Recommended Posts

installation tab - with/without backups are named incorrectly, or else the sentence and tick box above is incorrect:

the tick box allows you to enter stuff in the second box which it says will allow you to install with backups.

However, it actually opens up the box labeled 'without' backups!

^ Actually they give the same meaning..

"This module requires a separate installation procedure for installation with backups"

and

"This module requires a separate installation procedure for installation without backups"

In both cases this means "Gimme separate boxes!"

maybe its just the fact im tired, but it doesnt seem right.

the tick box makes sense - it allows you to enter a seperate procedure for adding backups.

however, i think the two boxes are just the wrong way around!

it should be:

- Tickbox "tick here if a seperate procedure is required for installation with backups"

- Box to enter commands without backups.

- Box to enter commands with backups (tickbox allows entry here).

could you also make the operating system tab a bit smarter.

for example, if you specified ANY_OS, if you then specified anything else it would either remove ANY_OS or display a warning

or if you specified ANY_XP_VERSION, and then XP_PRO, it would remove ANY_XP_VERSION or display a warning

and the IE and lang boxes should to do it as well.

:)

^ Oh, sure! I just forgot to post it (TheBlazingAngel already has this!).

585606916[/snapback]

dont forget the new autopatcher .exe to go along with it!

* file removed - outdated *

changes in latest ModuleEditor2:

1) installation tab - with/without backups box descriptions changed to correspond with sentence beside tick box.

2) drag&drop files onto detection tab fixed

3) more 2k flags - reason for new AP .exe

4) you can enter commas in the fields in the operating system tab

5) if you double ckicl on a blank line beside the flags, two squares (characters that cant be displayed) are no longer entered

6) all flags now work when double clicked

Edited by TheBlazingAngel
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • No, "a great deal" for 32GB of DDR5 is $50, not $350. I mean I see what you mean, that it's a decent price compared to what's currently available, but you really should put a disclaimer in this articles explaining that it's still multiple times more expensive than it used to be.
    • Linux 7.1 stable launch looms as Linus Torvalds releases the final release candidate by Paul Hill Linus Torvalds has just released what’s expected to be the final release candidate of Linux 7.1, rc7. The Linux founder said that this RC is not small, but smaller than recent releases, which is a good sign because he expects the stable version to drop next week if things continue on this trajectory. Linux kernels see a merge window for the first two weeks of their life, where developers add new features, then there are about seven or eight weeks of release candidates before the stable version. Typically, there are seven release candidates, but if more time is needed, then an eighth release candidate is released too. This week’s RC’s biggest area of fixes was for GPUs, with networking just behind. Torvalds said that the rest of the release was “pretty random and spread out” with some architecture fixes, driver fixes, filesystem improvements, and build fixes for more unusual configs. In terms of specific pieces of hardware receiving improvements in this update, we had more AMD Zen6 models supported and fixes for AMD SDMA 7.1 and GFX11. Hardware that got improvements includes Lenovo laptops, HONOR laptops, and MSI laptops. Here are the changelogs for those: ASoC: amd: acp: Add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 15ASH11 Input: atkbd - add DMI quirk for Lenovo Yoga Air 14 (83QK) Input: atkbd - skip deactivate for HONOR BCC-N's internal keyboard ASoC: amd: yc: Add MSI Raider A18 HX A9WJG to quirk table ASoC: amd: yc: Enable internal mic on MSI Bravo 17 C7VF When the stable Linux 7.1 is released, it will be up to distribution maintainers, such as Canonical and Red Hat, to release the update to their users via the update manager. Some versions of Linux will get it before others, and some will never get it at all. Fedora and Arch-based distros will be among the first to get it, though. If you don’t get it, the security fixes will be backported to your system’s kernel, so you won’t be at risk, but you won’t get newer hardware support, which is fine if your computer works now.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      68
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!