people saying that ALL msstyle are Luna mods or Longhorn themes. Search a little and you'll find a lot of original themes.

585187041[/snapback]

Don't get me wrong. I know you worked long and hard at this theme and should be proud of it. And you have every right o be proud of it, it looks great. But just indulge me and do a comparison:

Your new theme:

Sustenance_VS_by__kol.jpg

Original Luna:

XPLuna.gif

DogmaX WB:

DogmaX_v2a.jpg

What my desktop looks like with Sustenance applied via WB:

sus.jpg

You can't tell me that your new theme doesn't look a bit like luna? The color schemes, start button, shell style, even the red close button. That's all I am saying, msstyles lack creativity and originality because of their limitations. But when those limitations are lifted, DogmaX is a perfect example of what can be accomplished.

Edited by AthleticTrainer1981

Atheletic. From what I can see from the DogmaX screenshot, everything on it can be themed thru a change of .dll and .msstyles.

The only plus point WB has is that it takes less time. However, for this time you make up with money (pay for Stardock's programs).

I'll stay with the free alternative :)

Atheletic. From what I can see from the DogmaX screenshot, everything on it can be themed thru a change of .dll and .msstyles.

The only plus point WB has is that it takes less time. However, for this time you make up with money (pay for Stardock's programs).

I'll stay with the free alternative :)

585187250[/snapback]

The screenshot is not even part of it. You have to download it to experience it. Animated menus, the dialog boxes are excellent.

Don't get me wrong.  I know you worked long and hard at this theme and should be proud of it.  And you have every right o be proud of it, it looks great.  But just indulge me and do a comparison:

Your new theme:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/athl..._VS_by__kol.jpg

Original Luna:

http://skins3.wincustomize.com/CodeByte/wb/XPLuna.gif

DogmaX WB:

http://skins3.wincustomize.com/brewman/wb/DogmaX_v2a.jpg

What my desktop looks like with Sustenance applied via WB:

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v48/athl...ner1981/sus.jpg

You can't tell me that your new theme doesn't look a bit like luna?  The color schemes, start button, shell style, even the red close button.  That's all I am saying, msstyles lack creativity and originality because of their limitations.  But when those limitations are lifted, DogmaX is a perfect example of what can be accomplished.

585187197[/snapback]

The colors yes, the start button and close button??? the shellstye??? :blink:

I dont know what theme are you looking at but to me they are a lot different. As I said before, the only thing that the theme have similar to Luna are the colors because I wanted to do the theme that way. I like Luna colors.

only programs i like that stardock offers are, objectdock PLUS just because of those little tabs  :cool:  & cursor XP... the rest arent even worth buying when you can get a free alternative :p

but i forgive stardock

585187333[/snapback]

And your reasoning for that is why?

This thread is getting entirely out of hand. It was supposed to be about the benefits of porting over msstyles to WB and then taking your skins to the next step. I'm guessing that's not what people want.

His reason is same as all the others such as myself don't use stardock's programs... you have to pay to use a program that can be emulated for free.

585187430[/snapback]

except you get a hell of a lot more abilities with WB.

That's like saying I shouldn't have to buy Microsoft Word because they bundle wordpad with XP. Yes wordpad does the basics and will do wordprocessing, but when I want the more advanced features I have to go out and buy the program.

So I could be content with the basic skinning engine and its limitations or I could be someone who wants the more advanced features and I did buy the program.

Edited by AthleticTrainer1981
His reason is same as all the others such as myself don't use stardock's programs... you have to pay to use a program that can be emulated for free.

585187430[/snapback]

There is a free version.

AthleticTrainer1981: I don't see how you can compare Kol's new theme to luna. The only thing the same is the colors. If he had only released the white substyle, no one would even think of luna.

I'm looking forward to the next version of skin studio. I've tried with 4.4 to port some things, and it always needs a bit of tweaking (which I don't know how to do :p ).

List some of this abilities that can't be emulated with system mods by the use of resource hacker or programs as such.

