Recommended Posts

installation tab - with/without backups are named incorrectly, or else the sentence and tick box above is incorrect:

the tick box allows you to enter stuff in the second box which it says will allow you to install with backups.

However, it actually opens up the box labeled 'without' backups!

^ Actually they give the same meaning..

"This module requires a separate installation procedure for installation with backups"

and

"This module requires a separate installation procedure for installation without backups"

In both cases this means "Gimme separate boxes!"

maybe its just the fact im tired, but it doesnt seem right.

the tick box makes sense - it allows you to enter a seperate procedure for adding backups.

however, i think the two boxes are just the wrong way around!

it should be:

- Tickbox "tick here if a seperate procedure is required for installation with backups"

- Box to enter commands without backups.

- Box to enter commands with backups (tickbox allows entry here).

could you also make the operating system tab a bit smarter.

for example, if you specified ANY_OS, if you then specified anything else it would either remove ANY_OS or display a warning

or if you specified ANY_XP_VERSION, and then XP_PRO, it would remove ANY_XP_VERSION or display a warning

and the IE and lang boxes should to do it as well.

:)

^ Oh, sure! I just forgot to post it (TheBlazingAngel already has this!).

585606916[/snapback]

dont forget the new autopatcher .exe to go along with it!

* file removed - outdated *

changes in latest ModuleEditor2:

1) installation tab - with/without backups box descriptions changed to correspond with sentence beside tick box.

2) drag&drop files onto detection tab fixed

3) more 2k flags - reason for new AP .exe

4) you can enter commas in the fields in the operating system tab

5) if you double ckicl on a blank line beside the flags, two squares (characters that cant be displayed) are no longer entered

6) all flags now work when double clicked

Edited by TheBlazingAngel
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!