Recommended Posts

lookin good :D

Could you get autopatcher itself to assign the .amp file extension a name and the large orange icon.

(but not associate with the module installer)

And could you make a second icon for .amc's and associate them with the module editor.

(a while ago i somehow got an icon which was a blank white page with a small version of the orange icon in the middle, but ive lost it)

Then both will have a nice icon and it would be possible to distinguish between them (especially needed when extensions are hidden).

(currently i have the large orange icon for both).

lookin good  :D

Could you get autopatcher itself to assign the .amp file extension a name and the large orange icon.

(but not associate with the module installer)

And could you make a second icon for .amc's and associate them with the module editor.

(a while ago i somehow got an icon which was a blank white page with a small version of the orange icon in the middle, but ive lost it)

Then both will have a nice icon and it would be possible to distinguish between them (especially needed when extensions are hidden).

(currently i have the large orange icon for both).

585488051[/snapback]

1. I could, but it's not a good practice to do so without the user being aware of it.

2. Sure. The icon you 'got' is what Windows makes on its own when you associate a file type with a program. It just uses a blank file icon and then puts the program's icon (in a smaller form) on top. I will do a xp-style icon when I get some time.

spelling mistake in priority hover text - 'degit' instead of 'digit' !

also, i just tried editing the text in the registry key box for a module, i put the cursor in the correct place, deleted one letter and it jumped the cursor to the end !!

very annoying!

Edited by TheBlazingAngel

SECURITY BUG !!!!

ill explain exactly what i did...

ive been remaking the tweaks ready for the update

good find, fixed! - Raptor

I hope from that you can workout the problem raptor :)

-----

also spelling mistake in time to install hover text - 'second' instead of 'seconds'

Edited by nw_raptor

OK. The problem as you see is not the Module Editor, but AutoPatcher itself.

By the way: I'm currently uploading the first Test version of AutoPatcher for Windows 2003 (145MB)... If everything goes well, we got yet another release! :)

pasting is disabled under the behavior, detection and installation tabs

im guessing you did it deliberately, but it restricts you from copying and pasting from other modules, which may cause mistakes, and im not sure whether id prefer it enabled or not.

Great program, Raptor. It's near sheer perfection. Just a tiny flaw. Almost not worth to mention. The supported flags on the installation tab cannot be entered in the destinated box by double clicking.

585494057[/snapback]

That's done on purpose. There's really no point in adding it alone, since they mean nothing on their own. If you still want this features however, I'm willing to do it.

BlazingAngel: I will try to enable it :)

Great program, Raptor. It's near sheer perfection. Just a tiny flaw. Almost not worth to mention. The supported flags on the installation tab cannot be entered in the destinated box by double clicking.
That's done on purpose. There's really no point in adding it alone, since they mean nothing on their own. If you still want this features however, I'm willing to do it.

585494761[/snapback]

585494057[/snapback]

You're absolutely right, of course. I just thought I would be more user friendly and it will eliminate typing errors. We should bear in mind that this tool is being used by people who have a little bit more in depth knowledge about autopatching. Did I create a new verb, just now? So, if you would implement this small feature, you would make me a happy man.

Sorry, I thought you referred to my suggestions earlier on. I am sorry to report you that the feature still doesn?t work in the Installation tab.

585498680[/snapback]

Really? It works here alrigh:s:s Did you try clicking in a box (either one) before doing the double-click on the Flag Helper?

Edit: New build... try this....

AutoPatcher_Module_Editor_2.0.zip

Edited by nw_raptor

:blush: Stupid me. It works. I clicked on 'Supported flags' next to one of the boxes and with the mouse went straight to one of the flags, like I used to do on the other tabs. In that case double clicking doesn't work. Perhaps you also should make it possible to select the appropriate box by clicking on 'Supported flags'. That would imho be more intuitive and equal to the behaviour on the other tabs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!