585187467[/snapback]

Of course it can all be done with system mods and hacks, but that's the point. You don't have to hack anything with WB. It's all done beautifully with one little app. And it's easy to revert your system back to it's original state. All you do is unload WB

except you get a hell of a lot more abilities with WB.

That's like saying I shouldn't have to buy Microsoft Word because they bundle wordpad with XP.  Yes wordpad does the basics and will do wordprocessing, but when I want the more advanced features I have to go out and buy the program.

So I could be content with the basic skinning engine and its limitations or I could be someone who wants the more advanced features and I did buy the program.

585187446[/snapback]

What 'advanced features' are you talking about?

A little time + system hacks = Free alternative.

List some of this abilities that can't be emulated with system mods by the use of resource hacker or programs as such.

585187467[/snapback]

One of the most underused features of WB:Enhanced GUI controls: WindowBlinds supports third party extensions to the title bar and borders. For example, users can add roll-up buttons, always on top buttons, MP3 controls, etc. to the title bar as part of their visual style.

http://www.stardock.com/products/windowbli...wb4/#Advantages

As you stated, it is underused. And I'm sure there are free alternatives for those.

585187498[/snapback]

As I've said before, WB is free. There is a free version of WB. Another feature I've seen in recent skins is a transparency button built in. That's pretty cool and you don't have to run another app to do it.

As you stated, it is underused. And I'm sure there are free alternatives for those.

585187498[/snapback]

Actually there aren't. Stardock is also the only company to receieve the designed for XP logo by Microsoft for customizing windows. Stardock worked with MS to develop the original uxtheme engine.

Actually there aren't.  Stardock is also the only company to receieve the designed for XP logo by Microsoft for customizing windows.  Stardock worked with MS to develop the original uxtheme engine.

585187510[/snapback]

Actually you're wrong. Rollup buttons and always on top controls have been in Nvidia's nView application for months now. Not to mention there is also FreeShade which had been around for years that gives windows rollup functions without using all kinds of extra buttons in the GUI.

(Moderator Hat On)

Just want to say how proud I am that this discussion is so constructive and so intelligent.

I am sure I can speak for many other long time Neowiners when I say that these kinds of in depth technical debates were more of a pipe dream a couple years ago.

This kind of discussion is precisely the reason why I think Neowin will eventually be one of the defacto tech web sites on the net (which it's been moving towards for a long time)

(Moderator Hat Off)

Regarding Darian's experiences:

What I'm specifically referring to is flickering of WB elements for no apparent reason, objects not being refreshed after initially drawn (say when moving a window or something, where the "skin" should be there is just a white blankness that takes a moment or so to redraw where a msstyles skin would remain constant

Actually no I really don't know what you're talking about. I've never seen this bug nor heard of it before. I will take your word that you're running into this but I've never had a problem like that with either msstyles or WindowBlinds and I've had WB running on some pretty poor configurations during testing.

at I have not seen consistantly for quite some time, but it does still occur occasionally under some circumstances), and as far as games go, well, specifically I see that bug consistantly on any game based on the Quake III engine

Odd. As a Counterstrike junkie, I can tell you that when I have run CS in a window that I have no such issue. Again, it's skinned. In fact, WindowBlinds can even skin CMD.exe which msstyles can't.

The biggest reason I don't use WB is because it doesn't have many skins I like, and the skins that I use regularly are msstyles.

And this is a very legitimate reason. I agree with you. The fact of the matter is, you can patch uxtheme.dll for free and if msstyles are what you want to run then it's hard to argue that someone should go out and pay for WindowBlinds.

This is precisely why most WindowBlinds skins are more "complex" than msstyles however. The demographic of people who buy WindowBlinds are people who want more than msstyles can provide. If all they wanted were fairly simple skins and nothing more they wouldn't have bought WindowBlinds in the first place since they could get that for free. Right?

That said, WindowBlinds native skins bring a few key things to the table:

1) WindowBlinds 4.4 IS faster than msstyles. I've yet to see anyone, even WB detractors, who have used WB 4.4 claim otherwise.

2) WindowBlinds can change the color of skins on the fly.

