Patch or Full Source -> Linux Kernel


Recommended Posts

Errr... no

Now find where your vmlinuz file is located on mandrake that the kernel is booted from. If you can't find it, lilo.conf will say. rename that file and the "config" file to append .old. Then replace them with the new bzImage and config files (rename bzImage to vmlinuz). If there is a System.map replace that too. Then just type lilo and it should say "Added Linux *" aand then it should boot.

-Hatter

Silly me! I forgot to enable some of the configurations when I loaded the xconfig tool! :D I was wondering why the FAT32, network, sound, and USB devices weren't working and that was why. However, I did update the configuration, took the defconfig file, renamed it to config-2.4.18 since both files do match, then moved it to /boot. Even when doing that wouldn't work. The make install script did work actually, but I think I'll have to reload Linux because of the ridiculous mistake I did! OR is there a way to repair it?

In other words, restore the 2.4.3 kernel. However, it would be safe then to delete the linux-2.4.18 files! That should be easily accomplished since I still have my Linux boot disk that had the original kernel when I bought the Standard Edition of Linux-Mandrake 8.0. I also made myself a backup disk just in case.

Just in case if I forget, do I use the rm -f command for those three files in the /boot directory, remove the three files with the -2.4.18 extension, and then rename the .old files back to the original to make 2.4.3-20.mdk the default kernel?

Well, you can just reconfigure and remake the 2.4.18 kernel from the linux-2.4.18 directory and replace the files after. If you just want to go back to 2.4.3 just rename the .old files to their original names and run lilo. You don't need to delete the 2.4.18 directories unless you want to. Also remake the "linux" symlink in teh /usr/src dir to point ot linux-2.4.3.

Drat! I tried reconfiguring the kernel and still no luck! It keeps on saying that it can't find some of the devices, even when I enabled them in xconfig. How am I supposed to get these files working?!?! IF there isn't a way, then I'll just buy Mandrake 8.2! Although I can download it thanks to my high speed connection, I still declare full support for the Linux community. I'll be rebuilding my PC soon anyway since I'm going to get a GeForce video card!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • yeah, the "but X had it first" comments rarely add any value. Sometimes it is interesting that a feature gap for a seemingly simple feature can last for years or decades, but in this case, it is such a minor feature that I doubt anyone really cared.
    • Linux dev quits after "personal attacks" from user over Kapitano antivirus tool by David Uzondu Kapitano was a tool with a simple job: to give the ClamAV scanning engine a modern face on Linux. It relied on the ClamAV database, a massive, constantly updated list used to sniff out all sorts of nasties like viruses, worms, and Trojan horses. Since ClamAV is primarily a command-line tool, it depends on a GUI (frontend) for users who prefer not to live in the terminal. There are apps like ClamWin on Windows, ClamXav on Mac, and, until recently, Kapitano on Linux. Screenshot of Kapitano Now, the dev behind the Linux frontend, "zynequ," has marked the project as "Not Maintained" following what he described as personal attacks and harsh words. It all started when a user created an issue on the project's Codeberg page with the title, "Kaptiano resulted in 24 positives- for win.exploits and Trojans." In the post, they claimed the antivirus frontend was generating false positives on their Linux Mint system. The user noted that all the flagged files were related to the Kapitano Flatpak itself and ended with a rather aggressive warning. The whole thing seemed "strange," they said, concluding with, "program has ZERO reviews, and should remain that way until source code is verified by an independent source. DO NOT DOWNLOAD!" Zynequ, the project's author, responded by calmly referencing the wiki and explaining that the problem was with ClamAV itself, not his application. Kapitano, built with GTK4 and libadwaita, is just a wrapper that sends commands to the clamscan utility but has no say in what gets flagged. The developer also called the user out for the "personal attacks." He addressed the zero reviews situation, pointing out that this was hardly a conspiracy since the project was very new, launching back in June. Zynequ insisted that there is nothing "fishy" about their code and that it is fully open for review. The interaction soured from there. After zynequ closed the issue, the user created a duplicate one, then proceeded to resubmit the complaint under issue #13, this time with a different title: Kapitano developer is a malicious actor. Get this malware distributor blocked. After a heated back and forth with the dev, the user finally posted, "Your project is off of my laptop disk. Let it rest. Goodbye." This exchange is what led to the zynequ publishing their final note. They explained that Kapitano was "a hobby project, created in my free time without any financial support," and that it's hard to stay motivated when "personal attacks" are directed towards you. Zynequ noted that the project's code was now released into the public domain under The Unlicense, meaning anyone could fork it and do whatever they want with it. Kapitano will be delisted from Flathub, and the Codeberg repo will still be alive for a few months before they delete it and close their account for good.
    • Being harder to detect as a non-human work, doesn't justify its existence, to me.
    • Yeah and my poor choice of not questioning it is entirely my bad. Normally I check up on that stuff.
    • My apologies. I did read the entire discussion, but I mistakenly conflated your comments with dustojnikhummer's. He is the main person my comments were directed towards. Having said that, you did seem overly eager to defend his point of view based on the assumption you just quoted. I'm not sure why anyone would make that assumption, but I realize now it wasn't your assumption, you were just weighing in assuming it was true. I personally would have questioned the assumption instead of going along with it, but I do understand your perspective now. Thanks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Doreen768 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      James_kobe earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      James_kobe earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      macomen earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      657
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      253
    3. 3
      Xenon
      170
    4. 4
      neufuse
      148
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      133
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!