3) WindowBlinds skins a LOT more elements of Windows. Load up, for instance, Adobe Acrobat reader with an msstyle then load up that msstyle via WindowBlinds (converted) and then load up Acrobat. It's night and day. Acrobat looks like a Win95 app almost with msstyles because msot of it isn't skinned but with WindowBlinds it looks truly native. That is the case with many apps.

4) WindowBlinds can assign other commands to the right mouse button. On my computer, I have the right mouse button click on the title bar minimize it. That's a big deal for me. If WindowBlinds didn't even skin I would consider this a must-have program just for that.

5) The WindowBlinds version of the skin will not just work on Windows XP but also on Windows 2000, Windows 98, Windows ME, and in all likelyhood Longhorn. MSStyles, the format we are talking about today, will only exist on XP. We've got the Longhorn alphas and today's .msstyles won't work no matter what you patch.

Re Recoloring:

No, recoloring doesn't affect performance at all. It's recolored only once in memory and stored that way.

Re One last point about "quality" of skins. Let us remember that it's not a fair comparsion to pick the top skins from Kol or b0se that get posted here on Neowin with the typical skin on WinCustomize.com. If you want to do apples and apples, compare the skins on WinCustomize to the skins on ThemeXP.org. The typical msstyle is pretty horrific. And I don't care for most WindowBlinds skins either.

In a given GOOD year of skinning, there are probably about three dozen GOOD skins created. The best skins get mentioned here on Neowin. That is, after all, one of the points of coming to Neowin.net in the first place.

Cheers!

you're almost saying that we're dumb using this free alternative, because WB does so much more !

Why would we need more ?

msstyle skins the windows. the job gets done. And then you can mod dll and stuff or buy WB (or use the free version), but in my case, once the windows are skinned, with whatever restrictions you might think are bad (like not being able to put bloat on my titlebar), and the icons are changed, this might be as much as I want to customize my interface. Anything more IMHO is superfluous, and you might fail to understand that fact. Many people might have the same taste as I do, and if you can all comprehend that, maybe you will understand why those who don't support WB exists in the first place, even if you have a great product.

msstyle = skin windows, free

windowblinds = skin windows, and then some, $$$

It is still a question of choice. I just hope that in the end your porter won't kill the msstyle "free of charge" community by getting everyone to use WB, and then grab them by the balls, er I mean wallet.

PS: I tried to be much respectful to everyone, this is not trolling or a random flame

EDIT : I noticed that msstyle ports can be used with WIN200 and 9x. THAT is a great reason to do it. Otherwise, I still stand by what I said

Actually you're wrong.  Rollup buttons and always on top controls have been in Nvidia's nView application for months now.  Not to mention there is also FreeShade which had been around for years that gives windows rollup functions without using all kinds of extra buttons in the GUI.

585187543[/snapback]

Did not know about nview since I don't use it but freeshade hasn't been update since 2001 so I have no idea how well it would work with any modern programs.

Did not know about nview since I don't use it but freeshade hasn't been update since 2001 so I have no idea how well it would work with any modern programs.

585187572[/snapback]

microsoft did not change the Windows drawing and "window handling" code that much since after XP came out. Anything compiled with win32 should behave the same, unless you develop UI in your app in a dodgy way like adobe always does

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This is what I want. Hey Gemini, how do I remove you from all my google products permanently?
    • I would never install install this build before rtm process. only 3 months to go. never install on your daily devices. just wait 3 months.
    • Motrix Next 3.9.6 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.6 changelog: New Features Clipboard management — App-owned copy actions no longer trigger the Add Task auto-detect popup. aria2 input compatibility — Multi-line aria2-style task input is supported for URLs with per-task options such as out=. BitTorrent IPv6 DHT — Added IPv6 DHT support and related configuration. File category URL patterns — File category rules can match URL patterns with validation and localized hints. Task status tags — Added clearer waiting and sharing states for task cards. Download event bridge — Added an aria2 WebSocket event bridge for faster download notifications. Improvements Improved task list transitions and preserved task state during tab switches. Kept RPC origin access enabled for local integrations. Restored AppImage stripping in release builds after beta validation. Added localized preference guidance across supported languages. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!